Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 26 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  3. 25 5月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Serialize GTT/Aperture accesses on BXT · 0ef34ad6
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      BXT has a H/W issue with IOMMU which can lead to system hangs when
Aperture accesses are queued within the GAM behind GTT Accesses.

This patch avoids the condition by wrapping all GTT updates in stop_machine
and using a flushing read prior to restarting the machine.

The stop_machine guarantees no new Aperture accesses can begin while
the PTE writes are being emmitted. The flushing read ensures that
any following Aperture accesses cannot begin until the PTE writes
have been cleared out of the GAM's fifo.

Only FOLLOWING Aperture accesses need to be separated from in flight
PTE updates. PTE Writes may follow tightly behind already in flight
Aperture accesses, so no flushing read is required at the start of
a PTE update sequence.

This issue was reproduced by running
	igt/gem_readwrite and
	igt/gem_render_copy
simultaneously from different processes, each in a tight loop,
with INTEL_IOMMU enabled.

This patch was originally published as:
	drm/i915: Serialize GTT Updates on BXT

v2: Move bxt/iommu detection into static function
    Remove #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU protection
    Make function names more reflective of purpose
    Move flushing read into static function

v3: Tidy up for checkpatch.pl

Testcase: igt/gem_concurrent_blit
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <john.C.Harrison@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1495641251-30022-1-git-send-email-jon.bloomfield@intel.comReviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      0ef34ad6
  5. 24 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 23 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 22 5月, 2017 3 次提交
  11. 20 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 19 5月, 2017 7 次提交
  15. 18 5月, 2017 13 次提交
  17. 17 5月, 2017 9 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Don't force serialisation on marking up execlists irq posted · 955a4b89
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Since we coordinate with the execlists tasklet using a locked schedule
operation that ensures that after we set the engine->irq_posted we
always have an invocation of the tasklet, we do not need to use a locked
operation to set the engine->irq_posted itself.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-12-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      955a4b89
    • C
      drm/i915: Stop inlining the execlists IRQ handler · 5d3d69d5
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      As the handler is now quite complex, involving a few atomics, the cost
of the function preamble is negligible in comparison and so we should
leave the function out-of-line for better I$.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      5d3d69d5
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Reduce lock contention between schedule/submit_request · 349bdb68
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      If we do not require to perform priority bumping, and we haven't yet
submitted the request, we can update its priority in situ and skip
acquiring the engine locks -- thus avoiding any contention between us
and submit/execute.

v2: Remove the stack element from the list if we can do the early
assignment.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-10-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      349bdb68
    • C
      drm/i915: Create a kmem_cache to allocate struct i915_priolist from · c5cf9a91
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      The i915_priolist are allocated within an atomic context on a path where
we wish to minimise latency. If we use a dedicated kmem_cache, we have
the advantage of a local freelist from which to service new requests
that should keep the latency impact of an allocation small. Though
currently we expect the majority of requests to be at default priority
(and so hit the preallocate priolist), once userspace starts using
priorities they are likely to use many fine grained policies improving
the utilisation of a private slab.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      c5cf9a91
    • C
      drm/i915: Split execlist priority queue into rbtree + linked list · 6c067579
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      All the requests at the same priority are executed in FIFO order. They
do not need to be stored in the rbtree themselves, as they are a simple
list within a level. If we move the requests at one priority into a list,
we can then reduce the rbtree to the set of priorities. This should keep
the height of the rbtree small, as the number of active priorities can not
exceed the number of active requests and should be typically only a few.

Currently, we have ~2k possible different priority levels, that may
increase to allow even more fine grained selection. Allocating those in
advance seems a waste (and may be impossible), so we opt for allocating
upon first use, and freeing after its requests are depleted. To avoid
the possibility of an allocation failure causing us to lose a request,
we preallocate the default priority (0) and bump any request to that
priority if we fail to allocate it the appropriate plist. Having a
request (that is ready to run, so not leading to corruption) execute
out-of-order is better than leaking the request (and its dependency
tree) entirely.

There should be a benefit to reducing execlists_dequeue() to principally
using a simple list (and reducing the frequency of both rbtree iteration
and balancing on erase) but for typical workloads, request coalescing
should be small enough that we don't notice any change. The main gain is
from improving PI calls to schedule, and the explicit list within a
level should make request unwinding simpler (we just need to insert at
the head of the list rather than the tail and not have to make the
rbtree search more complicated).

v2: Avoid use-after-free when deleting a depleted priolist

v3: Michał found the solution to handling the allocation failure
gracefully. If we disable all priority scheduling following the
allocation failure, those requests will be executed in fifo and we will
ensure that this request and its dependencies are in strict fifo (even
when it doesn't realise it is only a single list). Normal scheduling is
restored once we know the device is idle, until the next failure!
Suggested-by: NMichał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      6c067579
    • C
      drm/i915: Use a define for the default priority [0] · e4f815f6
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Explicitly assign the default priority, and give it a name. After much
discussion, we have chosen to call it I915_PRIORITY_NORMAL!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      e4f815f6
    • C
      drm/i915: Don't mark an execlists context-switch when idle · a4b2b015
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      If we *know* that the engine is idle, i.e. we have not more contexts in
flight, we can skip any spurious CSB idle interrupts. These spurious
interrupts seem to arrive long after we assert that the engines are
completely idle, triggering later assertions:

[  178.896646] intel_engine_is_idle(bcs): interrupt not handled, irq_posted=2
[  178.896655] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[  178.896658] kernel BUG at drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_cs.c:226!
[  178.896661] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
[  178.896663] Modules linked in: i915(E) x86_pkg_temp_thermal(E) crct10dif_pclmul(E) crc32_pclmul(E) crc32c_intel(E) ghash_clmulni_intel(E) nls_ascii(E) nls_cp437(E) vfat(E) fat(E) intel_gtt(E) i2c_algo_bit(E) drm_kms_helper(E) syscopyarea(E) sysfillrect(E) sysimgblt(E) fb_sys_fops(E) aesni_intel(E) prime_numbers(E) evdev(E) aes_x86_64(E) drm(E) crypto_simd(E) cryptd(E) glue_helper(E) mei_me(E) mei(E) lpc_ich(E) efivars(E) mfd_core(E) battery(E) video(E) acpi_pad(E) button(E) tpm_tis(E) tpm_tis_core(E) tpm(E) autofs4(E) i2c_i801(E) fan(E) thermal(E) i2c_designware_platform(E) i2c_designware_core(E)
[  178.896694] CPU: 1 PID: 522 Comm: gem_exec_whispe Tainted: G            E   4.11.0-rc5+ #14
[  178.896702] task: ffff88040aba8d40 task.stack: ffffc900003f0000
[  178.896722] RIP: 0010:intel_engine_init_global_seqno+0x1db/0x1f0 [i915]
[  178.896725] RSP: 0018:ffffc900003f3ab0 EFLAGS: 00010246
[  178.896728] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88040af54000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[  178.896731] RDX: ffff88041ec933e0 RSI: ffff88041ec8cc48 RDI: ffff88041ec8cc48
[  178.896734] RBP: ffffc900003f3ac8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 000000000000047d
[  178.896736] R10: 0000000000000040 R11: ffff88040b344f80 R12: 0000000000000000
[  178.896739] R13: ffff88040bce0000 R14: ffff88040bce52d8 R15: ffff88040bce0000
[  178.896742] FS:  00007f2cccc2d8c0(0000) GS:ffff88041ec80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[  178.896746] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[  178.896749] CR2: 00007f41ddd8f000 CR3: 000000040bb03000 CR4: 00000000001406e0
[  178.896752] Call Trace:
[  178.896768]  reset_all_global_seqno.part.33+0x4e/0xd0 [i915]
[  178.896782]  i915_gem_request_alloc+0x304/0x330 [i915]
[  178.896795]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x8a1/0x17d0 [i915]
[  178.896799]  ? remove_wait_queue+0x48/0x50
[  178.896812]  ? i915_wait_request+0x300/0x590 [i915]
[  178.896816]  ? wake_up_q+0x70/0x70
[  178.896819]  ? refcount_dec_and_test+0x11/0x20
[  178.896823]  ? reservation_object_add_excl_fence+0xa5/0x100
[  178.896835]  i915_gem_execbuffer2+0xab/0x1f0 [i915]
[  178.896844]  drm_ioctl+0x1e6/0x460 [drm]
[  178.896858]  ? i915_gem_execbuffer+0x260/0x260 [i915]
[  178.896862]  ? dput+0xcf/0x250
[  178.896866]  ? full_proxy_release+0x66/0x80
[  178.896869]  ? mntput+0x1f/0x30
[  178.896872]  do_vfs_ioctl+0x8f/0x5b0
[  178.896875]  ? ____fput+0x9/0x10
[  178.896878]  ? task_work_run+0x80/0xa0
[  178.896881]  SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x70
[  178.896885]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x17/0x98
[  178.896888] RIP: 0033:0x7f2ccb455ca7
[  178.896890] RSP: 002b:00007ffcabec72d8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
[  178.896894] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055f897a44b90 RCX: 00007f2ccb455ca7
[  178.896897] RDX: 00007ffcabec74a0 RSI: 0000000040406469 RDI: 0000000000000003
[  178.896900] RBP: 00007f2ccb70a440 R08: 00007f2ccb70d0a4 R09: 0000000000000000
[  178.896903] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[  178.896905] R13: 000055f89782d71a R14: 00007ffcabecf838 R15: 0000000000000003
[  178.896908] Code: 00 31 d2 4c 89 ef 8d 70 48 41 ff 95 f8 06 00 00 e9 68 fe ff ff be 0f 00 00 00 48 c7 c7 48 dc 37 a0 e8 fa 33 d6 e0 e9 0b ff ff ff <0f> 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 0b 0f 1f 00 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00

On the other hand, by ignoring the interrupt do we risk running out of
space in CSB ring? Testing for a few hours suggests not, i.e. that we
only seem to get the odd delayed CSB idle notification.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      a4b2b015
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Pack the count into the low bits of the port.request · 77f0d0e9
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      add/remove: 1/1 grow/shrink: 5/4 up/down: 391/-578 (-187)
function                                     old     new   delta
execlists_submit_ports                       262     471    +209
port_assign.isra                               -     136    +136
capture                                     6344    6359     +15
reset_common_ring                            438     452     +14
execlists_submit_request                     228     238     +10
gen8_init_common_ring                        334     341      +7
intel_engine_is_idle                         106     105      -1
i915_engine_info                            2314    2290     -24
__i915_gem_set_wedged_BKL                    485     411     -74
intel_lrc_irq_handler                       1789    1604    -185
execlists_update_context                     294       -    -294

The most important change there is the improve to the
intel_lrc_irq_handler and excclist_submit_ports (net improvement since
execlists_update_context is now inlined).

v2: Use the port_api() for guc as well (even though currently we do not
pack any counters in there, yet) and hide all port->request_count inside
the helpers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      77f0d0e9
    • C
      drm/i915: Redefine ptr_pack_bits() and friends · 0ce81788
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Rebrand the current (pointer | bits) pack/unpack utility macros as
explicit bit twiddling for PAGE_SIZE so that we can use the more
flexible underlying macros for different bits.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170517121007.27224-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      0ce81788