Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  3. 04 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 28 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 22 2月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      isdn: whitespace coding style cleanup · 475be4d8
      由 Joe Perches 提交于 
      isdn source code uses a not-current coding style.

Update the coding style used on a per-line basis
so that git diff -w shows only elided blank lines
at EOF.

Done with emacs and some scripts and some typing.

Built x86 allyesconfig.
No detected change in objdump -d or size.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      475be4d8
  9. 07 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 18 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  15. 16 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 12 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h

percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.

percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
used as the basis of conversion.

  http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py

The script does the followings.

* Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
  only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
  gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.

* When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
  blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
  to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
  core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
  alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
  doesn't seem to be any matching order.

* If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
  because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
  an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
  file.

The conversion was done in the following steps.

1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
   over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
   and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
   files.

2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
   some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
   embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
   inclusions to around 150 files.

3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
   from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.

4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
   e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
   APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.

5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
   editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
   files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
   inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
   wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
   slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
   necessary.

6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.

7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
   were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
   distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
   more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
   build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).

   * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
   * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
   * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
   * s390 SMP allmodconfig
   * alpha SMP allmodconfig
   * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig

8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
   a separate patch and serve as bisection point.

Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
the specific arch.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  21. 26 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  25. 25 5月, 2009 2 次提交
  27. 16 2月, 2009 2 次提交
    • H
      drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN: change type of hfc_jiffies to unsigned long · aa611f85
      由 Hannes Eder 提交于 
      Jiffies are unsigned long, make sure we fit in jiffies store variable
on archs with bits per long > 32.

Patch suggested by Jiri Slaby.
Signed-off-by: NHannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      aa611f85
    • H
      drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN: fix sparse warnings: make symbols static · 6c2959aa
      由 Hannes Eder 提交于 
      Fix this sparse warnings:
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcpci.c:59:19: warning: symbol 'hfc_tl' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcpci.c:60:9: warning: symbol 'hfc_jiffies' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.h:201:6: warning: symbol 'conf_str' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.h:319:12: warning: symbol 'HFC_TE_LAYER1_STATES' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.h:331:12: warning: symbol 'HFC_NT_LAYER1_STATES' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.c:38:12: warning: symbol 'hfcsusb_rev' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.c:978:1: warning: symbol 'fill_isoc_urb' was not declared. Should it be static?
  drivers/isdn/hardware/mISDN/hfcsusb.c:1724:1: warning: symbol 'setup_hfcsusb' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NHannes Eder <hannes@hanneseder.net>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6c2959aa
  29. 12 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 10 1月, 2009 9 次提交
  33. 23 9月, 2008 2 次提交
  35. 02 8月, 2008 1 次提交
  37. 28 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  39. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交