- 10 4月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Adding notification mark to object list has been currently done through fsnotify_add_{inode|vfsmount}_mark() helpers from fsnotify_add_mark_locked() which call fsnotify_add_mark_list(). Remove this unnecessary indirection to simplify the code. Pushing all the locking to fsnotify_add_mark_list() also allows us to allocate the connector structure with GFP_KERNEL mode. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently inode reference is held by fsnotify marks. Change the rules so that inode reference is held by fsnotify_mark_connector structure whenever the list is non-empty. This simplifies the code and is more logical. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Move pointer to inode / vfsmount from mark itself to the fsnotify_mark_connector structure. This is another step on the path towards decoupling inode / vfsmount lifetime from notification mark lifetime. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Currently notification marks are attached to object (inode or vfsmnt) by a hlist_head in the object. The list is also protected by a spinlock in the object. So while there is any mark attached to the list of marks, the object must be pinned in memory (and thus e.g. last iput() deleting inode cannot happen). Also for list iteration in fsnotify() to work, we must hold fsnotify_mark_srcu lock so that mark itself and mark->obj_list.next cannot get freed. Thus we are required to wait for response to fanotify events from userspace process with fsnotify_mark_srcu lock held. That causes issues when userspace process is buggy and does not reply to some event - basically the whole notification subsystem gets eventually stuck. So to be able to drop fsnotify_mark_srcu lock while waiting for response, we have to pin the mark in memory and make sure it stays in the object list (as removing the mark waiting for response could lead to lost notification events for groups later in the list). However we don't want inode reclaim to block on such mark as that would lead to system just locking up elsewhere. This commit is the first in the series that paves way towards solving these conflicting lifetime needs. Instead of anchoring the list of marks directly in the object, we anchor it in a dedicated structure (fsnotify_mark_connector) and just point to that structure from the object. The following commits will also add spinlock protecting the list and object pointer to the structure. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Add a comment that lifetime of a notification mark is protected by SRCU and remove a comment about clearing of marks attached to the inode. It is stale and more uptodate version is at fsnotify_destroy_marks() which is the function handling this case. Reviewed-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-
- 24 12月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
There are only two calls sites of fsnotify_duplicate_mark(). Those are in kernel/audit_tree.c and both are bogus. Vfsmount pointer is unused for audit tree, inode pointer and group gets set in fsnotify_add_mark_locked() later anyway, mask and free_mark are already set in alloc_chunk(). In fact, calling fsnotify_duplicate_mark() is actively harmful because following fsnotify_add_mark_locked() will leak group reference by overwriting the group pointer. So just remove the two calls to fsnotify_duplicate_mark() and the function. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> [PM: line wrapping to fit in 80 chars] Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Inotify instance is destroyed when all references to it are dropped. That not only means that the corresponding file descriptor needs to be closed but also that all corresponding instance marks are freed (as each mark holds a reference to the inotify instance). However marks are freed only after SRCU period ends which can take some time and thus if user rapidly creates and frees inotify instances, number of existing inotify instances can exceed max_user_instances limit although from user point of view there is always at most one existing instance. Thus inotify_init() returns EMFILE error which is hard to justify from user point of view. This problem is exposed by LTP inotify06 testcase on some machines. We fix the problem by making sure all group marks are properly freed while destroying inotify instance. We wait for SRCU period to end in that path anyway since we have to make sure there is no event being added to the instance while we are tearing down the instance. So it takes only some plumbing to allow for marks to be destroyed in that path as well and not from a dedicated work item. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NXiaoguang Wang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 2月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq. In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are a lot of marks being removed, we delay the reaper job slightly when queueing it, to allow several to gather on the list. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Tested-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This reverts commit c510eff6 ("fsnotify: destroy marks with call_srcu instead of dedicated thread"). Eryu reported that he was seeing some OOM kills kick in when running a testcase that adds and removes inotify marks on a file in a tight loop. The above commit changed the code to use call_srcu to clean up the marks. While that does (in principle) work, the srcu callback job is limited to cleaning up entries in small batches and only once per jiffy. It's easily possible to overwhelm that machinery with too many call_srcu callbacks, and Eryu's reproduer did just that. There's also another potential problem with using call_srcu here. While you can obviously sleep while holding the srcu_read_lock, the callbacks run under local_bh_disable, so you can't sleep there. It's possible when putting the last reference to the fsnotify_mark that we'll end up putting a chain of references including the fsnotify_group, uid, and associated keys. While I don't see any obvious ways that that could occurs, it's probably still best to avoid using call_srcu here after all. This patch reverts the above patch. A later patch will take a different approach to eliminated the dedicated thread here. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Reported-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Tested-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 1月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
At the time that this code was originally written, call_srcu didn't exist, so this thread was required to ensure that we waited for that SRCU grace period to settle before finally freeing the object. It does exist now however and we can much more efficiently use call_srcu to handle this. That also allows us to potentially use srcu_barrier to ensure that they are all of the callbacks have run before proceeding. In order to conserve space, we union the rcu_head with the g_list. This will be necessary for nfsd which will allocate marks from a dedicated slabcache. We have to be able to ensure that all of the objects are destroyed before destroying the cache. That's fairly Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 9月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() is subtle to use because it temporarily releases group->mark_mutex. To avoid future problems with this function, split it into two. fsnotify_detach_mark() is the part that needs group->mark_mutex and fsnotify_free_mark() is the part that must be called outside of group->mark_mutex. This way it's much clearer what's going on and we also avoid some pointless acquisitions of group->mark_mutex. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Free list is used when all marks on given inode / mount should be destroyed when inode / mount is going away. However we can free all of the marks without using a special list with some care. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with fsnotify_destroy_marks() so that when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() drops mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and thus the next entry pointer we have cached may become stale and we dereference free memory. Fix the problem by first moving marks to free to a special private list and then always free the first entry in the special list. This method is safe even when entries from the list can disappear once we drop the lock. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com> Reported-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Cc: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit a2673b6e. Kinglong Mee reports a memory leak with that patch, and Jan Kara confirms: "Thanks for report! You are right that my patch introduces a race between fsnotify kthread and fsnotify_destroy_group() which can result in leaking inotify event on group destruction. I haven't yet decided whether the right fix is not to queue events for dying notification group (as that is pointless anyway) or whether we should just fix the original problem differently... Whenever I look at fsnotify code mark handling I get lost in the maze of locks, lists, and subtle differences between how different notification systems handle notification marks :( I'll think about it over night" and after thinking about it, Jan says: "OK, I have looked into the code some more and I found another relatively simple way of fixing the original oops. It will be IMHO better than trying to fixup this issue which has more potential for breakage. I'll ask Linus to revert the fsnotify fix he already merged and send a new fix" Reported-by: NKinglong Mee <kinglongmee@gmail.com> Requested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 7月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can race with fsnotify_destroy_marks() so when fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() drops mark_mutex, a mark from the list iterated by fsnotify_clear_marks_by_group_flags() can be freed and we dereference free memory in the loop there. Fix the problem by keeping mark_mutex held in fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked(). The reason why we drop that mutex is that we need to call a ->freeing_mark() callback which may acquire mark_mutex again. To avoid this and similar lock inversion issues, we move the call to ->freeing_mark() callback to the kthread destroying the mark. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NAshish Sangwan <a.sangwan@samsung.com> Suggested-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 12月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
destroy_list is used to track marks which still need waiting for srcu period end before they can be freed. However by the time mark is added to destroy_list it isn't in group's list of marks anymore and thus we can reuse fsnotify_mark->g_list for queueing into destroy_list. This saves two pointers for each fsnotify_mark. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
There's a lot of common code in inode and mount marks handling. Factor it out to a common helper function. Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
fsnotify() needs to merge inode and mount marks lists when notifying groups about events so that ignore masks from inode marks are reflected in mount mark notifications and groups are notified in proper order (according to priorities). Currently the sorting of the lists done by fsnotify_add_inode_mark() / fsnotify_add_vfsmount_mark() and fsnotify() differed which resulted ignore masks not being used in some cases. Fix the problem by always using the same comparison function when sorting / merging the mark lists. Thanks to Heinrich Schuchardt for improvements of my patch. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87721Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Reported-by: NHeinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Tested-by: NHeinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 05 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Cohen 提交于
Do not initialize private_destroy_list twice. list_replace_init() already takes care of initializing private_destroy_list. We don't need to initialize it with LIST_HEAD() beforehand. Signed-off-by: NDavid Cohen <david.a.cohen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 10 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
There have been changes in the locking scheme of fsnotify but the comments in the source code have not been updated yet. This patch corrects this. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 12 12月, 2012 7 次提交
-
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 04:38:22PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote: > > I finally built and tested a v3.0 kernel with these patches (I know I'm > SOOOOOO far behind). Not what I hoped for: > > > [ 150.937798] VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of tmpfs. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > > [ 150.945290] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000070 > > [ 150.946012] IP: [<ffffffff810ffd58>] shmem_free_inode+0x18/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] PGD 2bf9e067 PUD 2bf9f067 PMD 0 > > [ 150.946012] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC > > [ 150.946012] CPU 0 > > [ 150.946012] Modules linked in: nfs lockd fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl sunrpc ip6t_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 ip6table_filter ip6_tables ext4 jbd2 crc16 joydev ata_piix i2c_piix4 pcspkr uinput ipv6 autofs4 usbhid [last unloaded: scsi_wait_scan] > > [ 150.946012] > > [ 150.946012] Pid: 2764, comm: syscall_thrash Not tainted 3.0.0+ #1 Red Hat KVM > > [ 150.946012] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810ffd58>] [<ffffffff810ffd58>] shmem_free_inode+0x18/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] RSP: 0018:ffff88002c2e5df8 EFLAGS: 00010282 > > [ 150.946012] RAX: 000000004e370d9f RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88003a029438 > > [ 150.946012] RDX: 0000000033630a5f RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88003491c240 > > [ 150.946012] RBP: ffff88002c2e5e08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000 > > [ 150.946012] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff88003a029428 > > [ 150.946012] R13: ffff88003a029428 R14: ffff88003a029428 R15: ffff88003499a610 > > [ 150.946012] FS: 00007f5a05420700(0000) GS:ffff88003f600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > [ 150.946012] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b > > [ 150.946012] CR2: 0000000000000070 CR3: 000000002a662000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 > > [ 150.946012] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 > > [ 150.946012] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 > > [ 150.946012] Process syscall_thrash (pid: 2764, threadinfo ffff88002c2e4000, task ffff88002bfbc760) > > [ 150.946012] Stack: > > [ 150.946012] ffff88003a029438 ffff88003a029428 ffff88002c2e5e38 ffffffff81102f76 > > [ 150.946012] ffff88003a029438 ffff88003a029598 ffffffff8160f9c0 ffff88002c221250 > > [ 150.946012] ffff88002c2e5e68 ffffffff8115e9be ffff88002c2e5e68 ffff88003a029438 > > [ 150.946012] Call Trace: > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81102f76>] shmem_evict_inode+0x76/0x130 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff8115e9be>] evict+0x7e/0x170 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff8115ee40>] iput_final+0xd0/0x190 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff8115ef33>] iput+0x33/0x40 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81180205>] fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked+0x145/0x160 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81180316>] fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x36/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff81181937>] sys_inotify_rm_watch+0x77/0xd0 > > [ 150.946012] [<ffffffff815aca52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b > > [ 150.946012] Code: 67 4a 00 b8 e4 ff ff ff eb aa 66 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 55 48 89 e5 48 83 ec 10 48 89 1c 24 4c 89 64 24 08 48 8b 9f 40 05 00 00 > > [ 150.946012] 83 7b 70 00 74 1c 4c 8d a3 80 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 d2 5d 4a > > [ 150.946012] RIP [<ffffffff810ffd58>] shmem_free_inode+0x18/0x50 > > [ 150.946012] RSP <ffff88002c2e5df8> > > [ 150.946012] CR2: 0000000000000070 > > Looks at aweful lot like the problem from: > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg46101.html > I tried to reproduce this bug with your test program, but without success. However, if I understand correctly, this occurs since we dont hold any locks when we call iput() in mark_destroy(), right? With the patches you tested, iput() is also not called within any lock, since the groups mark_mutex is released temporarily before iput() is called. This is, since the original codes behaviour is similar. However since we now have a mutex as the biggest lock, we can do what you suggested (http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-fsdevel/msg46107.html) and call iput() with the mutex held to avoid the race. The patch below implements this. It uses nested locking to avoid deadlock in case we do the final iput() on an inode which still holds marks and thus would take the mutex again when calling fsnotify_inode_delete() in destroy_inode(). Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
In clear_marks_by_group_flags() the mark list of a group is iterated and the marks are put on a temporary list. Since we introduced fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() we dont need the temp list any more and are able to remove the marks while the mark list is iterated and the mark list mutex is held. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
This patch introduces fsnotify_add_mark_locked() and fsnotify_remove_mark_locked() which are essentially the same as fsnotify_add_mark() and fsnotify_remove_mark() but assume that the caller has already taken the groups mark mutex. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
In fsnotify_destroy_mark() dont get the group from the passed mark anymore, but pass the group itself as an additional parameter to the function. Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
Replaces the groups mark_lock spinlock with a mutex. Using a mutex instead of a spinlock results in more flexibility (i.e it allows to sleep while the lock is held). Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
Race-free addition and removal of a mark to a groups mark list would be easier if we could lock the mark list of group before we lock the specific mark. This patch changes the order used to add/remove marks to/from mark lists from 1. mark->lock 2. group->mark_lock 3. inode->i_lock to 1. group->mark_lock 2. mark->lock 3. inode->i_lock Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Lino Sanfilippo 提交于
Get a group ref for each mark that is added to the groups list and release that ref when the mark is freed in fsnotify_put_mark(). We also use get a group reference for duplicated marks and for private event data. Now we dont free a group any more when the number of marks becomes 0 but when the groups ref count does. Since this will only happen when all marks are removed from a groups mark list, we dont have to set the groups number of marks to 1 at group creation. Beside clearing all marks in fsnotify_destroy_group() we do also flush the groups event queue. This is since events may hold references to groups (due to private event data) and we have to put those references first before we get a chance to put the final ref, which will result in a call to fsnotify_final_destroy_group(). Signed-off-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
- 15 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miklos Szeredi 提交于
Removing the parent of a watched file results in "kernel BUG at fs/notify/mark.c:139". To reproduce add "-w /tmp/audit/dir/watched_file" to audit.rules rm -rf /tmp/audit/dir This is caused by fsnotify_destroy_mark() being called without an extra reference taken by the caller. Reported by Francesco Cosoleto here: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689860 Fix by removing the BUG_ON and adding a comment about not accessing mark after the iput. Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arun Sharma 提交于
This allows us to move duplicated code in <asm/atomic.h> (atomic_inc_not_zero() for now) to <linux/atomic.h> Signed-off-by: NArun Sharma <asharma@fb.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 25 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Chinner 提交于
All that remains of the inode_lock is protecting the inode hash list manipulation and traversals. Rename the inode_lock to inode_hash_lock to reflect it's actual function. Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 28 7月, 2010 9 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
The global fsnotify groups lists were invented as a way to increase the performance of fsnotify by shortcutting events which were not interesting. With the changes to walk the object lists rather than global groups lists these shortcuts are not useful. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Instead of moving list elements from destroy_list to &private_destroy_list, exchange the list heads. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Currently reading the inode->i_fsnotify_marks or vfsmount->mnt_fsnotify_marks lists are protected by a spinlock on both the read and the write side. This patch protects the read side of those lists with a new single srcu. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Currently fsnotify check is mark->group is NULL to decide if fsnotify_destroy_mark() has already been called or not. With the upcoming rcu work it is a heck of a lot easier to use an explicit flag than worry about group being set to NULL. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fsnotify takes an igrab on an inode when it adds a mark. The code was supposed to drop the reference when the mark was removed but didn't. This caused problems when an fs was unmounted because those inodes would clearly not be gone. Thus resulting in the most devistating of messages: VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of loop0. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. >>> Have a nice day... Jiri Slaby bisected the problem to a patch in the fsnotify tree. The code snippets below show my stupidity quite clearly. void fsnotify_destroy_inode_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark) { ... mark->inode = NULL; ... } void fsnotify_destroy_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark) { struct inode *inode = NULL; ... if (mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_INODE) { fsnotify_destroy_inode_mark(mark); inode = mark->i.inode; } ... if (inode) iput(inode); ... } Obviously the intent was to capture the inode before it was set to NULL in fsnotify_destory_inode_mark() so we wouldn't be leaking inodes forever. Instead we leaked them (and exploded on umount) Reported-by: NJiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
fanotify listeners may want to clear all marks. They may want to do this to destroy all of their inode marks which have nothing but ignores. Realistically this is useful for av vendors who update policy and want to clear all of their cached allows. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
The ignored_mask is a new mask which is part of fsnotify marks. A group's should_send_event() function can use the ignored mask to determine that certain events are not of interest. In particular if a group registers a mask including FS_OPEN on a vfsmount they could add FS_OPEN to the ignored_mask for individual inodes and not send open events for those inodes. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
inotify marks must pin inodes in core. dnotify doesn't technically need to since they are closed when the directory is closed. fanotify also need to pin inodes in core as it works today. But the next step is to introduce the concept of 'ignored masks' which is actually a mask of events for an inode of no interest. I claim that these should be liberally sent to the kernel and should not pin the inode in core. If the inode is brought back in the listener will get an event it may have thought excluded, but this is not a serious situation and one any listener should deal with. This patch lays the ground work for non-pinning inode marks by using lazy inode pinning. We do not pin a mark until it has a non-zero mask entry. If a listener new sets a mask we never pin the inode. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-
由 Eric Paris 提交于
Much like inode-mark.c has all of the code dealing with marks on inodes this patch adds a vfsmount-mark.c which has similar code but is intended for marks on vfsmounts. Signed-off-by: NEric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
-