Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 08 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 06 3月, 2014 2 次提交
  7. 14 2月, 2014 2 次提交
  9. 13 2月, 2014 3 次提交
  11. 07 2月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Disable dp aux irq on g4x · 4e6b788c
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      Apparently it's broken in the exact same way as the gmbus irq. For
reference of the full story see

commit c12aba5a
Author: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Date:   Tue Mar 19 09:56:57 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: stop using GMBUS IRQs on Gen4 chips

The effect is that we have a storm of unclaimed interrupts on the
legacy irq line. If that one is used by a different device then the
kernel will complain and rather quickly kill the irq source. Which
breaks any device trying to actually use the legacy irq line.

This regression has been introduced

commit 4aeebd74
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Thu Oct 31 09:53:36 2013 +0100

    drm/i915: dp aux irq support for g4x/vlv

Note that disabling MSI works around the issue, but we can't do that
since apparently then the hw will miss interrupts. At least if
relevant comments in i915_irq.c are accurate.

v2: Cross-reference dp aux and gmbus gen4 comments.

v3: Consolidate harder into i915_drv.h as suggested by Chris.

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reported-and-tested-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4e6b788c
  13. 31 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: vlv: fix DP PHY lockup due to invalid PP sequencer setup · 2cac613b
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      Atm we setup the HW panel power sequencer logic both for eDP and DP
ports. On eDP we then go on and start the power on sequence and commence
with link training when it's ready. On DP we don't do the power on
sequencing but do the link training immediately. At this point the DP
PHY block gets stuck, since - supposedly - it is waiting for the power
on sequence to finish. The actual register write that seems to hold off
the PHY is PIPEX_PP_ON_DELAYS[Panel Control Port Select]. Writing here
a non-0 value eventually sets PIPEX_PP_STATUS[Require Asset Status] to
1 and blocks the PHY until the panel power on is ready.

Fix this by not doing any PP sequencing setup for DP ports.

Thanks to Ville Syrjälä, Jesse Barnes and Todd Previte for the help in
tracking this down.

Note that on older gmch platforms (where we have lvds instead of edp)
we've hacked around this by writing the magic ABCD unlock key to PP
registers, which disables the hw sanity checks.

For edp all platforms thus far had the pch split, with the edp port in
the north display complex and the PP registers on the pch the hw
sanity checks (expressed through the "Require Asset Status" bit) was
never functional, hence never a real issue.

This regression has been introduce in

commit bf13e81b
Author: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Date:   Fri Sep 6 07:40:05 2013 +0300

    drm/i915: add support for per-pipe power sequencing on vlv
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
[danvet: Add note about the bigger story here.]
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      2cac613b
  15. 30 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  17. 28 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: move module parameters into a struct, in a new file · d330a953
      由 Jani Nikula 提交于 
      With 20+ module parameters, I think referring to them via a struct
improves clarity over just having a bunch of globals. While at it, move
the parameter initialization and definitions into a new file
i915_params.c to reduce clutter in i915_drv.c.

Apart from the ill-named i915_enable_rc6, i915_enable_fbc and
i915_enable_ppgtt parameters, for which we lose the "i915_" prefix
internally, the module parameters now look the same both on the kernel
command line and in code. For example, "i915.modeset".

The downsides of the change are losing static on a couple of variables
and not having the initialization and module_param_named() right next to
each other. On the other hand, all module parameters are now defined in
one place at i915_params.c. Plus you can do this to find all module
parameter references:

$ git grep "i915\." -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915

v2:
- move the definitions into a new file
- s/i915_params/i915/
- make i915_try_reset i915.reset, for consistency
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d330a953
  19. 27 1月, 2014 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: debugfs: Add support for probing DP sink CRC. · d2e216d0
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      This debugfs interface will allow intel-gpu-tools test case
to verify if screen has been updated properly on cases like PSR.

v2: Accepted all Daniel's suggestions:
    * grab modeset lock
    * loop over connector and check DPMS on
    * return errors
    * use _eDP1 suffix for easy future extension
    * don't cache crc_supported neither latest crc
    * return crc as a full array and read it at once with aux.
    * use 0 to turn TEST_SINK off.
    * split the drm_helpers definitions in another patch.

v3: Accepted 2 Damien's suggestion: remove h from printf hexa
    and return ENODEV when eDP not present instead of EAGAIN.

v4: Accepted 2 Jani' s suggestion: 1 path for unlock and remove
    _retry from aux read.

v5: removing last missing useless _retry (by Damien)

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d2e216d0
  21. 25 1月, 2014 11 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: Introduce a get_aux_send_ctl() vfunc · 153b1100
      由 Damien Lespiau 提交于 
      We need a bit more flexibility here in the future, bits get shuffled
around.

v2: more descriptive commit message (Jani Nikula)
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      153b1100
    • D
      drm/i915: Reorder the AUX_CTL bits in descending order · 788d4433
      由 Damien Lespiau 提交于 
      So it's easier to compare what we program with the documentation, not
having to jump at all.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      788d4433
    • D
      drm/i915: Factor out a function returning the AUX_CTL value to start a send · 5ed12a19
      由 Damien Lespiau 提交于 
      Also, move that computation outside of the for loop that tries 5 times,
this value doesn't change between tries.
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      5ed12a19
    • D
      drm/i915: Turn get_aux_clock_divider() into per-platform vfuncs · ec5b01dd
      由 Damien Lespiau 提交于 
      A tiny clean-up to allow better code separation between platforms.

v2: Fix comment placement (put in in i9xx_get_aux_clock_divider()) and
    nuke the outdated PCH eDP comment (Jani Nikula)
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      ec5b01dd
    • T
      drm/i915: Enable 5.4Ghz (HBR2) link rate for Displayport 1.2-capable devices · 06ea66b6
      由 Todd Previte 提交于 
      For HSW+ platforms, enable the 5.4Ghz (HBR2) link rate for devices that support it. The
sink device must report that is supports Displayport 1.2 and the HBR2 bit rate in the
DPCD in order to use HBR2.
Signed-off-by: NTodd Previte <tprevite@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      06ea66b6
    • P
      drm/i915: set the backlight panel delays registers to 1 · b2f19d1a
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Because we already do the wait in software: see
ironlake_wait_backlight_on and ironlake_edp_wait_backlight_off.

For the "backlight on" delay, even BSpec says we need to program 0x1
to PP_ON_DELAYS 12:0.

For the "backlight off" delay, if we don't do the same thing, when we
call ironlake_wait_panel_off we'll end up waiting for the it again.

On my machine the off delay is 200ms, so we save this amount of time
whenever we disable the panel (e.g, suspend).
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b2f19d1a
    • P
      drm/i915: don't wait for power cycle when waiting for power off · 1a5ef5b7
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Function ironlake_wait_panel_off should just wait for the power off
delay, while function ironlake_wait_panel_power_cycle should wait for
the panel cycle (that's required after we turn the panel off, before
we enable it again).

The problem is that, currently, ironlake_wait_panel_off is waiting not
just for the panel to be off, but also for the power cycle delay and
the backlight off delay. This function relies on the PP_STATUS bits
3:0, which are not documented and not supposed to be used. A quick
analysis of the values we get while waiting quickly shows that power
off is reached while bits 3:0 are still 0x1, and the time it takes to
become 0x0 is the power cycle delay.

On my system with backlight off delay of 200ms, power down delay of
50ms and power cycle delay of 500ms, this is what I get:
 - Start waiting with value 0x80000008, timestamp 6.429364.
 - Jumps to 0xa0000003, timestamp 6.431360 (time waited: 0.001996)
 - Jumps to 0xa0000002, timestamp 6.631277 (time waited: 0.201913)
 - Jumps to 0x08000001, timestamp 6.681258 (time waited: 0.251894)
 - Jumps to 0x00000000, timestamp 7.192012 (time waited: 0.762648)

As you can see, ironlake_wait_panel_off is sleeping 760ms instead of
the expected 50ms: the first 200ms matches the backlight off delay
(which we should already have waited for!), then the 50ms for the real
panel off delay, then the 500ms for the panel power cycle.

This patch makes is look just at bits 31 and 29:28, which will ignore
the panel power cycle.

And just to be clear: this saves 500ms on my system every time we
disable the panel. But we can still save 200ms more (the backlight off
delay) on the next patches.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuougseek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1a5ef5b7
    • P
      drm/i915: remove a column of zeros from the eDP wait definitions · ffd6749d
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      I like how the macros are nicely column-aligned, so we can properly
compare what each macro waits for, but a column full of zeroes doesn't
really help anything: it just makes the lines bigger, and they're
already way past 80 columns. I imagine this column was used in the
past, but IMHO now we can get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      ffd6749d
    • D
      drm/i915: drop ironlake_ prefix from edp panel/backlight functions · 4be73780
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      They now also work on vlv, which has the regs somewhere else. And
daring a glance into the looking glass it seems like this
functionality will continue to work the same for the next few hardware
platforms.

So it's better to just remove that misleading prefix and have a bit
shorter code for better readability.

The only exceptions are the panel/backlight functions shared with
intel_ddi.c, those get an intel_ prefix.

While at it make the vdd_on/off functions static.

And one straggler was missing the edp_ in the name, so make everything
neatly OCD.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4be73780
    • P
      drm/i915: save some time when waiting the eDP timings · dce56b3c
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      The eDP spec defines some points where after you do action A, you have
to wait some time before action B. The thing is that in our driver
action B does not happen exactly after action A, but we still use
msleep() calls directly. What this patch does is that we record the
timestamp of when action A happened, then, just before action B, we
look at how much time has passed and only sleep the remaining amount
needed.

With this change, I am able to save about 5-20ms (out of the total
200ms) of the backlight_off delay and completely skip the 1ms
backlight_on delay. The 600ms vdd_off delay doesn't happen during
normal usage anymore due to a previous patch.

v2: - Rename ironlake_wait_jiffies_delay to intel_wait_until_after and
      move it to intel_display.c
    - Fix the msleep call: diff is in jiffies
v3: - Use "tmp_jiffies" so we don't need to worry about the value of
      "jiffies" advancing while we're doing the math.
v4: - Rename function again.
    - Move function to i915_drv.h.
    - Store last_power_cycle at edp_panel_off too.
    - Use msecs_to_jiffies_timeout, then replace the msleep with an
      open-coded version that avoids the extra +1 jiffy.
    - Try to add units to every variable name so we don't confuse
      jiffies with milliseconds.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      dce56b3c
    • P
      drm/i915: init the DP panel power seq variables earlier · 0095e6dc
      由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于 
      Our driver has two different ways of waiting for panel power
sequencing delays. One of these ways is through
ironlake_wait_panel_status, which implicitly uses the values written
to our registers. The other way is through the functions that call
intel_wait_until_after, and on this case we do direct msleep() calls
on the intel_dp->xxx_delay variables.

Function intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer is responsible for
initializing the _delay variables and deciding which values we need to
write to the registers, but it does not write these values to the
registers. Only at intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers we
actually do this write.

Then problem is that when we call intel_dp_i2c_init, we will get some
I2C calls, which will trigger a VDD enable, which will make use of the
panel power sequencing registers and the _delay variables, so we need
to have both ready by this time. Today, when this happens, the _delay
variables are zero (because they were not computed) and the panel
power sequence registers contain whatever values were written by the
BIOS (which are usually correct).

What this patch does is to make sure that function
intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer is called earlier, so by the time
we call intel_dp_i2c_init, the _delay variables will already be
initialized. The actual registers won't contain their final values,
but at least they will contain the values set by the BIOS.

The good side is that we were reading the values, but were not using
them for anything (because we were just skipping the msleep(0) calls),
so this "fix" shouldn't fix any real existing bugs. I was only able to
identify the problem because I added some debug code to check how much
time time we were saving with my previous patch.

Regression introduced by:
    commit ed92f0b2
    Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
    Date:   Wed Jun 12 17:27:24 2013 -0300
        drm/i915: extract intel_edp_init_connector

v2: - Rewrite commit message.
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      0095e6dc
  23. 23 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  25. 22 1月, 2014 2 次提交
  27. 18 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  29. 12 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  31. 11 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  33. 04 12月, 2013 2 次提交
  35. 28 11月, 2013 3 次提交