- 20 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
The PCI host bridge scan handler installs its own notify handler, handle_hotplug_event_root(), by itself. Nevertheless, the ACPI hotplug framework also installs the common notify handler, acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), for PCI root bridges. This causes acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to call _OST method with unsupported error as hotplug.enabled is not set. To address this issue, introduce hotplug.ignore flag, which indicates that the scan handler installs its own notify handler by itself. The ACPI hotplug framework does not install the common notify handler when this flag is set. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> [rjw: Changed the name of the new flag] Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify struct acpi_dev_node to contain a pointer to struct acpi_device associated with the given device object (that is, its ACPI companion device) instead of an ACPI handle corresponding to it. Introduce two new macros for manipulating that pointer in a CONFIG_ACPI-safe way, ACPI_COMPANION() and ACPI_COMPANION_SET(), and rework the ACPI_HANDLE() macro to take the above changes into account. Drop the ACPI_HANDLE_SET() macro entirely and rework its users to use ACPI_COMPANION_SET() instead. For some of them who used to pass the result of acpi_get_child() directly to ACPI_HANDLE_SET() introduce a helper routine acpi_preset_companion() doing an equivalent thing. The main motivation for doing this is that there are things represented by struct acpi_device objects that don't have valid ACPI handles (so called fixed ACPI hardware features, such as power and sleep buttons) and we would like to create platform device objects for them and "glue" them to their ACPI companions in the usual way (which currently is impossible due to the lack of valid ACPI handles). However, there are more reasons why it may be useful. First, struct acpi_device pointers allow of much better type checking than void pointers which are ACPI handles, so it should be more difficult to write buggy code using modified struct acpi_dev_node and the new macros. Second, the change should help to reduce (over time) the number of places in which the result of ACPI_HANDLE() is passed to acpi_bus_get_device() in order to obtain a pointer to the struct acpi_device associated with the given "physical" device, because now that pointer is returned by ACPI_COMPANION() directly. Finally, the change should make it easier to write generic code that will build both for CONFIG_ACPI set and unset without adding explicit compiler directives to it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> # on Haswell Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA and SDIO part
-
- 08 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are two different interfaces for queuing up work items on the ACPI hotplug workqueue, alloc_acpi_hp_work() used by PCI and PCI host bridge hotplug code and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() used by the common ACPI hotplug code and docking stations. They both are somewhat cumbersome to use and work slightly differently. The users of alloc_acpi_hp_work() have to submit a work function that will extract the necessary data items from a struct acpi_hp_work object allocated by alloc_acpi_hp_work() and then will free that object, while it would be more straightforward to simply use a work function with one more argument and let the interface take care of the execution details. The users of acpi_os_hotplug_execute() also have to deal with the fact that it takes only one argument in addition to the work function pointer, although acpi_os_execute_deferred() actually takes care of the allocation and freeing of memory, so it would have been able to pass more arguments to the work function if it hadn't been constrained by the connection with acpi_os_execute(). Moreover, while alloc_acpi_hp_work() makes GFP_KERNEL memory allocations, which is correct, because hotplug work items are always queued up from process context, acpi_os_hotplug_execute() uses GFP_ATOMIC, as that is needed by acpi_os_execute(). Also, acpi_os_execute_deferred() queued up by it waits for the ACPI event workqueues to flush before executing the work function, whereas alloc_acpi_hp_work() can't do anything similar. That leads to somewhat arbitrary differences in behavior between various ACPI hotplug code paths and has to be straightened up. For this reason, replace both alloc_acpi_hp_work() and acpi_os_hotplug_execute() with a single interface, acpi_hotplug_execute(), combining their behavior and being more friendly to its users than any of the two. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that handle_root_bridge_removal() is the only user of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), so it doesn't have to be exported any more and can be made internal to the ACPI core. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Simplify handle_root_bridge_removal() and acpi_eject_store() by getting rid of struct acpi_eject_event and passing device objects directly to async routines executed via acpi_os_hotplug_execute(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 17 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Two functions defined in device_pm.c, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent() and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), have no callers and may be dropped, so drop them. Moreover, they are the only functions adding entries to and removing entries from the power_dependent list in struct acpi_device, so drop that list too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Some serial buses like I2C and SPI don't require that the parent device is in D0 before any of its children transitions to D0, but instead the parent device can control its own power independently from the children. This does not follow the ACPI specification as it requires the parent to be powered on before its children. However, Windows seems to ignore this requirement so I think we can do the same in Linux. Implement this by adding a new power flag 'ignore_parent' to struct acpi_device. If this flag is set the ACPI core ignores checking of the parent device power state when the device is powered on/off. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The current protocol for handling hot remove of containers is very fragile and causes acpi_eject_store() to acquire acpi_scan_lock which may deadlock with the removal of the device that it is called for (the reason is that device sysfs attributes cannot be removed while their callbacks are being executed and ACPI device objects are removed under acpi_scan_lock). The problem is related to the fact that containers are handled by acpi_bus_device_eject() in a special way, which is to emit an offline uevent instead of just removing the container. Then, user space is expected to handle that uevent and use the container's "eject" attribute to actually remove it. That is fragile, because user space may fail to complete the ejection (for example, by not using the container's "eject" attribute at all) leaving the BIOS kind of in a limbo. Moreover, if the eject event is not signaled for a container itself, but for its parent device object (or generally, for an ancestor above it in the ACPI namespace), the container will be removed straight away without doing that whole dance. For this reason, modify acpi_bus_device_eject() to remove containers synchronously like any other objects (user space will get its uevent anyway in case it does some other things in response to it) and remove the eject_pending ACPI device flag that is not used any more. This way acpi_eject_store() doesn't have a reason to acquire acpi_scan_lock any more and one possible deadlock scenario goes away (plus the code is simplified a bit). Reported-and-tested-by: NGu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In theory, under a given ACPI namespace node there should be only one child device object with _ADR whose value matches a given bus address exactly. In practice, however, there are systems in which multiple child device objects under a given parent have _ADR matching exactly the same address. In those cases we use _STA to determine which of the multiple matching devices is enabled, since some systems are known to indicate which ACPI device object to associate with the given physical (usually PCI) device this way. Unfortunately, as it turns out, there are systems in which many device objects under the same parent have _ADR matching exactly the same bus address and none of them has _STA, in which case they all should be regarded as enabled according to the spec. Still, if those device objects are supposed to represent bridges (e.g. this is the case for device objects corresponding to PCIe ports), we can try harder and skip the ones that have no child device objects in the ACPI namespace. With luck, we can avoid using device objects that we are not expected to use this way. Although this only works for bridges whose children also have ACPI namespace representation, it is sufficient to address graphics adapter detection issues on some systems, so rework the code finding a matching device ACPI handle for a given bus address to implement this idea. Introduce a new function, acpi_find_child(), taking three arguments: the ACPI handle of the device's parent, a bus address suitable for the device's bus type and a bool indicating if the device is a bridge and make it work as outlined above. Reimplement the function currently used for this purpose, acpi_get_child(), as a call to acpi_find_child() with the last argument set to 'false' and make the PCI subsystem use acpi_find_child() with the bridge information passed as the last argument to it. [Lan Tianyu notices that it is not sufficient to use pci_is_bridge() for that, because the device's subordinate pointer hasn't been set yet at this point, so use hdr_type instead.] This change fixes a regression introduced inadvertently by commit 33f767d7 (ACPI: Rework acpi_get_child() to be more efficient) which overlooked the fact that for acpi_walk_namespace() "post-order" means "after all children have been visited" rather than "on the way back", so for device objects without children and for namespace walks of depth 1, as in the acpi_get_child() case, the "post-order" callbacks ordering is actually the same as the ordering of "pre-order" ones. Since that commit changed the namespace walk in acpi_get_child() to terminate after finding the first matching object instead of going through all of them and returning the last one, it effectively changed the result returned by that function in some rare cases and that led to problems (the switch from a "pre-order" to a "post-order" callback was supposed to prevent that from happening, but it was ineffective). As it turns out, the systems where the change made by commit 33f767d7 actually matters are those where there are multiple ACPI device objects representing the same PCIe port (which effectively is a bridge). Moreover, only one of them, and the one we are expected to use, has child device objects in the ACPI namespace, so the regression can be addressed as described above. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60561Reported-by: NPeter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Tested-by: NVladimir Lalov <mail@vlalov.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.9+
-
- 06 8月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The physical_node_id_bitmap in struct acpi_device is only used for looking up the first currently unused dependent phyiscal node ID by acpi_bind_one(). It is not really necessary, however, because acpi_bind_one() walks the entire physical_node_list of the given device object for sanity checking anyway and if that list is always sorted by node_id, it is straightforward to find the first gap between the currently used node IDs and use that number as the ID of the new list node. This also removes the artificial limit of the maximum number of dependent physical devices per ACPI device object, which now depends only on the capacity of unsigend int. As a result, it fixes a regression introduced by commit e2ff3940 (ACPI / memhotplug: Bind removable memory blocks to ACPI device nodes) that caused acpi_memory_enable_device() to fail when the number of 128 MB blocks within one removable memory module was greater than 32. Reported-and-tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move acpi_bus_get_device() from bus.c to scan.c which allows acpi_bus_data_handler() to become static and clean up the latter. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are several places in the tree where ACPI_STATE_D3 is used instead of ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD which should be used instead for clarity. Modify them all to use ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD as appropriate. [The definition of ACPI_STATE_D3 itself cannot go away at this point as it is part of ACPICA.] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
It is quite some time that this one has been deprecated. Get rid of it. Should some really important user be overseen, it may be reverted and the userspace program worked on first, but it is time to do something to get rid of this old stuff... Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: NMatthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are no users of the ACPI bus notifier call chain, acpi_bus_notify_list, any more, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Functions acpi_dock_match() and acpi_bay_match() in scan.c can be shared with dock.c to reduce code duplication, so export them as global functions. Also add a new function acpi_ata_match() to check whether an ACPI device object represents an ATA device. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Introduce two helper functions, acpi_evaluate_ej0() and acpi_evaluate_lck(), that will execute the _EJ0 and _LCK ACPI control methods, respectively, and use them to simplify the ACPI scan code. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() and use it in a number of places to simplify code. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Introduce helper function acpi_has_method() and use it in a number of places to simplify code. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 7cd8407d (ACPI / PM: Do not execute _PS0 for devices without _PSC during initialization) introduced a regression on some systems with Intel Lynxpoint Low-Power Subsystem (LPSS) where some devices need to be powered up during initialization, but their device objects in the ACPI namespace have _PS0 and _PS3 only (without _PSC or power resources). To work around this problem, make the ACPI LPSS driver power up devices it knows about by using a new helper function acpi_device_fix_up_power() that does all of the necessary sanity checks and calls acpi_dev_pm_explicit_set() to put the device into D0. Reported-and-tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a name clash between function acpi_device_power_state() defined in drivers/acpi/device_pm.c and structure type acpi_device_power_state defined in include/acpi/acpi_bus.h, which may be resolved by renaming the function. Additionally, that funtion may be made static, because it is not used anywhere outside of the file it is defined in. Rename acpi_device_power_state() to acpi_dev_pm_get_state(), which better reflects its purpose, and make it static. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
suprise_removal_ok and performance_manageable in struct acpi_device_flags are not used by any code. So, remove them. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI processor driver was the only user of the removal_type field in struct acpi_device, but it doesn't use that field any more after recent changes. Thus, removal_type has no more users, so drop it along with the associated data type. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Now the global list acpi_pci_roots pci_root.c is useless, remove it. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Currently, drivers/acpi/device_pm.c depends on CONFIG_PM and all of the functions defined in there are replaced with static inline stubs if that option is unset. However, CONFIG_PM means, roughly, "runtime PM or suspend/hibernation support" and some of those functions are useful regardless of that. For example, they are used by the ACPI fan driver for controlling fans and acpi_device_set_power() is called during device removal. Moreover, device initialization may depend on setting device power states properly. For these reasons, make the routines manipulating ACPI device power states defined in drivers/acpi/device_pm.c available for CONFIG_PM unset too. Reported-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NMichel Lespinasse <walken@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org>
-
- 12 5月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the generic ACPI hotplug code to be able to check if devices scheduled for hot-removal may be gracefully removed from the system using the device offline/online mechanism introduced previously. Namely, make acpi_scan_hot_remove() handling device hot-removal call device_offline() for all physical companions of the ACPI device nodes involved in the operation and check the results. If any of the device_offline() calls fails, the function will not progress to the removal phase (which cannot be aborted), unless its (new) force argument is set (in case of a failing offline it will put the devices offlined by it back online). In support of 'forced' device hot-removal, add a new sysfs attribute 'force_remove' that will reside under /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
This patch updates the internal operations of acpi_device_set_id() to setup acpi_device_pnp without using acpi_device. There is no functional change to acpi_device_set_id() in this patch. acpi_pnp_type is added to acpi_device_pnp, so that PNPID type is self-contained within acpi_device_pnp. acpi_add_id(), acpi_bay_match(), acpi_dock_match(), acpi_ibm_smbus_match() and acpi_is_video_device() are changed to take acpi_handle as an argument, instead of acpi_device. Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 3月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce user space interface for manipulating hotplug profiles associated with ACPI scan handlers. The interface consists of sysfs directories under /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/, one for each hotplug profile, containing an attribute allowing user space to manipulate the enabled field of the corresponding profile. Namely, switching the enabled attribute from '0' to '1' will cause the common hotplug notify handler to be installed for all ACPI namespace objects representing devices matching the scan handler associated with the given hotplug profile (and analogously for the converse switch). Drivers willing to use the new user space interface should add their ACPI scan handlers with the help of new funtion acpi_scan_add_handler_with_hotplug(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Multiple drivers handling hotplug-capable ACPI device nodes install notify handlers covering the same types of events in a very similar way. Moreover, those handlers are installed in separate namespace walks, although that really should be done during namespace scans carried out by acpi_bus_scan(). This leads to substantial code duplication, unnecessary overhead and behavior that is hard to follow. For this reason, introduce common code in drivers/acpi/scan.c for handling hotplug-related notification and carrying out device insertion and eject operations in a generic fashion, such that it may be used by all of the relevant drivers in the future. To cover the existing differences between those drivers introduce struct acpi_hotplug_profile for representing collections of hotplug settings associated with different ACPI scan handlers that can be used by the drivers to make the common code reflect their current behavior. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Tested-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After PCI and USB have stopped using the .find_bridge() callback in struct acpi_bus_type, the only remaining user of it is SATA, but SATA only pretends to be a user, because it points that callback to a stub always returning -ENODEV. For this reason, drop the SATA's dummy .find_bridge() callback and remove .find_bridge(), which is not used any more, from struct acpi_bus_type entirely. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
USB uses the .find_bridge() callback from struct acpi_bus_type incorrectly, because as a result of the way it is used by USB every device in the system that doesn't have a bus type or parent is passed to usb_acpi_find_device() for inspection. What USB actually needs, though, is to call usb_acpi_find_device() for USB ports that don't have a bus type defined, but have usb_port_device_type as their device type, as well as for USB devices. To fix that replace the struct bus_type pointer in struct acpi_bus_type used for matching devices to specific subsystems with a .match() callback to be used for this purpose and update the users of struct acpi_bus_type, including USB, accordingly. Define the .match() callback routine for USB, usb_acpi_bus_match(), in such a way that it will cover both USB devices and USB ports and remove the now redundant .find_bridge() callback pointer from usb_acpi_bus. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
-
- 13 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure. First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created), those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler). Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by these functions themselves. For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim(). Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they are always called under acpi_scan_lock. Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example, acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection. In that case, the struct acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue. To protect agaist that, make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work). Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail, in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the context object to prevent leaks from happening. It also needs to run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on previously in that case. Modify the code accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
- 30 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler for representing objects that will do configuration tasks depending on ACPI device nodes' hardware IDs (HIDs). Currently, those tasks are done either directly by the ACPI namespace scanning code or by ACPI device drivers designed specifically for this purpose. None of the above is desirable, however, because doing that directly in the namespace scanning code makes that code overly complicated and difficult to follow and doing that in "special" device drivers leads to a great deal of confusion about their role and to confusing interactions with the driver core (for example, sysfs directories are created for those drivers, but they are completely unnecessary and only increase the kernel's memory footprint in vain). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI device start operation, acpi_op_start, is never used, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The second argument of ACPI driver .remove() operation is only used by the ACPI processor driver and the value passed to that driver through it is always available from the given struct acpi_device object's removal_type field. For this reason, the second ACPI driver .remove() argument is in fact useless, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_trim() cannot fail, change its definition to a void function, so that its callers don't check the return value in vain and update the callers. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Will need to use it for PCI root bridge hotplug support, so rename *acpiphp* to *acpi* and move to osc.c. Also make kacpi_hotplug_wq static after that. Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> CC: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> CC: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
-
- 24 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI power resources are going to be used more extensively on new hardware platforms, it becomes necessary for user space (powertop in particular) to observe some properties of those resources for diagnostics purposes. For this reason, expose the current status of each ACPI power resource to user space via sysfs by adding a new resource_in_use attribute to the sysfs directory representing the given power resource. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 20 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move ACPI device power management functions from drivers/acpi/bus.c to drivers/acpi/device_pm.c. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 19 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next invocations of it to do nothing. For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it. Additionally, rearrange the code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
-
- 17 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The function returning string representations of ACPI device power states, state_string((), is now static, because it is only used internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c. However, it will be used outside of that file going forward, so rename it to acpi_power_state_string(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-