Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 17 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 14 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 12 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 11 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 06 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 01 6月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Report all objects with allocated pages to the shrinker · d82b4b26
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Currently, we try to report to the shrinker the precise number of
objects (pages) that are available to be reaped at this moment. This
requires searching all objects with allocated pages to see if they
fulfill the search criteria, and this count is performed quite
frequently. (The shrinker tries to free ~128 pages on each invocation,
before which we count all the objects; counting takes longer than
unbinding the objects!) If we take the pragmatic view that with
sufficient desire, all objects are eventually reapable (they become
inactive, or no longer used as framebuffer etc), we can simply return
the count of pinned pages maintained during get_pages/put_pages rather
than walk the lists every time.

The downside is that we may (slightly) over-report the number of
objects/pages we could shrink and so penalize ourselves by shrinking
more than required. This is mitigated by keeping the order in which we
shrink objects such that we avoid penalizing active and frequently used
objects, and if memory is so tight that we need to free them we would
need to anyway.

v2: Only expose shrinkable objects to the shrinker; a small reduction in
not considering stolen and foreign objects.
v3: Restore the tracking from a "backup" copy from before the gem/ split
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      d82b4b26
    • C
      drm/i915: Track the purgeable objects on a separate eviction list · 3b4fa964
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Currently the purgeable objects, I915_MADV_DONTNEED, are mixed in the
normal bound/unbound lists. Every shrinker pass starts with an attempt
to purge from this set of unneeded objects, which entails us doing a
walk over both lists looking for any candidates. If there are none, and
since we are shrinking we can reasonably assume that the lists are
full!, this becomes a very slow futile walk.

If we separate out the purgeable objects into own list, this search then
becomes its own phase that is preferentially handled during shrinking.
Instead the cost becomes that we then need to filter the purgeable list
if we want to distinguish between bound and unbound objects.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190530203500.26272-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      3b4fa964
  13. 28 5月, 2019 2 次提交
  15. 20 5月, 2019 2 次提交
  17. 29 4月, 2019 1 次提交
    • T
      drm: Simplify stacktrace handling · 487f3c7f
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
array based interfaces.

The original code in all printing functions is really wrong. It allocates a
storage array on stack which is unused because depot_fetch_stack() does not
store anything in it. It overwrites the entries pointer in the stack_trace
struct so it points to the depot storage.
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: kasan-dev@googlegroups.com
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190425094802.622094226@linutronix.de
      487f3c7f
  19. 25 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 06 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 28 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 06 2月, 2019 2 次提交
  27. 29 1月, 2019 3 次提交
  29. 25 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  31. 18 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • T
      drm/i915: GEM_WARN_ON considered harmful · bbb8a9d7
      由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于 
      GEM_WARN_ON currently has dangerous semantics where it is completely
compiled out on !GEM_DEBUG builds. This can leave users who expect it to
be more like a WARN_ON, just without a warning in non-debug builds, in
complete ignorance.

Another gotcha with it is that it cannot be used as a statement. Which is
again different from a standard kernel WARN_ON.

This patch fixes both problems by making it behave as one would expect.

It can now be used both as an expression and as statement, and also the
condition evaluates properly in all builds - code under the conditional
will therefore not unexpectedly disappear.

To satisfy call sites which really want the code under the conditional to
completely disappear, we add GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON and convert some of the
callers to it. This one can also be used as both expression and statement.

>From the above it follows GEM_DEBUG_WARN_ON should be used in situations
where we are certain the condition will be hit during development, but at
a place in code where error can be handled to the benefit of not crashing
the machine.

GEM_WARN_ON on the other hand should be used where condition may happen in
production and we just want to distinguish the level of debugging output
emitted between the production and debug build.

v2:
 * Dropped BUG_ON hunk.
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181012063142.16080-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
      bbb8a9d7
  33. 30 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  35. 16 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  37. 24 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  39. 19 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  41. 07 7月, 2018 3 次提交
  43. 06 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  45. 03 7月, 2018 2 次提交
  47. 29 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  49. 08 6月, 2018 2 次提交
  51. 06 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  53. 05 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  55. 04 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Lazily unbind vma on close · 3365e226
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      When userspace is passing around swapbuffers using DRI, we frequently
have to open and close the same object in the foreign address space.
This shows itself as the same object being rebound at roughly 30fps
(with a second object also being rebound at 30fps), which involves us
having to rewrite the page tables and maintain the drm_mm range manager
every time.

However, since the object still exists and it is only the local handle
that disappears, if we are lazy and do not unbind the VMA immediately
when the local user closes the object but defer it until the GPU is
idle, then we can reuse the same VMA binding. We still have to be
careful to mark the handle and lookup tables as closed to maintain the
uABI, just allowing the underlying VMA to be resurrected if the user is
able to access the same object from the same context again.

If the object itself is destroyed (neither userspace keeping a handle to
it), the VMA will be reaped immediately as usual.

In the future, this will be even more useful as instantiating a new VMA
for use on the GPU will become heavier. A nuisance indeed, so nip it in
the bud.

v2: s/__i915_vma_final_close/i915_vma_destroy/ etc.
v3: Leave a hint as to why we deferred the unbind on close.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180503195115.22309-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      3365e226
  57. 22 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  59. 12 12月, 2017 1 次提交