1. 23 12月, 2009 1 次提交
    • L
      Revert "time: Remove xtime_cache" · 83f57a11
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      This reverts commit 7bc7d637, as
      requested by John Stultz. Quoting John:
      
       "Petr Titěra reported an issue where he saw odd atime regressions with
        2.6.33 where there were a full second worth of nanoseconds in the
        nanoseconds field.
      
        He also reviewed the time code and narrowed down the problem: unhandled
        overflow of the nanosecond field caused by rounding up the
        sub-nanosecond accumulated time.
      
        Details:
      
         * At the end of update_wall_time(), we currently round up the
        sub-nanosecond portion of accumulated time when storing it into xtime.
        This was added to avoid time inconsistencies caused when the
        sub-nanosecond portion was truncated when storing into xtime.
        Unfortunately we don't handle the possible second overflow caused by
        that rounding.
      
         * Previously the xtime_cache code hid this overflow by normalizing the
        xtime value when storing into the xtime_cache.
      
         * We could try to handle the second overflow after the rounding up, but
        since this affects the timekeeping's internal state, this would further
        complicate the next accumulation cycle, causing small errors in ntp
        steering. As much as I'd like to get rid of it, the xtime_cache code is
        known to work.
      
         * The correct fix is really to include the sub-nanosecond portion in the
        timekeeping accessor function, so we don't need to round up at during
        accumulation. This would greatly simplify the accumulation code.
        Unfortunately, we can't do this safely until the last three
        non-GENERIC_TIME arches (sparc32, arm, cris) are converted  (those
        patches are in -mm) and we kill off the spots where arches set xtime
        directly. This is all 2.6.34 material, so I think reverting the
        xtime_cache change is the best approach for now.
      
        Many thanks to Petr for both reporting and finding the issue!"
      Reported-by: NPetr Titěra <P.Titera@century.cz>
      Requested-by: Njohn stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      83f57a11
  2. 22 12月, 2009 5 次提交
  3. 21 12月, 2009 16 次提交
  4. 20 12月, 2009 12 次提交
  5. 19 12月, 2009 6 次提交