- 25 5月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
Currently we are loading buddy ext4_mb_load_buddy() for every block group we are going through in ext4_trim_fs() in many cases just to find out that there is not enough space to be bothered with. As Amir Goldstein suggested we can use bb_free information directly from ext4_group_info. This commit removes ext4_mb_load_buddy() from ext4_trim_fs() and rather get the ext4_group_info via ext4_get_group_info() and use the bb_free information directly from that. This avoids unnecessary call to load buddy in the case the group does not have enough free space to trim. Loading buddy is now moved to ext4_trim_all_free(). Tested by me with xfstests 251. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Eryu Guan 提交于
jbd2__journal_start() returns an ERR_PTR() value rather than NULL on failure. Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
jbd2_log_start_commit() returns 1 only when we really start a transaction. But we also need to wait for a transaction when the commit is already running. Fix this problem by waiting for transaction commit unconditionally (which is just a quick check if the transaction is already committed). Also we have to be more careful with sending of a barrier because when transaction is being committed in parallel to ext4_sync_file() running, we cannot be sure that the barrier the journalling code sends happens after we wrote all the data for fsync (note that not every data writeout needs to trigger metadata changes thus commit of some metadata changes can be running while other data is still written out). So use jbd2_will_send_data_barrier() helper to detect the common cases when we can be sure barrier will be issued by the commit code and issue the barrier ourselves in the remaining cases. Reported-by: NEdward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 24 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Provide a function which returns whether a transaction with given tid will send a flush to the filesystem device. The function will be used by ext4 to detect whether fsync needs to send a separate flush or not. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In data=ordered mode, it's theoretically possible (however rare) that an inode is filed to transaction's t_inode_list and a flusher thread writes all the data and inode is reclaimed before the transaction starts to commit. In such a case, we could erroneously omit sending a flush to file system device when it is different from the journal device (because data can still be in disk cache only). Fix the problem by setting a flag in a transaction when some inode is added to it and then send disk flush in the commit code when the flag is set. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
To get delayed-extent information, ext4_ext_fiemap_cb() looks up pagecache, it thus collects information starting from a page's head block. If blocksize < pagesize, the beginning blocks of a page may lies before the request range. So ext4_ext_fiemap_cb() should proceed ignoring them, because they has been handled before. If no mapped buffer in the range is found in the 1st page, we need to look up the 2nd page, otherwise delayed-extents after a hole will be ignored. Without this patch, xfstests 225 will hung on ext4 with 1K block. Reported-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sourceforge.net> Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In commit c8d46e41 (ext4: Add flag to files with blocks intentionally past EOF), if the EOFBLOCKS_FL flag is set, we call ext4_truncate() before calling vmtruncate(). This caused any allocated but unwritten blocks created by calling fallocate() with the FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE flag to be dropped. This was done to make to make sure that EOFBLOCKS_FL would not be cleared while still leaving blocks past i_size allocated. This was not necessary, since ext4_truncate() guarantees that blocks past i_size will be dropped, even in the case where truncate() has increased i_size before calling ext4_truncate(). So fix this by removing the EOFBLOCKS_FL special case treatment in ext4_setattr(). In addition, use truncate_setsize() followed by a call to ext4_truncate() instead of using vmtruncate(). This is more efficient since it skips the call to inode_newsize_ok(), which has been checked already by inode_change_ok(). This is also in a win in the case where EOFBLOCKS_FL is set since it avoids calling ext4_truncate() twice. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 23 5月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
t_max_wait is added in commit 8e85fb3f to indicate how long we were waiting for new transaction to start. In commit 6d0bf005, it is moved to another function named update_t_max_wait to avoid a build warning. But the wrong thing is that the original 'ts' is initialized in the start of function start_this_handle and we can calculate t_max_wait in the right way. while with this change, ts is initialized within the function and t_max_wait can never be calculated right. This patch moves the initialization of ts to the original beginning of start_this_handle and pass it to function update_t_max_wait so that it can be calculated right and the build warning is avoided also. Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Gouriou 提交于
ext4_ext_truncate() should not invoke up_write(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_data_sem) when ext4_orphan_add() returns an error, as it hasn't performed a down_write() yet. This trivial patch fixes this by moving the up_write() invocation above the out_stop label. Signed-off-by: NEric Gouriou <egouriou@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Vivek Haldar 提交于
The number of hits and misses for each filesystem is exposed in /sys/fs/ext4/<dev>/extent_cache_{hits, misses}. Tested: fsstress, manual checks. Signed-off-by: NVivek Haldar <haldar@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
After creating an ext4 file system without a journal: # mke2fs -t ext4 -O ^has_journal /dev/sda # mount -t ext4 /dev/sda /test the /proc/mounts will show: "/dev/sda /test ext4 rw,relatime,user_xattr,acl,barrier=1,data=writeback 0 0" which can fool users into thinking that the fs is using writeback mode. So don't set the writeback option when the journal has not been enabled; we don't depend on the writeback option being set, since ext4_should_writeback_data() in ext4_jbd2.h tests to see if the journal is not present before returning true. Reported-by: NRobin Dong <sanbai@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 21 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
We need to take reference to the s_li_request after we take a mutex, because it might be freed since then, hence result in accessing old already freed memory. Also we should protect the whole ext4_remove_li_request() because ext4_li_info might be in the process of being freed in ext4_lazyinit_thread(). Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
For some reason, when we set the mount option "init_itable=0" it behaves as we would set init_itable=20 which is not right at all. Basically when we set it to zero we are saying to lazyinit thread not to wait between zeroing the inode table (except of cond_resched()) so this commit fixes that and removes the unnecessary condition. The 'n' should be also properly used on remount. When the n is not set at all, it means that the default miltiplier EXT4_DEF_LI_WAIT_MULT is set instead. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reported-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
For some reason we have been waiting for lazyinit thread to start in the ext4_run_lazyinit_thread() but it is not needed since it was jus unnecessary complexity, so get rid of it. We can also remove li_task and li_wait_task since it is not used anymore. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
In order to make lazyinit eat approx. 10% of io bandwidth at max, we are sleeping between zeroing each single inode table. For that purpose we are using timer which wakes up thread when it expires. It is set via add_timer() and this may cause troubles in the case that thread has been woken up earlier and in next iteration we call add_timer() on still running timer hence hitting BUG_ON in add_timer(). We could fix that by using mod_timer() instead however we can use schedule_timeout_interruptible() for waiting and hence simplifying things a lot. This commit exchange the old "waiting mechanism" with simple schedule_timeout_interruptible(), setting the time to sleep. Hence we do not longer need li_wait_daemon waiting queue and others, so get rid of it. Addresses-Red-Hat-Bugzilla: #699708 Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
-
- 19 5月, 2011 3 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
In order to stabilize pages during disk writes, ext4_page_mkwrite must wait for writeback operations to complete before making a page writable. Furthermore, the function must return locked pages, and recheck the writeback status if the page lock is ever dropped. The "someone could wander in" part of this patch was suggested by Chris Mason. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
wait_on_page_writeback already checks the writeback bit, so callers of it needn't do that test. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
Currently, if we mkfs a new ext4 volume with s_max_mnt_count set to zero, and mount it for the first time, we will get the warning: maximal mount count reached, running e2fsck is recommended It is really misleading. So change the check so that it won't warn in that case. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Allison Henderson 提交于
This patch addresses bugs found while testing punch hole with the fsx test. The patch corrects the number of blocks that are zeroed out while splitting an extent, and also corrects the return value to return the number of blocks split out, instead of the number of blocks zeroed out. This patch has been tested in addition to the following patches: [Ext4 punch hole v7] [XFS Tests Punch Hole 1/1 v2] Add Punch Hole Testing to FSX The test ran successfully for 24 hours. Signed-off-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
If quota is not enabled when ext4_quota_off() is called, we must not dereference quota file inode since it is NULL. Check properly for this. This fixes a bug in commit 21f97697 (ext4: remove unnecessary [cm]time update of quota file), which was merged for 2.6.39-rc3. Reported-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 15 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Allison Henderson 提交于
Fix for a null pointer bug found while running punch hole tests Signed-off-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 10 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
After taking care of all group init races, all that remains is to remove alloc_semp from ext4_allocation_context and ext4_buddy structs. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
After online resize which adds new groups, some of the groups in a buddy page may be initialized and uptodate, while other (new ones) may be uninitialized. The indication for init of new block groups is when ext4_mb_init_cache() is called with an uptodate buddy page. In this case, initialized groups on that buddy page must be skipped when initializing the buddy cache. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
The old routines ext4_mb_[get|put]_buddy_cache_lock(), which used to take grp->alloc_sem for all groups on the buddy page have been replaced with the routines ext4_mb_[get|put]_buddy_page_lock(). The new routines take both buddy and bitmap page locks to protect against concurrent init of groups on the same buddy page. The GROUP_NEED_INIT flag is tested again under page lock to check if the group was initialized by another caller. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
The old imlementation used to take grp->alloc_sem and set the GROUP_NEED_INIT flag, so that the buddy cache would be reloaded. The new implementation updates the buddy cache by freeing the added blocks and making them available for use, so there is no need to reload the buddy cache and there is no need to take grp->alloc_sem. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 09 5月, 2011 8 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The block allocation code used to use jbd2_journal_get_undo_access as a way to make changes that wouldn't show up until the commit took place. The new multi-block allocation code has a its own way of preventing newly freed blocks from getting reused until the commit takes place (it avoids updating the buddy bitmaps until the commit is done), so we don't need to use jbd2_journal_get_undo_access(), which has extra overhead compared to jbd2_journal_get_write_access(). There was one last vestigal use of ext4_journal_get_undo_access() in ext4_add_groupblocks(); change it to use ext4_journal_get_write_access() and then remove the ext4_journal_get_undo_access() support. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
In preparation for the next patch, the function ext4_add_groupblocks() is moved to mballoc.c, where it could use some static functions. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Amerigo Wang 提交于
There is already an #ifdef CONFIG_QUOTA some lines above, so this one is totally useless. Signed-off-by: NWANG Cong <amwang@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
We have checked first_not_zeroed == ngroups already above, so remove this redundant check. sbi->s_li_request = NULL above is also removed since it is NULL already. Cc: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In __ext4_get_inode_loc, we calculate inodes_per_block every time by EXT4_BLOCK_SIZE(sb) / EXT4_INODE_SIZE(sb). AFAICS, this function is a hot path for ext4, so we'd better use s_inodes_per_block directly instead of calculating every time. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
We have EXT4FS_DEBUG for some old debug and CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG for the new mballoc debug, but there isn't any EXT4_DEBUG. As CONFIG_EXT4_DEBUG seems to be only used in mballoc, use EXT4FS_DEBUG in fsync.c. [ It doesn't really matter; although I'm including this commit for consistency's sake. The whole point of the #ifdef's is to disable the debugging code. In general you're not going to want to enable all of the code protected by EXT4FS_DEBUG at the same time. -- Ted ] Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
If we somehow wrap, we don't want to keep printing the warning message over and over again. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
In do_get_write_access() we wait on BH_Unshadow bit for buffer to get from shadow state. The waking code in journal_commit_transaction() has a bug because it does not issue a memory barrier after the buffer is moved from the shadow state and before wake_up_bit() is called. Thus a waitqueue check can happen before the buffer is actually moved from the shadow state and waiting process may never be woken. Fix the problem by issuing proper barrier. Reported-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
Reimplement ext4_ext_convert_to_initialized() and ext4_split_unwritten_extents() using ext4_split_extent() Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
Add two functions: ext4_split_extent_at(), which splits an extent into two extents at given logical block, and ext4_split_extent() which splits an extent into three extents. Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
1) Rename ext4_ext_try_to_merge() to ext4_ext_try_to_merge_right(). 2) Add a new function ext4_ext_try_to_merge() which tries to merge an extent both left and right. 3) Use the new function in ext4_ext_convert_unwritten_endio() and ext4_ext_insert_extent(). Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com> Tested-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
ext4_symlink() cannot call __page_symlink() with transaction open. __page_symlink() calls ext4_write_begin() which can wait for transaction commit if we are running out of space thus causing a deadlock. Also error recovery in ext4_truncate_failed_write() does not count with the transaction being already started (although I'm not aware of any particular deadlock here). Fix the problem by stopping a transaction before calling __page_symlink() (we have to be careful and put inode to orphan list so that it gets deleted in case of crash) and starting another one after __page_symlink() returns for addition of symlink into a directory. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
When make_indexed_dir() fails (e.g. because of ENOSPC) after it has allocated block for index tree root, we did not properly mark all changed buffers dirty. This lead to only some of these buffers being written out and thus effectively corrupting the directory. Fix the issue by marking all changed data dirty even in the error failure case. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Fix a typo that was introduced in commit 07a03824 (in 2.6.36) which caused the extents flag not to be set at the conclusion of converting an inode to use extents. Reported-by: NPeter Uchno <peter.uchno@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-