Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 3月, 2012 2 次提交
    • T
      gpio/omap: fix redundant decoding of gpio offset · 7fcca715
      由 Tarun Kanti DebBarma 提交于 
      In gpio_get(), _get_gpio_datain() and _get_gpio_dataout() get rid of
un-necessary operation to compute gpio mask. The gpio offset passed
to gpio_get() is sufficient to do that.

Here is Russell's original comment:
Can someone explain to me this:

static int _get_gpio_datain(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio)
{
       void __iomem *reg = bank->base + bank->regs->datain;

       return (__raw_readl(reg) & GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio)) != 0;
}

static int gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
{
       struct gpio_bank *bank = container_of(chip, struct gpio_bank, chip);
       void __iomem *reg = bank->base;
       int gpio = chip->base + offset;
       u32 mask = GPIO_BIT(bank, gpio);

       if (gpio_is_input(bank, mask))
               return _get_gpio_datain(bank, gpio);
       else
               return _get_gpio_dataout(bank, gpio);
}

Given that bank->width on OMAP is either 32 or 16, and GPIO numbers for
any GPIO chip are always aligned to 32 or 16, why does this code bother
adding the chips base gpio number and then modulo the width?

Surely this means if - for argument sake - you registered a GPIO chip
with 8 lines followed by one with 16 lines, GPIO0..7 would be chip 0
bit 0..7, GPIO8..15 would be chip 1 bit 8..15, GPIO16..23 would be
chip 1 bit 0..7.

However, if you registered a GPIO chip with 16 lines first, it would
mean GPIO0..15 would be chip 0 bit 0..15, and GPIO16..31 would be
chip 1 bit 0..15.

Surely this kind of behaviour is not intended?

Is there a reason why the bitmask can't just be (1 << offset) where
offset is passed into these functions as GPIO number - chip->base ?
Reported-by: NRussell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NTarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      7fcca715
    • T
      gpio/omap: fix incorrect update to context.irqenable1 · 2a900eb7
      由 Tarun Kanti DebBarma 提交于 
      In _enable_gpio_irqbank() when bank->regs->set_irqenable is TRUE,
gpio_mask can be directly set by writing to set_irqenable register
without overwriting current value. In order to ensure the same is
stored in context.irqenable1, we must avoid overwriting it with
gpio_mask at the end of the function. Instead, update irqenable1
appropriately by OR'ing with gpio_mask.
For the case where bank->regs->set_irqenable is FALSE, irqenable1
can be directly overwritten with 'l' which holds correct computed
value.
        if (bank->regs->set_irqenable) {
                reg += bank->regs->set_irqenable;
                l = gpio_mask;
        } else {
                reg += bank->regs->irqenable;
                l = __raw_readl(reg);
                if (bank->regs->irqenable_inv)
                        l &= ~gpio_mask;
                else
                        l |= gpio_mask;
        }

Make similar change for _disable_gpio_irqbank().
Signed-off-by: NTarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Reviewed-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
      2a900eb7
  3. 20 3月, 2012 5 次提交
  5. 13 3月, 2012 2 次提交
    • T
      gpio/omap: Fix section warning for omap_mpuio_alloc_gc() · 8805f410
      由 Tony Lindgren 提交于 
      Make omap_mpuio_alloc_gc() __devinit as omap_gpio_chip_init()
is __devinit. Otherwise we get:

WARNING: vmlinux.o(.devinit.text+0xa10): Section mismatch in reference
from the function omap_gpio_chip_init() to the function .init.text:omap_mpuio_alloc_gc()
The function __devinit omap_gpio_chip_init() references
a function __init omap_mpuio_alloc_gc().
If omap_mpuio_alloc_gc is only used by omap_gpio_chip_init then
annotate omap_mpuio_alloc_gc with a matching annotation.
Signed-off-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Acked-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      8805f410
    • K
      gpio/omap: fix wakeups on level-triggered GPIOs · 68942edb
      由 Kevin Hilman 提交于 
      While both level- and edge-triggered GPIOs are capable of generating
interrupts, only edge-triggered GPIOs are capable of generating a
module-level wakeup to the PRCM (c.f. 34xx NDA TRM section 25.5.3.2.)

In order to ensure that devices using level-triggered GPIOs as
interrupts can also cause wakeups (e.g. from idle), this patch enables
edge-triggering for wakeup-enabled, level-triggered GPIOs when a GPIO
bank is runtime-suspended (which also happens during idle.)

This fixes a problem found in GPMC-connected network cards with GPIO
interrupts (e.g. smsc911x on Zoom3, Overo, ...) where network booting
with NFSroot was very slow since the GPIO IRQs used by the NIC were
not generating PRCM wakeups, and thus not waking the system from idle.
NOTE: until v3.3, this boot-time problem was somewhat masked because
the UART init prevented WFI during boot until the full serial driver
was available.  Preventing WFI allowed regular GPIO interrupts to fire
and this problem was not seen.  After the UART runtime PM cleanups, we
no longer avoid WFI during boot, so GPIO IRQs that were not causing
wakeups resulted in very slow IRQ response times.

Tested on platforms using level-triggered GPIOs for network IRQs using
the SMSC911x NIC: 3530/Overo and 3630/Zoom3.
Reported-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Tested-by: NTarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Tested-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
      68942edb
  7. 06 3月, 2012 4 次提交
  9. 06 2月, 2012 24 次提交
  11. 14 10月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 24 8月, 2011 2 次提交