- 15 9月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This reaches encapsulation for this file. In order to reach this: * move priv->valid_context to iwl_shared * move the last_rejected initialization to the upper layer * define a wrapper iwl_nic_config in the upper layer that calls to cfg->lib->ops->nic_config Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Another round of clean up on the transport layer. Define a wrapper around wiphy_rfkill_set_hw_state to prevent the transport layer from accessing priv->hw. Also move wait_command_queue to the transport layer. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2011 34 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
In order to implement support for GO powersave on the P2P client side, the ucode needs to know what GO we're trying to authenticate/associate with, it needs to have a station entry and the BSSID in the RXON set. Implement the new mac80211 callbacks to give this data to the device. Since this is also useful for the device when a normal connection is established, also program it with the information in that case. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
priv->mac80211_registered and priv->hw needed to move to shared. stop_queue API was added in order to allow the upper layer to stop the SW queues for regulatory purposes. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This one is really transport related. ==== moves Stanislaw's code to BSD area ==== Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This one is really transport related. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Remove a few dereferences of priv from the transport layer while at it. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This mapping is transport related. This allows us to remove the notion of tx queue from the tx path in the upper layer. iwl_wake_any_queue moved to transport layer since it needs to access these mappings. The TX API is nicer now: int (*tx)(struct iwl_trans *trans, struct sk_buff *skb, struct iwl_device_cmd *dev_cmd, u8 ctx, u8 sta_id); Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
In a near future, the upper layer won't be aware of the tx queues. This allows to remove one place where the upper layer needed to provide the tx queue index to the transport layer. This also saves around 1.5MB. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
the mapping tx_queue -> fifo is really transport related. The upper layer should be involved in such things. Note that upon agg_disable, the queue is always mapped to fifo 0, but this doesn't matter since when the queue will be setup again for a new BA session, it will be configured to the good fifo anyway. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
When we remove the module, we free all the tx and rx resources. Before doing that, we'd better stop the tx / rx activity. Calling iwl_trans_stop_device in iwl_remove helps also to remove a few API functions: * rx_free: happens in iwl_trans_free * tx_free: happens in iwl_trans_free * disable_sync_irq: happens in iwl_trans_stop_device Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
There are still quite a few, but much less. A few fields have been moved /copied to hw_params which sits in the shared area: * priv->cfg->base_params->num_of_ampdu_queues * priv->cfg->base_params->shadow_reg_enable * priv->cfg->sku * priv->ucode_owner Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The rate scaling and the transport need to access the data in iwl_tid_data, hence the move. Note that the only component in the upper layer that needs this data is the rate scaling. Refactoring the rate scaling may help to move iwl_tid_data from the shared area to the transport area. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Which means that iwl-io.c doesn't need to include iwl-dev.h any more. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since iwl-fh.h contains transport related data, it shouldn't be included by the upper layer. Only the transport layer and iwl-agn-ucode.c includes it. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Some of them weren't used at all, the others always had the same value since the driver split. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Continue to the clean up of the priv dereferencing from the transport layer. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is needed for host commands only, it is needed in transport layer only Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Logic move after all priv->status moved to struct iwl_shared Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Wey-Yi Guy 提交于
Add comments for better description Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Wey-Yi Guy 提交于
Enable HT aggregation when it reach reasonable traffic without checking traffic load which delay enabling the aggregation and lower the throughput but this behavior can be overwrite by module parameter this address https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40042Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
It is transport dependent, move to the PCIe transport layer. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since the ISR is entirely in the transport layer, its data should be in the pcie specific region. Change sync_irq to first disable and then synchronize the IRQ. iwl_isr and iwl_isr_ict now receive iwl_trans. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
These flows needs to access the APM and a few other registers that can differ between different transports. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Remove iwl_transport_register which was a W/A. The bus layer knows what transport to use. So now, the bus layer gives the upper layer a pointer to the iwl_trans_ops struct that it wants to use. The upper layer then, allocates the desired transport layer using iwl_trans_ops->alloc function. As a result of this, priv->trans, no longer exists, priv holds a pointer to iwl_shared, which holds a pointer to iwl_trans. This required to change all the calls to the transport layer from upper layer. While we were at it, trans_X inlines have been renamed to iwl_trans_X to avoid confusions, which of course required to rename the functions inside the transport layer because of conflicts in names. So the static API functions inside the transport layer implementation have been renamed to iwl_trans_pcie_X. Until now, the IRQ / Tasklet were initialized in iwl_transport_layer. This is confusing since the registration doesn't mean to request IRQ, so I added a handler for that. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Since it is used by all the layers, it needs to move to iwl_shared. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This will allow all the modules to look at it. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This struct will hold pointers to all the layers, so that every layer will find the pointers it needs when calling another layer. Note that the drv_data set to struct device is now a pointer to struct iwl_shared. This solves of bug that I introduced in iwlagn: simplify the bus architecture Bug description: sysfs gets the the driver data from struct device. Till the aforementioned patch, dev_get_drvdata would return iwl_priv. After the patch, dev_get_drvdata return iwl_bus which is buggy since the sysfs handlers rely on this value, and sysfs handlers need iwl_priv. Now, dev_get_drvdata return iwl-shared. Since we have pointers to all the layers in iwl_shared, every layer will be able to get the pointer it needs: bus layer will gets iwl_bus from the PCI suspend callbacks, and the sysfs handlers will get the iwl_priv they need. In order to keep good encapsulation, we need to avoid to dereference iwl_priv from a different layer. This is why instead of including iwl-dev.h from iwl-shared.h, I added a forward declaration to iwl_priv. Moreover we keep type safety while providing encapsulation. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
It will hold declaration of functions and forward declaration of struct that are used by several layers. This will allow modules not to include iwl_priv. iwl_bus and iwl_trans are still visible to all. All the layers share the module parameters, move the struct to iwl-shared.h. Also add all module parameters to iwl_mod_params instead of having them as global static. This includes * debug_level * ant_coupling * bt_ch_announce * wanted_ucode_alternative Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Wey-Yi Guy 提交于
There are number of functions with "iwlcore_" prefix which not feels right, rename those to "iwl_". No functional changes by making the renames. Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The previous P2P implementation turned out to not work well and new uCode capabilities were added to support P2P. Modify the driver to take advantage of those, and also discover P2P support automatically based on a uCode flag instead of having a Kconfig symbol for P2P. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The availability of contexts depends on the firmware capabilities. Currently only the presence of the second context depends on it, but soon P2P support will also be different. Move the context initialisation code to the firmware-dependent setup before registering with mac80211 to make it easier to handle. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We sometimes need to support new firmware API for a while before we can publish them since testing them fully takes a long time. We could keep all the new code private, but that causes plenty of problems and sometimes we can give a pre-release version of firmware to people who need to test. However, when we just bump the API version, the driver will warn everybody that their firmware is outdated, when in fact it isn't. (Currently our case for this doesn't really change the API but bumping the API version is necessary because the firmware isn't fully backward compatible) In order to handle this in the future, add a new "api_ok" version; only below this will the driver warn that the uCode is too old. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
linux/wireless.h and net/iw_handler.h headers are for wireless extensions only, so mac80211 drivers shouldn't be including them. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
-