1. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 16 11月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      Docs/Kconfig: Update: osdl.org -> linuxfoundation.org · c996d8b9
      Michael Witten 提交于
      Some of the documentation refers to web pages under
      the domain `osdl.org'. However, `osdl.org' now
      redirects to `linuxfoundation.org'.
      
      Rather than rely on redirections, this patch updates
      the addresses appropriately; for the most part, only
      documentation that is meant to be current has been
      updated.
      
      The patch should be pretty quick to scan and check;
      each new web-page url was gotten by trying out the
      original URL in a browser and then simply copying the
      the redirected URL (formatting as necessary).
      
      There is some conflict as to which one of these domain
      names is preferred:
      
        linuxfoundation.org
        linux-foundation.org
      
      So, I wrote:
      
        info@linuxfoundation.org
      
      and got this reply:
      
        Message-ID: <4CE17EE6.9040807@linuxfoundation.org>
        Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:41:42 -0800
        From: David Ames <david@linuxfoundation.org>
      
        ...
      
        linuxfoundation.org is preferred. The canonical name for our web site is
        www.linuxfoundation.org. Our list site is actually
        lists.linux-foundation.org.
      
        Regarding email linuxfoundation.org is preferred there are a few people
        who choose to use linux-foundation.org for their own reasons.
      
      Consequently, I used `linuxfoundation.org' for web pages and
      `lists.linux-foundation.org' for mailing-list web pages and email addresses;
      the only personal email address I updated from `@osdl.org' was that of
      Andrew Morton, who prefers `linux-foundation.org' according `git log'.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
      c996d8b9
  3. 04 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4