Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 22 8月, 2015 4 次提交
  3. 08 7月, 2015 1 次提交
  5. 07 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      powerpc/powernv: Fix race in updating core_idle_state · b32aadc1
      由 Shreyas B. Prabhu 提交于 
      core_idle_state is maintained for each core. It uses 0-7 bits to track
whether a thread in the core has entered fastsleep or winkle. 8th bit is
used as a lock bit.
The lock bit is set in these 2 scenarios-
 - The thread is first in subcore to wakeup from sleep/winkle.
 - If its the last thread in the core about to enter sleep/winkle

While the lock bit is set, if any other thread in the core wakes up, it
loops until the lock bit is cleared before proceeding in the wakeup
path. This helps prevent race conditions w.r.t fastsleep workaround and
prevents threads from switching to process context before core/subcore
resources are restored.

But, in the path to sleep/winkle entry, we currently don't check for
lock-bit. This exposes us to following race when running with subcore
on-

First thread in the subcorea		Another thread in the same
waking up		   		core entering sleep/winkle

lwarx   r15,0,r14
ori     r15,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_LOCK_BIT
stwcx.  r15,0,r14
[Code to restore subcore state]

						lwarx   r15,0,r14
						[clear thread bit]
						stwcx.  r15,0,r14

andi.   r15,r15,PNV_CORE_IDLE_THREAD_BITS
stw     r15,0(r14)

Here, after the thread entering sleep clears its thread bit in
core_idle_state, the value is overwritten by the thread waking up.
In such cases when the core enters fastsleep, code mistakes an idle
thread as running. Because of this, the first thread waking up from
fastsleep which is supposed to resync timebase skips it. So we can
end up having a core with stale timebase value.

This patch fixes the above race by looping on the lock bit even while
entering the idle states.
Signed-off-by: NShreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Fixes: 7b54e9f213f76 'powernv/powerpc: Add winkle support for offline cpus'
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19+
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      b32aadc1
  7. 06 7月, 2015 5 次提交
  9. 26 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 25 6月, 2015 8 次提交
  13. 24 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 19 6月, 2015 4 次提交
  17. 18 6月, 2015 4 次提交
  19. 17 6月, 2015 5 次提交
    • S
      powerpc: Make doorbell check preemption safe · 3609d819
      由 Shreyas B. Prabhu 提交于 
      Doorbell can be used to cause ipi on cpus which are sibling threads on
the same core. So icp_native_cause_ipi checks if the destination cpu
is a sibling thread of the current cpu and uses doorbell in such cases.

But while running with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y, since this section is
preemtible, we can run into issues if after we check if the destination
cpu is a sibling cpu, the task gets migrated from a sibling cpu to a
cpu on another core.

Fix this by using get_cpu()/ put_cpu()
Signed-off-by: NShreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      3609d819
    • P
      powerpc: don't use module_init for non-modular core hugetlb code · 6f114281
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The hugetlbpage.o is obj-y (always built in).  It will never
be modular, so using module_init as an alias for __initcall is
somewhat misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of arch_initcall (which
makes sense for arch code) will thus change this registration
from level 6-device to level 3-arch (i.e. slightly earlier).
However no observable impact of that small difference has
been observed during testing, or is expected.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      6f114281
    • P
      powerpc: use subsys_initcall for Freescale Local Bus · 383d14a5
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The FSL_SOC option is bool, and hence this code is either
present or absent.  It will never be modular, so using
module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of subsys_initcall (which
makes sense for bus code) will thus change this registration
from level 6-device to level 4-subsys (i.e. slightly earlier).
However no observable impact of that small difference has
been observed during testing, or is expected.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Acked-by: NScott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      383d14a5
    • P
      powerpc: don't use module_init in non-modular 83xx suspend code · a390a2f1
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      The suspend.o is built for SUSPEND -- which is bool, and hence
this code is either present or absent.  It will never be modular,
so using module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat
misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.

Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      a390a2f1
    • P
      powerpc: use device_initcall for registering rtc devices · 8f6b9512
      由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于 
      Currently these two RTC devices are in core platform code
where it is not possible for them to be modular.  It will
never be modular, so using module_init as an alias for
__initcall can be somewhat misleading.

Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future.  If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.

Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups.  As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- they will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.

Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Acked-by: NGeoff Levand <geoff@infradead.org>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      8f6b9512
  21. 15 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 11 6月, 2015 5 次提交