1. 29 7月, 2023 11 次提交
  2. 28 7月, 2023 2 次提交
  3. 27 7月, 2023 3 次提交
  4. 25 7月, 2023 4 次提交
  5. 24 7月, 2023 2 次提交
  6. 20 7月, 2023 4 次提交
  7. 19 7月, 2023 3 次提交
    • L
      pmu: remove uncore code for Zhaoxin Platform · e0b206d1
      leoliu-oc 提交于
      zhaoxin inclusion
      category: bugfix
      bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7LXCE
      CVE: NA
      
      --------------------------------------------
      
      There are some issues that need to be resolved for Zhaoxin Platform.
      So remove Zhaoxin uncore code first.
      Signed-off-by: Nleoliu-oc <leoliu-oc@zhaoxin.com>
      e0b206d1
    • Z
      ipv6/addrconf: fix a potential refcount underflow for idev · fd2ee0ae
      Ziyang Xuan 提交于
      mainline inclusion
      from mainline-v6.5-rc2
      commit 06a0716949c22e2aefb648526580671197151acc
      category: bugfix
      bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7M991
      CVE: NA
      
      Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=06a0716949c22e2aefb648526580671197151acc
      
      ---------------------------
      
      Now in addrconf_mod_rs_timer(), reference idev depends on whether
      rs_timer is not pending. Then modify rs_timer timeout.
      
      There is a time gap in [1], during which if the pending rs_timer
      becomes not pending. It will miss to hold idev, but the rs_timer
      is activated. Thus rs_timer callback function addrconf_rs_timer()
      will be executed and put idev later without holding idev. A refcount
      underflow issue for idev can be caused by this.
      
      	if (!timer_pending(&idev->rs_timer))
      		in6_dev_hold(idev);
      		  <--------------[1]
      	mod_timer(&idev->rs_timer, jiffies + when);
      
      To fix the issue, hold idev if mod_timer() return 0.
      
      Fixes: b7b1bfce ("ipv6: split duplicate address detection and router solicitation timer")
      Suggested-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NZiyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
      Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NZiyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
      fd2ee0ae
    • T
      netfilter: nf_tables: prevent OOB access in nft_byteorder_eval · 2aafe85a
      Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo 提交于
      mainline inclusion
      from mainline-v6.5-rc2
      commit caf3ef7468f7534771b5c44cd8dbd6f7f87c2cbd
      category: bugfix
      bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I7ISR1
      CVE: CVE-2023-35001
      
      Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=caf3ef7468f7534771b5c44cd8dbd6f7f87c2cbd
      
      ---------------------------
      
      When evaluating byteorder expressions with size 2, a union with 32-bit and
      16-bit members is used. Since the 16-bit members are aligned to 32-bit,
      the array accesses will be out-of-bounds.
      
      It may lead to a stack-out-of-bounds access like the one below:
      
      [   23.095215] ==================================================================
      [   23.095625] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in nft_byteorder_eval+0x13c/0x320
      [   23.096020] Read of size 2 at addr ffffc90000007948 by task ping/115
      [   23.096358]
      [   23.096456] CPU: 0 PID: 115 Comm: ping Not tainted 6.4.0+ #413
      [   23.096770] Call Trace:
      [   23.096910]  <IRQ>
      [   23.097030]  dump_stack_lvl+0x60/0xc0
      [   23.097218]  print_report+0xcf/0x630
      [   23.097388]  ? nft_byteorder_eval+0x13c/0x320
      [   23.097577]  ? kasan_addr_to_slab+0xd/0xc0
      [   23.097760]  ? nft_byteorder_eval+0x13c/0x320
      [   23.097949]  kasan_report+0xc9/0x110
      [   23.098106]  ? nft_byteorder_eval+0x13c/0x320
      [   23.098298]  __asan_load2+0x83/0xd0
      [   23.098453]  nft_byteorder_eval+0x13c/0x320
      [   23.098659]  nft_do_chain+0x1c8/0xc50
      [   23.098852]  ? __pfx_nft_do_chain+0x10/0x10
      [   23.099078]  ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
      [   23.099295]  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
      [   23.099535]  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
      [   23.099745]  ? __kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20
      [   23.099929]  nft_do_chain_ipv4+0xfe/0x140
      [   23.100105]  ? __pfx_nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x10/0x10
      [   23.100327]  ? lock_release+0x204/0x400
      [   23.100515]  ? nf_hook.constprop.0+0x340/0x550
      [   23.100779]  nf_hook_slow+0x6c/0x100
      [   23.100977]  ? __pfx_nft_do_chain_ipv4+0x10/0x10
      [   23.101223]  nf_hook.constprop.0+0x334/0x550
      [   23.101443]  ? __pfx_ip_local_deliver_finish+0x10/0x10
      [   23.101677]  ? __pfx_nf_hook.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
      [   23.101882]  ? __pfx_ip_rcv_finish+0x10/0x10
      [   23.102071]  ? __pfx_ip_local_deliver_finish+0x10/0x10
      [   23.102291]  ? rcu_read_lock_held+0x4b/0x70
      [   23.102481]  ip_local_deliver+0xbb/0x110
      [   23.102665]  ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10
      [   23.102839]  ip_rcv+0x199/0x2a0
      [   23.102980]  ? __pfx_ip_rcv+0x10/0x10
      [   23.103140]  __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x13e/0x150
      [   23.103362]  ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10
      [   23.103647]  ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0xa0
      [   23.103819]  ? process_backlog+0x36c/0x380
      [   23.103999]  __netif_receive_skb+0x23/0xc0
      [   23.104179]  process_backlog+0x91/0x380
      [   23.104350]  __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x66/0x360
      [   23.104589]  ? net_rx_action+0x1cb/0x610
      [   23.104811]  net_rx_action+0x33e/0x610
      [   23.105024]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x23/0x50
      [   23.105257]  ? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10
      [   23.105485]  ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0xa0
      [   23.105741]  __do_softirq+0xfa/0x5ab
      [   23.105956]  ? __dev_queue_xmit+0x765/0x1c00
      [   23.106193]  do_softirq.part.0+0x49/0xc0
      [   23.106423]  </IRQ>
      [   23.106547]  <TASK>
      [   23.106670]  __local_bh_enable_ip+0xf5/0x120
      [   23.106903]  __dev_queue_xmit+0x789/0x1c00
      [   23.107131]  ? __pfx___dev_queue_xmit+0x10/0x10
      [   23.107381]  ? find_held_lock+0x8e/0xb0
      [   23.107585]  ? lock_release+0x204/0x400
      [   23.107798]  ? neigh_resolve_output+0x185/0x350
      [   23.108049]  ? mark_held_locks+0x48/0xa0
      [   23.108265]  ? neigh_resolve_output+0x185/0x350
      [   23.108514]  neigh_resolve_output+0x246/0x350
      [   23.108753]  ? neigh_resolve_output+0x246/0x350
      [   23.109003]  ip_finish_output2+0x3c3/0x10b0
      [   23.109250]  ? __pfx_ip_finish_output2+0x10/0x10
      [   23.109510]  ? __pfx_nf_hook+0x10/0x10
      [   23.109732]  __ip_finish_output+0x217/0x390
      [   23.109978]  ip_finish_output+0x2f/0x130
      [   23.110207]  ip_output+0xc9/0x170
      [   23.110404]  ip_push_pending_frames+0x1a0/0x240
      [   23.110652]  raw_sendmsg+0x102e/0x19e0
      [   23.110871]  ? __pfx_raw_sendmsg+0x10/0x10
      [   23.111093]  ? lock_release+0x204/0x400
      [   23.111304]  ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x148/0x330
      [   23.111567]  ? find_held_lock+0x8e/0xb0
      [   23.111777]  ? find_held_lock+0x8e/0xb0
      [   23.111993]  ? __rcu_read_unlock+0x7c/0x2f0
      [   23.112225]  ? aa_sk_perm+0x18a/0x550
      [   23.112431]  ? filemap_map_pages+0x4f1/0x900
      [   23.112665]  ? __pfx_aa_sk_perm+0x10/0x10
      [   23.112880]  ? find_held_lock+0x8e/0xb0
      [   23.113098]  inet_sendmsg+0xa0/0xb0
      [   23.113297]  ? inet_sendmsg+0xa0/0xb0
      [   23.113500]  ? __pfx_inet_sendmsg+0x10/0x10
      [   23.113727]  sock_sendmsg+0xf4/0x100
      [   23.113924]  ? move_addr_to_kernel.part.0+0x4f/0xa0
      [   23.114190]  __sys_sendto+0x1d4/0x290
      [   23.114391]  ? __pfx___sys_sendto+0x10/0x10
      [   23.114621]  ? __pfx_mark_lock.part.0+0x10/0x10
      [   23.114869]  ? lock_release+0x204/0x400
      [   23.115076]  ? find_held_lock+0x8e/0xb0
      [   23.115287]  ? rcu_is_watching+0x23/0x60
      [   23.115503]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x6e2/0x860
      [   23.115778]  ? __kasan_check_write+0x14/0x30
      [   23.116008]  ? blkcg_maybe_throttle_current+0x8d/0x770
      [   23.116285]  ? mark_held_locks+0x28/0xa0
      [   23.116503]  ? do_syscall_64+0x37/0x90
      [   23.116713]  __x64_sys_sendto+0x7f/0xb0
      [   23.116924]  do_syscall_64+0x59/0x90
      [   23.117123]  ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x25/0x30
      [   23.117387]  ? irqentry_exit+0x77/0xb0
      [   23.117593]  ? exc_page_fault+0x92/0x140
      [   23.117806]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
      [   23.118081] RIP: 0033:0x7f744aee2bba
      [   23.118282] Code: d8 64 89 02 48 c7 c0 ff ff ff ff eb b8 0f 1f 00 f3 0f 1e fa 41 89 ca 64 8b 04 25 18 00 00 00 85 c0 75 15 b8 2c 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 7e c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 48 83 ec 30 44 89
      [   23.119237] RSP: 002b:00007ffd04a7c9f8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000002c
      [   23.119644] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007ffd04a7e0a0 RCX: 00007f744aee2bba
      [   23.120023] RDX: 0000000000000040 RSI: 000056488e9e6300 RDI: 0000000000000003
      [   23.120413] RBP: 000056488e9e6300 R08: 00007ffd04a80320 R09: 0000000000000010
      [   23.120809] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000040
      [   23.121219] R13: 00007ffd04a7dc38 R14: 00007ffd04a7ca00 R15: 00007ffd04a7e0a0
      [   23.121617]  </TASK>
      [   23.121749]
      [   23.121845] The buggy address belongs to the virtual mapping at
      [   23.121845]  [ffffc90000000000, ffffc90000009000) created by:
      [   23.121845]  irq_init_percpu_irqstack+0x1cf/0x270
      [   23.122707]
      [   23.122803] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
      [   23.123104] page:0000000072ac19f0 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x24a09
      [   23.123609] flags: 0xfffffc0001000(reserved|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
      [   23.123998] page_type: 0xffffffff()
      [   23.124194] raw: 000fffffc0001000 ffffea0000928248 ffffea0000928248 0000000000000000
      [   23.124610] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
      [   23.125023] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
      [   23.125326]
      [   23.125421] Memory state around the buggy address:
      [   23.125682]  ffffc90000007800: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
      [   23.126072]  ffffc90000007880: 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 f2 f2 00
      [   23.126455] >ffffc90000007900: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00
      [   23.126840]                                               ^
      [   23.127138]  ffffc90000007980: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3
      [   23.127522]  ffffc90000007a00: f3 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1
      [   23.127906] ==================================================================
      [   23.128324] Disabling lock debugging due to kernel taint
      
      Using simple s16 pointers for the 16-bit accesses fixes the problem. For
      the 32-bit accesses, src and dst can be used directly.
      
      Fixes: 96518518 ("netfilter: add nftables")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Reported-by: Tanguy DUBROCA (@SidewayRE) from @Synacktiv working with ZDI
      Signed-off-by: NThadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo@canonical.com>
      Reviewed-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
      Signed-off-by: NPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
      Signed-off-by: NZiyang Xuan <william.xuanziyang@huawei.com>
      2aafe85a
  8. 18 7月, 2023 3 次提交
  9. 17 7月, 2023 5 次提交
  10. 14 7月, 2023 2 次提交
    • Z
      ext4: Add debug message to notify user space is out of free · 963b3ef7
      Zhihao Cheng 提交于
      hulk inclusion
      category: bugfix
      bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I7CBCS
      CVE: NA
      
      --------------------------------
      
      Add debug message to notify user that ext4_writepages is stuck in loop
      caused by ENOSPC.
      Signed-off-by: NZhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
      963b3ef7
    • Z
      Revert "ext4: Stop trying writing pages if no free blocks generated" · 62405f69
      Zhihao Cheng 提交于
      This reverts commit 6b84e9d9.
      
      When ext4 runs out of space, there could be a potential data lost in
      ext4_writepages:
      If there are many preallocated blocks for some files, e4b bitmap is
      different from block bitmap, and there are more free blocks accounted
      by block bitmap.
      
          ext4_writepages                         P2
      ext4_mb_new_blocks                  ext4_map_blocks
       ext4_mb_regular_allocator // No free bits in e4b bitmap
       ext4_mb_discard_preallocations_should_retry
        ext4_mb_discard_preallocations
         ext4_mb_discard_group_preallocations
          ext4_mb_release_inode_pa // updates e4b bitmap by pa->pa_free
           mb_free_blocks
                                           ext4_mb_new_blocks
                                            ext4_mb_regular_allocator
                                            // Got e4b bitmap's free bits
       ext4_mb_regular_allocator  // After 3 times retrying, ret ENOSPC
      
      ext4_writepages
       mpage_map_and_submit_extent
        mpage_map_one_extent // ret ENOSPC
        if (err == -ENOSPC && EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mb_free_pending)
        // s_mb_free_pending is 0
        *give_up_on_write = true  // Abandon writeback, data lost!
      
      Fixes: 6b84e9d9 ("ext4: Stop trying writing pages if no free ...")
      Signed-off-by: NZhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
      62405f69
  11. 13 7月, 2023 1 次提交