Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 29 5月, 2018 32 次提交
  3. 28 5月, 2018 3 次提交
  5. 24 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • O
      Btrfs: fix error handling in btrfs_truncate() · d5014738
      由 Omar Sandoval 提交于 
      Jun Wu at Facebook reported that an internal service was seeing a return
value of 1 from ftruncate() on Btrfs in some cases. This is coming from
the NEED_TRUNCATE_BLOCK return value from btrfs_truncate_inode_items().

btrfs_truncate() uses two variables for error handling, ret and err.
When btrfs_truncate_inode_items() returns non-zero, we set err to the
return value. However, NEED_TRUNCATE_BLOCK is not an error. Make sure we
only set err if ret is an error (i.e., negative).

To reproduce the issue: mount a filesystem with -o compress-force=zstd
and the following program will encounter return value of 1 from
ftruncate:

int main(void) {
        char buf[256] = { 0 };
        int ret;
        int fd;

        fd = open("test", O_CREAT | O_WRONLY | O_TRUNC, 0666);
        if (fd == -1) {
                perror("open");
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
        }

        if (write(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) != sizeof(buf)) {
                perror("write");
                close(fd);
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
        }

        if (fsync(fd) == -1) {
                perror("fsync");
                close(fd);
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
        }

        ret = ftruncate(fd, 128);
        if (ret) {
                printf("ftruncate() returned %d\n", ret);
                close(fd);
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
        }

        close(fd);
        return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

Fixes: ddfae63c ("btrfs: move btrfs_truncate_block out of trans handle")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.15+
Reported-by: NJun Wu <quark@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d5014738
  7. 17 5月, 2018 4 次提交
    • A
      btrfs: fix crash when trying to resume balance without the resume flag · 02ee654d
      由 Anand Jain 提交于 
      We set the BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME flag in the btrfs_recover_balance()
only, which isn't called during the remount. So when resuming from
the paused balance we hit the bug:

 kernel: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3890!
 ::
 kernel:  balance_kthread+0x51/0x60 [btrfs]
 kernel:  kthread+0x111/0x130
 ::
 kernel: RIP: btrfs_balance+0x12e1/0x1570 [btrfs] RSP: ffffba7d0090bde8

Reproducer:
  On a mounted filesystem:

  btrfs balance start --full-balance /btrfs
  btrfs balance pause /btrfs
  mount -o remount,ro /dev/sdb /btrfs
  mount -o remount,rw /dev/sdb /btrfs

To fix this set the BTRFS_BALANCE_RESUME flag in
btrfs_resume_balance_async().

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      02ee654d
    • N
      btrfs: Fix delalloc inodes invalidation during transaction abort · fe816d0f
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      When a transaction is aborted btrfs_cleanup_transaction is called to
cleanup all the various in-flight bits and pieces which migth be
active. One of those is delalloc inodes - inodes which have dirty
pages which haven't been persisted yet. Currently the process of
freeing such delalloc inodes in exceptional circumstances such as
transaction abort boiled down to calling btrfs_invalidate_inodes whose
sole job is to invalidate the dentries for all inodes related to a
root. This is in fact wrong and insufficient since such delalloc inodes
will likely have pending pages or ordered-extents and will be linked to
the sb->s_inode_list. This means that unmounting a btrfs instance with
an aborted transaction could potentially lead inodes/their pages
visible to the system long after their superblock has been freed. This
in turn leads to a "use-after-free" situation once page shrink is
triggered. This situation could be simulated by running generic/019
which would cause such inodes to be left hanging, followed by
generic/176 which causes memory pressure and page eviction which lead
to touching the freed super block instance. This situation is
additionally detected by the unmount code of VFS with the following
message:

"VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of Self-destruct in 5 seconds.  Have a nice day..."

Additionally btrfs hits WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&root->inode_tree));
in free_fs_root for the same reason.

This patch aims to rectify the sitaution by doing the following:

1. Change btrfs_destroy_delalloc_inodes so that it calls
invalidate_inode_pages2 for every inode on the delalloc list, this
ensures that all the pages of the inode are released. This function
boils down to calling btrfs_releasepage. During test I observed cases
where inodes on the delalloc list were having an i_count of 0, so this
necessitates using igrab to be sure we are working on a non-freed inode.

2. Since calling btrfs_releasepage might queue delayed iputs move the
call out to btrfs_cleanup_transaction in btrfs_error_commit_super before
calling run_delayed_iputs for the last time. This is necessary to ensure
that delayed iputs are run.

Note: this patch is tagged for 4.14 stable but the fix applies to older
versions too but needs to be backported manually due to conflicts.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14.x: 2b877331: btrfs: Split btrfs_del_delalloc_inode into 2 functions
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14.x
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment to igrab ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fe816d0f
    • N
      btrfs: Split btrfs_del_delalloc_inode into 2 functions · 2b877331
      由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于 
      This is in preparation of fixing delalloc inodes leakage on transaction
abort. Also export the new function.
Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2b877331
    • L
      btrfs: fix reading stale metadata blocks after degraded raid1 mounts · 02a3307a
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      If a btree block, aka. extent buffer, is not available in the extent
buffer cache, it'll be read out from the disk instead, i.e.

btrfs_search_slot()
  read_block_for_search()  # hold parent and its lock, go to read child
    btrfs_release_path()
    read_tree_block()  # read child

Unfortunately, the parent lock got released before reading child, so
commit 5bdd3536 ("Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race") had
used 0 as parent transid to read the child block.  It forces
read_tree_block() not to check if parent transid is different with the
generation id of the child that it reads out from disk.

A simple PoC is included in btrfs/124,

0. A two-disk raid1 btrfs,

1. Right after mkfs.btrfs, block A is allocated to be device tree's root.

2. Mount this filesystem and put it in use, after a while, device tree's
   root got COW but block A hasn't been allocated/overwritten yet.

3. Umount it and reload the btrfs module to remove both disks from the
   global @fs_devices list.

4. mount -odegraded dev1 and write some data, so now block A is allocated
   to be a leaf in checksum tree.  Note that only dev1 has the latest
   metadata of this filesystem.

5. Umount it and mount it again normally (with both disks), since raid1
   can pick up one disk by the writer task's pid, if btrfs_search_slot()
   needs to read block A, dev2 which does NOT have the latest metadata
   might be read for block A, then we got a stale block A.

6. As parent transid is not checked, block A is marked as uptodate and
   put into the extent buffer cache, so the future search won't bother
   to read disk again, which means it'll make changes on this stale
   one and make it dirty and flush it onto disk.

To avoid the problem, parent transid needs to be passed to
read_tree_block().

In order to get a valid parent transid, we need to hold the parent's
lock until finishing reading child.

This patch needs to be slightly adapted for stable kernels, the
&first_key parameter added to read_tree_block() is from 4.16+
(581c1760). The fix is to replace 0 by 'gen'.

Fixes: 5bdd3536 ("Btrfs: Fix block generation verification race")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.liu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      02a3307a