During lock resource migration, o2dlm fills the packet with a LVB from the
first valid lock. For sanity, it ensures that the other valid locks have the
same LVB. If not, it BUGs.

The valid locks are ones that have granted EX or PR lock levels and are either
on the Granted or Converting lists. Locks in the Blocked list cannot have a
valid LVB.

This patch ensures that we skip the locks in the Blocked list.

Fixes oss bugzilla#1202
http://oss.oracle.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1202Signed-off-by: NSunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>

Patch removes trailing whitespaces.
Signed-off-by: NSunil Mushran <sunil.mushran@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>

a local variable "dlm_version" is used as a fs locking version.
rename it fs_version.
Signed-off-by: NWengang Wang <wen.gang.wang@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>

In ocfs2-tools, we have added ocfs2_max_inline_data_with_xattr,
so add it in the kernel's ocfs2_fs.h.
Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <tao.ma@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>

If ->follow_link handler returns an error, it should decrement
nd->path refcnt. But ocfs2_fast_follow_link() doesn't decrement.

This patch fixes the problem by using nd_set_link() style error handling
instead of playing with nd->path.
Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NJoel Becker <joel.becker@oracle.com>

A long time ago we regarded zero page as file_rss and vm_normal_page
doesn't return NULL.

But now, we reinstated ZERO_PAGE and vm_normal_page's implementation can
return NULL in case of zero page.  Also we don't count it with file_rss
any more.

Then, RSS and PSS can't be matched.  For consistency, Let's ignore zero
page in smaps_pte_range.
Signed-off-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NKAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMatt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit d899bf7b (procfs: provide stack information for threads) introduced
to show stack information in /proc/{pid}/status.  But it cause large
performance regression.  Unfortunately /proc/{pid}/status is used ps
command too and ps is one of most important component.  Because both to
take mmap_sem and page table walk are heavily operation.

If many process run, the ps performance is,

[before d899bf7b]

% perf stat ps >/dev/null

 Performance counter stats for 'ps':

     4090.435806  task-clock-msecs         #      0.032 CPUs
             229  context-switches         #      0.000 M/sec
               0  CPU-migrations           #      0.000 M/sec
             234  page-faults              #      0.000 M/sec
      8587565207  cycles                   #   2099.425 M/sec
      9866662403  instructions             #      1.149 IPC
      3789415411  cache-references         #    926.409 M/sec
        30419509  cache-misses             #      7.437 M/sec

   128.859521955  seconds time elapsed

[after d899bf7b]

% perf stat  ps  > /dev/null

 Performance counter stats for 'ps':

     4305.081146  task-clock-msecs         #      0.028 CPUs
             480  context-switches         #      0.000 M/sec
               2  CPU-migrations           #      0.000 M/sec
             237  page-faults              #      0.000 M/sec
      9021211334  cycles                   #   2095.480 M/sec
     10605887536  instructions             #      1.176 IPC
      3612650999  cache-references         #    839.160 M/sec
        23917502  cache-misses             #      5.556 M/sec

   152.277819582  seconds time elapsed

Thus, this patch revert it. Fortunately /proc/{pid}/task/{tid}/smaps
provide almost same information. we can use it.

Commit d899bf7b introduced two features:

 1) Add the annotattion of [thread stack: xxxx] mark to
    /proc/{pid}/task/{tid}/maps.
 2) Add StackUsage field to /proc/{pid}/status.

I only revert (2), because I haven't seen (1) cause regression.
Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Stefani Seibold <stefani@seibold.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit fd8fbfc1 modified the way we find amount of reserved space
belonging to an inode. The amount of reserved space is checked
from dquot_transfer and thus inode_reserved_space gets called
even for filesystems that don't provide get_reserved_space callback
which results in a BUG.

Fix the problem by checking get_reserved_space callback and return 0 if
the filesystem does not provide it.

CC: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@openvz.org>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

Using ~0ULL was cauing sign issues in filemap_fdatawrite_range, so
use MAX_LFS_FILESIZE instead.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

When we search for and find a busy extent during allocation we
force the log out to ensure the extent free transaction is on
disk before the allocation transaction. The current implementation
has a subtle bug in it--it does not handle multiple overlapping
ranges.

That is, if we free lots of little extents into a single
contiguous extent, then allocate the contiguous extent, the busy
search code stops searching at the first extent it finds that
overlaps the allocated range. It then uses the commit LSN of the
transaction to force the log out to.

Unfortunately, the other busy ranges might have more recent
commit LSNs than the first busy extent that is found, and this
results in xfs_alloc_search_busy() returning before all the
extent free transactions are on disk for the range being
allocated. This can lead to potential metadata corruption or
stale data exposure after a crash because log replay won't replay
all the extent free transactions that cover the allocation range.
Modified-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

(Dropped the "found" argument from the xfs_alloc_busysearch trace
event.)
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

Because inodes remain in cache much longer than inode buffers do
under memory pressure, we can get the situation where we have
stale, dirty inodes being reclaimed but the backing storage has
been freed.  Hence we should never, ever flush XFS_ISTALE inodes
to disk as there is no guarantee that the backing buffer is in
cache and still marked stale when the flush occurs.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

We currently have some rather odd code in xfs_setattr for
updating the a/c/mtime timestamps:

 - first we do a non-transaction update if all three are updated
   together
 - second we implicitly update the ctime for various changes
   instead of relying on the ATTR_CTIME flag
 - third we set the timestamps to the current time instead of the
   arguments in the iattr structure in many cases.

This patch makes sure we update it in a consistent way:

 - always transactional
 - ctime is only updated if ATTR_CTIME is set or we do a size
   update, which is a special case
 - always to the times passed in from the caller instead of the
   current time

The only non-size caller of xfs_setattr that doesn't come from
the VFS is updated to set ATTR_CTIME and pass in a valid ctime
value.
Reported-by: NEric Blake <ebb9@byu.net>
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

Using DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS allows us to to use trace event code
instead of duplicating it in the binary.  This was not available
before 2.6.33 so it had to be done as a separate step once the
prerequisite was merged.

This only requires changes to xfs_trace.h and the results are
rather impressive:

hch@brick:~/work/linux-2.6/obj-kvm$ size fs/xfs/xfs.o*
text	   data	    bss	    dec	    hex	filename
 607732	  41884	   3616	 653232	  9f7b0	fs/xfs/xfs.o
1026732	  41884	   3808	1072424	 105d28	fs/xfs/xfs.o.old
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

Randy Dunlap Reported printk() format-related warnings reported
on i386 builds in his environment.  Dave Chinner provided this
patch to eliminate them.

Signed-off by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>

The ref counting for the bh returned by gfs2_ea_find() was
wrong. This patch ensures that we always drop the ref count
to that bh correctly.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

The rename code was taking a resource group lock in cases where
it wasn't actually needed, this caused problems if the rename
was resulting in an inode being unlinked. The patch ensures that
we only take the rgrp lock early if it is really needed.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

The VFS reads the inode size during generic_file_aio_write() but
with no locking around it. In order to get the expected result
from O_APPEND opens, this patch updated the inode size before
calling generic_file_aio_write()

There is of course still a race here, in that there is nothing to
prevent another node coming in and extending the file in the
mean time. On the other hand, when used with file locking this
will ensure that the expected results are obtained.
Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>

Fix remaining xattr locks acquired in reiserfs_xattr_set_handle()
while we are holding the reiserfs lock to avoid lock inversions.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Stanse found an unreachable statement in reiserfs_ioctl. There is a
if followed by error assignment and `break' with no braces. Add the
braces so that we don't break every time, but only in error case,
so that REISERFS_IOC_SETVERSION actually works when it returns no
error.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
Cc: Reiserfs <reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>

reiserfs_get_acl is usually not called under the reiserfs lock,
as it doesn't need it. But it happens when it is called by
reiserfs_acl_chmod(), which creates a dependency inversion against
the private xattr inodes mutexes for the given inode.

We need to call it without the reiserfs lock, especially since
it's unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

The current code will load the stack size and protection markings, but
then only use the markings in the MMU code path.  The NOMMU code path
always passes PROT_EXEC to the mmap() call.  While this doesn't matter
to most people whilst the code is running, it will cause a pointless
icache flush when starting every FDPIC application.  Typically this
icache flush will be of a region on the order of 128KB in size, or may
be the entire icache, depending on the facilities available on the CPU.

In the case where the arch default behaviour seems to be desired
(EXSTACK_DEFAULT), we probe VM_STACK_FLAGS for VM_EXEC to determine
whether we should be setting PROT_EXEC or not.

For arches that support an MPU (Memory Protection Unit - an MMU without
the virtual mapping capability), setting PROT_EXEC or not will make an
important difference.

It should be noted that this change also affects the executability of
the brk region, since ELF-FDPIC has that share with the stack.  However,
this is probably irrelevant as NOMMU programs aren't likely to use the
brk region, preferring instead allocation via mmap().
Signed-off-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Recent change is missing to update "rehash".  With that change, it will
become the cause of adding dentry to hash twice.

This explains the reason of Oops (dereference the freed dentry in
__d_lookup()) on my machine.
Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Reported-by: NMarvin <marvin24@gmx.de>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

nfsd is not using vfs_fsync, so I missed it when changing the calling
convention during the 2.6.32 window.  This patch fixes it to not only
start the data writeout, but also wait for it to complete before calling
into ->fsync.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>

exofs uses simple_write_end() for it's .write_end handler. But
it is not enough because simple_write_end() does not call
mark_inode_dirty() when it extends i_size. So even if we do
call mark_inode_dirty at beginning of write out, with a very
long IO and a saturated system we might get the .write_inode()
called while still extend-writing to file and miss out on the last
i_size updates.

So override .write_end, call simple_write_end(), and afterwords if
i_size was changed call mark_inode_dirty().

It stands to logic that since simple_write_end() was the one extending
i_size it should also call mark_inode_dirty(). But it looks like all
users of simple_write_end() are memory-bound pseudo filesystems, who
could careless about mark_inode_dirty(). I might submit a
warning-comment patch to simple_write_end() in future.

CC: Stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>

Some on disk exofs constants and types are defined in the pnfs_osd_xdr.h
file. Since we needed these types before the pnfs-objects code was
accepted to mainline we duplicated the minimal needed definitions into
an exofs local header. The definitions where conditionally included
depending on !CONFIG_PNFS defined. So if PNFS was present in the tree
definitions are taken from there and if not they are defined locally.

That was all good but, the CONFIG_PNFS is planed to be included upstream
before the pnfs-objects is also included. (The first pnfs batch might be
pnfs-files only)

So condition exofs local definitions on the absence of pnfs_osd_xdr.h
inclusion (__PNFS_OSD_XDR_H__ not defined). User code must make sure
that in future pnfs_osd_xdr.h will be included before fs/exofs/pnfs.h,
which happens to be so in current code.

Once pnfs-objects hits mainline, exofs's local header will be removed.
Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>

When we remove an xattr, we call lookup_and_delete_xattr()
that takes some private xattr inodes mutexes. But we hold
the reiserfs lock at this time, which leads to dependency
inversions.

We can safely call lookup_and_delete_xattr() without the
reiserfs lock, where xattr inodes lookups only need the
xattr inodes mutexes.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

While truncating a file, reiserfs_setattr() calls inode_setattr()
that will truncate the mapping for the given inode, but for that
it needs the pages locks.

In order to release these, the owners need the reiserfs lock to
complete their jobs. But they can't, as we don't release it before
calling inode_setattr().

We need to do that to fix the following softlockups:

INFO: task flush-8:0:2149 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
flush-8:0     D f51af998     0  2149      2 0x00000000
 f51af9ac 00000092 00000002 f51af998 c2803304 00000000 c1894ad0 010f3000
 f51af9cc c1462604 c189ef80 f51af974 c1710304 f715b450 f715b5ec c2807c40
 00000000 0005bb00 c2803320 c102c55b c1710304 c2807c50 c2803304 00000246
Call Trace:
 [<c1462604>] ? schedule+0x434/0xb20
 [<c102c55b>] ? resched_task+0x4b/0x70
 [<c106fa22>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c146414d>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x1fd/0x350
 [<c14640b9>] mutex_lock_nested+0x169/0x350
 [<c1178cde>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x2e/0x40
 [<c1178cde>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x2e/0x40
 [<c11719a2>] do_journal_end+0xc2/0xe70
 [<c1172912>] journal_end+0xb2/0x120
 [<c11686b3>] ? pathrelse+0x33/0xb0
 [<c11729e4>] reiserfs_end_persistent_transaction+0x64/0x70
 [<c1153caa>] reiserfs_get_block+0x12ba/0x15f0
 [<c106fa22>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c1154b24>] reiserfs_writepage+0xa74/0xe80
 [<c1465a27>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x27/0x50
 [<c11f3d25>] ? radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag_slot+0x95/0xc0
 [<c10b5377>] ? find_get_pages_tag+0x127/0x1a0
 [<c106fa22>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c106fcd4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170
 [<c10bc1e0>] __writepage+0x10/0x40
 [<c10bc9ab>] write_cache_pages+0x16b/0x320
 [<c10bc1d0>] ? __writepage+0x0/0x40
 [<c10bcb88>] generic_writepages+0x28/0x40
 [<c10bcbd5>] do_writepages+0x35/0x40
 [<c11059f7>] writeback_single_inode+0xc7/0x330
 [<c11067b2>] writeback_inodes_wb+0x2c2/0x490
 [<c1106a86>] wb_writeback+0x106/0x1b0
 [<c1106cf6>] wb_do_writeback+0x106/0x1e0
 [<c1106c18>] ? wb_do_writeback+0x28/0x1e0
 [<c1106e0a>] bdi_writeback_task+0x3a/0xb0
 [<c10cbb13>] bdi_start_fn+0x63/0xc0
 [<c10cbab0>] ? bdi_start_fn+0x0/0xc0
 [<c105d1f4>] kthread+0x74/0x80
 [<c105d180>] ? kthread+0x0/0x80
 [<c100327a>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10
3 locks held by flush-8:0/2149:
 #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#30){+++++.}, at: [<c110676f>] writeback_inodes_wb+0x27f/0x490
 #1:  (&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c117199a>] do_journal_end+0xba/0xe70
 #2:  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1178cde>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x2e/0x40
INFO: task fstest:3813 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
fstest        D 00000002     0  3813   3812 0x00000000
 f5103c94 00000082 f5103c40 00000002 f5ad5450 00000007 f5103c28 011f3000
 00000006 f5ad5450 c10bb005 00000480 c1710304 f5ad5450 f5ad55ec c2907c40
 00000001 f5ad5450 f5103c74 00000046 00000002 f5ad5450 00000007 f5103c6c
Call Trace:
 [<c10bb005>] ? free_hot_cold_page+0x1d5/0x280
 [<c1462d64>] io_schedule+0x74/0xc0
 [<c10b5a45>] sync_page+0x35/0x60
 [<c146325a>] __wait_on_bit_lock+0x4a/0x90
 [<c10b5a10>] ? sync_page+0x0/0x60
 [<c10b59e5>] __lock_page+0x85/0x90
 [<c105d660>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x60
 [<c10bf654>] truncate_inode_pages_range+0x1e4/0x2d0
 [<c10bf75f>] truncate_inode_pages+0x1f/0x30
 [<c10bf7cf>] truncate_pagecache+0x5f/0xa0
 [<c10bf86a>] vmtruncate+0x5a/0x70
 [<c10fdb7d>] inode_setattr+0x5d/0x190
 [<c1150117>] reiserfs_setattr+0x1f7/0x2f0
 [<c1464569>] ? down_write+0x49/0x70
 [<c10fde01>] notify_change+0x151/0x330
 [<c10e6f3d>] do_truncate+0x6d/0xa0
 [<c10f4ce2>] do_filp_open+0x9a2/0xcf0
 [<c1465aec>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2c/0x50
 [<c10fec50>] ? alloc_fd+0xe0/0x100
 [<c10e602d>] do_sys_open+0x6d/0x130
 [<c1002cfb>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x16
 [<c10e615e>] sys_open+0x2e/0x40
 [<c1002ccc>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
3 locks held by fstest/3813:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10e6f33>] do_truncate+0x63/0xa0
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_alloc_sem_key#3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10fdf07>] notify_change+0x257/0x330
 #2:  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1178c8e>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x2e/0x50
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

On chown, reiserfs will call reiserfs_setattr() to change the owner
of the given inode, but it may also recursively call
reiserfs_setattr() to propagate the owner change to the private xattr
files for this inode.

Hence, the reiserfs lock may be acquired twice which is not wanted
as reiserfs_setattr() calls journal_begin() that is going to try to
relax the lock in order to safely acquire the journal mutex.

Using reiserfs_write_lock_once() from reiserfs_setattr() solves
the problem.

This fixes the following warning, that precedes a lockdep report.

WARNING: at fs/reiserfs/lock.c:95 reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50()
Hardware name: MS-7418
Unwanted recursive reiserfs lock!
Pid: 4189, comm: fsstress Not tainted 2.6.33-rc2-tip-atom+ #195
Call Trace:
 [<c1178bff>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c1178bff>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c103f7ac>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6c/0xc0
 [<c1178bff>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c103f84b>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2b/0x30
 [<c1178bff>] reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3f/0x50
 [<c1172ae3>] do_journal_begin_r+0x83/0x350
 [<c1172f2d>] journal_begin+0x7d/0x140
 [<c106509a>] ? in_group_p+0x2a/0x30
 [<c10fda71>] ? inode_change_ok+0x91/0x140
 [<c115007d>] reiserfs_setattr+0x15d/0x2e0
 [<c10f9bf3>] ? dput+0xe3/0x140
 [<c1465adc>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2c/0x50
 [<c117831d>] chown_one_xattr+0xd/0x10
 [<c11780a3>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x113/0x2c0
 [<c1178310>] ? chown_one_xattr+0x0/0x10
 [<c14641e9>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2a9/0x350
 [<c117826f>] reiserfs_chown_xattrs+0x1f/0x60
 [<c106509a>] ? in_group_p+0x2a/0x30
 [<c10fda71>] ? inode_change_ok+0x91/0x140
 [<c1150046>] reiserfs_setattr+0x126/0x2e0
 [<c1177c20>] ? reiserfs_getxattr+0x0/0x90
 [<c11b0d57>] ? cap_inode_need_killpriv+0x37/0x50
 [<c10fde01>] notify_change+0x151/0x330
 [<c10e659f>] chown_common+0x6f/0x90
 [<c10e67bd>] sys_lchown+0x6d/0x80
 [<c1002ccc>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
---[ end trace 7c2b77224c1442fc ]---
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Holding locks over device_del -> kobject_del -> sysfs_deactivate can
cause deadlocks if those same locks are grabbed in sysfs show or store
methods.

The I model s_active count + completion as a sleeping read/write lock.
I describe to lockdep sysfs_get_active as a read_trylock,
sysfs_put_active as a read_unlock, and sysfs_deactivate as a
write_lock and write_unlock pair.  This seems to capture the essence
for purposes of finding deadlocks, and in my testing gives finds real
issues and ignores non-issues.

This brings us back to holding locks over kobject_del is a problem
that ideally we should find a way of addressing, but at least lockdep
can tell us about the problems instead of requiring developers to debug
rare strange system deadlocks, that happen when sysfs files are removed
while being written to.
Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit f6151dfe introduces build
breakage, so this patch fixes it together with some printk formatting
cleanup.
Signed-off-by: NDaisuke HATAYAMA <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>

Fix a mistake in commit 0719d343
(reiserfs: Fix reiserfs lock <-> i_xattr_sem dependency inversion)
that has converted a down_write() into a down_read() accidentally.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Fix the following htmldocs warning:

  Warning(fs/fs-writeback.c:255): No description found for parameter 'sb'
Signed-off-by: NJaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Acked-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Relax the reiserfs lock before taking the inode mutex from
xattr_rmdir() to avoid the usual reiserfs lock <-> inode mutex
bad dependency.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Relax the reiserfs lock before taking the inode mutex from
reiserfs_for_each_xattr() to avoid the usual bad dependencies:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.32-atom #179
-------------------------------------------------------
rm/3242 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c11428ef>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x23f/0x290

but task is already holding lock:
 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1143389>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401aab>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c1143339>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
       [<c1117022>] reiserfs_lookup+0x62/0x140
       [<c10bd85f>] __lookup_hash+0xef/0x110
       [<c10bf21d>] lookup_one_len+0x8d/0xc0
       [<c1141e3a>] open_xa_dir+0xea/0x1b0
       [<c1142720>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x70/0x290
       [<c11429ba>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
       [<c111ea2f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
       [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
       [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
       [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
       [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
       [<c10c0b13>] sys_unlinkat+0x23/0x40
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

-> #0 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401aab>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c11428ef>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x23f/0x290
       [<c11429ba>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
       [<c111ea2f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
       [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
       [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
       [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
       [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
       [<c10c0b13>] sys_unlinkat+0x23/0x40
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

other info that might help us debug this:

1 lock held by rm/3242:
 #0:  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1143389>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3242, comm: rm Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #179
Call Trace:
 [<c13ffa13>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
 [<c105d33a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0
 [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
 [<c105c932>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c105cc3b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
 [<c1401098>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0x10
 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
 [<c11428ef>] ? reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x23f/0x290
 [<c11428ef>] ? reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x23f/0x290
 [<c1401aab>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
 [<c11428ef>] ? reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x23f/0x290
 [<c11428ef>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x23f/0x290
 [<c1143180>] ? delete_one_xattr+0x0/0x100
 [<c11429ba>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
 [<c1143339>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c111ea2f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
 [<c11b0d4f>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x4f/0x70
 [<c111e990>] ? reiserfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x150
 [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
 [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
 [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
 [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
 [<c1401098>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0x10
 [<c10c3e0d>] ? vfs_readdir+0x7d/0xb0
 [<c10c3af0>] ? filldir64+0x0/0xf0
 [<c1002ef3>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x16
 [<c105cbe4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170
 [<c10c0b13>] sys_unlinkat+0x23/0x40
 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

We need to relax the reiserfs lock before locking the inode mutex
from xattr_unlink(), otherwise we'll face the usual bad dependencies:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.32-atom #178
-------------------------------------------------------
rm/3202 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<c113c234>] do_journal_begin_r+0x94/0x360

but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/2){+.+...}, at: [<c1142a67>] xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/2){+.+...}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a7b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c1142a67>] xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
       [<c1143179>] delete_one_xattr+0x29/0x100
       [<c11427bb>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x10b/0x290
       [<c11429ba>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
       [<c111ea2f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
       [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
       [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
       [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
       [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
       [<c10c0b13>] sys_unlinkat+0x23/0x40
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

-> #1 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a7b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c1143359>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40
       [<c113c23c>] do_journal_begin_r+0x9c/0x360
       [<c113c680>] journal_begin+0x80/0x130
       [<c1127363>] reiserfs_remount+0x223/0x4e0
       [<c10b6dd6>] do_remount_sb+0xa6/0x140
       [<c10ce6a0>] do_mount+0x560/0x750
       [<c10ce914>] sys_mount+0x84/0xb0
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

-> #0 (&journal->j_mutex){+.+...}:
       [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a7b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c113c234>] do_journal_begin_r+0x94/0x360
       [<c113c680>] journal_begin+0x80/0x130
       [<c1116d63>] reiserfs_unlink+0x83/0x2e0
       [<c1142a74>] xattr_unlink+0x64/0xb0
       [<c1143179>] delete_one_xattr+0x29/0x100
       [<c11427bb>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x10b/0x290
       [<c11429ba>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
       [<c111ea2f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
       [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
       [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
       [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
       [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
       [<c10c0b13>] sys_unlinkat+0x23/0x40
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by rm/3202:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c114274b>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x9b/0x290
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/2){+.+...}, at: [<c1142a67>] xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3202, comm: rm Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #178
Call Trace:
 [<c13ff9e3>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
 [<c105d33a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0
 [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
 [<c1142a67>] ? xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
 [<c113c234>] ? do_journal_begin_r+0x94/0x360
 [<c113c234>] ? do_journal_begin_r+0x94/0x360
 [<c1401a7b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
 [<c113c234>] ? do_journal_begin_r+0x94/0x360
 [<c113c234>] do_journal_begin_r+0x94/0x360
 [<c10411b6>] ? run_timer_softirq+0x1a6/0x220
 [<c103cb00>] ? __do_softirq+0x50/0x140
 [<c113c680>] journal_begin+0x80/0x130
 [<c103cba2>] ? __do_softirq+0xf2/0x140
 [<c104f72f>] ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xdf/0x220
 [<c1116d63>] reiserfs_unlink+0x83/0x2e0
 [<c105c932>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c11b8d08>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0xc/0x10
 [<c1002fd8>] ? restore_all_notrace+0x0/0x18
 [<c1142a67>] ? xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
 [<c1142a74>] xattr_unlink+0x64/0xb0
 [<c1143179>] delete_one_xattr+0x29/0x100
 [<c11427bb>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x10b/0x290
 [<c1143150>] ? delete_one_xattr+0x0/0x100
 [<c1401cb9>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x299/0x340
 [<c11429ba>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
 [<c1143309>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c111ea2f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
 [<c11b0d1f>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x4f/0x70
 [<c111e990>] ? reiserfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x150
 [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
 [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
 [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
 [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
 [<c1401068>] ? mutex_unlock+0x8/0x10
 [<c10c3e0d>] ? vfs_readdir+0x7d/0xb0
 [<c10c3af0>] ? filldir64+0x0/0xf0
 [<c1002ef3>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x16
 [<c105cbe4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170
 [<c10c0b13>] sys_unlinkat+0x23/0x40
 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

reiserfs_unlink() may or may not be called under the reiserfs
lock.
But it also takes the reiserfs lock and can then acquire it
recursively which leads to do_journal_begin_r() that fails to
relax the reiserfs lock before grabbing the journal mutex,
creating an unexpected lock inversion.

We need to ensure reiserfs_unlink() won't get the reiserfs lock
recursively using reiserfs_write_lock_once().

This fixes the following warning that precedes a lock inversion
report (reiserfs lock <-> journal mutex).

------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at fs/reiserfs/lock.c:95 reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3a/0x50()
Hardware name: MS-7418
Unwanted recursive reiserfs lock!
Pid: 3208, comm: dbench Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #177
Call Trace:
 [<c114327a>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3a/0x50
 [<c114327a>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3a/0x50
 [<c10373a7>] warn_slowpath_common+0x67/0xc0
 [<c114327a>] ? reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3a/0x50
 [<c1037446>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x26/0x30
 [<c114327a>] reiserfs_lock_check_recursive+0x3a/0x50
 [<c113c213>] do_journal_begin_r+0x83/0x360
 [<c105eb16>] ? __lock_acquire+0x1296/0x19e0
 [<c1142a57>] ? xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
 [<c113c670>] journal_begin+0x80/0x130
 [<c1116d5d>] reiserfs_unlink+0x7d/0x2d0
 [<c1142a57>] ? xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
 [<c1142a57>] ? xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
 [<c1142a57>] ? xattr_unlink+0x57/0xb0
 [<c1142a64>] xattr_unlink+0x64/0xb0
 [<c1143169>] delete_one_xattr+0x29/0x100
 [<c11427ab>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x10b/0x290
 [<c1143140>] ? delete_one_xattr+0x0/0x100
 [<c1401ca9>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x299/0x340
 [<c11429aa>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
 [<c11432f9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c111ea1f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
 [<c11b0d0f>] ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x4f/0x70
 [<c111e980>] ? reiserfs_delete_inode+0x0/0x150
 [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
 [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
 [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
 [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
 [<c10505c6>] ? up_read+0x16/0x30
 [<c1022ab7>] ? do_page_fault+0x187/0x330
 [<c1002fd8>] ? restore_all_notrace+0x0/0x18
 [<c1022930>] ? do_page_fault+0x0/0x330
 [<c105cbe4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170
 [<c10c0a00>] sys_unlink+0x10/0x20
 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
---[ end trace 2e35d71a6cc69d0c ]---
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

We call xattr_lookup() from reiserfs_xattr_get(). We then hold
the reiserfs lock when we grab the i_mutex. But later, we may
relax the reiserfs lock, creating dependency inversion between
both locks.

The lookups and creation jobs ar already protected by the
inode mutex, so we can safely relax the reiserfs lock, dropping
the unwanted reiserfs lock -> i_mutex dependency, as shown
in the following lockdep report:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.32-atom #173
-------------------------------------------------------
cp/3204 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c11432b9>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50

but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1141e18>] open_xa_dir+0xd8/0x1b0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a2b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c1141d83>] open_xa_dir+0x43/0x1b0
       [<c1142722>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x62/0x260
       [<c114299a>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
       [<c111ea1f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
       [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
       [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
       [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
       [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
       [<c10c0a00>] sys_unlink+0x10/0x20
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

-> #0 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a2b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c11432b9>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
       [<c1117012>] reiserfs_lookup+0x62/0x140
       [<c10bd85f>] __lookup_hash+0xef/0x110
       [<c10bf21d>] lookup_one_len+0x8d/0xc0
       [<c1141e2a>] open_xa_dir+0xea/0x1b0
       [<c1141fe5>] xattr_lookup+0x15/0x160
       [<c1142476>] reiserfs_xattr_get+0x56/0x2a0
       [<c1144042>] reiserfs_get_acl+0xa2/0x360
       [<c114461a>] reiserfs_cache_default_acl+0x3a/0x160
       [<c111789c>] reiserfs_mkdir+0x6c/0x2c0
       [<c10bea96>] vfs_mkdir+0xd6/0x180
       [<c10c0c10>] sys_mkdirat+0xc0/0xd0
       [<c10c0c40>] sys_mkdir+0x20/0x30
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by cp/3204:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10bd8d6>] lookup_create+0x26/0xa0
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1141e18>] open_xa_dir+0xd8/0x1b0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3204, comm: cp Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #173
Call Trace:
 [<c13ff993>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
 [<c105d33a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0
 [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
 [<c105d3aa>] ? check_usage+0x6a/0x460
 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
 [<c11432b9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c11432b9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c1401a2b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
 [<c11432b9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c11432b9>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c1117012>] reiserfs_lookup+0x62/0x140
 [<c105ccca>] ? debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x8a/0x140
 [<c105cbe4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170
 [<c10bd85f>] __lookup_hash+0xef/0x110
 [<c10bf21d>] lookup_one_len+0x8d/0xc0
 [<c1141e2a>] open_xa_dir+0xea/0x1b0
 [<c1141fe5>] xattr_lookup+0x15/0x160
 [<c1142476>] reiserfs_xattr_get+0x56/0x2a0
 [<c1144042>] reiserfs_get_acl+0xa2/0x360
 [<c10ca2e7>] ? new_inode+0x27/0xa0
 [<c114461a>] reiserfs_cache_default_acl+0x3a/0x160
 [<c1402eb7>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
 [<c111789c>] reiserfs_mkdir+0x6c/0x2c0
 [<c10c7cb8>] ? __d_lookup+0x108/0x190
 [<c105c932>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c1401c8d>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2bd/0x340
 [<c10bd17a>] ? generic_permission+0x1a/0xa0
 [<c11788fe>] ? security_inode_permission+0x1e/0x20
 [<c10bea96>] vfs_mkdir+0xd6/0x180
 [<c10c0c10>] sys_mkdirat+0xc0/0xd0
 [<c10505c6>] ? up_read+0x16/0x30
 [<c1002fd8>] ? restore_all_notrace+0x0/0x18
 [<c10c0c40>] sys_mkdir+0x20/0x30
 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

Keeping the reiserfs lock while freeing the journal on
umount path triggers a lock inversion between bdev->bd_mutex
and the reiserfs lock.

We don't need the reiserfs lock at this stage. The filesystem
is not usable anymore, and there are no more pending commits,
everything got flushed (even this operation was done in parallel
and didn't required the reiserfs lock from the current process).

This fixes the following lockdep report:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.32-atom #172
-------------------------------------------------------
umount/3904 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10de2c2>] __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160

but task is already holding lock:
 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1143279>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c1143229>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
       [<c111c485>] reiserfs_get_block+0x85/0x1620
       [<c10e1040>] do_mpage_readpage+0x1f0/0x6d0
       [<c10e1640>] mpage_readpages+0xc0/0x100
       [<c1119b89>] reiserfs_readpages+0x19/0x20
       [<c108f1ec>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x1bc/0x260
       [<c108f2b8>] ra_submit+0x28/0x40
       [<c1087e3e>] filemap_fault+0x40e/0x420
       [<c109b5fd>] __do_fault+0x3d/0x430
       [<c109d47e>] handle_mm_fault+0x12e/0x790
       [<c1022a65>] do_page_fault+0x135/0x330
       [<c1403663>] error_code+0x6b/0x70
       [<c10ef9ca>] load_elf_binary+0x82a/0x1a10
       [<c10ba130>] search_binary_handler+0x90/0x1d0
       [<c10bb70f>] do_execve+0x1df/0x250
       [<c1001746>] sys_execve+0x46/0x70
       [<c1002fa5>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb

-> #2 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c109b1ab>] might_fault+0x8b/0xb0
       [<c11b8f52>] copy_to_user+0x32/0x70
       [<c10c3b94>] filldir64+0xa4/0xf0
       [<c1109116>] sysfs_readdir+0x116/0x210
       [<c10c3e1d>] vfs_readdir+0x8d/0xb0
       [<c10c3ea9>] sys_getdents64+0x69/0xb0
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

-> #1 (sysfs_mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c110951c>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x2c/0xb0
       [<c1109aa0>] create_dir+0x40/0x90
       [<c1109b1b>] sysfs_create_dir+0x2b/0x50
       [<c11b2352>] kobject_add_internal+0xc2/0x1b0
       [<c11b2531>] kobject_add_varg+0x31/0x50
       [<c11b25ac>] kobject_add+0x2c/0x60
       [<c1258294>] device_add+0x94/0x560
       [<c11036ea>] add_partition+0x18a/0x2a0
       [<c110418a>] rescan_partitions+0x33a/0x450
       [<c10de5bf>] __blkdev_get+0x12f/0x2d0
       [<c10de76a>] blkdev_get+0xa/0x10
       [<c11034b8>] register_disk+0x108/0x130
       [<c11a87a9>] add_disk+0xd9/0x130
       [<c12998e5>] sd_probe_async+0x105/0x1d0
       [<c10528af>] async_thread+0xcf/0x230
       [<c104bfd4>] kthread+0x74/0x80
       [<c1003aab>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x3c

-> #0 (&bdev->bd_mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c10de2c2>] __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160
       [<c10de40a>] blkdev_put+0xa/0x10
       [<c113ce22>] free_journal_ram+0xd2/0x130
       [<c113ea18>] do_journal_release+0x98/0x190
       [<c113eb2a>] journal_release+0xa/0x10
       [<c1128eb6>] reiserfs_put_super+0x36/0x130
       [<c10b776f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x4f/0xe0
       [<c10b7825>] kill_block_super+0x25/0x40
       [<c11255df>] reiserfs_kill_sb+0x7f/0x90
       [<c10b7f4a>] deactivate_super+0x7a/0x90
       [<c10cccd8>] mntput_no_expire+0x98/0xd0
       [<c10ccfcc>] sys_umount+0x4c/0x310
       [<c10cd2a9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by umount/3904:
 #0:  (&type->s_umount_key#30){+++++.}, at: [<c10b7f45>] deactivate_super+0x75/0x90
 #1:  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1143279>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x29/0x40

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3904, comm: umount Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #172
Call Trace:
 [<c13ff903>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
 [<c105d33a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0
 [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
 [<c108b66f>] ? free_pcppages_bulk+0x1f/0x250
 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
 [<c10de2c2>] ? __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160
 [<c10de2c2>] ? __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160
 [<c140199b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
 [<c10de2c2>] ? __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160
 [<c105c932>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c10afe12>] ? kfree+0x92/0xd0
 [<c10de2c2>] __blkdev_put+0x22/0x160
 [<c105cc3b>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0x10
 [<c10de40a>] blkdev_put+0xa/0x10
 [<c113ce22>] free_journal_ram+0xd2/0x130
 [<c113ea18>] do_journal_release+0x98/0x190
 [<c113eb2a>] journal_release+0xa/0x10
 [<c1128eb6>] reiserfs_put_super+0x36/0x130
 [<c1050596>] ? up_write+0x16/0x30
 [<c10b776f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x4f/0xe0
 [<c10b7825>] kill_block_super+0x25/0x40
 [<c10f41e0>] ? vfs_quota_off+0x0/0x20
 [<c11255df>] reiserfs_kill_sb+0x7f/0x90
 [<c10b7f4a>] deactivate_super+0x7a/0x90
 [<c10cccd8>] mntput_no_expire+0x98/0xd0
 [<c10ccfcc>] sys_umount+0x4c/0x310
 [<c10cd2a9>] sys_oldumount+0x19/0x20
 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

While deleting the xattrs of an inode, we hold the reiserfs lock
and grab the inode->i_mutex of the targeted inode and the root
private xattr directory.

Later on, we may relax the reiserfs lock for various reasons, this
creates inverted dependencies.

We can remove the reiserfs lock -> i_mutex dependency by relaxing
the former before calling open_xa_dir(). This is fine because the
lookup and creation of xattr private directories done in
open_xa_dir() are covered by the targeted inode mutexes. And deeper
operations in the tree are still done under the write lock.

This fixes the following lockdep report:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.32-atom #173
-------------------------------------------------------
cp/3204 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<c11432b9>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50

but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1141e18>] open_xa_dir+0xd8/0x1b0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105ea7f>] __lock_acquire+0x11ff/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a2b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c1141d83>] open_xa_dir+0x43/0x1b0
       [<c1142722>] reiserfs_for_each_xattr+0x62/0x260
       [<c114299a>] reiserfs_delete_xattrs+0x1a/0x60
       [<c111ea1f>] reiserfs_delete_inode+0x9f/0x150
       [<c10c9c32>] generic_delete_inode+0xa2/0x170
       [<c10c9d4f>] generic_drop_inode+0x4f/0x70
       [<c10c8b07>] iput+0x47/0x50
       [<c10c0965>] do_unlinkat+0xd5/0x160
       [<c10c0a00>] sys_unlink+0x10/0x20
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

-> #0 (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.+.}:
       [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
       [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
       [<c1401a2b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
       [<c11432b9>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
       [<c1117012>] reiserfs_lookup+0x62/0x140
       [<c10bd85f>] __lookup_hash+0xef/0x110
       [<c10bf21d>] lookup_one_len+0x8d/0xc0
       [<c1141e2a>] open_xa_dir+0xea/0x1b0
       [<c1141fe5>] xattr_lookup+0x15/0x160
       [<c1142476>] reiserfs_xattr_get+0x56/0x2a0
       [<c1144042>] reiserfs_get_acl+0xa2/0x360
       [<c114461a>] reiserfs_cache_default_acl+0x3a/0x160
       [<c111789c>] reiserfs_mkdir+0x6c/0x2c0
       [<c10bea96>] vfs_mkdir+0xd6/0x180
       [<c10c0c10>] sys_mkdirat+0xc0/0xd0
       [<c10c0c40>] sys_mkdir+0x20/0x30
       [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by cp/3204:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<c10bd8d6>] lookup_create+0x26/0xa0
 #1:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#4/3){+.+.+.}, at: [<c1141e18>] open_xa_dir+0xd8/0x1b0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3204, comm: cp Not tainted 2.6.32-atom #173
Call Trace:
 [<c13ff993>] ? printk+0x18/0x1a
 [<c105d33a>] print_circular_bug+0xca/0xd0
 [<c105f176>] __lock_acquire+0x18f6/0x19e0
 [<c105d3aa>] ? check_usage+0x6a/0x460
 [<c105f2c8>] lock_acquire+0x68/0x90
 [<c11432b9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c11432b9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c1401a2b>] mutex_lock_nested+0x5b/0x340
 [<c11432b9>] ? reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c11432b9>] reiserfs_write_lock_once+0x29/0x50
 [<c1117012>] reiserfs_lookup+0x62/0x140
 [<c105ccca>] ? debug_check_no_locks_freed+0x8a/0x140
 [<c105cbe4>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x124/0x170
 [<c10bd85f>] __lookup_hash+0xef/0x110
 [<c10bf21d>] lookup_one_len+0x8d/0xc0
 [<c1141e2a>] open_xa_dir+0xea/0x1b0
 [<c1141fe5>] xattr_lookup+0x15/0x160
 [<c1142476>] reiserfs_xattr_get+0x56/0x2a0
 [<c1144042>] reiserfs_get_acl+0xa2/0x360
 [<c10ca2e7>] ? new_inode+0x27/0xa0
 [<c114461a>] reiserfs_cache_default_acl+0x3a/0x160
 [<c1402eb7>] ? _spin_unlock+0x27/0x40
 [<c111789c>] reiserfs_mkdir+0x6c/0x2c0
 [<c10c7cb8>] ? __d_lookup+0x108/0x190
 [<c105c932>] ? mark_held_locks+0x62/0x80
 [<c1401c8d>] ? mutex_lock_nested+0x2bd/0x340
 [<c10bd17a>] ? generic_permission+0x1a/0xa0
 [<c11788fe>] ? security_inode_permission+0x1e/0x20
 [<c10bea96>] vfs_mkdir+0xd6/0x180
 [<c10c0c10>] sys_mkdirat+0xc0/0xd0
 [<c10505c6>] ? up_read+0x16/0x30
 [<c1002fd8>] ? restore_all_notrace+0x0/0x18
 [<c10c0c40>] sys_mkdir+0x20/0x30
 [<c1002ec4>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32

v2: Don't drop reiserfs_mutex_lock_nested_safe() as we'll still
    need it later
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

When we relax the reiserfs lock to avoid creating unwanted
dependencies against others locks while grabbing these,
we want to ensure it has not been taken recursively, otherwise
the lock won't be really relaxed. Only its depth will be decreased.
The unwanted dependency would then actually happen.

To prevent from that, add a reiserfs_lock_check_recursive() call
in the places that need it.
Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>