Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

FL_CLOSE is quite common when you close a file on which you hold a
lock. The spurious "Unknown lock flags" message in cFYI is
confusing in this case.
Reported-by: NAlexander Bokovoy <abokovoy@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Now we walk though cifsFileInfo's list for every incoming lease
break and look for an equivalent there. That approach misses lease
breaks that come just after an open response - we don't have time
to populate new cifsFileInfo structure to the list. Fix this by
adding new list of pending opens and look for a lease there if we
didn't find it in the list of cifsFileInfo structures.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

When we have a file opened with read oplock and we are writing a data
to this file, we need to store the data in the cache and then send to
the server to ensure that the next read operation will get a coherent
data.

Also mark it as CONFIG_CIFS_SMB2 because it's more suitable for SMB2
code but can fix some CIFS problems too (when server delays sending
an oplock break after a write request). We can drop this ifdefs
dependence in future.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

if server supports them and we need oplocks.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Currently CIFS code accept read/write ops on mandatory locked area
when two processes use the same file descriptor - it's wrong.
Fix this by serializing io and brlock operations on the inode.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

and allow several processes to walk through the lock list and read
can_cache_brlcks value if they are not going to modify them.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>

Now we need to lock/unlock a spinlock while processing brlock ops
on the inode. Move brlocks of a fid to a separate list and attach
all such lists to the inode. This let us not hold a spinlock.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>

The array is no longer needed. We just need a single kvec to hold the
header for signature checking.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

Replace the "marshal_iov" function with a "read_into_pages" function.
That function will copy the read data off the socket and into the
pages array, kmapping and reading pages one at a time.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

We'll need an array to put into a smb_rqst, so convert this into an array
instead of (ab)using the lru list_head.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

Eventually, we're going to want to append a list of pages to
cifs_readdata instead of a list of kvecs. To prepare for that, turn
the kvec array allocation into a separate one and just keep a
pointer to it in the readdata.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

This is help us to extend the code for future protocols that can use
another fid mechanism (as SMB2 that has it divided into two parts:
persistent and violatile).

Also rename variables and refactor the code around the changes.
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

The readpages bug is a regression that was introduced in 6993f74a.
This also fixes a couple of similar bugs in the uncached read and write
codepaths.

Also, prevent this sort of thing in the future by having cifsFileInfo_get
take the spinlock itself, and adding a _locked variant for use in places
that are already holding the lock. The _put code has always done that
so this makes for a less confusing interface.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.5.x
Reviewed-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Since both CIFS and SMB2 use ses->capabilities (server->capabilities)
field but flags are different we should make such checks protocol
independent.
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

struct file_lock is pretty large, so we really don't want that on the
stack in a potentially long call chain. Reorganize the arguments to
CIFSSMBPosixLock to eliminate the need for that.

Eliminate the get_flag and simply use a non-NULL pLockInfo to indicate
that this is a "get" operation. In order to do that, need to add a new
loff_t argument for the start_offset.
Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Those macros add a newline on their own, so there's not any need to
embed one in the message itself.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <smfrench@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

when cifs_reconnect sets maxBuf to 0 and we try to calculate a size
of memory we need to store locks.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <pshilovsky@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

While traversing the linked list of open file handles, if the identfied
file handle is invalid, a reopen is attempted and if it fails, we
resume traversing where we stopped and cifs can oops while accessing
invalid next element, for list might have changed.

So mark the invalid file handle and attempt reopen if no
valid file handle is found in rest of the list.
If reopen fails, move the invalid file handle to the end of the list
and start traversing the list again from the begining.
Repeat this four times before giving up and returning an error if
file reopen keeps failing.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NShirish Pargaonkar <shirishpargaonkar@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NSteve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Shilovsky <piastry@etersoft.ru>