Btrfs can be remounted without barrier, but there is no "barrier" option
so nobody can remount btrfs back with barrier on. Only umount and
mount again can re-enable barrier.(Quite awkward)

Also the mount options in the document is also changed slightly for the
further pairing options changes.
Reported-by: NDaniel Blueman <daniel@quora.org>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMike Fleetwood <mike.fleetwood@googlemail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We only intent to fua the first superblock in every device from
comments, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

@full is not protected within global_rsv.lock, so we may think global_rsv
is already full but in fact it's not, so we miss the opportunity to return
free space to global_rsv directly when we release other block_rsvs.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

During balance test, we hit an oops:
[ 2013.841551] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1174!

The problem is that if we fail to relocate tree blocks, we should
update backref cache, otherwise, some pending nodes are not updated
while snapshot check @cache->last_trans is within one transaction
and won't update it and then oops happen.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The following warning message was outputed when running the 274th case
of xfstests with nodatacow option:
 BUG: Bad page state in process kswapd0  pfn:1c66f
 page:ffffea0000636848 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null) index:0x78000
 page flags: 0x1000000000100a(error|uptodate|private_2)

It is because the check of nocow range was wrong, we should compare the
start and end position of the extent with the write position to verify
if the write position was in the extent, but the current code just used
the start postion to do the check, so we got the wrong extent and told
the caller that it was a nocow write. And then when we write back the
dirty pages, we found we should cow the extent, but at that time, there
was no space in the fs, we had to the error flag for the page. When
someone reclaimed that page, the above warning outputed. Fix it.
Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Previously, we will free reloc root memory and then force filesystem
to be readonly. The problem is that there may be another thread commiting
transaction which will try to access freed reloc root during merging reloc
roots process.

To keep consistency snapshots shared space, we should allow snapshot
finished if possible, so here we don't free reloc root memory.
signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

@nr is no longer used, remove it from select_reloc_root()
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we do a btree search with the goal of updating an existing item
without changing its size (ins_len == 0 and cow == 1), then we never
need to hold locks on upper level nodes (even when slot == 0) after we
COW their child nodes/leaves, as we won't have node splits or merges
in this scenario (that is, no key additions, removals or shifts on any
nodes or leaves).

Therefore release the locks immediately after COWing the child nodes/leaves
while navigating the btree, even if their parent slot is 0, instead of
returning a path to the caller with those nodes locked, which would get
released only when the caller releases or frees the path (or if it calls
btrfs_unlock_up_safe).

This is a common scenario, for example when updating inode items in fs
trees and block group items in the extent tree.

The following benchmarks were performed on a quad core machine with 32Gb
of ram, using a leaf/node size of 4Kb (to generate deeper fs trees more
quickly).

  sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=131072 --file-total-size=8G \
    --file-test-mode=seqwr --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
    --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]

Before this change:  49.85Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
After this change:   50.38Mb/s (average of 5 runs)
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The local variable 'new_size' comes from userspace. If a large number
was passed, there would be an integer overflow in the following line:
	new_size = old_size + new_size;
Signed-off-by: NWenliang Fan <fanwlexca@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We can starve out the transaction commit with a bunch of caching threads all
running at the same time.  This is because we will only drop the
extent_commit_sem if we need_resched(), which isn't likely to happen since we
will be reading a lot from the disk so have already schedule()'ed plenty.  Alex
observed that he could starve out a transaction commit for up to a minute with
32 caching threads all running at once.  This will allow us to drop the
extent_commit_sem to allow the transaction commit to swap the commit_root out
and then all the cachers will start back up. Here is an explanation provided by
Igno

So, just to fill in what happens in this loop:

                                mutex_unlock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                                cond_resched();
                                goto again;

where 'again:' takes caching_ctl->mutex and fs_info->extent_commit_sem
again:

        again:
                mutex_lock(&caching_ctl->mutex);
                /* need to make sure the commit_root doesn't disappear */
                down_read(&fs_info->extent_commit_sem);

So, if I'm reading the code correct, there can be a fair amount of
concurrency here: there may be multiple 'caching kthreads' per filesystem
active, while there's one fs_info->extent_commit_sem per filesystem
AFAICS.

So, what happens if there are a lot of CPUs all busy holding the
->extent_commit_sem rwsem read-locked and a writer arrives? They'd all
rush to try to release the fs_info->extent_commit_sem, and they'd block in
the down_read() because there's a writer waiting.

So there's a guarantee of forward progress. This should answer akpm's
concern I think.

Thanks,
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Btrfs needs a simple way to know if it needs to let go of it's read lock on a
rwsem.  Introduce rwsem_is_contended to check to see if there are any waiters on
this rwsem currently.  This is just a hueristic, it is meant to be light and not
100% accurate and called by somebody already holding on to the rwsem in either
read or write.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

The inode reference item is close to inode item, so we insert it simultaneously
with the inode item insertion when we create a file/directory.. In fact, we also
can handle the inode reference deletion by the same way. So we made this patch to
introduce the delayed inode reference deletion for the single link inode(At most
case, the file doesn't has hard link, so we don't take the hard link into account).

This function is based on the delayed inode mechanism. After applying this patch,
we can reduce the time of the file/directory deletion by ~10%.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Two reasons:
- btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta() is the same as btrfs_end_transaction_throttle()
  so it is unnecessary.
- All the delayed items should be dealt in the current transaction, so the
  workers should not commit the transaction, instead, deal with the delayed
  items as many as possible.

So we can remove btrfs_end_transaction_dmeta()
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

- move the condition check for wait into a function
- use wait_event_interruptible instead of prepare-schedule-finish process
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If the number of the delayed items is greater than the upper limit, we will
try to flush all the delayed items. After that, it is unnecessary to run
them again because they are being dealt with by the wokers or the number of
them is less than the lower limit.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Before applying the patch
  commit de3cb945
  title: Btrfs: improve the delayed inode throttling

We need requeue the async work after the current work was done, it
introduced a deadlock problem. So we wrote the code that this patch
removes to avoid the above problem. But after applying the above
patch, the deadlock problem didn't exist. So we should remove that
fix code.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While running the test btrfs/004 from xfstests in a loop, it failed
about 1 time out of 20 runs in my desktop. The failure happened in
the backref walking part of the test, and the test's error message was
like this:

  btrfs/004 93s ... [failed, exit status 1] - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad)
      --- tests/btrfs/004.out	2013-11-26 18:25:29.263333714 +0000
      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad	2013-12-10 15:25:10.327518516 +0000
      @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
       QA output created by 004
       *** test backref walking
      -*** done
      +unexpected output from
      +	/home/fdmanana/git/hub/btrfs-progs/btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
      +expected inum: 405, expected address: 454656, file: /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1/snap1/p0/d6/d3d/d156/fce, got:
      +
       ...
       (Run 'diff -u tests/btrfs/004.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests_2/results//btrfs/004.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
  Ran: btrfs/004
  Failures: btrfs/004
  Failed 1 of 1 tests

But immediately after the test finished, the btrfs inspect-internal command
returned the expected output:

  $ btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve -P 141512704 /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1
  inode 405 offset 454656 root 258
  inode 405 offset 454656 root 5

It turned out this was because the btrfs_search_old_slot() calls performed
during backref walking (backref.c:__resolve_indirect_ref) were not finding
anything. The reason for this turned out to be that the tree mod logging
code was not logging some node multi-step operations atomically, therefore
btrfs_search_old_slot() callers iterated often over an incomplete tree that
wasn't fully consistent with any tree state from the past. Besides missing
items, this often (but not always) resulted in -EIO errors during old slot
searches, reported in dmesg like this:

[ 4299.933936] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 4299.933949] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 23190 at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1343 btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]()
[ 4299.933950] Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) bnep rfcomm bluetooth parport_pc ppdev binfmt_misc joydev snd_hda_codec_h
[ 4299.933977] CPU: 0 PID: 23190 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[ 4299.933978] Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
[ 4299.933979]  000000000000053f ffff8806f3fd98f8 ffffffff8176d284 0000000000000007
[ 4299.933982]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f3fd9938 ffffffff8104a81c ffff880659c64b70
[ 4299.933984]  ffff880659c643d0 ffff8806599233d8 ffff880701e2e938 0000160000000000
[ 4299.933987] Call Trace:
[ 4299.933991]  [<ffffffff8176d284>] dump_stack+0x55/0x76
[ 4299.933994]  [<ffffffff8104a81c>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
[ 4299.933997]  [<ffffffff8104a86a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
[ 4299.934003]  [<ffffffffa065d3bb>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x57b/0xab0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934005]  [<ffffffff81775f3b>] ? _raw_read_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[ 4299.934010]  [<ffffffffa0655001>] ? __tree_mod_log_search+0x81/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934019]  [<ffffffffa06dd9b0>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x130/0x5f0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934027]  [<ffffffffa06a21f1>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x61/0xc0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934034]  [<ffffffffa06de39c>] find_parent_nodes+0x1fc/0xe40 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934042]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934048]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934056]  [<ffffffffa06df980>] iterate_extent_inodes+0xe0/0x250 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934058]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[ 4299.934065]  [<ffffffffa06dfb82>] iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x92/0xb0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934071]  [<ffffffffa06b13e0>] ? defrag_lookup_extent+0xe0/0xe0 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934078]  [<ffffffffa06b7015>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf65/0x1f60 [btrfs]
[ 4299.934080]  [<ffffffff811658b8>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x278/0xb00
[ 4299.934083]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
[ 4299.934085]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
[ 4299.934088]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
[ 4299.934090]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
[ 4299.934093]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[ 4299.934096]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
[ 4299.934098]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
[ 4299.934100]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4299.934102]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[ 4299.934104] ---[ end trace 48f0cfc902491414 ]---
[ 4299.934378] btrfs bad fsid on block 0

These tree mod log operations that must be performed atomically, tree_mod_log_free_eb,
tree_mod_log_eb_copy, tree_mod_log_insert_root and tree_mod_log_insert_move, used to
be performed atomically before the following commit:

  c8cc6341
  (Btrfs: stop using GFP_ATOMIC for the tree mod log allocations)

That change removed the atomicity of such operations. This patch restores the
atomicity while still not doing the GFP_ATOMIC allocations of tree_mod_elem
structures, so it has to do the allocations using GFP_NOFS before acquiring
the mod log lock.

This issue has been experienced by several users recently, such as for example:

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg28574.html

After running the btrfs/004 test for 679 consecutive iterations with this
patch applied, I didn't ran into the issue anymore.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Warn if the balance goes below zero, which appears to be unlikely
though. Otherwise cleans up the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Since daivd did the work that force us to use readonly snapshot,
we can safely remove transaction protection from btrfs send.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We met the following oops when doing space balance:
 kobject (ffff88081b590278): tried to init an initialized object, something is seriously wrong.
 ...
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81937262>] dump_stack+0x49/0x5f
  [<ffffffff8137d259>] kobject_init+0x89/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8137d36a>] kobject_init_and_add+0x2a/0x70
  [<ffffffffa009bd79>] ? clear_extent_bit+0x199/0x470 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa005e82c>] __link_block_group+0xfc/0x120 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa006b9db>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x24b/0x370 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00a899b>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x54b/0x7e0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00a8c6f>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x3f/0x50 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0060123>] do_chunk_alloc+0x363/0x440 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa00633d4>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x104/0x310 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0069f4d>] btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x48d/0x600 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa007aad4>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x184/0x250 [btrfs]
  ...

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>
 # mount -o nospace_cache <dev> <mnt>
 # btrfs balance start <mnt>
 # dd if=/dev/zero of=<mnt>/tmpfile bs=1M count=1

The reason of this problem is that we initialized the raid kobject when we added
a block group into a empty raid list. As we know, when we mounted a btrfs filesystem,
the raid list was empty, we would initialize the raid kobject when we added the first
block group. But if there was not data stored in the block group, the block group
would be freed when doing balance, and the raid list would be empty. And then if we
allocated a new block group and added it into the raid list, we would initialize
the raid kobject again, the oops happened.

Fix this problem by initializing the raid kobject just when mounting the fs.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reported-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

See the warning below:

[ 1209.102076]  [<ffffffffa04721b9>] remove_extent_mapping+0x69/0x70 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102084]  [<ffffffffa0466b06>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x96/0x4d0 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102089]  [<ffffffff81073010>] ? wake_atomic_t_function+0x40/0x40
[ 1209.102092]  [<ffffffff8118ab2e>] evict+0x9e/0x190
[ 1209.102094]  [<ffffffff8118b313>] iput+0xf3/0x180
[ 1209.102101]  [<ffffffffa0461fd1>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0xb1/0xd0 [btrfs]
[ 1209.102107]  [<ffffffffa045d358>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x268/0x350 [btrfs]

clear extent bit here to avoid triggering WARN_ON() in remove_extent_mapping()
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

All the subvolues that are involved in send must be read-only during the
whole operation. The ioctl SUBVOL_SETFLAGS could be used to change the
status to read-write and the result of send stream is undefined if the
data change unexpectedly.

Fix that by adding a refcount for all involved roots and verify that
there's no send in progress during SUBVOL_SETFLAGS ioctl call that does
read-only -> read-write transition.

We need refcounts because there are no restrictions on number of send
parallel operations currently run on a single subvolume, be it source,
parent or one of the multiple clone sources.

Kernel is silent when the RO checks fail and returns EPERM. The same set
of checks is done already in userspace before send starts.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Unused since ed259095
"Btrfs: stop using vfs_read in send".
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Remove ifdefed code:

- tlv_put for 8, 16 and 32, add a generic tempalte if needed in future
- tlv_put_timespec - the btrfs_timespec fields are used
- fs_path_remove obsoleted long ago
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While running btrfs/004 from xfstests, after 503 iterations, dmesg reported
a deadlock between tasks iterating inode refs and tasks running delayed inodes
(during a transaction commit).

It turns out that iterating inode refs implies doing one tree search and
release all nodes in the path except the leaf node, and then passing that
leaf node to btrfs_ref_to_path(), which in turn does another tree search
without releasing the lock on the leaf node it received as parameter.

This is a problem when other task wants to write to the btree as well and
ends up updating the leaf that is read locked - the writer task locks the
parent of the leaf and then blocks waiting for the leaf's lock to be
released - at the same time, the task executing btrfs_ref_to_path()
does a second tree search, without releasing the lock on the first leaf,
and wants to access a leaf (the same or another one) that is a child of
the same parent, resulting in a deadlock.

The trace reported by lockdep follows.

[84314.936373] INFO: task fsstress:11930 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84314.936381]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[84314.936383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84314.936386] fsstress        D ffff8806e1bf8000     0 11930  11926 0x00000000
[84314.936393]  ffff8804d6d89b78 0000000000000046 ffff8804d6d89b18 ffffffff810bd8bd
[84314.936399]  ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8
[84314.936405]  ffff880806308000 ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89c08 ffff8804deb8f190
[84314.936410] Call Trace:
[84314.936421]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[84314.936428]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[84314.936451]  [<ffffffffa0715bf5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x75/0x270 [btrfs]
[84314.936457]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[84314.936470]  [<ffffffffa06ba231>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f1/0x930 [btrfs]
[84314.936489]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936504]  [<ffffffffa06d2e1f>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs]
[84314.936510]  [<ffffffff810bd6ef>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x1e0
[84314.936528]  [<ffffffffa073173c>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x4c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[84314.936543]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936558]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936573]  [<ffffffffa0731c82>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x192/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936589]  [<ffffffffa0731d03>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
[84314.936604]  [<ffffffffa06dbcd4>] btrfs_flush_all_pending_stuffs+0x24/0x80 [btrfs]
[84314.936620]  [<ffffffffa06ddc13>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x223/0xa20 [btrfs]
[84314.936630]  [<ffffffffa06ae5ae>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x6e/0x110 [btrfs]
[84314.936635]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
[84314.936639]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
[84314.936643]  [<ffffffff811d0b70>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30
[84314.936648]  [<ffffffff811a3541>] iterate_supers+0xf1/0x100
[84314.936652]  [<ffffffff811d0c45>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90
[84314.936658]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[84314.936660] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[84314.936663] INFO: task btrfs:11955 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84314.936666]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[84314.936668] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84314.936670] btrfs           D ffff880541729a88     0 11955  11608 0x00000000
[84314.936674]  ffff880541729a38 0000000000000046 ffff8805417299d8 ffffffff810bd8bd
[84314.936680]  ffff88075430c8a0 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8
[84314.936685]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff88075430c8a0 ffff8804de8b00b8 ffff8804de8b0000
[84314.936690] Call Trace:
[84314.936695]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[84314.936700]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[84314.936717]  [<ffffffffa0715815>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xd5/0x140 [btrfs]
[84314.936721]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[84314.936733]  [<ffffffffa06ba201>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7c1/0x930 [btrfs]
[84314.936746]  [<ffffffffa06bd505>] btrfs_find_item+0x55/0x160 [btrfs]
[84314.936763]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
[84314.936780]  [<ffffffffa073c9ca>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xba/0x1e0 [btrfs]
[84314.936797]  [<ffffffffa06f9719>] ? release_extent_buffer+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs]
[84314.936813]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
[84314.936830]  [<ffffffffa073cb50>] inode_to_path+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs]
[84314.936846]  [<ffffffffa073d365>] paths_from_inode+0x115/0x3c0 [btrfs]
[84314.936851]  [<ffffffff8118dd44>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x200
[84314.936868]  [<ffffffffa0714494>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf14/0x2030 [btrfs]
[84314.936873]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
[84314.936877]  [<ffffffff8116598f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x34f/0xb00
[84314.936882]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
[84314.936886]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
[84314.936892]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
[84314.936896]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
[84314.936901]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
[84314.936906]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
[84314.936910]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
[84314.936915]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
[84314.936920]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[84314.936922] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
[84434.866873] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:11921 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
[84434.866881]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
[84434.866883] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
[84434.866886] btrfs-transacti D ffff880755b6a478     0 11921      2 0x00000000
[84434.866893]  ffff8800735b9ce8 0000000000000046 ffff8800735b9c88 ffffffff810bd8bd
[84434.866899]  ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8
[84434.866904]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff880755b6a478 ffff8804cece78f0
[84434.866910] Call Trace:
[84434.866920]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[84434.866927]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
[84434.866948]  [<ffffffffa06dd2ef>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs]
[84434.866954]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
[84434.866970]  [<ffffffffa06dec18>] start_transaction+0x388/0x5a0 [btrfs]
[84434.866985]  [<ffffffffa06db9b5>] ? transaction_kthread+0xb5/0x280 [btrfs]
[84434.866999]  [<ffffffffa06dee97>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
[84434.867012]  [<ffffffffa06dba9e>] transaction_kthread+0x19e/0x280 [btrfs]
[84434.867026]  [<ffffffffa06db900>] ? open_ctree+0x2260/0x2260 [btrfs]
[84434.867030]  [<ffffffff81070dad>] kthread+0xed/0x100
[84434.867035]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
[84434.867040]  [<ffffffff8177ee6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
[84434.867044]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Chris introduced hleper function  read_csums() and this function
has been removed, but we forgot to remove its corresponding comments.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It's not used anywhere, so just drop it.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

fs/btrfs/file.c: In function ‘prepare_pages.isra.18’:
fs/btrfs/file.c:1265:6: warning: ‘err’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We have commited transaction before, remove redundant filemap writting and
waiting here, it can speed up balance relocation process.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Clean up btrfs_lookup_dentry() to never return NULL, but PTR_ERR(-ENOENT)
instead. This keeps the return value convention consistent.

Callers who use btrfs_lookup_dentry() require a trivial update.

create_snapshot() in particular looks like it can also lose a BUG_ON(!inode)
which is not really needed - there seems less harm in returning ENOENT to
userspace at that point in the stack than there is to crash the machine.
Signed-off-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In ctree.c:tree_mod_log_set_node_key() we were calling
__tree_mod_log_insert_key() even when the modification doesn't need
to be logged. This would allocate a tree_mod_elem structure, fill it
and pass it to  __tree_mod_log_insert(), which would just acquire
the tree mod log write lock and then free the tree_mod_elem structure
and return (that is, a no-op).

Therefore call tree_mod_log_insert() instead of __tree_mod_log_insert()
which just returns immediately if the modification doesn't need to be
logged (without allocating the structure, fill it, acquire write lock,
free structure).
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

I need to create a fake tree to test qgroups and I don't want to have to setup a
fake btree_inode.  The fact is we only use the radix tree for the fs_info, so
everybody else who allocates an extent_io_tree is just wasting the space anyway.
This patch moves the radix tree and its lock into btrfs_fs_info so there is less
stuff I have to fake to do qgroup sanity tests.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

For creating a dummy in-memory btree I need to be able to use the radix tree to
keep track of the buffers like normal extent buffers.  With dummy buffers we
skip the radix tree step, and we still want to do that for the tree mod log
dummy buffers but for my test buffers we need to be able to remove them from the
radix tree like normal.  This will give me a way to do that.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

I need to add infrastructure to allocate dummy extent buffers for running sanity
tests, and to do this I need to not have to worry about having an
address_mapping for an io_tree, so just fix up the places where we assume that
all io_tree's have a non-NULL ->mapping.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently when finding the leaf to insert a key into a btree, if the
leaf doesn't have enough space to store the item we attempt to move
off some items from our leaf to its right neighbor leaf, and if this
fails to create enough free space in our leaf, we try to move off more
items to the left neighbor leaf as well.

When trying to move off items to the right neighbor leaf, if it has
enough room to store the new key but not not enough room to move off
at least one item from our target leaf, __push_leaf_right returns 1 and
we have to attempt to move items to the left neighbor (push_leaf_left
function) without touching the right neighbor leaf.
For the case where the right leaf has enough room to store at least 1
item from our leaf, we end up modifying (and dirtying) both our leaf
and the right leaf. This is non-optimal for the case where the new key
is greater than any key in our target leaf because it can be inserted at
slot 0 of the right neighbor leaf and we don't need to touch our leaf
at all nor to attempt to move off items to the left neighbor leaf.

Therefore this change just selects the right neighbor leaf as our new
target leaf if it has enough room for the new key without modifying our
initial target leaf - we do this only if the new key is higher than any
key in the initial target leaf.

While running the following test, push_leaf_right was called by split_leaf
4802 times. Out of those 4802 calls, for 2571 calls (53.5%) we hit this
special case (right leaf has enough room and new key is higher than any key
in the initial target leaf).

Test:

  sysbench --test=fileio --file-num=512 --file-total-size=5G \
    --file-test-mode=[seqwr|rndwr] --num-threads=512 --file-block-size=8192 \
    --max-requests=100000 --file-io-mode=sync [prepare|run]

Results:

sequential writes

Throughput before this change: 65.71Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
Throughput after this change:  66.58Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)

random writes

Throughput before this change: 10.75Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
Throughput after this change:  11.56Mb/sec (average of 10 runs)
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Just wrap same code into one function scrub_blocked_if_needed().

This make a change that we will move waiting (@workers_pending = 0)
before we can wake up commiting transaction(atomic_inc(@scrub_paused)),
we must take carefully to not deadlock here.

Thread 1			Thread 2
				|->btrfs_commit_transaction()
					|->set trans type(COMMIT_DOING)
					|->btrfs_scrub_paused()(blocked)
|->join_transaction(blocked)

Move btrfs_scrub_paused() before setting trans type which means we can
still join a transaction when commiting_transaction is blocked.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Suggested-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We came a race condition when scrubbing superblocks, the story is:

In commiting transaction, we will update @last_trans_commited after
writting superblocks, if scrubber start after writting superblocks
and before updating @last_trans_commited, generation mismatch happens!

We fix this by checking @scrub_pause_req, and we won't start a srubber
until commiting transaction is finished.(after btrfs_scrub_continue()
finished.)
Reported-by: NSebastian Ochmann <ochmann@informatik.uni-bonn.de>
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>