Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 3月, 2012 4 次提交
  3. 19 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      i387: move TS_USEDFPU flag from thread_info to task_struct · f94edacf
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This moves the bit that indicates whether a thread has ownership of the
FPU from the TS_USEDFPU bit in thread_info->status to a word of its own
(called 'has_fpu') in task_struct->thread.has_fpu.

This fixes two independent bugs at the same time:

 - changing 'thread_info->status' from the scheduler causes nasty
   problems for the other users of that variable, since it is defined to
   be thread-synchronous (that's what the "TS_" part of the naming was
   supposed to indicate).

   So perfectly valid code could (and did) do

	ti->status |= TS_RESTORE_SIGMASK;

   and the compiler was free to do that as separate load, or and store
   instructions.  Which can cause problems with preemption, since a task
   switch could happen in between, and change the TS_USEDFPU bit. The
   change to TS_USEDFPU would be overwritten by the final store.

   In practice, this seldom happened, though, because the 'status' field
   was seldom used more than once, so gcc would generally tend to
   generate code that used a read-modify-write instruction and thus
   happened to avoid this problem - RMW instructions are naturally low
   fat and preemption-safe.

 - On x86-32, the current_thread_info() pointer would, during interrupts
   and softirqs, point to a *copy* of the real thread_info, because
   x86-32 uses %esp to calculate the thread_info address, and thus the
   separate irq (and softirq) stacks would cause these kinds of odd
   thread_info copy aliases.

   This is normally not a problem, since interrupts aren't supposed to
   look at thread information anyway (what thread is running at
   interrupt time really isn't very well-defined), but it confused the
   heck out of irq_fpu_usable() and the code that tried to squirrel
   away the FPU state.

   (It also caused untold confusion for us poor kernel developers).

It also turns out that using 'task_struct' is actually much more natural
for most of the call sites that care about the FPU state, since they
tend to work with the task struct for other reasons anyway (ie
scheduling).  And the FPU data that we are going to save/restore is
found there too.

Thanks to Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> for pointing us to
the %esp issue.

Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: NRaphael Prevost <raphael@buro.asia>
Acked-and-tested-by: NSuresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Tested-by: NPeter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f94edacf
  5. 17 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • L
      i387: don't ever touch TS_USEDFPU directly, use helper functions · 6d59d7a9
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      This creates three helper functions that do the TS_USEDFPU accesses, and
makes everybody that used to do it by hand use those helpers instead.

In addition, there's a couple of helper functions for the "change both
CR0.TS and TS_USEDFPU at the same time" case, and the places that do
that together have been changed to use those.  That means that we have
fewer random places that open-code this situation.

The intent is partly to clarify the code without actually changing any
semantics yet (since we clearly still have some hard to reproduce bug in
this area), but also to make it much easier to use another approach
entirely to caching the CR0.TS bit for software accesses.

Right now we use a bit in the thread-info 'status' variable (this patch
does not change that), but we might want to make it a full field of its
own or even make it a per-cpu variable.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6d59d7a9
  7. 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 27 12月, 2011 6 次提交
    • A
      KVM: VMX: Intercept RDPMC · fee84b07
      由 Avi Kivity 提交于 
      Intercept RDPMC and forward it to the PMU emulation code.
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      fee84b07
    • A
      KVM: Move cpuid code to new file · 00b27a3e
      由 Avi Kivity 提交于 
      The cpuid code has grown; put it into a separate file.
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      00b27a3e
    • X
      KVM: introduce id_to_memslot function · 28a37544
      由 Xiao Guangrong 提交于 
      Introduce id_to_memslot to get memslot by slot id
Signed-off-by: NXiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      28a37544
    • G
      KVM: VMX: remove unneeded vmx_load_host_state() calls. · 46199f33
      由 Gleb Natapov 提交于 
      vmx_load_host_state() does not handle msrs switching (except
MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE) since commit 26bb0981. Remove call to it
where it is no longer make sense.
Signed-off-by: NGleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      46199f33
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Fix warning-causing idt-vectoring-info behavior · 51cfe38e
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      When L0 wishes to inject an interrupt while L2 is running, it emulates an exit
to L1 with EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT. This was explained in the original
nVMX patch 23, titled "Correct handling of interrupt injection".

Unfortunately, it is possible (though rare) that at this point there is valid
idt_vectoring_info in vmcs02. For example, L1 injected some interrupt to L2,
and when L2 tried to run this interrupt's handler, it got a page fault - so
it returns the original interrupt vector in idt_vectoring_info. The problem
is that if this is the case, we cannot exit to L1 with EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT
like we wished to, because the VMX spec guarantees that idt_vectoring_info
and exit_reason_external_interrupt can never happen together. This is not
just specified in the spec - a KVM L1 actually prints a kernel warning
"unexpected, valid vectoring info" if we violate this guarantee, and some
users noticed these warnings in L1's logs.

In order to better emulate a processor, which would never return the external
interrupt and the idt-vectoring-info together, we need to separate the two
injection steps: First, complete L1's injection into L2 (i.e., enter L2,
injecting to it the idt-vectoring-info); Second, after entry into L2 succeeds
and it exits back to L0, exit to L1 with the EXIT_REASON_EXTERNAL_INTERRUPT.
Most of this is already in the code - the only change we need is to remain
in L2 (and not exit to L1) in this case.

Note that the previous patch ensures (by using KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT) that
although we do enter L2 first, it will exit immediately after processing its
injection, allowing us to promptly inject to L1.

Note how we test vmcs12->idt_vectoring_info_field; This isn't really the
vmcs12 value (we haven't exited to L1 yet, so vmcs12 hasn't been updated),
but rather the place we save, at the end of vmx_vcpu_run, the vmcs02 value
of this field. This was explained in patch 25 ("Correct handling of idt
vectoring info") of the original nVMX patch series.

Thanks to Dave Allan and to Federico Simoncelli for reporting this bug,
to Abel Gordon for helping me figure out the solution, and to Avi Kivity
for helping to improve it.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      51cfe38e
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Add KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT · d6185f20
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      This patch adds a new vcpu->requests bit, KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT.
This bit requests that when next entering the guest, we should run it only
for as little as possible, and exit again.

We use this new option in nested VMX: When L1 launches L2, but L0 wishes L1
to continue running so it can inject an event to it, we unfortunately cannot
just pretend to have run L2 for a little while - We must really launch L2,
otherwise certain one-off vmcs12 parameters (namely, L1 injection into L2)
will be lost. So the existing code runs L2 in this case.
But L2 could potentially run for a long time until it exits, and the
injection into L1 will be delayed. The new KVM_REQ_IMMEDIATE_EXIT allows us
to request that L2 will be entered, as necessary, but will exit as soon as
possible after entry.

Our implementation of this request uses smp_send_reschedule() to send a
self-IPI, with interrupts disabled. The interrupts remain disabled until the
guest is entered, and then, after the entry is complete (often including
processing an injection and jumping to the relevant handler), the physical
interrupt is noticed and causes an exit.

On recent Intel processors, we could have achieved the same goal by using
MTF instead of a self-IPI. Another technique worth considering in the future
is to use VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT and a highest-priority vector IPI - to
slightly improve performance by avoiding the useless interrupt handler
which ends up being called when smp_send_reschedule() is used.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      d6185f20
  11. 17 11月, 2011 3 次提交
  13. 26 9月, 2011 7 次提交
  15. 24 7月, 2011 2 次提交
  17. 12 7月, 2011 15 次提交
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Fix bug preventing more than two levels of nesting · 509c75ea
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      The nested VMX feature is supposed to fully emulate VMX for the guest. This
(theoretically) not only allows it to run its own guests, but also also
to further emulate VMX for its own guests, and allow arbitrarily deep nesting.

This patch fixes a bug (discovered by Kevin Tian) in handling a VMLAUNCH
by L2, which prevented deeper nesting.

Deeper nesting now works (I only actually tested L3), but is currently
*absurdly* slow, to the point of being unusable.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      509c75ea
    • J
      KVM: VMX: Silence warning on 32-bit hosts · 2e4ce7f5
      由 Jan Kiszka 提交于 
      a is unused now on CONFIG_X86_32.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      2e4ce7f5
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Miscellenous small corrections · 2844d849
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      Small corrections of KVM (spelling, etc.) not directly related to nested VMX.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      2844d849
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Add VMX to list of supported cpuid features · 7b8050f5
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      If the "nested" module option is enabled, add the "VMX" CPU feature to the
list of CPU features KVM advertises with the KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID ioctl.

Qemu uses this ioctl, and intersects KVM's list with its own list of desired
cpu features (depending on the -cpu option given to qemu) to determine the
final list of features presented to the guest.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      7b8050f5
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Additional TSC-offset handling · 7991825b
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      In the unlikely case that L1 does not capture MSR_IA32_TSC, L0 needs to
emulate this MSR write by L2 by modifying vmcs02.tsc_offset. We also need to
set vmcs12.tsc_offset, for this change to survive the next nested entry (see
prepare_vmcs02()).
Additionally, we also need to modify vmx_adjust_tsc_offset: The semantics
of this function is that the TSC of all guests on this vcpu, L1 and possibly
several L2s, need to be adjusted. To do this, we need to adjust vmcs01's
tsc_offset (this offset will also apply to each L2s we enter). We can't set
vmcs01 now, so we have to remember this adjustment and apply it when we
later exit to L1.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      7991825b
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Further fixes for lazy FPU loading · 36cf24e0
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      KVM's "Lazy FPU loading" means that sometimes L0 needs to set CR0.TS, even
if a guest didn't set it. Moreover, L0 must also trap CR0.TS changes and
NM exceptions, even if we have a guest hypervisor (L1) who didn't want these
traps. And of course, conversely: If L1 wanted to trap these events, we
must let it, even if L0 is not interested in them.

This patch fixes some existing KVM code (in update_exception_bitmap(),
vmx_fpu_activate(), vmx_fpu_deactivate()) to do the correct merging of L0's
and L1's needs. Note that handle_cr() was already fixed in the above patch,
and that new code in introduced in previous patches already handles CR0
correctly (see prepare_vmcs02(), prepare_vmcs12(), and nested_vmx_vmexit()).
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      36cf24e0
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Handling of CR0 and CR4 modifying instructions · eeadf9e7
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      When L2 tries to modify CR0 or CR4 (with mov or clts), and modifies a bit
which L1 asked to shadow (via CR[04]_GUEST_HOST_MASK), we already do the right
thing: we let L1 handle the trap (see nested_vmx_exit_handled_cr() in a
previous patch).
When L2 modifies bits that L1 doesn't care about, we let it think (via
CR[04]_READ_SHADOW) that it did these modifications, while only changing
(in GUEST_CR[04]) the bits that L0 doesn't shadow.

This is needed for corect handling of CR0.TS for lazy FPU loading: L0 may
want to leave TS on, while pretending to allow the guest to change it.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      eeadf9e7
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Correct handling of idt vectoring info · 66c78ae4
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      This patch adds correct handling of IDT_VECTORING_INFO_FIELD for the nested
case.

When a guest exits while delivering an interrupt or exception, we get this
information in IDT_VECTORING_INFO_FIELD in the VMCS. When L2 exits to L1,
there's nothing we need to do, because L1 will see this field in vmcs12, and
handle it itself. However, when L2 exits and L0 handles the exit itself and
plans to return to L2, L0 must inject this event to L2.

In the normal non-nested case, the idt_vectoring_info case is discovered after
the exit, and the decision to inject (though not the injection itself) is made
at that point. However, in the nested case a decision of whether to return
to L2 or L1 also happens during the injection phase (see the previous
patches), so in the nested case we can only decide what to do about the
idt_vectoring_info right after the injection, i.e., in the beginning of
vmx_vcpu_run, which is the first time we know for sure if we're staying in
L2.

Therefore, when we exit L2 (is_guest_mode(vcpu)), we disable the regular
vmx_complete_interrupts() code which queues the idt_vectoring_info for
injection on next entry - because such injection would not be appropriate
if we will decide to exit to L1. Rather, we just save the idt_vectoring_info
and related fields in vmcs12 (which is a convenient place to save these
fields). On the next entry in vmx_vcpu_run (*after* the injection phase,
potentially exiting to L1 to inject an event requested by user space), if
we find ourselves in L1 we don't need to do anything with those values
we saved (as explained above). But if we find that we're in L2, or rather
*still* at L2 (it's not nested_run_pending, meaning that this is the first
round of L2 running after L1 having just launched it), we need to inject
the event saved in those fields - by writing the appropriate VMCS fields.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      66c78ae4
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Correct handling of exception injection · 0b6ac343
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      Similar to the previous patch, but concerning injection of exceptions rather
than external interrupts.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      0b6ac343
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Correct handling of interrupt injection · b6f1250e
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      The code in this patch correctly emulates external-interrupt injection
while a nested guest L2 is running.

Because of this code's relative un-obviousness, I include here a longer-than-
usual justification for what it does - much longer than the code itself ;-)

To understand how to correctly emulate interrupt injection while L2 is
running, let's look first at what we need to emulate: How would things look
like if the extra L0 hypervisor layer is removed, and instead of L0 injecting
an interrupt, we had hardware delivering an interrupt?

Now we have L1 running on bare metal with a guest L2, and the hardware
generates an interrupt. Assuming that L1 set PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK to 1, and
VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT to 0 (we'll revisit these assumptions below), what
happens now is this: The processor exits from L2 to L1, with an external-
interrupt exit reason but without an interrupt vector. L1 runs, with
interrupts disabled, and it doesn't yet know what the interrupt was. Soon
after, it enables interrupts and only at that moment, it gets the interrupt
from the processor. when L1 is KVM, Linux handles this interrupt.

Now we need exactly the same thing to happen when that L1->L2 system runs
on top of L0, instead of real hardware. This is how we do this:

When L0 wants to inject an interrupt, it needs to exit from L2 to L1, with
external-interrupt exit reason (with an invalid interrupt vector), and run L1.
Just like in the bare metal case, it likely can't deliver the interrupt to
L1 now because L1 is running with interrupts disabled, in which case it turns
on the interrupt window when running L1 after the exit. L1 will soon enable
interrupts, and at that point L0 will gain control again and inject the
interrupt to L1.

Finally, there is an extra complication in the code: when nested_run_pending,
we cannot return to L1 now, and must launch L2. We need to remember the
interrupt we wanted to inject (and not clear it now), and do it on the
next exit.

The above explanation shows that the relative strangeness of the nested
interrupt injection code in this patch, and the extra interrupt-window
exit incurred, are in fact necessary for accurate emulation, and are not
just an unoptimized implementation.

Let's revisit now the two assumptions made above:

If L1 turns off PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK (no hypervisor that I know
does, by the way), things are simple: L0 may inject the interrupt directly
to the L2 guest - using the normal code path that injects to any guest.
We support this case in the code below.

If L1 turns on VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT, things look very different from the
description above: L1 expects to see an exit from L2 with the interrupt vector
already filled in the exit information, and does not expect to be interrupted
again with this interrupt. The current code does not (yet) support this case,
so we do not allow the VM_EXIT_ACK_INTR_ON_EXIT exit-control to be turned on
by L1.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      b6f1250e
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Deciding if L0 or L1 should handle an L2 exit · 644d711a
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      This patch contains the logic of whether an L2 exit should be handled by L0
and then L2 should be resumed, or whether L1 should be run to handle this
exit (using the nested_vmx_vmexit() function of the previous patch).

The basic idea is to let L1 handle the exit only if it actually asked to
trap this sort of event. For example, when L2 exits on a change to CR0,
we check L1's CR0_GUEST_HOST_MASK to see if L1 expressed interest in any
bit which changed; If it did, we exit to L1. But if it didn't it means that
it is we (L0) that wished to trap this event, so we handle it ourselves.

The next two patches add additional logic of what to do when an interrupt or
exception is injected: Does L0 need to do it, should we exit to L1 to do it,
or should we resume L2 and keep the exception to be injected later.

We keep a new flag, "nested_run_pending", which can override the decision of
which should run next, L1 or L2. nested_run_pending=1 means that we *must* run
L2 next, not L1. This is necessary in particular when L1 did a VMLAUNCH of L2
and therefore expects L2 to be run (and perhaps be injected with an event it
specified, etc.). Nested_run_pending is especially intended to avoid switching
to L1 in the injection decision-point described above.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      644d711a
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: vmcs12 checks on nested entry · 7c177938
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      This patch adds a bunch of tests of the validity of the vmcs12 fields,
according to what the VMX spec and our implementation allows. If fields
we cannot (or don't want to) honor are discovered, an entry failure is
emulated.

According to the spec, there are two types of entry failures: If the problem
was in vmcs12's host state or control fields, the VMLAUNCH instruction simply
fails. But a problem is found in the guest state, the behavior is more
similar to that of an exit.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      7c177938
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Exiting from L2 to L1 · 4704d0be
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      This patch implements nested_vmx_vmexit(), called when the nested L2 guest
exits and we want to run its L1 parent and let it handle this exit.

Note that this will not necessarily be called on every L2 exit. L0 may decide
to handle a particular exit on its own, without L1's involvement; In that
case, L0 will handle the exit, and resume running L2, without running L1 and
without calling nested_vmx_vmexit(). The logic for deciding whether to handle
a particular exit in L1 or in L0, i.e., whether to call nested_vmx_vmexit(),
will appear in a separate patch below.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      4704d0be
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: No need for handle_vmx_insn function any more · 99e65e80
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      Before nested VMX support, the exit handler for a guest executing a VMX
instruction (vmclear, vmlaunch, vmptrld, vmptrst, vmread, vmread, vmresume,
vmwrite, vmon, vmoff), was handle_vmx_insn(). This handler simply threw a #UD
exception. Now that all these exit reasons are properly handled (and emulate
the respective VMX instruction), nothing calls this dummy handler and it can
be removed.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      99e65e80
    • N
      KVM: nVMX: Implement VMLAUNCH and VMRESUME · cd232ad0
      由 Nadav Har'El 提交于 
      Implement the VMLAUNCH and VMRESUME instructions, allowing a guest
hypervisor to run its own guests.

This patch does not include some of the necessary validity checks on
vmcs12 fields before the entry. These will appear in a separate patch
below.
Signed-off-by: NNadav Har'El <nyh@il.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
      cd232ad0