Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  3. 03 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 02 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 01 2月, 2018 2 次提交
    • S
      drm/i915/guc: Add uc_fini_wq in gem_init unwind path · c950af50
      由 Sagar Arun Kamble 提交于 
      While moving code around for solving lockdep issue for GuC log relay,
spotted that uc_fini_wq is not being called in failure path in gem_init.
Missed in the below commit. Add it.

v2: Removed GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC()) from intel_uc_fini_wq as init happens
only based on enable_guc module parameter and does not consider has_guc
capability. (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Fixes: 3176ff49 ("drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex")
Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1515588857-10283-1-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.comSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
(cherry picked from commit da943b5a)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
      c950af50
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Don't forget to free GuC error log · bf67ce62
      由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于 
      We're freeing GuC error log in uc_fini_hw() that matches
corresponding uc_init_hw() but we missed the point that this
log object is copied on error path and in case of failure in
uc_init_hw() we will leak this object as uc_fini_hw() is
never called.

If we free this log object as part of the late uC cleanup, where
we also release other firmware objects, we can avoid this BUG:

[70841.001413] BUG drm_i915_gem_object (Tainted: G     U  W       ): Objects remaining in drm_i915_gem_object on __kmem_cache_shutdown()
[70841.001436] INFO: Slab 0x00000000c94e41af objects=21 used=1 fp=0x000000001d60c40a flags=0x8000000000008100

[70841.001466] Call Trace:
[70841.001471]  dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e
[70841.001476]  slab_err+0x99/0xb0
[70841.001483]  ? __slab_alloc.isra.24.constprop.29+0x62/0x70
[70841.001491]  ? __kmalloc+0x1f5/0x320
[70841.001497]  __kmem_cache_shutdown+0x18b/0x400
[70841.001505]  shutdown_cache+0x13/0x1c0
[70841.001511]  kmem_cache_destroy+0x1c2/0x240
[70841.001517]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x38/0x270
[70841.001559]  i915_gem_load_cleanup+0xbc/0x130 [i915]
[70841.001595]  i915_driver_cleanup_early+0x11/0x60 [i915]
[70841.001630]  i915_driver_load+0x708/0x1720 [i915]
[70841.001638]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe2/0x1c0
[70841.001673]  i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915]
[70841.001680]  pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
[70841.001687]  driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490
[70841.001694]  __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
[70841.001700]  ? driver_probe_device+0x490/0x490
[70841.001705]  bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
[70841.001712]  bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260
[70841.001717]  ? 0xffffffffa0685000
[70841.001723]  driver_register+0x52/0xc0
[70841.001728]  ? 0xffffffffa0685000
[70841.001733]  do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170
[70841.001739]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[70841.001746]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x27b/0x2e0
[70841.001753]  do_init_module+0x56/0x1ec
[70841.001759]  load_module+0x219e/0x2550
[70841.001766]  ? vfs_read+0x121/0x140
[70841.001774]  ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
[70841.001779]  SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
[70841.001788]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x22/0x8f

[70841.001806] INFO: Object 0x00000000eab7ed96 @offset=6208
[70841.001850] INFO: Allocated in i915_gem_object_create.part.32+0x1f/0x260 [i915] age=38 cpu=0 pid=2708
[70841.001861] 	kmem_cache_alloc+0x23d/0x2d0
[70841.001897] 	i915_gem_object_create.part.32+0x1f/0x260 [i915]
[70841.001937] 	intel_guc_allocate_vma+0x15/0x100 [i915]
[70841.001977] 	intel_guc_log_create+0x34/0x1c0 [i915]
[70841.002014] 	intel_guc_init+0x5a/0x100 [i915]
[70841.002051] 	intel_uc_init+0x3e/0xb0 [i915]
[70841.002089] 	i915_gem_init+0x18e/0x540 [i915]
[70841.002123] 	i915_driver_load+0xa7a/0x1720 [i915]
[70841.002159] 	i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915]
[70841.002165] 	pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
[70841.002171] 	driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490
[70841.002177] 	__driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
[70841.002182] 	bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
[70841.002188] 	bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260
[70841.002193] 	driver_register+0x52/0xc0
[70841.002198] 	do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170
[70841.002462] kmem_cache_destroy drm_i915_gem_object: Slab cache still has objects

[70841.002491] Call Trace:
[70841.002497]  dump_stack+0x5e/0x8e
[70841.002503]  kmem_cache_destroy+0x1e0/0x240
[70841.002509]  ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x38/0x270
[70841.002551]  i915_gem_load_cleanup+0xbc/0x130 [i915]
[70841.002586]  i915_driver_cleanup_early+0x11/0x60 [i915]
[70841.002621]  i915_driver_load+0x708/0x1720 [i915]
[70841.002629]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0xe2/0x1c0
[70841.002664]  i915_pci_probe+0x2d/0x90 [i915]
[70841.002671]  pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
[70841.002678]  driver_probe_device+0x2a9/0x490
[70841.002684]  __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
[70841.002690]  ? driver_probe_device+0x490/0x490
[70841.002696]  bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
[70841.002702]  bus_add_driver+0x1eb/0x260
[70841.002708]  ? 0xffffffffa0685000
[70841.002713]  driver_register+0x52/0xc0
[70841.002719]  ? 0xffffffffa0685000
[70841.002724]  do_one_initcall+0x39/0x170
[70841.002731]  ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x6f/0x80
[70841.002737]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x27b/0x2e0
[70841.002745]  do_init_module+0x56/0x1ec
[70841.002751]  load_module+0x219e/0x2550
[70841.002758]  ? vfs_read+0x121/0x140
[70841.002766]  ? SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
[70841.002772]  SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
[70841.002781]  entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x22/0x8f
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180131173241.19704-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.comReviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      bf67ce62
  9. 25 1月, 2018 1 次提交
    • S
      drm/i915/guc: Fix lockdep due to log relay channel handling under struct_mutex · 70deeadd
      由 Sagar Arun Kamble 提交于 
      This patch fixes lockdep issue due to circular locking dependency of
struct_mutex, i_mutex_key, mmap_sem, relay_channels_mutex.
For GuC log relay channel we create debugfs file that requires i_mutex_key
lock and we are doing that under struct_mutex. So we introduced newer
dependency as:
    &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 --> &mm->mmap_sem
However, there is dependency from mmap_sem to struct_mutex. Hence we
separate the relay create/destroy operation from under struct_mutex.
Also added runtime check of relay buffer status.
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0-rc6-CI-Patchwork_7614+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
debugfs_test/1388 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<00000000d5e1d915>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<0000000029a9c131>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
       _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70
       filldir+0x8c/0xf0
       dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160
       iterate_dir+0xdc/0x140
       SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3){++++}:
       start_creating+0x59/0x110
       __debugfs_create_file+0x2e/0xe0
       relay_create_buf_file+0x62/0x80
       relay_late_setup_files+0x84/0x250
       guc_log_late_setup+0x4f/0x110 [i915]
       i915_guc_log_register+0x32/0x40 [i915]
       i915_driver_load+0x7b6/0x1720 [i915]
       i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915]
       pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
       driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480
       __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
       bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
       bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260
       driver_register+0x52/0xc0
       do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150
       do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef
       load_module+0x231c/0x2d70
       SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #1 (relay_channels_mutex){+.+.}:
       relay_open+0x12c/0x2b0
       intel_guc_log_runtime_create+0xab/0x230 [i915]
       intel_guc_init+0x81/0x120 [i915]
       intel_uc_init+0x29/0xa0 [i915]
       i915_gem_init+0x182/0x530 [i915]
       i915_driver_load+0xaa9/0x1720 [i915]
       i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915]
       pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
       driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480
       __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
       bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
       bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260
       driver_register+0x52/0xc0
       do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150
       do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef
       load_module+0x231c/0x2d70
       SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}:
       __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
       i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
       i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x790 [i915]
       __do_fault+0x15/0x70
       __handle_mm_fault+0x677/0xdc0
       handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
       __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
       page_fault+0x4c/0x60

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3 --> &mm->mmap_sem

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#3);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
  lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by debugfs_test/1388:
 #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<0000000029a9c131>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1388 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc6-CI-Patchwork_7614+ #1
Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./J4205-ITX, BIOS P1.10 09/29/2016
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x5f/0x86
 print_circular_bug.isra.18+0x1d0/0x2c0
 __lock_acquire+0x14ae/0x1b60
 ? lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x790 [i915]
 __do_fault+0x15/0x70
 ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40
 __handle_mm_fault+0x677/0xdc0
 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
 ? page_fault+0x36/0x60
 page_fault+0x4c/0x60

v2: Added lock protection to guc->log.runtime.relay_chan (Chris)
    Fixed locking inside guc_flush_logs uncovered by new lockdep.

v3: Locking guc_read_update_log_buffer entirely with relay_lock. (Chris)
    Prepared intel_guc_init_early. Moved relay_lock inside relay_create
    relay_destroy, relay_file_create, guc_read_update_log_buffer. (Michal)
    Removed struct_mutex lock around guc_log_flush and removed usage
    of guc_log_has_relay() from runtime_create path as it needs
    struct_mutex lock.

v4: Handle NULL relay sub buffer pointer earlier in read_update_log_buffer
    (Chris). Fixed comment suffix **/. (Michal)

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104693
Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with enable_guc=1 and guc_log_level=1
Signed-off-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Marta Lofstedt <marta.lofstedt@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1516808821-3638-3-git-send-email-sagar.a.kamble@intel.com
      70deeadd
  11. 19 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 10 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 14 12月, 2017 3 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Extract guc_init from guc_init_hw · 61b5c158
      由 Michał Winiarski 提交于 
      After GPU reset, GuC HW needs to be reinitialized (with FW reload).
Unfortunately, we're doing some extra work there (mostly allocating stuff),
work that can be moved to guc_init and called once at driver load time.

As a side effect we're no longer hitting an assert in
i915_ggtt_enable_guc on suspend/resume.

v2: Do not duplicate disable_communication / reset_guc_interrupts
v3: Add proper teardown after rebase

References: 04f7b24e ("drm/i915/guc: Assert that we switch between known ggtt->invalidate functions")
Signed-off-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-3-michal.winiarski@intel.com
      61b5c158
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Move GuC workqueue allocations outside of the mutex · 3176ff49
      由 Michał Winiarski 提交于 
      This gets rid of the following lockdep splat:

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
debugfs_test/1351 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<000000009d90d1a3>] i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #6 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}:
       __might_fault+0x63/0x90
       _copy_to_user+0x1e/0x70
       filldir+0x8c/0xf0
       dcache_readdir+0xeb/0x160
       iterate_dir+0xe6/0x150
       SyS_getdents+0xa0/0x130
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #5 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5){++++}:
       lockref_get+0x9/0x20

-> #4 ((completion)&req.done){+.+.}:
       wait_for_common+0x54/0x210
       devtmpfs_create_node+0x130/0x150
       device_add+0x5ad/0x5e0
       device_create_groups_vargs+0xd4/0xe0
       device_create+0x35/0x40
       msr_device_create+0x22/0x40
       cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xc5/0xbf0
       cpuhp_thread_fun+0x167/0x210
       smpboot_thread_fn+0x17f/0x270
       kthread+0x173/0x1b0
       ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30

-> #3 (cpuhp_state-up){+.+.}:
       cpuhp_issue_call+0x132/0x1c0
       __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x12f/0x2a0
       __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50
       page_writeback_init+0x3a/0x5c
       start_kernel+0x393/0x3e2
       secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0

-> #2 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}:
       __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
       __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x4b/0x2a0
       __cpuhp_setup_state+0x3a/0x50
       page_alloc_init+0x1f/0x26
       start_kernel+0x139/0x3e2
       secondary_startup_64+0xa5/0xb0

-> #1 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}:
       cpus_read_lock+0x34/0xa0
       apply_workqueue_attrs+0xd/0x40
       __alloc_workqueue_key+0x2c7/0x4e1
       intel_guc_submission_init+0x10c/0x650 [i915]
       intel_uc_init_hw+0x29e/0x460 [i915]
       i915_gem_init_hw+0xca/0x290 [i915]
       i915_gem_init+0x115/0x3a0 [i915]
       i915_driver_load+0x9a8/0x16c0 [i915]
       i915_pci_probe+0x2e/0x90 [i915]
       pci_device_probe+0x9c/0x120
       driver_probe_device+0x2a3/0x480
       __driver_attach+0xd9/0xe0
       bus_for_each_dev+0x57/0x90
       bus_add_driver+0x168/0x260
       driver_register+0x52/0xc0
       do_one_initcall+0x39/0x150
       do_init_module+0x56/0x1ef
       load_module+0x231c/0x2d70
       SyS_finit_module+0xa5/0xe0
       entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1c/0x89

-> #0 (&dev->struct_mutex){+.+.}:
       lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
       __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
       i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
       i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915]
       __do_fault+0x15/0x70
       __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40
       handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
       __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
       page_fault+0x22/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &dev->struct_mutex --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5 --> &mm->mmap_sem

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#5);
                               lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
  lock(&dev->struct_mutex);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by debugfs_test/1351:
 #0:  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: [<000000005df01c1e>] __do_page_fault+0x106/0x560

stack backtrace:
CPU: 2 PID: 1351 Comm: debugfs_test Not tainted 4.15.0-rc2-CI-Patchwork_7428+ #1
Hardware name:                  /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0057.2017.0119.1758 01/19/2017
Call Trace:
 dump_stack+0x5f/0x86
 print_circular_bug+0x230/0x3b0
 check_prev_add+0x439/0x7b0
 ? lockdep_init_map_crosslock+0x20/0x20
 ? unwind_get_return_address+0x16/0x30
 ? __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0
 __lock_acquire+0x1385/0x15a0
 lock_acquire+0xaf/0x200
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 __mutex_lock+0x81/0x9b0
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 i915_mutex_lock_interruptible+0x47/0x130 [i915]
 ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x4f/0x80
 i915_gem_fault+0x201/0x760 [i915]
 __do_fault+0x15/0x70
 __handle_mm_fault+0x85b/0xe40
 handle_mm_fault+0x14f/0x2f0
 __do_page_fault+0x2d1/0x560
 page_fault+0x22/0x30
RIP: 0033:0x7f98d6f49116
RSP: 002b:00007ffd6ffc3278 EFLAGS: 00010283
RAX: 00007f98d39a2bc0 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000001680
RDX: 0000000000001680 RSI: 00007ffd6ffc3400 RDI: 00007f98d39a2bc0
RBP: 00007ffd6ffc33a0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00000000000005a0
R10: 000055e847c2a830 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000001
R13: 000055e847c1d040 R14: 00007ffd6ffc3400 R15: 00007f98d6752ba0

v2: Init preempt_work unconditionally (Chris)
v3: Mention that we need the enable_guc=1 for lockdep splat (Chris)

Testcase: igt/debugfs_test/read_all_entries # with i915.enable_guc=1
Signed-off-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-2-michal.winiarski@intel.com
      3176ff49
    • M
      drm/i915/guc: Move shared data allocation away from submission path · 1bbbca0d
      由 Michał Winiarski 提交于 
      We need shared data for actions (e.g. guc suspend/resume), and we're
using those with GuC submission disabled.
Let's introduce intel_guc_init and move shared data alloc there.

This fixes GPF during module unload with HuC, but without GuC submission:

BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 000000005aee7809
IP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915]
PGD 0 P4D 0
Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in: i915(O-) netconsole x86_pkg_temp_thermal
intel_powerclamp coretemp crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel
mei_me i2c_i801 mei prime_numbers [last unloaded: i915]
CPU: 2 PID: 2794 Comm: rmmod Tainted: G     U  W  O 4.15.0-rc2+ #297
Hardware name: /NUC6i5SYB, BIOS SYSKLi35.86A.0054.2016.0930.1102 09/30/2016
task: 0000000055945c61 task.stack: 00000000264ccb43
RIP: 0010:intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915]
RSP: 0018:ffffc90000483df8 EFLAGS: 00010286
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff880829180000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000006 RSI: ffff880844c2c938 RDI: ffff880844c2c000
RBP: ffff880829180000 R08: 00000000a29c58c1 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffa040ba40
R13: ffffffffa040bab0 R14: ffff88084a195060 R15: 000055df3ef357a0
FS:  00007ff43c043740(0000) GS:ffff88084e200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000000000f9 CR3: 000000083f179005 CR4: 00000000003606e0
Call Trace:
 i915_gem_suspend+0x9d/0x130 [i915]
 ? i915_driver_unload+0x68/0x180 [i915]
 i915_driver_unload+0x70/0x180 [i915]
 i915_pci_remove+0x15/0x20 [i915]
 pci_device_remove+0x36/0xb0
 device_release_driver_internal+0x15f/0x220
 driver_detach+0x3a/0x80
 bus_remove_driver+0x58/0xd0
 pci_unregister_driver+0x29/0x90
 SyS_delete_module+0x150/0x1e0
 entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x23/0x9a
RIP: 0033:0x7ff43b51b5c7
RSP: 002b:00007ffe6825a758 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007ff43b51b5c7
RDX: 000000000000000a RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 000055df3ef35808
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 00007ffe682596d1 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 00007ff43b594880 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 000055df3ef357a0
R13: 00007ffe68259740 R14: 000055df3ef35260 R15: 000055df3ef357a0
Code: 00 00 02 74 03 31 c0 c3 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 10 e8 52 0f
f8 ff 48 b8 01 05 00 00 02 00 00 00 48 89 44 24 04 48 8b 83 00 12 00 00 <f6> 80
f9 00 00 00 01 0f 84 a7 00 00 00 f6 80 98 00 00 00 01 0f
RIP: intel_guc_suspend+0x34/0x140 [i915] RSP: ffffc90000483df8
CR2: 00000000000000f9
---[ end trace 23a192a61d937a3e ]---

Fixes: b8e5eb96 ("drm/i915/guc: Allocate separate shared data object for GuC communication")
Signed-off-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171213221352.7173-1-michal.winiarski@intel.com
      1bbbca0d
  17. 06 12月, 2017 6 次提交
  19. 16 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  21. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  23. 16 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  25. 06 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  27. 05 10月, 2017 3 次提交
  29. 26 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  31. 22 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  33. 13 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  35. 08 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  37. 26 5月, 2017 3 次提交
  39. 19 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  41. 11 5月, 2017 2 次提交