- 04 4月, 2008 13 次提交
-
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDenis V.Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Do this by replacing sock_create_kern with inet_ctl_sock_create. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
uc_ttl is initialized in inet(6)_create and never changed except setsockopt ioctl. Remove this assignment. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Replace sock_create_kern with inet_ctl_sock_create. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
This is a generic requirement, so make inet_ctl_sock_create namespace aware and create a inet_ctl_sock_destroy wrapper around sk_release_kernel. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
All upper protocol layers are already use sock internally. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
sk->sk_proc->(un)hash is noop right now, so the unification is correct. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
This call is nothing common with INET connection sockets code. It simply creates an unhashes kernel sockets for protocol messages. Move the new call into af_inet.c after the rename. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
This seems a purism as module can't be unloaded, but though if cleanup method is present it should be correct and clean all staff created. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Replace dccp_v(4|6)_ctl_socket with sock to unify a code with TCP/ICMP. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Denis V. Lunev 提交于
Replace tcp_socket with tcp_sock. This is more effective (less derefferences on fast paths). Additionally, the approach is unified to one used in ICMP. Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 02 4月, 2008 22 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
This may lead to situations, when each of two proc entries produce data for the other's device. Looks like a BUG, so this patch is for net-2.6. It will not apply to net-2.6.26 since dev->nd_net access is replaced with dev_net(dev) one. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
When we encounter an error while looking up the dst the second time we need to drop the first dst. This patch is pretty much the same as the one for IPv4. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Benoit Boissinot 提交于
From RFC341: A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units. In particular, an implementation must not create a temporary address with a zero Preferred Lifetime. Signed-off-by: NBenoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org> Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Benoit Boissinot 提交于
When receiving a prefix information from a routeur, only update the lifetimes of the temporary address associated with that prefix. Otherwise if one deprecated prefix is advertized, all your temporary addresses will become deprecated. Signed-off-by: NBenoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org> Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing. The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add: rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock In __rfcomm_dlc_close: d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change) There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;" is enough. [ 295.002046] ======================================================= [ 295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] [ 295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] ------------------------------------------------------- [ 295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock: [ 295.002046] (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] but task is already holding lock: [ 295.002046] (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240 [ 295.002046] [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90 [ 295.002046] [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140 [ 295.002046] [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60 [ 295.002046] [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}: [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] other info that might help us debug this: [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705: [ 295.002046] #0: (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] #1: (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [ 295.002046] stack backtrace: [ 295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1 [ 295.002046] [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20 [ 295.002046] [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200 [ 295.002046] [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0 [ 295.002046] [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320 [ 295.002046] [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760 [ 295.002046] [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80 [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130 [ 295.002046] [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70 [ 295.002046] [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0 [ 295.002046] [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30 [ 295.002046] [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm] [ 295.002046] [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0 [ 295.002046] [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 [ 295.002046] ======================= Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
'rfcomm connect' will trigger lockdep warnings which is caused by locking diffrent kinds of bluetooth sockets at the same time. So using sub-classes per AF_BLUETOOTH sub-type for lockdep. Thanks for the hints from dave jones. --- > From: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> > Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 12:21:56 -0400 > > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: Pid: 3611, comm: obex-data-serve Not tainted 2.6.25-0.121.rc5.git4.fc9 #1 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__lock_acquire+2287/3089] __lock_acquire+0x8ef/0xc11 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sched_clock+8/11] ? sched_clock+0x8/0xb > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_acquire+106/144] lock_acquire+0x6a/0x90 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_sock_nested+182/198] lock_sock_nested+0xb6/0xc6 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] ? l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [security_socket_post_create+22/27] ? security_socket_post_create+0x16/0x1b > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__sock_create+388/472] ? __sock_create+0x184/0x1d8 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8bd9321>] l2cap_sock_bind+0x29/0x108 [l2cap] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [kernel_bind+10/13] kernel_bind+0xa/0xd > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8dad3d7>] rfcomm_dlc_open+0xc8/0x294 [rfcomm] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [lock_sock_nested+187/198] ? lock_sock_nested+0xbb/0xc6 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [<f8dae18c>] rfcomm_sock_connect+0x8b/0xc2 [rfcomm] > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sys_connect+96/125] sys_connect+0x60/0x7d > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [__lock_acquire+1370/3089] ? __lock_acquire+0x55a/0xc11 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [sys_socketcall+140/392] sys_socketcall+0x8c/0x188 > > Mar 27 08:10:57 localhost kernel: [syscall_call+7/11] syscall_call+0x7/0xb --- Signed-off-by: NDave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jarek Poplawski 提交于
rose_release() doesn't release sockets properly, e.g. it skips sock_orphan(), so OOPSes are triggered in sock_def_write_space(), which was observed especially while ROSE skbs were kfreed from ax25_frames_acked(). There is also sock_hold() and lock_sock() added - similarly to ax25_release(). Thanks to Bernard Pidoux for substantial help in debugging this problem. Signed-off-by: NJarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NBernard Pidoux <bpidoux@free.fr> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Luis Carlos Cobo 提交于
This allows cleaner code when accesing bss->mesh_config components. Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Luis Carlos Cobo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Luis Carlos Cobo 提交于
...not only broadcast. Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Luis Carlos Cobo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Luis Carlos Cobo 提交于
The bug shows up with CONFIG_PREEMPT enabled. Pointed out by Andrew Morton. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NLuis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
A variable 'i' is being shadowed by another one, but the second one can just be removed. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Vladimir Koutny <vlado@work.ksp.sk> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When the IBSS code tries to flush the STA list, it does so in an atomic context. Flushing isn't safe there, however, and requires the RTNL, so we need to defer it to a workqueue. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Calling sta_info_destroy() doesn't require RCU-synchronisation before-hand because it does that internally. However, it does require rtnl-locking so insert that where necessary. Also clean up the code doing it internally to be a bit clearer and not synchronize twice if keys are configured. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When STA structure insertion fails, it has been allocated but isn't really alive yet, it isn't reachable by any other code and also can't yet have much configured. This patch changes the code so that when the insertion fails, the resulting STA pointer is no longer valid because it is freed. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
sta_info_destroy(NULL) should be valid, but currently isn't because the argument is dereferenced before the NULL check. There are no users that currently pass in NULL, i.e. all check before calling the function, but I want to change that. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When joining a new IBSS, all old stations are flushed, but currently all stations belonging to all virtual interfaces are flushed, which is wrong. This patch fixes it. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
This bool causes my gcc-4.1.0 alpha cross compiler to go into an infinite loop. Switching it to u8 works around that. Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Cc: Luis Carlos Cobo <luisca@cozybit.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Vladimir Koutny 提交于
ERP IE bit for preamble mode is 0 for short and 1 for long, not the other way around. This fixes the value reported to the driver via bss_conf->use_short_preamble field. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Koutny <vlado@ksp.sk> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Jan Niehusmann 提交于
ieee80211_sta_work is disabled while network interface is down. Therefore, if you configure wireless parameters before bringing the interface up, these configurations are not yet effective and association fails. A workaround from userspace is calling a command like 'iwconfig wlan0 ap any' after the interface is brought up. To fix this behaviour, trigger execution of ieee80211_sta_work from ieee80211_open when in STA or IBSS mode. Signed-off-by: NJan Niehusmann <jan@gondor.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 01 4月, 2008 5 次提交
-
-
由 Joonwoo Park 提交于
Allocate the skb for llc responses with the received packet size by using the size adjustable llc_frame_alloc. Don't allocate useless extra payload. Cleanup magic numbers. So, this fixes oops. Reported by Jim Westfall: kernel: skb_over_panic: text:c0541fc7 len:1000 put:997 head:c166ac00 data:c166ac2f tail:0xc166b017 end:0xc166ac80 dev:eth0 kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:95! Signed-off-by: NJoonwoo Park <joonwpark81@gmail.com> Acked-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Do with the sockstat6 file what we've already done for the sockstat. Same good side effect - ipv6 reassembling stats are now shown per-net. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Besides, now we can see per-net fragments statistics in the same file, since this stats is already per-net. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Currently they live in init_net only, but now almost all the info they can provide is available per-net. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Such an accounting would cost us two more dereferences to get the percpu variable from the struct net, so I make sock_prot_inuse_get and _add calls work differently depending on CONFIG_NET_NS - without it old optimized routines are used. The per-cpu counter for init_net is prepared in core_initcall, so that even af_inet, that starts as fs_initcall, will already have the init_net prepared. Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-