Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000146

Some h/w that can adjust screen brightness through ACPI functions, but
can't turn on/off the backlight power correctly. So, we list those h/w in
quirks and try to turn on/off the backlight power through WMI.
Signed-off-by: NAceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Some models work better with different values of wapf, so move the
variable into quriks_entry to make it more easy to give a specific
value to different models.

Based on original patch from AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>

Cc: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Due to some implementation reasons, ASUS ET2012 All-in-One machines
can't report the correct backlight power status, it will always return
1. To track the backlight power status correctly, we have to store the
status by ourselves.

BTW, by the BIOS design, the backlight power will be turn on/off
sequently, no matter what the value of the parameter will be.
More over, the brightness adjustment command will turn on the backlight
power. Those behaviors will make us fail to track the backlight power
status.
For example, While we are trying to turn on the backlight power,
we will send out the brightness adjustment command and then trying to
figure out if we have to turn on the backlight power, then send out
the command. But, the real case is that, the backlight power turns on
while sending the brightness adjustment command, and then we send out
the command to turn on the backlight power, it actually will turn off
the backlight power and the backlight power status we recorded becomes
wrong. So, we have to seperate these two commands by a if statement.
Signed-off-by: NAceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Some ASUS ET2012E/I All-in-One machines that use a scalar board
to control the brightness, and they only accept brightness up and down
command. So, I introduced a get_scalar_command() function to pass the
command to the scalar board through WMI.

Besides, we have to store the brightness value locally, for we need the
old value to know the brightness value is increasing or decreasing.

BTW, since there is no way to retrieve the actual brightness(it would be
a fixed value), and the max brightness value would be fixed to 1, so we
have to keep passing the brightness up/down command when we reached the
max brightness value or 0.
Signed-off-by: NAceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NChih-Wei Huang <cwhuang@linux.org.tw>
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

ref: http://dev.iksaif.net/projects/3/wiki/Asus-laptop_WAPFSigned-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

This key is different than other hotkeys, having seperate scan
codes for press, release, and hold, so it requires some special
filtering. Press and release events are passed on, and hold events
are ignored since sparse-keymap does not support hardware
autorepeat.

Note that "Home" in the context of this button doesn't mean the
same thing as the usual Home key, and it really isn't clear at
all what is meant by "Home". The manufacurer's description of the
button indicates that it should launch some sort of touch screen
settings interface on short press and apply a desktop rotation on
long press.
Signed-off-by: NSeth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Just a trivial pr_warning to pr_warn conversion
while adding a few missing newlines.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NKeng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

New Asus notebooks are using a WMI device similar to
the one used in Eee PCs. Since we don't want to load
eeepc-wmi module on Asus notebooks, and we want to
keep the eeepc-wmi module for backward compatibility,
this patch introduce a new module, named asus-wmi, that
will be used by eeepc-wmi and the new Asus Notebook WMI
Driver.

eeepc-wmi's input device strings (device name and phys)
are kept, but rfkill and led names are changed (s/eeepc/asus/).
This should not break anything since rfkill are used by type or
index, not by name, and the eeepc::touchpad led wasn't working
correctly before 2.6.39 anyway.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

New Asus notebooks are using a WMI device similar to
the one used in Eee PCs. Since we don't want to load
a module named eeepc-laptop on Asus Notebooks, start by
copying all the code to asus-wmi.c.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

These keys are supposed to be handled by any software
using the camera (like webKam or cheese...). They can
also be used to actually move the camera when possible.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Each device seems to be in a "group" (devid >> 16 & 0xFF).
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Found while checking PDF manuals...
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

This key should power off the backlight, not the display,
it is also used in acpi/video.c to do the same thing.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

I checked some more DSDT, and it seems that I wasn't
totally right about the meaning of DSTS return value.
Bit 0 is clearly the status of the device, and I discovered
that bit 16 is set when the device is present.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

This allow to remove ~30 lines of code.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

eeepc_wmi_get_devstate returns an acpi_status, so each
call need extra logic to handle the return code. This
patch add a simple getter, returning a boolean (or a
negative error code).
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

\AMW0.WMBC, which is the main method that we use,
is not reentrant. When wireless hotpluging is enabled,
toggling the status of the wireless device using WMBC will
trigger a notification and the notification handler need to
call WMBC again to get the new status of the device, this
will trigger the following error:

ACPI Error (dswload-0802): [_T_0] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS
ACPI Exception: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20100428/psloop-231)
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\AMW0.WMBC] (Node f7023b88), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS
ACPI: Marking method WMBC as Serialized because of AE_ALREADY_EXISTS error

Since there is currently no way to tell the acpi subsystem to mark
a method as serialized, we do it in eeepc-wmi.

Of course, we could let the first call fail, and then it would work,
but it doesn't seems really clean, and it will make the first
WMBC call return a random value.

This patch was tested on EeePc 1000H with a RaLink RT2860
wireless card using the rt2800pci driver. rt2860sta driver
seems to deadlock when we remove the pci device...
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Implement wireless like hotplug handling (code stolen from eeepc-laptop).

Reminder: on some models rfkill is implemented by logically unplugging the
wireless card from the PCI bus. Despite sending ACPI notifications, this does
not appear to be implemented using standard ACPI hotplug - nor does the
firmware provide the _OSC method required to support native PCIe hotplug.
The only sensible choice appears to be to handle the hotplugging directly in
the platform driver.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

If legacy device (SB.ATKD - ASUS010) used by eeepc-laptop
is enabled, don't allow eeepc-wmi to load because:
- eeepc-laptop may be loaded, and can conflict with
  eeepc-wmi (they both try to register eeepc::touchpad
  led for example).
- the WMI interface is inteded to be used when the OS is
  not detected as Win 7. And when this is the case, the
  ASUS010 device is disabled.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>

Since eeepc-wmi has currently no official maintainer, I claim
maintainership of this driver, and add it to the acpi4asus project.
Signed-off-by: NCorentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>