Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 31 8月, 2015 11 次提交
  3. 29 8月, 2015 4 次提交
  5. 22 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      mm: make page pfmemalloc check more robust · 2f064f34
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      Commit c48a11c7 ("netvm: propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb") added
checks for page->pfmemalloc to __skb_fill_page_desc():

        if (page->pfmemalloc && !page->mapping)
                skb->pfmemalloc = true;

It assumes page->mapping == NULL implies that page->pfmemalloc can be
trusted.  However, __delete_from_page_cache() can set set page->mapping
to NULL and leave page->index value alone.  Due to being in union, a
non-zero page->index will be interpreted as true page->pfmemalloc.

So the assumption is invalid if the networking code can see such a page.
And it seems it can.  We have encountered this with a NFS over loopback
setup when such a page is attached to a new skbuf.  There is no copying
going on in this case so the page confuses __skb_fill_page_desc which
interprets the index as pfmemalloc flag and the network stack drops
packets that have been allocated using the reserves unless they are to
be queued on sockets handling the swapping which is the case here and
that leads to hangs when the nfs client waits for a response from the
server which has been dropped and thus never arrive.

The struct page is already heavily packed so rather than finding another
hole to put it in, let's do a trick instead.  We can reuse the index
again but define it to an impossible value (-1UL).  This is the page
index so it should never see the value that large.  Replace all direct
users of page->pfmemalloc by page_is_pfmemalloc which will hide this
nastiness from unspoiled eyes.

The information will get lost if somebody wants to use page->index
obviously but that was the case before and the original code expected
that the information should be persisted somewhere else if that is
really needed (e.g.  what SLAB and SLUB do).

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix blooper in slub]
Fixes: c48a11c7 ("netvm: propagate page->pfmemalloc to skb")
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Debugged-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.com>
Debugged-by: NJiri Bohac <jbohac@suse.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[3.6+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2f064f34
  7. 20 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  9. 19 8月, 2015 4 次提交
  11. 18 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • M
      ASoC: topology: Add Kconfig option for topology · 78b50f39
      由 Mark Brown 提交于 
      Allow the topology code to be compiled out so that users who don't need
topology don't need to havve the code compiled in, saving them some
memory.

Some more configuration could be added to remove some of the hooks into
the core data structures but that is probably best done with some
refactoring to use functions to do the updates of the data structures
rather than ifdefing in the code as we'd need to do at the minute.
Suggested-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
      78b50f39
  13. 13 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 11 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  17. 07 8月, 2015 3 次提交
    • D
      drm/vblank: Use u32 consistently for vblank counters · 209e4dbc
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      In

commit 99264a61
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Date:   Wed Apr 15 19:34:43 2015 +0200

    drm/vblank: Fixup and document timestamp update/read barriers

I've switched vblank->count from atomic_t to unsigned long and
accidentally created an integer comparison bug in
drm_vblank_count_and_time since vblanke->count might overflow the u32
local copy and hence the retry loop never succeed.

Fix this by consistently using u32.

Cc: Michel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Reported-by: NMichel Dänzer <michel@daenzer.net>
Reviewed-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      209e4dbc
    • N
      mm: check __PG_HWPOISON separately from PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_* · f4c18e6f
      由 Naoya Horiguchi 提交于 
      The race condition addressed in commit add05cec ("mm: soft-offline:
don't free target page in successful page migration") was not closed
completely, because that can happen not only for soft-offline, but also
for hard-offline.  Consider that a slab page is about to be freed into
buddy pool, and then an uncorrected memory error hits the page just
after entering __free_one_page(), then VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page->flags &
PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP) is triggered, despite the fact that it's not
necessary because the data on the affected page is not consumed.

To solve it, this patch drops __PG_HWPOISON from page flag checks at
allocation/free time.  I think it's justified because __PG_HWPOISON
flags is defined to prevent the page from being reused, and setting it
outside the page's alloc-free cycle is a designed behavior (not a bug.)

For recent months, I was annoyed about BUG_ON when soft-offlined page
remains on lru cache list for a while, which is avoided by calling
put_page() instead of putback_lru_page() in page migration's success
path.  This means that this patch reverts a major change from commit
add05cec about the new refcounting rule of soft-offlined pages, so
"reuse window" revives.  This will be closed by a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Dean Nelson <dnelson@redhat.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f4c18e6f
    • M
      fs, file table: reinit files_stat.max_files after deferred memory initialisation · 4248b0da
      由 Mel Gorman 提交于 
      Dave Hansen reported the following;

	My laptop has been behaving strangely with 4.2-rc2.  Once I log
	in to my X session, I start getting all kinds of strange errors
	from applications and see this in my dmesg:

        	VFS: file-max limit 8192 reached

The problem is that the file-max is calculated before memory is fully
initialised and miscalculates how much memory the kernel is using.  This
patch recalculates file-max after deferred memory initialisation.  Note
that using memory hotplug infrastructure would not have avoided this
problem as the value is not recalculated after memory hot-add.

4.1:             files_stat.max_files = 6582781
4.2-rc2:         files_stat.max_files = 8192
4.2-rc2 patched: files_stat.max_files = 6562467

Small differences with the patch applied and 4.1 but not enough to matter.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Reported-by: NDave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Alex Ng <alexng@microsoft.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      4248b0da
  19. 06 8月, 2015 5 次提交
  21. 04 8月, 2015 3 次提交
  23. 03 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 31 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      net: sched: fix refcount imbalance in actions · 28e6b67f
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      Since commit 55334a5d ("net_sched: act: refuse to remove bound action
outside"), we end up with a wrong reference count for a tc action.

Test case 1:

  FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
  BAR="1,6 0 0 4294967294,"
  tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 \
     action bpf bytecode "$FOO"
  tc actions show action bpf
    action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967295' default-action pipe
    index 1 ref 1 bind 1
  tc actions replace action bpf bytecode "$BAR" index 1
  tc actions show action bpf
    action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967294' default-action pipe
    index 1 ref 2 bind 1
  tc actions replace action bpf bytecode "$FOO" index 1
  tc actions show action bpf
    action order 0: bpf bytecode '1,6 0 0 4294967295' default-action pipe
    index 1 ref 3 bind 1

Test case 2:

  FOO="1,6 0 0 4294967295,"
  tc filter add dev foo parent 1: bpf bytecode "$FOO" flowid 1:1 action ok
  tc actions show action gact
    action order 0: gact action pass
    random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 1 bind 1
  tc actions add action drop index 1
    RTNETLINK answers: File exists [...]
  tc actions show action gact
    action order 0: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 2 bind 1
  tc actions add action drop index 1
    RTNETLINK answers: File exists [...]
  tc actions show action gact
    action order 0: gact action pass
     random type none pass val 0
     index 1 ref 3 bind 1

What happens is that in tcf_hash_check(), we check tcf_common for a given
index and increase tcfc_refcnt and conditionally tcfc_bindcnt when we've
found an existing action. Now there are the following cases:

  1) We do a late binding of an action. In that case, we leave the
     tcfc_refcnt/tcfc_bindcnt increased and are done with the ->init()
     handler. This is correctly handeled.

  2) We replace the given action, or we try to add one without replacing
     and find out that the action at a specific index already exists
     (thus, we go out with error in that case).

In case of 2), we have to undo the reference count increase from
tcf_hash_check() in the tcf_hash_check() function. Currently, we fail to
do so because of the 'tcfc_bindcnt > 0' check which bails out early with
an -EPERM error.

Now, while commit 55334a5d prevents 'tc actions del action ...' on an
already classifier-bound action to drop the reference count (which could
then become negative, wrap around etc), this restriction only accounts for
invocations outside a specific action's ->init() handler.

One possible solution would be to add a flag thus we possibly trigger
the -EPERM ony in situations where it is indeed relevant.

After the patch, above test cases have correct reference count again.

Fixes: 55334a5d ("net_sched: act: refuse to remove bound action outside")
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Reviewed-by: NCong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28e6b67f
  27. 30 7月, 2015 1 次提交