- 07 1月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
dcache_inode_lock can be replaced with per-inode locking. Use existing inode->i_lock for this. This is slightly non-trivial because we sometimes need to find the inode from the dentry, which requires d_inode to be stabilised (either with refcount or d_lock). Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
Require filesystems be aware of .d_revalidate being called in rcu-walk mode (nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU). For now do a simple push down, returning -ECHILD from all implementations. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
dget_locked was a shortcut to avoid the lazy lru manipulation when we already held dcache_lock (lru manipulation was relatively cheap at that point). However, how that the lru lock is an innermost one, we never hold it at any caller, so the lock cost can now be avoided. We already have well working lazy dcache LRU, so it should be fine to defer LRU manipulations to scan time. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
dcache_lock no longer protects anything. remove it. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
Add a new lock, dcache_inode_lock, to protect the inode's i_dentry list from concurrent modification. d_alias is also protected by d_lock. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
-
由 Nick Piggin 提交于
Protect d_unhashed(dentry) condition with d_lock. This means keeping DCACHE_UNHASHED bit in synch with hash manipulations. Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
-
- 19 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tristan Ye 提交于
I suddenly hit the problem during 2.6.37-rc1 regression test, which was introduced by commit '5e98d492'(Track negative entries v3), following scenario reproduces the issue easily: Node A Node B ================ ============ $touch testfile $ls testfile $rm -rf testfile $touch testfile $ls testfile ls: cannot access testfile: No such file or directory This patch stops tracking the dentry which was negativated by a inode deletion, so as to force the revaliation in next lookup, in case we'll touch the inode again in the same node. It didn't hurt the performance of multiple lookup for none-existed files anyway, while regresses a bit in the first try after a file deletion. Signed-off-by: NTristan Ye <tristan.ye@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Goldwyn Rodrigues 提交于
Track negative dentries by recording the generation number of the parent directory in d_fsdata. The generation number for the parent directory is recorded in the inode_info, which increments every time the lock on the directory is dropped. If the generation number of the parent directory and the negative dentry matches, there is no need to perform the revalidate, else a revalidate is forced. This improves performance in situations where nodes look for the same non-existent file multiple times. Thanks Mark for explaining the DLM sequence. Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In commit a5a0a630, when ocfs2_attch_dentry_lock fails, we call an extra iput and reset dentry->d_fsdata to NULL. This resolve a bug, but it isn't completed and the dentry is still there. When we want to use it again, ocfs2_dentry_revalidate doesn't catch it and return true. That make future ocfs2_dentry_lock panic out. One bug is http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1162. The resolution is to add a check for dentry->d_fsdata in revalidate process and return false if dentry->d_fsdata is NULL, so that a new ocfs2_lookup will be called again. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 22 7月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In commit ea455f8a, we moved the dentry lock put process into ocfs2_wq. This causes problems during umount because ocfs2_wq can drop references to inodes while they are being invalidated by invalidate_inodes() causing all sorts of nasty things (invalidate_inodes() ending in an infinite loop, "Busy inodes after umount" messages etc.). We fix the problem by stopping ocfs2_wq from doing any further releasing of inode references on the superblock being unmounted, wait until it finishes the current round of releasing and finally cleaning up all the references in dentry_lock_list from ocfs2_put_super(). The issue was tracked down by Tao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 24 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sunil Mushran 提交于
In ocfs2_dentry_attach_lock(), if unable to get the dentry lock, we need to call iput(inode) because a failure here means no d_instantiate(), which means the normally matching iput() will not be called during dput(dentry). This patch fixes the oops that accompanies the following message: (3996,1):dlm_empty_lockres:2708 ERROR: lockres W00000000000000000a1046b06a4382 still has local locks! kernel BUG in dlm_empty_lockres at /rpmbuild/smushran/BUILD/ocfs2-1.4.2/fs/ocfs2/dlm/dlmmaster.c:2709! Signed-off-by: NSunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Dropping of last reference to dentry lock is a complicated operation involving dropping of reference to inode. This can get complicated and quota code in particular needs to obtain some quota locks which leads to potential deadlock. Thus we defer dropping of inode reference to ocfs2_wq. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
The node maps that are set/unset by these votes are no longer relevant, thus we can remove the mount and umount votes. Since those are the last two remaining votes, we can also remove the entire vote infrastructure. The vote thread has been renamed to the downconvert thread, and the small amount of functionality related to managing it has been moved into fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c. All references to votes have been removed or updated. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
- 28 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
The existing bug statement didn't take into account unhashed dentries which might not have a cluster lock on them. This could happen if a node exporting the file system via NFS is rebooted, re-exported to nfs clients and then unmounted. It's fine in this case to not have a dentry cluster lock. Just remove the bug statement and replace it with an error print, which does the proper checks. Though we want to know if something has happened which might have prevented a cluster lock from being created, it's definitely not necessary to panic the machine for this. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Do this to avoid a theoretical (I haven't seen this in practice) race where the downconvert thread might drop the dentry lock, allowing a remote unlink to proceed before dropping the inode locks. This could bounce access to the orphan dir between nodes. There doesn't seem to be a need to do the same in ocfs2_dentry_iput() as that's never called for the last ref drop from the downconvert thread. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
- 20 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Robert P. J. Day 提交于
Fix the various misspellings of "system", controller", "interrupt" and "[un]necessary". Signed-off-by: NRobert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
-
- 25 9月, 2006 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
We can't use LKM_LOCAL for new dentry locks because an unlink and subsequent re-create of a name/inode pair may result in the lock still being mastered somewhere in the cluster. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Make use of FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE to avoid a race condition that can occur during ->rename() if we d_move() outside of the parent directory cluster locks, and another node discovers the new name (created during the rename) and unlinks it. d_move() will unconditionally rehash a dentry - which will leave stale data in the system. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Replace the dentry vote mechanism with a cluster lock which covers a set of dentries. This allows us to force d_delete() only on nodes which actually care about an unlink. Every node that does a ->lookup() gets a read only lock on the dentry, until an unlink during which the unlinking node, will request an exclusive lock, forcing the other nodes who care about that dentry to d_delete() it. The effect is that we retain a very lightweight ->d_revalidate(), and at the same time get to make large improvements to the average case performance of the ocfs2 unlink and rename operations. This patch adds the higher level API and the dentry manipulation code. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Replace the dentry vote mechanism with a cluster lock which covers a set of dentries. This allows us to force d_delete() only on nodes which actually care about an unlink. Every node that does a ->lookup() gets a read only lock on the dentry, until an unlink during which the unlinking node, will request an exclusive lock, forcing the other nodes who care about that dentry to d_delete() it. The effect is that we retain a very lightweight ->d_revalidate(), and at the same time get to make large improvements to the average case performance of the ocfs2 unlink and rename operations. This patch adds the cluster lock type which OCFS2 can attach to dentries. A small number of fs/ocfs2/dcache.c functions are stubbed out so that this change can compile. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
The OCFS2 file system module. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NKurt Hackel <kurt.hackel@oracle.com>
-