1. 02 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • G
      parisc: Add <asm/hash.h> · 773e1c5f
      George Spelvin 提交于
      PA-RISC is interesting; integer multiplies are implemented in the
      FPU, so are painful in the kernel.  But it tries to be friendly to
      shift-and-add sequences for constant multiplies.
      
      __hash_32 is implemented using the same shift-and-add sequence as
      Microblaze, just scheduled for the PA7100.  (It's 2-way superscalar
      but in-order, like the Pentium.)
      
      hash_64 was tricky, but a suggestion from Jason Thong allowed a
      good solution by breaking up the multiplier.  After a lot of manual
      optimization, I found a 19-instruction sequence for the multiply that
      can be executed in 10 cycles using only 4 temporaries.
      
      (The PA8xxx can issue 4 instructions per cycle, but 2 must be ALU ops
      and 2 must be loads/stores.  And the final add can't be paired.)
      
      An alternative considered, but ultimately not used, was Thomas Wang's
      64-to-32-bit integer hash.  At 12 instructions, it's smaller, but they're
      all sequentially dependent, so it has longer latency.
      
      https://web.archive.org/web/2011/http://www.concentric.net/~Ttwang/tech/inthash.htm
      http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/integer.htmlSigned-off-by: NGeorge Spelvin <linux@sciencehorizons.net>
      Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Cc: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      773e1c5f
  2. 25 6月, 2016 2 次提交
    • M
      parisc: get rid of superfluous __GFP_REPEAT · aade311a
      Michal Hocko 提交于
      __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
      around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
      
      pmd_alloc_one allocate PMD_ORDER which is 1.  This means that this flag
      has never been actually useful here because it has always been used only
      for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-10-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
      Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      aade311a
    • M
      tree wide: get rid of __GFP_REPEAT for order-0 allocations part I · 32d6bd90
      Michal Hocko 提交于
      This is the third version of the patchset previously sent [1].  I have
      basically only rebased it on top of 4.7-rc1 tree and dropped "dm: get
      rid of superfluous gfp flags" which went through dm tree.  I am sending
      it now because it is tree wide and chances for conflicts are reduced
      considerably when we want to target rc2.  I plan to send the next step
      and rename the flag and move to a better semantic later during this
      release cycle so we will have a new semantic ready for 4.8 merge window
      hopefully.
      
      Motivation:
      
      While working on something unrelated I've checked the current usage of
      __GFP_REPEAT in the tree.  It seems that a majority of the usage is and
      always has been bogus because __GFP_REPEAT has always been about costly
      high order allocations while we are using it for order-0 or very small
      orders very often.  It seems that a big pile of them is just a
      copy&paste when a code has been adopted from one arch to another.
      
      I think it makes some sense to get rid of them because they are just
      making the semantic more unclear.  Please note that GFP_REPEAT is
      documented as
      
      * __GFP_REPEAT: Try hard to allocate the memory, but the allocation attempt
      
      * _might_ fail.  This depends upon the particular VM implementation.
        while !costly requests have basically nofail semantic.  So one could
        reasonably expect that order-0 request with __GFP_REPEAT will not loop
        for ever.  This is not implemented right now though.
      
      I would like to move on with __GFP_REPEAT and define a better semantic
      for it.
      
        $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT origin/master | wc -l
        111
        $ git grep __GFP_REPEAT | wc -l
        36
      
      So we are down to the third after this patch series.  The remaining
      places really seem to be relying on __GFP_REPEAT due to large allocation
      requests.  This still needs some double checking which I will do later
      after all the simple ones are sorted out.
      
      I am touching a lot of arch specific code here and I hope I got it right
      but as a matter of fact I even didn't compile test for some archs as I
      do not have cross compiler for them.  Patches should be quite trivial to
      review for stupid compile mistakes though.  The tricky parts are usually
      hidden by macro definitions and thats where I would appreciate help from
      arch maintainers.
      
      [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1461849846-27209-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
      
      This patch (of 19):
      
      __GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
      around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.  Yet we
      have the full kernel tree with its usage for apparently order-0
      allocations.  This is really confusing because __GFP_REPEAT is
      explicitly documented to allow allocation failures which is a weaker
      semantic than the current order-0 has (basically nofail).
      
      Let's simply drop __GFP_REPEAT from those places.  This would allow to
      identify place which really need allocator to retry harder and formulate
      a more specific semantic for what the flag is supposed to do actually.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464599699-30131-2-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
      Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
      Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com> [for tile]
      Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Cc: John Crispin <blogic@openwrt.org>
      Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
      Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      32d6bd90
  3. 05 6月, 2016 4 次提交
    • H
      58f1c654
    • H
      parisc: Fix pagefault crash in unaligned __get_user() call · 8b78f260
      Helge Deller 提交于
      One of the debian buildd servers had this crash in the syslog without
      any other information:
      
       Unaligned handler failed, ret = -2
       clock_adjtime (pid 22578): Unaligned data reference (code 28)
       CPU: 1 PID: 22578 Comm: clock_adjtime Tainted: G  E  4.5.0-2-parisc64-smp #1 Debian 4.5.4-1
       task: 000000007d9960f8 ti: 00000001bde7c000 task.ti: 00000001bde7c000
      
            YZrvWESTHLNXBCVMcbcbcbcbOGFRQPDI
       PSW: 00001000000001001111100000001111 Tainted: G            E
       r00-03  000000ff0804f80f 00000001bde7c2b0 00000000402d2be8 00000001bde7c2b0
       r04-07  00000000409e1fd0 00000000fa6f7fff 00000001bde7c148 00000000fa6f7fff
       r08-11  0000000000000000 00000000ffffffff 00000000fac9bb7b 000000000002b4d4
       r12-15  000000000015241c 000000000015242c 000000000000002d 00000000fac9bb7b
       r16-19  0000000000028800 0000000000000001 0000000000000070 00000001bde7c218
       r20-23  0000000000000000 00000001bde7c210 0000000000000002 0000000000000000
       r24-27  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 00000001bde7c148 00000000409e1fd0
       r28-31  0000000000000001 00000001bde7c320 00000001bde7c350 00000001bde7c218
       sr00-03  0000000001200000 0000000001200000 0000000000000000 0000000001200000
       sr04-07  0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
      
       IASQ: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 IAOQ: 00000000402d2e84 00000000402d2e88
        IIR: 0ca0d089    ISR: 0000000001200000  IOR: 00000000fa6f7fff
        CPU:        1   CR30: 00000001bde7c000 CR31: ffffffffffffffff
        ORIG_R28: 00000002369fe628
        IAOQ[0]: compat_get_timex+0x2dc/0x3c0
        IAOQ[1]: compat_get_timex+0x2e0/0x3c0
        RP(r2): compat_get_timex+0x40/0x3c0
       Backtrace:
        [<00000000402d4608>] compat_SyS_clock_adjtime+0x40/0xc0
        [<0000000040205024>] syscall_exit+0x0/0x14
      
      This means the userspace program clock_adjtime called the clock_adjtime()
      syscall and then crashed inside the compat_get_timex() function.
      Syscalls should never crash programs, but instead return EFAULT.
      
      The IIR register contains the executed instruction, which disassebles
      into "ldw 0(sr3,r5),r9".
      This load-word instruction is part of __get_user() which tried to read the word
      at %r5/IOR (0xfa6f7fff). This means the unaligned handler jumped in.  The
      unaligned handler is able to emulate all ldw instructions, but it fails if it
      fails to read the source e.g. because of page fault.
      
      The following program reproduces the problem:
      
      #define _GNU_SOURCE
      #include <unistd.h>
      #include <sys/syscall.h>
      #include <sys/mman.h>
      
      int main(void) {
              /* allocate 8k */
              char *ptr = mmap(NULL, 2*4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
              /* free second half (upper 4k) and make it invalid. */
              munmap(ptr+4096, 4096);
              /* syscall where first int is unaligned and clobbers into invalid memory region */
              /* syscall should return EFAULT */
              return syscall(__NR_clock_adjtime, 0, ptr+4095);
      }
      
      To fix this issue we simply need to check if the faulting instruction address
      is in the exception fixup table when the unaligned handler failed. If it
      is, call the fixup routine instead of crashing.
      
      While looking at the unaligned handler I found another issue as well: The
      target register should not be modified if the handler was unsuccessful.
      Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      8b78f260
    • H
      parisc: Fix printk time during boot · 0032c088
      Helge Deller 提交于
      Avoid showing invalid printk time stamps during boot.
      Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Reviewed-by: NAaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@iki.fi>
      0032c088
    • M
      parisc: Fix backtrace on PA-RISC · be24a897
      Mikulas Patocka 提交于
      This patch fixes backtrace on PA-RISC
      
      There were several problems:
      
      1) The code that decodes instructions handles instructions that subtract
      from the stack pointer incorrectly. If the instruction subtracts the
      number X from the stack pointer the code increases the frame size by
      (0x100000000-X).  This results in invalid accesses to memory and
      recursive page faults.
      
      2) Because gcc reorders blocks, handling instructions that subtract from
      the frame pointer is incorrect. For example, this function
      	int f(int a)
      	{
      		if (__builtin_expect(a, 1))
      			return a;
      		g();
      		return a;
      	}
      is compiled in such a way, that the code that decreases the stack
      pointer for the first "return a" is placed before the code for "g" call.
      If we recognize this decrement, we mistakenly believe that the frame
      size for the "g" call is zero.
      
      To fix problems 1) and 2), the patch doesn't recognize instructions that
      decrease the stack pointer at all. To further safeguard the unwind code
      against nonsense values, we don't allow frame size larger than
      Total_frame_size.
      
      3) The backtrace is not locked. If stack dump races with module unload,
      invalid table can be accessed.
      
      This patch adds a spinlock when processing module tables.
      
      Note, that for correct backtrace, you need recent binutils.
      Binutils 2.18 from Debian 5 produce garbage unwind tables.
      Binutils 2.21 work better (it sometimes forgets function frames, but at
      least it doesn't generate garbage).
      Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      be24a897
  4. 25 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 24 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  6. 23 5月, 2016 11 次提交
  7. 21 5月, 2016 2 次提交
    • Z
      lib/GCD.c: use binary GCD algorithm instead of Euclidean · fff7fb0b
      Zhaoxiu Zeng 提交于
      The binary GCD algorithm is based on the following facts:
      	1. If a and b are all evens, then gcd(a,b) = 2 * gcd(a/2, b/2)
      	2. If a is even and b is odd, then gcd(a,b) = gcd(a/2, b)
      	3. If a and b are all odds, then gcd(a,b) = gcd((a-b)/2, b) = gcd((a+b)/2, b)
      
      Even on x86 machines with reasonable division hardware, the binary
      algorithm runs about 25% faster (80% the execution time) than the
      division-based Euclidian algorithm.
      
      On platforms like Alpha and ARMv6 where division is a function call to
      emulation code, it's even more significant.
      
      There are two variants of the code here, depending on whether a fast
      __ffs (find least significant set bit) instruction is available.  This
      allows the unpredictable branches in the bit-at-a-time shifting loop to
      be eliminated.
      
      If fast __ffs is not available, the "even/odd" GCD variant is used.
      
      I use the following code to benchmark:
      
      	#include <stdio.h>
      	#include <stdlib.h>
      	#include <stdint.h>
      	#include <string.h>
      	#include <time.h>
      	#include <unistd.h>
      
      	#define swap(a, b) \
      		do { \
      			a ^= b; \
      			b ^= a; \
      			a ^= b; \
      		} while (0)
      
      	unsigned long gcd0(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
      	{
      		unsigned long r;
      
      		if (a < b) {
      			swap(a, b);
      		}
      
      		if (b == 0)
      			return a;
      
      		while ((r = a % b) != 0) {
      			a = b;
      			b = r;
      		}
      
      		return b;
      	}
      
      	unsigned long gcd1(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
      	{
      		unsigned long r = a | b;
      
      		if (!a || !b)
      			return r;
      
      		b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
      
      		for (;;) {
      			a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
      			if (a == b)
      				return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
      
      			if (a < b)
      				swap(a, b);
      			a -= b;
      		}
      	}
      
      	unsigned long gcd2(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
      	{
      		unsigned long r = a | b;
      
      		if (!a || !b)
      			return r;
      
      		r &= -r;
      
      		while (!(b & r))
      			b >>= 1;
      
      		for (;;) {
      			while (!(a & r))
      				a >>= 1;
      			if (a == b)
      				return a;
      
      			if (a < b)
      				swap(a, b);
      			a -= b;
      			a >>= 1;
      			if (a & r)
      				a += b;
      			a >>= 1;
      		}
      	}
      
      	unsigned long gcd3(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
      	{
      		unsigned long r = a | b;
      
      		if (!a || !b)
      			return r;
      
      		b >>= __builtin_ctzl(b);
      		if (b == 1)
      			return r & -r;
      
      		for (;;) {
      			a >>= __builtin_ctzl(a);
      			if (a == 1)
      				return r & -r;
      			if (a == b)
      				return a << __builtin_ctzl(r);
      
      			if (a < b)
      				swap(a, b);
      			a -= b;
      		}
      	}
      
      	unsigned long gcd4(unsigned long a, unsigned long b)
      	{
      		unsigned long r = a | b;
      
      		if (!a || !b)
      			return r;
      
      		r &= -r;
      
      		while (!(b & r))
      			b >>= 1;
      		if (b == r)
      			return r;
      
      		for (;;) {
      			while (!(a & r))
      				a >>= 1;
      			if (a == r)
      				return r;
      			if (a == b)
      				return a;
      
      			if (a < b)
      				swap(a, b);
      			a -= b;
      			a >>= 1;
      			if (a & r)
      				a += b;
      			a >>= 1;
      		}
      	}
      
      	static unsigned long (*gcd_func[])(unsigned long a, unsigned long b) = {
      		gcd0, gcd1, gcd2, gcd3, gcd4,
      	};
      
      	#define TEST_ENTRIES (sizeof(gcd_func) / sizeof(gcd_func[0]))
      
      	#if defined(__x86_64__)
      
      	#define rdtscll(val) do { \
      		unsigned long __a,__d; \
      		__asm__ __volatile__("rdtsc" : "=a" (__a), "=d" (__d)); \
      		(val) = ((unsigned long long)__a) | (((unsigned long long)__d)<<32); \
      	} while(0)
      
      	static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
      								unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
      	{
      		unsigned long long start, end;
      		unsigned long long ret;
      		unsigned long gcd_res;
      
      		rdtscll(start);
      		gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
      		rdtscll(end);
      
      		if (end >= start)
      			ret = end - start;
      		else
      			ret = ~0ULL - start + 1 + end;
      
      		*res = gcd_res;
      		return ret;
      	}
      
      	#else
      
      	static inline struct timespec read_time(void)
      	{
      		struct timespec time;
      		clock_gettime(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, &time);
      		return time;
      	}
      
      	static inline unsigned long long diff_time(struct timespec start, struct timespec end)
      	{
      		struct timespec temp;
      
      		if ((end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec) < 0) {
      			temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec - 1;
      			temp.tv_nsec = 1000000000ULL + end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
      		} else {
      			temp.tv_sec = end.tv_sec - start.tv_sec;
      			temp.tv_nsec = end.tv_nsec - start.tv_nsec;
      		}
      
      		return temp.tv_sec * 1000000000ULL + temp.tv_nsec;
      	}
      
      	static unsigned long long benchmark_gcd_func(unsigned long (*gcd)(unsigned long, unsigned long),
      								unsigned long a, unsigned long b, unsigned long *res)
      	{
      		struct timespec start, end;
      		unsigned long gcd_res;
      
      		start = read_time();
      		gcd_res = gcd(a, b);
      		end = read_time();
      
      		*res = gcd_res;
      		return diff_time(start, end);
      	}
      
      	#endif
      
      	static inline unsigned long get_rand()
      	{
      		if (sizeof(long) == 8)
      			return (unsigned long)rand() << 32 | rand();
      		else
      			return rand();
      	}
      
      	int main(int argc, char **argv)
      	{
      		unsigned int seed = time(0);
      		int loops = 100;
      		int repeats = 1000;
      		unsigned long (*res)[TEST_ENTRIES];
      		unsigned long long elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
      		int i, j, k;
      
      		for (;;) {
      			int opt = getopt(argc, argv, "n:r:s:");
      			/* End condition always first */
      			if (opt == -1)
      				break;
      
      			switch (opt) {
      			case 'n':
      				loops = atoi(optarg);
      				break;
      			case 'r':
      				repeats = atoi(optarg);
      				break;
      			case 's':
      				seed = strtoul(optarg, NULL, 10);
      				break;
      			default:
      				/* You won't actually get here. */
      				break;
      			}
      		}
      
      		res = malloc(sizeof(unsigned long) * TEST_ENTRIES * loops);
      		memset(elapsed, 0, sizeof(elapsed));
      
      		srand(seed);
      		for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
      			unsigned long a = get_rand();
      			/* Do we have args? */
      			unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
      			unsigned long long min_elapsed[TEST_ENTRIES];
      			for (k = 0; k < repeats; k++) {
      				for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
      					unsigned long long tmp = benchmark_gcd_func(gcd_func[i], a, b, &res[j][i]);
      					if (k == 0 || min_elapsed[i] > tmp)
      						min_elapsed[i] = tmp;
      				}
      			}
      			for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
      				elapsed[i] += min_elapsed[i];
      		}
      
      		for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
      			printf("gcd%d: elapsed %llu\n", i, elapsed[i]);
      
      		k = 0;
      		srand(seed);
      		for (j = 0; j < loops; j++) {
      			unsigned long a = get_rand();
      			unsigned long b = argc > optind ? strtoul(argv[optind], NULL, 10) : get_rand();
      			for (i = 1; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++) {
      				if (res[j][i] != res[j][0])
      					break;
      			}
      			if (i < TEST_ENTRIES) {
      				if (k == 0) {
      					k = 1;
      					fprintf(stderr, "Error:\n");
      				}
      				fprintf(stderr, "gcd(%lu, %lu): ", a, b);
      				for (i = 0; i < TEST_ENTRIES; i++)
      					fprintf(stderr, "%ld%s", res[j][i], i < TEST_ENTRIES - 1 ? ", " : "\n");
      			}
      		}
      
      		if (k == 0)
      			fprintf(stderr, "PASS\n");
      
      		free(res);
      
      		return 0;
      	}
      
      Compiled with "-O2", on "VirtualBox 4.4.0-22-generic #38-Ubuntu x86_64" got:
      
        zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
        gcd0: elapsed 10174
        gcd1: elapsed 2120
        gcd2: elapsed 2902
        gcd3: elapsed 2039
        gcd4: elapsed 2812
        PASS
        zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
        gcd0: elapsed 9309
        gcd1: elapsed 2280
        gcd2: elapsed 2822
        gcd3: elapsed 2217
        gcd4: elapsed 2710
        PASS
        zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
        gcd0: elapsed 9589
        gcd1: elapsed 2098
        gcd2: elapsed 2815
        gcd3: elapsed 2030
        gcd4: elapsed 2718
        PASS
        zhaoxiuzeng@zhaoxiuzeng-VirtualBox:~/develop$ ./gcd -r 500000 -n 10
        gcd0: elapsed 9914
        gcd1: elapsed 2309
        gcd2: elapsed 2779
        gcd3: elapsed 2228
        gcd4: elapsed 2709
        PASS
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: avoid #defining a CONFIG_ variable]
      Signed-off-by: NZhaoxiu Zeng <zhaoxiu.zeng@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGeorge Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      fff7fb0b
    • J
      exit_thread: remove empty bodies · 5f56a5df
      Jiri Slaby 提交于
      Define HAVE_EXIT_THREAD for archs which want to do something in
      exit_thread. For others, let's define exit_thread as an empty inline.
      
      This is a cleanup before we change the prototype of exit_thread to
      accept a task parameter.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix mips]
      Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@parisc-linux.org>
      Cc: Aurelien Jacquiot <a-jacquiot@ti.com>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
      Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.linux@gmail.com>
      Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@mellanox.com>
      Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
      Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
      Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@gmail.com>
      Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
      Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
      Cc: James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>
      Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Cc: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
      Cc: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
      Cc: Jonas Bonn <jonas@southpole.se>
      Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@jp.panasonic.com>
      Cc: Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@gmail.com>
      Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>
      Cc: Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>
      Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
      Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
      Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
      Cc: Mikael Starvik <starvik@axis.com>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
      Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
      Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
      Cc: Richard Kuo <rkuo@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Steven Miao <realmz6@gmail.com>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
      Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
      Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      5f56a5df
  8. 06 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 14 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  10. 09 4月, 2016 5 次提交
  11. 05 4月, 2016 2 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: remove remaining PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} usage · ea1754a0
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      Mostly direct substitution with occasional adjustment or removing
      outdated comments.
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ea1754a0
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
      ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
      cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
      
      This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.
      
      We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
      PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
      PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
      especially on the border between fs and mm.
      
      Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
      breakage to be doable.
      
      Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
      not.
      
      The changes are pretty straight-forward:
      
       - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;
      
       - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};
      
       - page_cache_get() -> get_page();
      
       - page_cache_release() -> put_page();
      
      This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
      script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
      I've called spatch for them manually.
      
      The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
      PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.
      
      There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
      fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
      will be addressed with the separate patch.
      
      virtual patch
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
      + E
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
      + PAGE_SHIFT
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
      + PAGE_SIZE
      
      @@
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_MASK
      + PAGE_MASK
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
      + PAGE_ALIGN(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_get(E)
      + get_page(E)
      
      @@
      expression E;
      @@
      - page_cache_release(E)
      + put_page(E)
      Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  12. 31 3月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 26 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 23 3月, 2016 4 次提交
  15. 18 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
反馈
建议
客服 返回
顶部