1. 29 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  2. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 31 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  4. 26 3月, 2018 6 次提交
  5. 22 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  6. 16 8月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 17 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • D
      VFS: Convert sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY to sb_rdonly(sb) · bc98a42c
      David Howells 提交于
      Firstly by applying the following with coccinelle's spatch:
      
      	@@ expression SB; @@
      	-SB->s_flags & MS_RDONLY
      	+sb_rdonly(SB)
      
      to effect the conversion to sb_rdonly(sb), then by applying:
      
      	@@ expression A, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(!sb_rdonly(SB)) && A
      	+!sb_rdonly(SB) && A
      	|
      	-A != (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A == (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-!(sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+!sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A && (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A && sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-A || (sb_rdonly(SB))
      	+A || sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) != A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) != A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) == A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) == A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) && A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) && A
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) || A
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) || A
      	)
      
      	@@ expression A, B, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? 1 : 0
      	+sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(sb_rdonly(SB)) ? A : B
      	+sb_rdonly(SB) ? A : B
      	)
      
      to remove left over excess bracketage and finally by applying:
      
      	@@ expression A, SB; @@
      	(
      	-(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	+(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) != sb_rdonly(SB)
      	|
      	-(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	+(bool)(A & MS_RDONLY) == sb_rdonly(SB)
      	)
      
      to make comparisons against the result of sb_rdonly() (which is a bool)
      work correctly.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      bc98a42c
  8. 30 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 18 4月, 2017 3 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: switch to div64_u64 if with a u64 divisor · 42c61ab6
      Liu Bo 提交于
      This is fixing code pieces where we use div_u64 when passing a u64 divisor.
      
      Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      42c61ab6
    • Q
      btrfs: Wait for in-flight bios before freeing target device for raid56 · ae6529c3
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      When raid56 dev-replace is cancelled by running scrub, we will free
      target device without waiting for in-flight bios, causing the following
      NULL pointer deference or general protection failure.
      
       BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000000000005e0
       IP: generic_make_request_checks+0x4d/0x610
       CPU: 1 PID: 11676 Comm: kworker/u4:14 Tainted: G  O    4.11.0-rc2 #72
       Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.10.2-20170228_101828-anatol 04/01/2014
       Workqueue: btrfs-endio-raid56 btrfs_endio_raid56_helper [btrfs]
       task: ffff88002875b4c0 task.stack: ffffc90001334000
       RIP: 0010:generic_make_request_checks+0x4d/0x610
       Call Trace:
        ? generic_make_request+0xc7/0x360
        generic_make_request+0x24/0x360
        ? generic_make_request+0xc7/0x360
        submit_bio+0x64/0x120
        ? page_in_rbio+0x4d/0x80 [btrfs]
        ? rbio_orig_end_io+0x80/0x80 [btrfs]
        finish_rmw+0x3f4/0x540 [btrfs]
        validate_rbio_for_rmw+0x36/0x40 [btrfs]
        raid_rmw_end_io+0x7a/0x90 [btrfs]
        bio_endio+0x56/0x60
        end_workqueue_fn+0x3c/0x40 [btrfs]
        btrfs_scrubparity_helper+0xef/0x620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_endio_raid56_helper+0xe/0x10 [btrfs]
        process_one_work+0x2af/0x720
        ? process_one_work+0x22b/0x720
        worker_thread+0x4b/0x4f0
        kthread+0x10f/0x150
        ? process_one_work+0x720/0x720
        ? kthread_create_on_node+0x40/0x40
        ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x40
       RIP: generic_make_request_checks+0x4d/0x610 RSP: ffffc90001337bb8
      
      In btrfs_dev_replace_finishing(), we will call
      btrfs_rm_dev_replace_blocked() to wait bios before destroying the target
      device when scrub is finished normally.
      
      However when dev-replace is aborted, either due to error or cancelled by
      scrub, we didn't wait for bios, this can lead to use-after-free if there
      are bios holding the target device.
      
      Furthermore, for raid56 scrub, at least 2 places are calling
      btrfs_map_sblock() without protection of bio_counter, leading to the
      problem.
      
      This patch fixes the problem:
      1) Wait for bio_counter before freeing target device when canceling
         replace
      2) When calling btrfs_map_sblock() for raid56, use bio_counter to
         protect the call.
      
      Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ae6529c3
    • D
      btrfs: track exclusive filesystem operation in flags · 171938e5
      David Sterba 提交于
      There are several operations, usually started from ioctls, that cannot
      run concurrently. The status is tracked in
      mutually_exclusive_operation_running as an atomic_t. We can easily track
      the status as one of the per-filesystem flag bits with same
      synchronization guarantees.
      
      The conversion replaces:
      
      * atomic_xchg(..., 1)    ->   test_and_set_bit(FLAG, ...)
      * atomic_set(..., 0)     ->   clear_bit(FLAG, ...)
      Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      171938e5
  10. 28 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  11. 06 12月, 2016 3 次提交
  12. 27 9月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 26 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  14. 26 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  16. 04 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 28 4月, 2016 5 次提交
  18. 04 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • Y
      btrfs: Reset IO error counters before start of device replacing · 7ccefb98
      Yauhen Kharuzhy 提交于
      If device replace entry was found on disk at mounting and its num_write_errors
      stats counter has non-NULL value, then replace operation will never be
      finished and -EIO error will be reported by btrfs_scrub_dev() because
      this counter is never reset.
      
       # mount -o degraded /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/
       # btrfs replace status /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/
       Started on 25.Mar 07:28:00, canceled on 25.Mar 07:28:01 at 0.0%, 40 write errs, 0 uncorr. read errs
       # btrfs replace start -B 4 /dev/sdg /media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/
       ERROR: ioctl(DEV_REPLACE_START) failed on "/media/a4fb5c0a-21c5-4fe7-8d0e-fdd87d5f71ee/": Input/output error, no error
      
      Reset num_write_errors and num_uncorrectable_read_errors counters in the
      dev_replace structure before start of replacing.
      Signed-off-by: NYauhen Kharuzhy <yauhen.kharuzhy@zavadatar.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      7ccefb98
  19. 14 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  20. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace · 73beece9
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,
      
      [ 1226.649039] =========================================================
      [ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
      [ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
      [ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
      [ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
      [ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
      [ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
      [ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}
      
      and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
      
      [ 1226.652955]
      other info that might help us debug this:
      [ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
        &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock
      
      [ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
      
      [ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
      [ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
      [ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
      [ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
      [ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
      [ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
      [ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
      [ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
      [ 1226.652955]
       *** DEADLOCK ***
      
      Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
      to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
      run to this.
      
      The above lock chain comes from
      btrfs_commit_transaction
        ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
          ...
          ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
            ...
            ->__btrfs_cow_block
               ...
               ->find_free_extent
                  ->cache_block_group
                    ->load_free_space_cache
                      ->btrfs_readpages
                        ->submit_one_bio
                          ...
                          ->__btrfs_map_block
                            ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock
      
      However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
      be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
      by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
      to
      
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
      [ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700
      
      delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
      to a ABBA deadlock.
      
      To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
      things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.
      
      With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      73beece9
  21. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: scrub: use GFP_KERNEL on the submission path · 58c4e173
      David Sterba 提交于
      Scrub is not on the critical writeback path we don't need to use
      GFP_NOFS for all allocations. The failures are handled and stats passed
      back to userspace.
      
      Let's use GFP_KERNEL on the paths where everything is ok, ie. setup the
      global structures and the IO submission paths.
      
      Functions that do the repair and fixups still use GFP_NOFS as we might
      want to skip any other filesystem activity if we encounter an error.
      This could turn out to be unnecessary, but requires more review compared
      to the easy cases in this patch.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      58c4e173