1. 24 10月, 2013 4 次提交
  2. 22 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      s390/time: correct use of store clock fast · 8c071b0f
      Martin Schwidefsky 提交于
      The result of the store-clock-fast (STCKF) instruction is a bit fuzzy.
      It can happen that the value stored on one CPU is smaller than the value
      stored on another CPU, although the order of the stores is the other
      way around. This can cause deltas of get_tod_clock() values to become
      negative when they should not be.
      
      We need to be more careful with store-clock-fast, this patch partially
      reverts git commit e4b7b4238e666682555461fa52eecd74652f36bb "time:
      always use stckf instead of stck if available". The get_tod_clock()
      function now uses the store-clock-extended (STCKE) instruction.
      get_tod_clock_fast() can be used if the fuzziness of store-clock-fast
      is acceptable e.g. for wait loops local to a CPU.
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      8c071b0f
  3. 15 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  4. 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 08 10月, 2013 1 次提交
    • A
      net: fix unsafe set_memory_rw from softirq · d45ed4a4
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      on x86 system with net.core.bpf_jit_enable = 1
      
      sudo tcpdump -i eth1 'tcp port 22'
      
      causes the warning:
      [   56.766097]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [   56.766097]
      [   56.780146]        CPU0
      [   56.786807]        ----
      [   56.793188]   lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock);
      [   56.799593]   <Interrupt>
      [   56.805889]     lock(&(&vb->lock)->rlock);
      [   56.812266]
      [   56.812266]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [   56.812266]
      [   56.830670] 1 lock held by ksoftirqd/1/13:
      [   56.836838]  #0:  (rcu_read_lock){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff8118f44c>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380
      [   56.849757]
      [   56.849757] stack backtrace:
      [   56.862194] CPU: 1 PID: 13 Comm: ksoftirqd/1 Not tainted 3.12.0-rc3+ #45
      [   56.868721] Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/P8Z77 WS, BIOS 3007 07/26/2012
      [   56.882004]  ffffffff821944c0 ffff88080bbdb8c8 ffffffff8175a145 0000000000000007
      [   56.895630]  ffff88080bbd5f40 ffff88080bbdb928 ffffffff81755b14 0000000000000001
      [   56.909313]  ffff880800000001 ffff880800000000 ffffffff8101178f 0000000000000001
      [   56.923006] Call Trace:
      [   56.929532]  [<ffffffff8175a145>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
      [   56.936067]  [<ffffffff81755b14>] print_usage_bug+0x1f7/0x208
      [   56.942445]  [<ffffffff8101178f>] ? save_stack_trace+0x2f/0x50
      [   56.948932]  [<ffffffff810cc0a0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x150/0x150
      [   56.955470]  [<ffffffff810ccb52>] mark_lock+0x282/0x2c0
      [   56.961945]  [<ffffffff810ccfed>] __lock_acquire+0x45d/0x1d50
      [   56.968474]  [<ffffffff810cce6e>] ? __lock_acquire+0x2de/0x1d50
      [   56.975140]  [<ffffffff81393bf5>] ? cpumask_next_and+0x55/0x90
      [   56.981942]  [<ffffffff810cef72>] lock_acquire+0x92/0x1d0
      [   56.988745]  [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
      [   56.995619]  [<ffffffff817628f1>] _raw_spin_lock+0x41/0x50
      [   57.002493]  [<ffffffff8118f52a>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
      [   57.009447]  [<ffffffff8118f52a>] vm_unmap_aliases+0x16a/0x380
      [   57.016477]  [<ffffffff8118f44c>] ? vm_unmap_aliases+0x8c/0x380
      [   57.023607]  [<ffffffff810436b0>] change_page_attr_set_clr+0xc0/0x460
      [   57.030818]  [<ffffffff810cfb8d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [   57.037896]  [<ffffffff811a8330>] ? kmem_cache_free+0xb0/0x2b0
      [   57.044789]  [<ffffffff811b59c3>] ? free_object_rcu+0x93/0xa0
      [   57.051720]  [<ffffffff81043d9f>] set_memory_rw+0x2f/0x40
      [   57.058727]  [<ffffffff8104e17c>] bpf_jit_free+0x2c/0x40
      [   57.065577]  [<ffffffff81642cba>] sk_filter_release_rcu+0x1a/0x30
      [   57.072338]  [<ffffffff811108e2>] rcu_process_callbacks+0x202/0x7c0
      [   57.078962]  [<ffffffff81057f17>] __do_softirq+0xf7/0x3f0
      [   57.085373]  [<ffffffff81058245>] run_ksoftirqd+0x35/0x70
      
      cannot reuse jited filter memory, since it's readonly,
      so use original bpf insns memory to hold work_struct
      
      defer kfree of sk_filter until jit completed freeing
      
      tested on x86_64 and i386
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
      Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d45ed4a4
  6. 30 9月, 2013 3 次提交
  7. 28 9月, 2013 2 次提交
  8. 13 9月, 2013 2 次提交
  9. 12 9月, 2013 5 次提交
  10. 09 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • H
      s390/irq: reduce size of external interrupt handler hash array · 9e75c627
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Change the hash algorithm a bit so it produces only values in the
      range of 0..31.
      This allows to reduce the size of the external interrupt handler hash
      array even further while making sure that each of the known interrupt
      sources keeps its unique hash with the slightly modified algorithm:
      
      0x1004 --> 12
      0x1201 --> 10
      0x1202 --> 11
      0x1406 --> 16
      0x1407 --> 17
      0x2401 --> 19
      0x2603 --> 22
      0x4000 --> 0
      
      This also means that the entire array now fits into exactly one cache
      line; so add a proper align statement as well.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      9e75c627
  11. 07 9月, 2013 6 次提交
  12. 04 9月, 2013 12 次提交