1. 09 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 03 11月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix lockup due to no error backoff after ack transmit error · c7e86acf
      David Howells 提交于
      If the network becomes (partially) unavailable, say by disabling IPv6, the
      background ACK transmission routine can get itself into a tizzy by
      proposing immediate ACK retransmission.  Since we're in the call event
      processor, that happens immediately without returning to the workqueue
      manager.
      
      The condition should clear after a while when either the network comes back
      or the call times out.
      
      Fix this by:
      
       (1) When re-proposing an ACK on failed Tx, don't schedule it immediately.
           This will allow a certain amount of time to elapse before we try
           again.
      
       (2) Enforce a return to the workqueue manager after a certain number of
           iterations of the call processing loop.
      
       (3) Add a backoff delay that increases the delay on deferred ACKs by a
           jiffy per failed transmission to a limit of HZ.  The backoff delay is
           cleared on a successful return from kernel_sendmsg().
      
       (4) Cancel calls immediately if the opening sendmsg fails.  The layer
           above can arrange retransmission or rotate to another server.
      
      Fixes: 248f219c ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code")
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c7e86acf
  4. 01 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 05 6月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix handling of call quietly cancelled out on server · 1a025028
      David Howells 提交于
      Sometimes an in-progress call will stop responding on the fileserver when
      the fileserver quietly cancels the call with an internally marked abort
      (RX_CALL_DEAD), without sending an ABORT to the client.
      
      This causes the client's call to eventually expire from lack of incoming
      packets directed its way, which currently leads to it being cancelled
      locally with ETIME.  Note that it's not currently clear as to why this
      happens as it's really hard to reproduce.
      
      The rotation policy implement by kAFS, however, doesn't differentiate
      between ETIME meaning we didn't get any response from the server and ETIME
      meaning the call got cancelled mid-flow.  The latter leads to an oops when
      fetching data as the rotation partially resets the afs_read descriptor,
      which can result in a cleared page pointer being dereferenced because that
      page has already been filled.
      
      Handle this by the following means:
      
       (1) Set a flag on a call when we receive a packet for it.
      
       (2) Store the highest packet serial number so far received for a call
           (bearing in mind this may wrap).
      
       (3) If, when the "not received anything recently" timeout expires on a
           call, we've received at least one packet for a call and the connection
           as a whole has received packets more recently than that call, then
           cancel the call locally with ECONNRESET rather than ETIME.
      
           This indicates that the call was definitely in progress on the server.
      
       (4) In kAFS, if the rotation algorithm sees ECONNRESET rather than ETIME,
           don't try the next server, but rather abort the call.
      
           This avoids the oops as we don't try to reuse the afs_read struct.
           Rather, as-yet ungotten pages will be reread at a later data.
      
      Also:
      
       (5) Add an rxrpc tracepoint to log detection of the call being reset.
      
      Without this, I occasionally see an oops like the following:
      
          general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
          ...
          RIP: 0010:_copy_to_iter+0x204/0x310
          RSP: 0018:ffff8800cae0f828 EFLAGS: 00010206
          RAX: 0000000000000560 RBX: 0000000000000560 RCX: 0000000000000560
          RDX: ffff8800cae0f968 RSI: ffff8800d58b3312 RDI: 0005080000000000
          RBP: ffff8800cae0f968 R08: 0000000000000560 R09: ffff8800ca00f400
          R10: ffff8800c36f28d4 R11: 00000000000008c4 R12: ffff8800cae0f958
          R13: 0000000000000560 R14: ffff8800d58b3312 R15: 0000000000000560
          FS:  00007fdaef108080(0000) GS:ffff8800ca680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
          CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
          CR2: 00007fb28a8fa000 CR3: 00000000d2a76002 CR4: 00000000001606e0
          Call Trace:
           skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x14e/0x289
           rxrpc_recvmsg_data.isra.0+0x6f3/0xf68
           ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x4f/0x89
           rxrpc_kernel_recv_data+0x149/0x421
           afs_extract_data+0x1e0/0x798
           ? afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0xc9/0x52e
           afs_deliver_fs_fetch_data+0x33a/0x5ab
           afs_deliver_to_call+0x1ee/0x5e0
           ? afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0xc9/0x52e
           afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0x12b/0x52e
           ? wake_up_q+0x54/0x54
           afs_make_call+0x287/0x462
           ? afs_fs_fetch_data+0x3e6/0x3ed
           ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5d/0x63
           afs_fs_fetch_data+0x3e6/0x3ed
           afs_fetch_data+0xbb/0x14a
           afs_readpages+0x317/0x40d
           __do_page_cache_readahead+0x203/0x2ba
           ? ondemand_readahead+0x3a7/0x3c1
           ondemand_readahead+0x3a7/0x3c1
           generic_file_buffered_read+0x18b/0x62f
           __vfs_read+0xdb/0xfe
           vfs_read+0xb2/0x137
           ksys_read+0x50/0x8c
           do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x1a0
           entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
      
      Note the weird value in RDI which is a result of trying to kmap() a NULL
      page pointer.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1a025028
  6. 31 3月, 2018 2 次提交
    • M
      rxrpc: Fix resend event time calculation · 59299aa1
      Marc Dionne 提交于
      Commit a158bdd3 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts") reworked the time calculation
      for the next resend event.  For this calculation, "oldest" will be before
      "now", so ktime_sub(oldest, now) will yield a negative value.  When passed
      to nsecs_to_jiffies which expects an unsigned value, the end result will be
      a very large value, and a resend event scheduled far into the future.  This
      could cause calls to stall if some packets were lost.
      
      Fix by ordering the arguments to ktime_sub correctly.
      
      Fixes: a158bdd3 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts")
      Signed-off-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      59299aa1
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix a bit of time confusion · f82eb88b
      David Howells 提交于
      The rxrpc_reduce_call_timer() function should be passed the 'current time'
      in jiffies, not the current ktime time.  It's confusing in rxrpc_resend
      because that has to deal with both.  Pass the correct current time in.
      
      Note that this only affects the trace produced and not the functioning of
      the code.
      
      Fixes: a158bdd3 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts")
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      f82eb88b
  7. 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  8. 29 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 24 11月, 2017 4 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Add keepalive for a call · 415f44e4
      David Howells 提交于
      We need to transmit a packet every so often to act as a keepalive for the
      peer (which has a timeout from the last time it received a packet) and also
      to prevent any intervening firewalls from closing the route.
      
      Do this by resetting a timer every time we transmit a packet.  If the timer
      ever expires, we transmit a PING ACK packet and thereby also elicit a PING
      RESPONSE ACK from the other side - which prevents our last-rx timeout from
      expiring.
      
      The timer is set to 1/6 of the last-rx timeout so that we can detect the
      other side going away if it misses 6 replies in a row.
      
      This is particularly necessary for servers where the processing of the
      service function may take a significant amount of time.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      415f44e4
    • D
      rxrpc: Add a timeout for detecting lost ACKs/lost DATA · bd1fdf8c
      David Howells 提交于
      Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that
      has the request-ack flag set.  This allows us to detect if we don't get an
      ACK in response to the latest flagged packet.
      
      The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within
      2*RTT of the transmission.
      
      If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out
      the state of the other side.  If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner,
      we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that
      instead.
      
      If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what
      we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA
      packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have
      been lost and retransmit immediately.
      
      Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and
      speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set.  It should result in
      either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the
      a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      bd1fdf8c
    • D
      rxrpc: Express protocol timeouts in terms of RTT · beb8e5e4
      David Howells 提交于
      Express protocol timeouts for data retransmission and deferred ack
      generation in terms on RTT rather than specified timeouts once we have
      sufficient RTT samples.
      
      For the moment, this requires just one RTT sample to be able to use this
      for ack deferral and two for data retransmission.
      
      The data retransmission timeout is set at RTT*1.5 and the ACK deferral
      timeout is set at RTT.
      
      Note that the calculated timeout is limited to a minimum of 4ns to make
      sure it doesn't happen too quickly.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      beb8e5e4
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix call timeouts · a158bdd3
      David Howells 提交于
      Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from
      userspace.  By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three
      timeouts:
      
       (1) "Normal timeout"
      
           This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any
           packets from the peer in a while.  It is measured from the last time
           we received any packet on that call.  This is not reset by any
           connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets).
      
           If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate
           PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal
           timeout so is to keep both sides alive.  This is set at 1/6 of normal
           timeout.
      
       (2) "Idle timeout"
      
           This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop
           receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data.  It is
           measured from the last time we received a DATA packet.
      
       (3) "Hard timeout"
      
           This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that
           call.  It should not be specified by default.  Some operations (such
           as volume transfer) take a long time.
      
      Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a
      control message:
      
      	RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS
      
      The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need
      be given:
      
      	u32 hard_timeout;	/* sec from first packet */
      	u32 idle_timeout;	/* msec from packet Rx */
      	u32 normal_timeout;	/* msec from data Rx */
      
      This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a
      call.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      a158bdd3
  10. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix call expiry handling · dcbefc30
      David Howells 提交于
      Fix call expiry handling in the following ways
      
       (1) If all the request data from a client call is acked, don't send a
           follow up IDLE ACK with firstPacket == 1 and previousPacket == 0 as
           this appears to fool some servers into thinking everything has been
           accepted.
      
       (2) Never send an abort back to the server once it has ACK'd all the
           request packets; rather just try to reuse the channel for the next
           call.  The first request DATA packet of the next call on the same
           channel will implicitly ACK the entire reply of the dead call - even
           if we haven't transmitted it yet.
      
       (3) Don't send RX_CALL_TIMEOUT in an ABORT packet, librx uses abort codes
           to pass local errors to the caller in addition to remote errors, and
           this is meant to be local only.
      
      The following also need to be addressed in future patches:
      
       (4) Service calls should send PING ACKs as 'keep alives' if the server is
           still processing the call.
      
       (5) VERSION REPLY packets should be sent to the peers of service
           connections to act as keep-alives.  This is used to keep firewall
           routes in place.  The AFS CM should enable this.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      dcbefc30
  11. 06 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  12. 06 10月, 2016 5 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Need to produce an ACK for service op if op takes a long time · 9749fd2b
      David Howells 提交于
      We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we
      start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected.
      This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its
      resources.
      
      To make this work:
      
       (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to
           the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel
           the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet
           of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase).
      
       (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding
           call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function
           out.
      
       (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      9749fd2b
    • D
      rxrpc: Add missing notification · 94bc669e
      David Howells 提交于
      The call's background processor work item needs to notify the socket when
      it completes a call so that recvmsg() or the AFS fs can deal with it.
      Without this, call expiry isn't handled.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      94bc669e
    • D
      rxrpc: Queue the call on expiry · d7833d00
      David Howells 提交于
      When a call expires, it must be queued for the background processor to deal
      with otherwise a service call that is improperly terminated will just sit
      there awaiting an ACK and won't expire.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      d7833d00
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix loss of PING RESPONSE ACK production due to PING ACKs · a5af7e1f
      David Howells 提交于
      Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so
      that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE
      ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be
      scheduling transmission of at the same time.
      
      If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting
      for it and refuse to proceed otherwise.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      a5af7e1f
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix warning by splitting rxrpc_send_call_packet() · 26cb02aa
      David Howells 提交于
      Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more
      complicated) from ABORT generation.  This simplifies the code a bit and
      fixes the following warning:
      
      In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0:
      net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet':
      net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
      net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here
      net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
      Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      26cb02aa
  13. 30 9月, 2016 3 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix the call timer handling · 405dea1d
      David Howells 提交于
      The call timer's concept of a call timeout (of which there are three) that
      is inactive is that it is the timeout has the same expiration time as the
      call expiration timeout (the expiration timer is never inactive).  However,
      I'm not resetting the timeouts when they expire, leading to repeated
      processing of expired timeouts when other timeout events occur.
      
      Fix this by:
      
       (1) Move the timer expiry detection into rxrpc_set_timer() inside the
           locked section.  This means that if a timeout is set that will expire
           immediately, we deal with it immediately.
      
       (2) If a timeout is at or before now then it has expired.  When an expiry
           is detected, an event is raised, the timeout is automatically
           inactivated and the event processor is queued.
      
       (3) If a timeout is at or after the expiry timeout then it is inactive.
           Inactive timeouts do not contribute to the timer setting.
      
       (4) The call timer callback can now just call rxrpc_set_timer() to handle
           things.
      
       (5) The call processor work function now checks the event flags rather
           than checking the timeouts directly.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      405dea1d
    • D
      rxrpc: Keep the call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies · df0adc78
      David Howells 提交于
      Keep that call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies so that they can be
      expressed as functions of RTT.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      df0adc78
    • D
      rxrpc: Make Tx loss-injection go through normal return and adjust tracing · a1767077
      David Howells 提交于
      In rxrpc_send_data_packet() make the loss-injection path return through the
      same code as the transmission path so that the RTT determination is
      initiated and any future timer shuffling will be done, despite the packet
      having been binned.
      
      Whilst we're at it:
      
       (1) Add to the tx_data tracepoint an indication of whether or not we're
           retransmitting a data packet.
      
       (2) When we're deciding whether or not to request an ACK, rather than
           checking if we're in fast-retransmit mode check instead if we're
           retransmitting.
      
       (3) Don't invoke the lose_skb tracepoint when losing a Tx packet as we're
           not altering the sk_buff refcount nor are we just seeing it after
           getting it off the Tx list.
      
       (4) The rxrpc_skb_tx_lost note is then no longer used so remove it.
      
       (5) rxrpc_lose_skb() no longer needs to deal with rxrpc_skb_tx_lost.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      a1767077
  14. 25 9月, 2016 3 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Implement slow-start · 57494343
      David Howells 提交于
      Implement RxRPC slow-start, which is similar to RFC 5681 for TCP.  A
      tracepoint is added to log the state of the congestion management algorithm
      and the decisions it makes.
      
      Notes:
      
       (1) Since we send fixed-size DATA packets (apart from the final packet in
           each phase), counters and calculations are in terms of packets rather
           than bytes.
      
       (2) The ACK packet carries the equivalent of TCP SACK.
      
       (3) The FLIGHT_SIZE calculation in RFC 5681 doesn't seem particularly
           suited to SACK of a small number of packets.  It seems that, almost
           inevitably, by the time three 'duplicate' ACKs have been seen, we have
           narrowed the loss down to one or two missing packets, and the
           FLIGHT_SIZE calculation ends up as 2.
      
       (4) In rxrpc_resend(), if there was no data that apparently needed
           retransmission, we transmit a PING ACK to ask the peer to tell us what
           its Rx window state is.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      57494343
    • D
      rxrpc: Schedule an ACK if the reply to a client call appears overdue · 0d967960
      David Howells 提交于
      If we've sent all the request data in a client call but haven't seen any
      sign of the reply data yet, schedule an ACK to be sent to the server to
      find out if the reply data got lost.
      
      If the server hasn't yet hard-ACK'd the request data, we send a PING ACK to
      demand a response to find out whether we need to retransmit.
      
      If the server says it has received all of the data, we send an IDLE ACK to
      tell the server that we haven't received anything in the receive phase as
      yet.
      
      To make this work, a non-immediate PING ACK must carry a delay.  I've chosen
      the same as the IDLE ACK for the moment.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      0d967960
    • D
      rxrpc: Delay the resend timer to allow for nsec->jiffies conv error · df0562a7
      David Howells 提交于
      When determining the resend timer value, we have a value in nsec but the
      timer is in jiffies which may be a million or more times more coarse.
      nsecs_to_jiffies() rounds down - which means that the resend timeout
      expressed as jiffies is very likely earlier than the one expressed as
      nanoseconds from which it was derived.
      
      The problem is that rxrpc_resend() gets triggered by the timer, but can't
      then find anything to resend yet.  It sets the timer again - but gets
      kicked off immediately again and again until the nanosecond-based expiry
      time is reached and we actually retransmit.
      
      Fix this by adding 1 to the jiffies-based resend_at value to counteract the
      rounding and make sure that the timer happens after the nanosecond-based
      expiry is passed.
      
      Alternatives would be to adjust the timestamp on the packets to align
      with the jiffie scale or to switch back to using jiffie-timestamps.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      df0562a7
  15. 23 9月, 2016 6 次提交
  16. 22 9月, 2016 4 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Reduce the number of PING ACKs sent · fc943f67
      David Howells 提交于
      We don't want to send a PING ACK for every new incoming call as that just
      adds to the network traffic.  Instead, we send a PING ACK to the first
      three that we receive and then once per second thereafter.
      
      This could probably be made adjustable in future.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      fc943f67
    • D
      rxrpc: Obtain RTT data by requesting ACKs on DATA packets · 50235c4b
      David Howells 提交于
      In addition to sending a PING ACK to gain RTT data, we can set the
      RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag on a DATA packet and get a REQUESTED-ACK ACK.  The
      ACK packet contains the serial number of the packet it is in response to,
      so we can look through the Tx buffer for a matching DATA packet.
      
      This requires that the data packets be stamped with the time of
      transmission as a ktime rather than having the resend_at time in jiffies.
      
      This further requires the resend code to do the resend determination in
      ktimes and convert to jiffies to set the timer.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      50235c4b
    • D
      rxrpc: Add re-sent Tx annotation · f07373ea
      David Howells 提交于
      Add a Tx-phase annotation for packet buffers to indicate that a buffer has
      already been retransmitted.  This will be used by future congestion
      management.  Re-retransmissions of a packet don't affect the congestion
      window managment in the same way as initial retransmissions.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      f07373ea
    • D
      rxrpc: Don't store the rxrpc header in the Tx queue sk_buffs · 5a924b89
      David Howells 提交于
      Don't store the rxrpc protocol header in sk_buffs on the transmit queue,
      but rather generate it on the fly and pass it to kernel_sendmsg() as a
      separate iov.  This reduces the amount of storage required.
      
      Note that the security header is still stored in the sk_buff as it may get
      encrypted along with the data (and doesn't change with each transmission).
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      5a924b89
  17. 17 9月, 2016 3 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Improve skb tracing · 71f3ca40
      David Howells 提交于
      Improve sk_buff tracing within AF_RXRPC by the following means:
      
       (1) Use an enum to note the event type rather than plain integers and use
           an array of event names rather than a big multi ?: list.
      
       (2) Distinguish Rx from Tx packets and account them separately.  This
           requires the call phase to be tracked so that we know what we might
           find in rxtx_buffer[].
      
       (3) Add a parameter to rxrpc_{new,see,get,free}_skb() to indicate the
           event type.
      
       (4) A pair of 'rotate' events are added to indicate packets that are about
           to be rotated out of the Rx and Tx windows.
      
       (5) A pair of 'lost' events are added, along with rxrpc_lose_skb() for
           packet loss injection recording.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
       
      71f3ca40
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix retransmission algorithm · dfa7d920
      David Howells 提交于
      Make the retransmission algorithm use for-loops instead of do-loops and
      move the counter increments into the for-statement increment slots.
      
      Though the do-loops are slighly more efficient since there will be at least
      one pass through the each loop, the counter increments are harder to get
      right as the continue-statements skip them.
      
      Without this, if there are any positive acks within the loop, the do-loop
      will cycle forever because the counter increment is never done.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      dfa7d920
    • D
      rxrpc: Remove some whitespace. · fabf9201
      David Howells 提交于
      Remove a tab that's on a line that should otherwise be blank.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      fabf9201