- 09 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Don't bother generating maxSkew in the ACK packet as it has been obsolete since AFS 3.1. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
-
- 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NAllison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 03 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
If the network becomes (partially) unavailable, say by disabling IPv6, the background ACK transmission routine can get itself into a tizzy by proposing immediate ACK retransmission. Since we're in the call event processor, that happens immediately without returning to the workqueue manager. The condition should clear after a while when either the network comes back or the call times out. Fix this by: (1) When re-proposing an ACK on failed Tx, don't schedule it immediately. This will allow a certain amount of time to elapse before we try again. (2) Enforce a return to the workqueue manager after a certain number of iterations of the call processing loop. (3) Add a backoff delay that increases the delay on deferred ACKs by a jiffy per failed transmission to a limit of HZ. The backoff delay is cleared on a successful return from kernel_sendmsg(). (4) Cancel calls immediately if the opening sendmsg fails. The layer above can arrange retransmission or rotate to another server. Fixes: 248f219c ("rxrpc: Rewrite the data and ack handling code") Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 YueHaibing 提交于
Variables 'sp' and 'did_discard' are being assigned, but are never used, hence they are redundant and can be removed. fix following warning: net/rxrpc/call_event.c:165:25: warning: variable 'sp' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] net/rxrpc/conn_client.c:1054:7: warning: variable 'did_discard' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable] Signed-off-by: NYueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Sometimes an in-progress call will stop responding on the fileserver when the fileserver quietly cancels the call with an internally marked abort (RX_CALL_DEAD), without sending an ABORT to the client. This causes the client's call to eventually expire from lack of incoming packets directed its way, which currently leads to it being cancelled locally with ETIME. Note that it's not currently clear as to why this happens as it's really hard to reproduce. The rotation policy implement by kAFS, however, doesn't differentiate between ETIME meaning we didn't get any response from the server and ETIME meaning the call got cancelled mid-flow. The latter leads to an oops when fetching data as the rotation partially resets the afs_read descriptor, which can result in a cleared page pointer being dereferenced because that page has already been filled. Handle this by the following means: (1) Set a flag on a call when we receive a packet for it. (2) Store the highest packet serial number so far received for a call (bearing in mind this may wrap). (3) If, when the "not received anything recently" timeout expires on a call, we've received at least one packet for a call and the connection as a whole has received packets more recently than that call, then cancel the call locally with ECONNRESET rather than ETIME. This indicates that the call was definitely in progress on the server. (4) In kAFS, if the rotation algorithm sees ECONNRESET rather than ETIME, don't try the next server, but rather abort the call. This avoids the oops as we don't try to reuse the afs_read struct. Rather, as-yet ungotten pages will be reread at a later data. Also: (5) Add an rxrpc tracepoint to log detection of the call being reset. Without this, I occasionally see an oops like the following: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI ... RIP: 0010:_copy_to_iter+0x204/0x310 RSP: 0018:ffff8800cae0f828 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: 0000000000000560 RBX: 0000000000000560 RCX: 0000000000000560 RDX: ffff8800cae0f968 RSI: ffff8800d58b3312 RDI: 0005080000000000 RBP: ffff8800cae0f968 R08: 0000000000000560 R09: ffff8800ca00f400 R10: ffff8800c36f28d4 R11: 00000000000008c4 R12: ffff8800cae0f958 R13: 0000000000000560 R14: ffff8800d58b3312 R15: 0000000000000560 FS: 00007fdaef108080(0000) GS:ffff8800ca680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00007fb28a8fa000 CR3: 00000000d2a76002 CR4: 00000000001606e0 Call Trace: skb_copy_datagram_iter+0x14e/0x289 rxrpc_recvmsg_data.isra.0+0x6f3/0xf68 ? trace_buffer_unlock_commit_regs+0x4f/0x89 rxrpc_kernel_recv_data+0x149/0x421 afs_extract_data+0x1e0/0x798 ? afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0xc9/0x52e afs_deliver_fs_fetch_data+0x33a/0x5ab afs_deliver_to_call+0x1ee/0x5e0 ? afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0xc9/0x52e afs_wait_for_call_to_complete+0x12b/0x52e ? wake_up_q+0x54/0x54 afs_make_call+0x287/0x462 ? afs_fs_fetch_data+0x3e6/0x3ed ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x5d/0x63 afs_fs_fetch_data+0x3e6/0x3ed afs_fetch_data+0xbb/0x14a afs_readpages+0x317/0x40d __do_page_cache_readahead+0x203/0x2ba ? ondemand_readahead+0x3a7/0x3c1 ondemand_readahead+0x3a7/0x3c1 generic_file_buffered_read+0x18b/0x62f __vfs_read+0xdb/0xfe vfs_read+0xb2/0x137 ksys_read+0x50/0x8c do_syscall_64+0x7d/0x1a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Note the weird value in RDI which is a result of trying to kmap() a NULL page pointer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 31 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Dionne 提交于
Commit a158bdd3 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts") reworked the time calculation for the next resend event. For this calculation, "oldest" will be before "now", so ktime_sub(oldest, now) will yield a negative value. When passed to nsecs_to_jiffies which expects an unsigned value, the end result will be a very large value, and a resend event scheduled far into the future. This could cause calls to stall if some packets were lost. Fix by ordering the arguments to ktime_sub correctly. Fixes: a158bdd3 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts") Signed-off-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The rxrpc_reduce_call_timer() function should be passed the 'current time' in jiffies, not the current ktime time. It's confusing in rxrpc_resend because that has to deal with both. Pass the correct current time in. Note that this only affects the trace produced and not the functioning of the code. Fixes: a158bdd3 ("rxrpc: Fix call timeouts") Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint to trace packet resend events and to dump the Tx annotation buffer for added illumination. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@rdhat.com>
-
- 29 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
Values assigned to both variable resend_at and ack_at are overwritten before they can be used. The correct fix here is to add 'now' to the previously computed value in resend_at and ack_at. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462262 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462263 Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1462264 Fixes: beb8e5e4 ("rxrpc: Express protocol timeouts in terms of RTT") Link: https://marc.info/?i=17004.1511808959%40warthog.procyon.org.ukSigned-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Clean up some whitespace from rxrpc. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 24 11月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
We need to transmit a packet every so often to act as a keepalive for the peer (which has a timeout from the last time it received a packet) and also to prevent any intervening firewalls from closing the route. Do this by resetting a timer every time we transmit a packet. If the timer ever expires, we transmit a PING ACK packet and thereby also elicit a PING RESPONSE ACK from the other side - which prevents our last-rx timeout from expiring. The timer is set to 1/6 of the last-rx timeout so that we can detect the other side going away if it misses 6 replies in a row. This is particularly necessary for servers where the processing of the service function may take a significant amount of time. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add an extra timeout that is set/updated when we send a DATA packet that has the request-ack flag set. This allows us to detect if we don't get an ACK in response to the latest flagged packet. The ACK packet is adjudged to have been lost if it doesn't turn up within 2*RTT of the transmission. If the timeout occurs, we schedule the sending of a PING ACK to find out the state of the other side. If a new DATA packet is ready to go sooner, we cancel the sending of the ping and set the request-ack flag on that instead. If we get back a PING-RESPONSE ACK that indicates a lower tx_top than what we had at the time of the ping transmission, we adjudge all the DATA packets sent between the response tx_top and the ping-time tx_top to have been lost and retransmit immediately. Rather than sending a PING ACK, we could just pick a DATA packet and speculatively retransmit that with request-ack set. It should result in either a REQUESTED ACK or a DUPLICATE ACK which we can then use in lieu the a PING-RESPONSE ACK mentioned above. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Express protocol timeouts for data retransmission and deferred ack generation in terms on RTT rather than specified timeouts once we have sufficient RTT samples. For the moment, this requires just one RTT sample to be able to use this for ack deferral and two for data retransmission. The data retransmission timeout is set at RTT*1.5 and the ACK deferral timeout is set at RTT. Note that the calculated timeout is limited to a minimum of 4ns to make sure it doesn't happen too quickly. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix the rxrpc call expiration timeouts and make them settable from userspace. By analogy with other rx implementations, there should be three timeouts: (1) "Normal timeout" This is set for all calls and is triggered if we haven't received any packets from the peer in a while. It is measured from the last time we received any packet on that call. This is not reset by any connection packets (such as CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets). If a service operation takes a long time, the server should generate PING ACKs at a duration that's substantially less than the normal timeout so is to keep both sides alive. This is set at 1/6 of normal timeout. (2) "Idle timeout" This is set only for a service call and is triggered if we stop receiving the DATA packets that comprise the request data. It is measured from the last time we received a DATA packet. (3) "Hard timeout" This can be set for a call and specified the maximum lifetime of that call. It should not be specified by default. Some operations (such as volume transfer) take a long time. Allow userspace to set/change the timeouts on a call with sendmsg, using a control message: RXRPC_SET_CALL_TIMEOUTS The data to the message is a number of 32-bit words, not all of which need be given: u32 hard_timeout; /* sec from first packet */ u32 idle_timeout; /* msec from packet Rx */ u32 normal_timeout; /* msec from data Rx */ This can be set in combination with any other sendmsg() that affects a call. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix call expiry handling in the following ways (1) If all the request data from a client call is acked, don't send a follow up IDLE ACK with firstPacket == 1 and previousPacket == 0 as this appears to fool some servers into thinking everything has been accepted. (2) Never send an abort back to the server once it has ACK'd all the request packets; rather just try to reuse the channel for the next call. The first request DATA packet of the next call on the same channel will implicitly ACK the entire reply of the dead call - even if we haven't transmitted it yet. (3) Don't send RX_CALL_TIMEOUT in an ABORT packet, librx uses abort codes to pass local errors to the caller in addition to remote errors, and this is meant to be local only. The following also need to be addressed in future patches: (4) Service calls should send PING ACKs as 'keep alives' if the server is still processing the call. (5) VERSION REPLY packets should be sent to the peers of service connections to act as keep-alives. This is used to keep firewall routes in place. The AFS CM should enable this. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 06 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Use negative error codes in struct rxrpc_call::error because that's what the kernel normally deals with and to make the code consistent. We only turn them positive when transcribing into a cmsg for userspace recvmsg. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 06 10月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
We need to generate a DELAY ACK from the service end of an operation if we start doing the actual operation work and it takes longer than expected. This will hard-ACK the request data and allow the client to release its resources. To make this work: (1) We have to set the ack timer and propose an ACK when the call moves to the RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_ACK_REQUEST and clear the pending ACK and cancel the timer when we start transmitting the reply (the first DATA packet of the reply implicitly ACKs the request phase). (2) It must be possible to set the timer when the caller is holding call->state_lock, so split the lock-getting part of the timer function out. (3) Add trace notes for the ACK we're requesting and the timer we clear. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The call's background processor work item needs to notify the socket when it completes a call so that recvmsg() or the AFS fs can deal with it. Without this, call expiry isn't handled. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
When a call expires, it must be queued for the background processor to deal with otherwise a service call that is improperly terminated will just sit there awaiting an ACK and won't expire. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Separate the output of PING ACKs from the output of other sorts of ACK so that if we receive a PING ACK and schedule transmission of a PING RESPONSE ACK, the response doesn't get cancelled by a PING ACK we happen to be scheduling transmission of at the same time. If a PING RESPONSE gets lost, the other side might just sit there waiting for it and refuse to proceed otherwise. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Split rxrpc_send_data_packet() to separate ACK generation (which is more complicated) from ABORT generation. This simplifies the code a bit and fixes the following warning: In file included from ../net/rxrpc/output.c:20:0: net/rxrpc/output.c: In function 'rxrpc_send_call_packet': net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h:1187:27: error: 'top' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] net/rxrpc/output.c:103:24: note: 'top' was declared here net/rxrpc/output.c:225:25: error: 'hard_ack' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized] Reported-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 30 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The call timer's concept of a call timeout (of which there are three) that is inactive is that it is the timeout has the same expiration time as the call expiration timeout (the expiration timer is never inactive). However, I'm not resetting the timeouts when they expire, leading to repeated processing of expired timeouts when other timeout events occur. Fix this by: (1) Move the timer expiry detection into rxrpc_set_timer() inside the locked section. This means that if a timeout is set that will expire immediately, we deal with it immediately. (2) If a timeout is at or before now then it has expired. When an expiry is detected, an event is raised, the timeout is automatically inactivated and the event processor is queued. (3) If a timeout is at or after the expiry timeout then it is inactive. Inactive timeouts do not contribute to the timer setting. (4) The call timer callback can now just call rxrpc_set_timer() to handle things. (5) The call processor work function now checks the event flags rather than checking the timeouts directly. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Keep that call timeouts as ktimes rather than jiffies so that they can be expressed as functions of RTT. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
In rxrpc_send_data_packet() make the loss-injection path return through the same code as the transmission path so that the RTT determination is initiated and any future timer shuffling will be done, despite the packet having been binned. Whilst we're at it: (1) Add to the tx_data tracepoint an indication of whether or not we're retransmitting a data packet. (2) When we're deciding whether or not to request an ACK, rather than checking if we're in fast-retransmit mode check instead if we're retransmitting. (3) Don't invoke the lose_skb tracepoint when losing a Tx packet as we're not altering the sk_buff refcount nor are we just seeing it after getting it off the Tx list. (4) The rxrpc_skb_tx_lost note is then no longer used so remove it. (5) rxrpc_lose_skb() no longer needs to deal with rxrpc_skb_tx_lost. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Implement RxRPC slow-start, which is similar to RFC 5681 for TCP. A tracepoint is added to log the state of the congestion management algorithm and the decisions it makes. Notes: (1) Since we send fixed-size DATA packets (apart from the final packet in each phase), counters and calculations are in terms of packets rather than bytes. (2) The ACK packet carries the equivalent of TCP SACK. (3) The FLIGHT_SIZE calculation in RFC 5681 doesn't seem particularly suited to SACK of a small number of packets. It seems that, almost inevitably, by the time three 'duplicate' ACKs have been seen, we have narrowed the loss down to one or two missing packets, and the FLIGHT_SIZE calculation ends up as 2. (4) In rxrpc_resend(), if there was no data that apparently needed retransmission, we transmit a PING ACK to ask the peer to tell us what its Rx window state is. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
If we've sent all the request data in a client call but haven't seen any sign of the reply data yet, schedule an ACK to be sent to the server to find out if the reply data got lost. If the server hasn't yet hard-ACK'd the request data, we send a PING ACK to demand a response to find out whether we need to retransmit. If the server says it has received all of the data, we send an IDLE ACK to tell the server that we haven't received anything in the receive phase as yet. To make this work, a non-immediate PING ACK must carry a delay. I've chosen the same as the IDLE ACK for the moment. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
When determining the resend timer value, we have a value in nsec but the timer is in jiffies which may be a million or more times more coarse. nsecs_to_jiffies() rounds down - which means that the resend timeout expressed as jiffies is very likely earlier than the one expressed as nanoseconds from which it was derived. The problem is that rxrpc_resend() gets triggered by the timer, but can't then find anything to resend yet. It sets the timer again - but gets kicked off immediately again and again until the nanosecond-based expiry time is reached and we actually retransmit. Fix this by adding 1 to the jiffies-based resend_at value to counteract the rounding and make sure that the timer happens after the nanosecond-based expiry is passed. Alternatives would be to adjust the timestamp on the packets to align with the jiffie scale or to switch back to using jiffie-timestamps. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint to log in rxrpc_resend() which packets will be retransmitted. Note that if a positive ACK comes in whilst we have dropped the lock to retransmit another packet, the actual retransmission may not happen, though some of the effects will (such as altering the congestion management). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint to log proposed ACKs, including whether the proposal is used to update a pending ACK or is discarded in favour of an easlier, higher priority ACK. Whilst we're at it, get rid of the rxrpc_acks() function and access the name array directly. We do, however, need to validate the ACK reason number given to trace_rxrpc_rx_ack() to make sure we don't overrun the array. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a tracepoint to log call timer initiation, setting and expiry. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Fix the call timer in the following ways: (1) If call->resend_at or call->ack_at are before or equal to the current time, then ignore that timeout. (2) If call->expire_at is before or equal to the current time, then don't set the timer at all (possibly we should queue the call). (3) Don't skip modifying the timer if timer_pending() is true. This indicates that the timer is working, not that it has expired and is running/waiting to run its expiry handler. Also call rxrpc_set_timer() to start the call timer going rather than calling add_timer(). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
When a DATA packet has its initial transmission, we may need to start or adjust the resend timer. Without this we end up relying on being sent a NACK to initiate the resend. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
ktime_add_ms() should be used to add the resend time (in ms) rather than ktime_add_ns(). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
We don't want to send a PING ACK for every new incoming call as that just adds to the network traffic. Instead, we send a PING ACK to the first three that we receive and then once per second thereafter. This could probably be made adjustable in future. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
In addition to sending a PING ACK to gain RTT data, we can set the RXRPC_REQUEST_ACK flag on a DATA packet and get a REQUESTED-ACK ACK. The ACK packet contains the serial number of the packet it is in response to, so we can look through the Tx buffer for a matching DATA packet. This requires that the data packets be stamped with the time of transmission as a ktime rather than having the resend_at time in jiffies. This further requires the resend code to do the resend determination in ktimes and convert to jiffies to set the timer. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a Tx-phase annotation for packet buffers to indicate that a buffer has already been retransmitted. This will be used by future congestion management. Re-retransmissions of a packet don't affect the congestion window managment in the same way as initial retransmissions. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Don't store the rxrpc protocol header in sk_buffs on the transmit queue, but rather generate it on the fly and pass it to kernel_sendmsg() as a separate iov. This reduces the amount of storage required. Note that the security header is still stored in the sk_buff as it may get encrypted along with the data (and doesn't change with each transmission). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Improve sk_buff tracing within AF_RXRPC by the following means: (1) Use an enum to note the event type rather than plain integers and use an array of event names rather than a big multi ?: list. (2) Distinguish Rx from Tx packets and account them separately. This requires the call phase to be tracked so that we know what we might find in rxtx_buffer[]. (3) Add a parameter to rxrpc_{new,see,get,free}_skb() to indicate the event type. (4) A pair of 'rotate' events are added to indicate packets that are about to be rotated out of the Rx and Tx windows. (5) A pair of 'lost' events are added, along with rxrpc_lose_skb() for packet loss injection recording. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Make the retransmission algorithm use for-loops instead of do-loops and move the counter increments into the for-statement increment slots. Though the do-loops are slighly more efficient since there will be at least one pass through the each loop, the counter increments are harder to get right as the continue-statements skip them. Without this, if there are any positive acks within the loop, the do-loop will cycle forever because the counter increment is never done. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Remove a tab that's on a line that should otherwise be blank. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-