Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  3. 14 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 13 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 05 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 03 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Add bpf_link pinning/unpinning · c016b68e
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      With bpf_link abstraction supported by kernel explicitly, add
pinning/unpinning API for links. Also allow to create (open) bpf_link from BPF
FS file.

This API allows to have an "ephemeral" FD-based BPF links (like raw tracepoint
or fexit/freplace attachments) surviving user process exit, by pinning them in
a BPF FS, which is an important use case for long-running BPF programs.

As part of this, expose underlying FD for bpf_link. While legacy bpf_link's
might not have a FD associated with them (which will be expressed as
a bpf_link with fd=-1), kernel's abstraction is based around FD-based usage,
so match it closely. This, subsequently, allows to have a generic
pinning/unpinning API for generalized bpf_link. For some types of bpf_links
kernel might not support pinning, in which case bpf_link__pin() will return
error.

With FD being part of generic bpf_link, also get rid of bpf_link_fd in favor
of using vanialla bpf_link.
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200303043159.323675-3-andriin@fb.com
      c016b68e
  11. 21 2月, 2020 2 次提交
  13. 18 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 25 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  17. 23 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 18 1月, 2020 3 次提交
  21. 16 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  23. 11 1月, 2020 2 次提交
  25. 10 1月, 2020 2 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Make bpf_map order and indices stable · 492ab020
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Currently, libbpf re-sorts bpf_map structs after all the maps are added and
initialized, which might change their relative order and invalidate any
bpf_map pointer or index taken before that. This is inconvenient and
error-prone. For instance, it can cause .kconfig map index to point to a wrong
map.

Furthermore, libbpf itself doesn't rely on any specific ordering of bpf_maps,
so it's just an unnecessary complication right now. This patch drops sorting
of maps and makes their relative positions fixed. If efficient index is ever
needed, it's better to have a separate array of pointers as a search index,
instead of reordering bpf_map struct in-place. This will be less error-prone
and will allow multiple independent orderings, if necessary (e.g., either by
section index or by name).

Fixes: 166750bc ("libbpf: Support libbpf-provided extern variables")
Reported-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200110034247.1220142-1-andriin@fb.com
      492ab020
    • M
      bpf: libbpf: Add STRUCT_OPS support · 590a0088
      由 Martin KaFai Lau 提交于 
      This patch adds BPF STRUCT_OPS support to libbpf.

The only sec_name convention is SEC(".struct_ops") to identify the
struct_ops implemented in BPF,
e.g. To implement a tcp_congestion_ops:

SEC(".struct_ops")
struct tcp_congestion_ops dctcp = {
	.init           = (void *)dctcp_init,  /* <-- a bpf_prog */
	/* ... some more func prts ... */
	.name           = "bpf_dctcp",
};

Each struct_ops is defined as a global variable under SEC(".struct_ops")
as above.  libbpf creates a map for each variable and the variable name
is the map's name.  Multiple struct_ops is supported under
SEC(".struct_ops").

In the bpf_object__open phase, libbpf will look for the SEC(".struct_ops")
section and find out what is the btf-type the struct_ops is
implementing.  Note that the btf-type here is referring to
a type in the bpf_prog.o's btf.  A "struct bpf_map" is added
by bpf_object__add_map() as other maps do.  It will then
collect (through SHT_REL) where are the bpf progs that the
func ptrs are referring to.  No btf_vmlinux is needed in
the open phase.

In the bpf_object__load phase, the map-fields, which depend
on the btf_vmlinux, are initialized (in bpf_map__init_kern_struct_ops()).
It will also set the prog->type, prog->attach_btf_id, and
prog->expected_attach_type.  Thus, the prog's properties do
not rely on its section name.
[ Currently, the bpf_prog's btf-type ==> btf_vmlinux's btf-type matching
  process is as simple as: member-name match + btf-kind match + size match.
  If these matching conditions fail, libbpf will reject.
  The current targeting support is "struct tcp_congestion_ops" which
  most of its members are function pointers.
  The member ordering of the bpf_prog's btf-type can be different from
  the btf_vmlinux's btf-type. ]

Then, all obj->maps are created as usual (in bpf_object__create_maps()).

Once the maps are created and prog's properties are all set,
the libbpf will proceed to load all the progs.

bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() is added to register a struct_ops
map to a kernel subsystem.
Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200109003514.3856730-1-kafai@fb.com
      590a0088
  27. 26 12月, 2019 1 次提交
    • A
      libbpf: Support CO-RE relocations for LDX/ST/STX instructions · 8ab9da57
      由 Andrii Nakryiko 提交于 
      Clang patch [0] enables emitting relocatable generic ALU/ALU64 instructions
(i.e, shifts and arithmetic operations), as well as generic load/store
instructions. The former ones are already supported by libbpf as is. This
patch adds further support for load/store instructions. Relocatable field
offset is encoded in BPF instruction's 16-bit offset section and are adjusted
by libbpf based on target kernel BTF.

These Clang changes and corresponding libbpf changes allow for more succinct
generated BPF code by encoding relocatable field reads as a single
ST/LDX/STX instruction. It also enables relocatable access to BPF context.
Previously, if context struct (e.g., __sk_buff) was accessed with CO-RE
relocations (e.g., due to preserve_access_index attribute), it would be
rejected by BPF verifier due to modified context pointer dereference. With
Clang patch, such context accesses are both relocatable and have a fixed
offset from the point of view of BPF verifier.

  [0] https://reviews.llvm.org/D71790Signed-off-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191223180305.86417-1-andriin@fb.com
      8ab9da57
  29. 19 12月, 2019 6 次提交
  31. 18 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 17 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 16 12月, 2019 10 次提交