- 15 8月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
This allows us to have more context in ubifs_assert() and take different actions depending on the configuration. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Since commit 6da2ec56 ("treewide: kmalloc() -> kmalloc_array()") we use kmalloc_array() for kmalloc() that computes the length with a multiplication. Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Suggested-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Check whether the size is within bounds before using it. If the size is not correct, abort and dump the bad data node. Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1e51764a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Reported-by: NSilvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
This reverts commit 353748a3. It bypassed the linux-mtd review process and fixes the issue not as it should. Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Silvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Every single time I come across that code, I get confused because it looks like a possible dead lock. Help myself by adding a comment. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
In ubifs_jnl_update() we sync parent and child inodes to the flash, in case of xattrs, the parent inode (AKA host inode) has a non-zero data_len. Therefore we need to adjust synced_i_size too. This issue was reported by ubifs self tests unter a xattr related work load. UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1896): dbg_check_synced_i_size: ui_size is 4, synced_i_size is 0, but inode is clean UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1896): dbg_check_synced_i_size: i_ino 65, i_mode 0x81a4, i_size 4 Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Fixes: 1e51764a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 13 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Silvio Cesare 提交于
There is potential for the size and len fields in ubifs_data_node to be too large causing either a negative value for the length fields or an integer overflow leading to an incorrect memory allocation. Likewise, when the len field is small, an integer underflow may occur. Signed-off-by: NSilvio Cesare <silvio.cesare@gmail.com> Fixes: 1e51764a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
- 07 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sascha Hauer 提交于
In the description of reserve_space() it is claimed that write_node() and write_head() unlock the journal head. This is not true and has never been true. All callers of write_node() and write_head() call release_head() themselves. Remove the wrong comment. Signed-off-by: NSascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 15 7月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
We developed RENAME_EXCHANGE and UBIFS_FLG_DOUBLE_HASH more or less in parallel and this case was forgotten. :-( Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: d63d61c1 ("ubifs: Implement UBIFS_FLG_DOUBLE_HASH") Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
When UBIFS prepares data structures which will be written to the MTD it ensues that their lengths are multiple of 8. Since it uses kmalloc() the padded bytes are left uninitialized and we leak a few bytes of kernel memory to the MTD. To make sure that all bytes are initialized, let's switch to kzalloc(). Kzalloc() is fine in this case because the buffers are not huge and in the IO path the performance bottleneck is anyway the MTD. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1e51764a ("UBIFS: add new flash file system") Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Reviewed-by: NBoris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
If file names are encrypted we can no longer print them. That's why we have to change these prints or remove them completely. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
When removing an encrypted file with a long name and without having the key we have to be able to locate and remove the directory entry via a double hash. This corner case was simply forgotten. Fixes: 528e3d17 ("ubifs: Add full hash lookup support") Reported-by: NDavid Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 David Oberhollenzer 提交于
Currently, the function truncate_data_node only updates the destination data node size if compression is used. For uncompressed nodes, the old length is incorrectly retained. This patch makes sure that the length is correctly set when compression is disabled. Fixes: 7799953b ("ubifs: Implement encrypt/decrypt for all IO") Signed-off-by: NDavid Oberhollenzer <david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 17 1月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Rosin 提交于
Without this, I get the following on reboot: UBIFS error (ubi1:0 pid 703): ubifs_load_znode: bad target node (type 1) length (8240) UBIFS error (ubi1:0 pid 703): ubifs_load_znode: have to be in range of 48-4144 UBIFS error (ubi1:0 pid 703): ubifs_load_znode: bad indexing node at LEB 13:11080, error 5 magic 0x6101831 crc 0xb1cb246f node_type 9 (indexing node) group_type 0 (no node group) sqnum 546 len 128 child_cnt 5 level 0 Branches: 0: LEB 14:72088 len 161 key (133, inode) 1: LEB 14:81120 len 160 key (134, inode) 2: LEB 20:26624 len 8240 key (134, data, 0) 3: LEB 14:81280 len 160 key (135, inode) 4: LEB 20:34864 len 8240 key (135, data, 0) UBIFS warning (ubi1:0 pid 703): ubifs_ro_mode.part.0: switched to read-only mode, error -22 CPU: 0 PID: 703 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.9.0-next-20161213+ #1197 Hardware name: Atmel SAMA5 [<c010d2ac>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010b250>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) [<c010b250>] (show_stack) from [<c024df94>] (ubifs_jnl_update+0x2e8/0x614) [<c024df94>] (ubifs_jnl_update) from [<c0254bf8>] (ubifs_mkdir+0x160/0x204) [<c0254bf8>] (ubifs_mkdir) from [<c01a6030>] (vfs_mkdir+0xb0/0x104) [<c01a6030>] (vfs_mkdir) from [<c0286070>] (ovl_create_real+0x118/0x248) [<c0286070>] (ovl_create_real) from [<c0283ed4>] (ovl_fill_super+0x994/0xaf4) [<c0283ed4>] (ovl_fill_super) from [<c019c394>] (mount_nodev+0x44/0x9c) [<c019c394>] (mount_nodev) from [<c019c4ac>] (mount_fs+0x14/0xa4) [<c019c4ac>] (mount_fs) from [<c01b5338>] (vfs_kern_mount+0x4c/0xd4) [<c01b5338>] (vfs_kern_mount) from [<c01b6b80>] (do_mount+0x154/0xac8) [<c01b6b80>] (do_mount) from [<c01b782c>] (SyS_mount+0x74/0x9c) [<c01b782c>] (SyS_mount) from [<c0107f80>] (ret_fast_syscall+0x0/0x3c) UBIFS error (ubi1:0 pid 703): ubifs_mkdir: cannot create directory, error -22 overlayfs: failed to create directory /mnt/ovl/work/work (errno: 22); mounting read-only Fixes: 7799953b ("ubifs: Implement encrypt/decrypt for all IO") Signed-off-by: NPeter Rosin <peda@axentia.se> Tested-by: NKevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Colin Ian King 提交于
err is no longer being set on a successful return path, causing a garbage value being returned. Fix this by setting err to zero for the successful return path. Found with static analysis by CoverityScan, CID 1389473 Fixes: 7799953b ("ubifs: Implement encrypt/decrypt for all IO") Signed-off-by: NColin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 13 12月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
This feature flag indicates that all directory entry nodes have a 32bit cookie set and therefore UBIFS is allowed to perform lookups by hash. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
UBIFS stores a 32bit hash of every file, for traditional lookups by name this scheme is fine since UBIFS can first try to find the file by the hash of the filename and upon collisions it can walk through all entries with the same hash and do a string compare. When filesnames are encrypted fscrypto will ask the filesystem for a unique cookie, based on this cookie the filesystem has to be able to locate the target file again. With 32bit hashes this is impossible because the chance for collisions is very high. Do deal with that we store a 32bit cookie directly in the UBIFS directory entry node such that we get a 64bit cookie (32bit from filename hash and the dent cookie). For a lookup by hash UBIFS finds the entry by the first 32bit and then compares the dent cookie. If it does not match, it has to do a linear search of the whole directory and compares all dent cookies until the correct entry is found. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NDavid Gstir <david@sigma-star.at> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NDavid Gstir <david@sigma-star.at> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
When data of a data node is compressed and encrypted we need to store the size of the compressed data because before encryption we may have to add padding bytes. For the new field we consume the last two padding bytes in struct ubifs_data_node. Two bytes are fine because the data length is at most 4096. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 03 10月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
...to make the code more consistent since we use move already in other places. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Adds RENAME_EXCHANGE to UBIFS, the operation itself is completely disjunct from a regular rename() that's why we dispatch very early in ubifs_reaname(). RENAME_EXCHANGE used by the renameat2() system call allows the caller to exchange two paths atomically. Both paths have to exist and have to be on the same filesystem. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
Adds RENAME_WHITEOUT support to UBIFS, we implement it in the same way as ext4 and xfs do. For an overview of other ways to implement it please refere to commit 7dcf5c3e ("xfs: add RENAME_WHITEOUT support"). Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
-
- 16 4月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Howells 提交于
that's the bulk of filesystem drivers dealing with inodes of their own Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 25 3月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sheng Yong 提交于
In the case where we have more than one volumes on different UBI devices, it may be not that easy to tell which volume prints the messages. Add ubi number and volume id in ubifs_msg/warn/error to help debug. These two values are passed by struct ubifs_info. For those where ubifs_info is not initialized yet, ubifs_* is replaced by pr_*. For those where ubifs_info is not avaliable, ubifs_info is passed to the calling function as a const parameter. The output looks like, [ 95.444879] UBIFS (ubi0:1): background thread "ubifs_bgt0_1" started, PID 696 [ 95.484688] UBIFS (ubi0:1): UBIFS: mounted UBI device 0, volume 1, name "test1" [ 95.484694] UBIFS (ubi0:1): LEB size: 126976 bytes (124 KiB), min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048 bytes/2048 bytes [ 95.484699] UBIFS (ubi0:1): FS size: 30220288 bytes (28 MiB, 238 LEBs), journal size 1523712 bytes (1 MiB, 12 LEBs) [ 95.484703] UBIFS (ubi0:1): reserved for root: 1427378 bytes (1393 KiB) [ 95.484709] UBIFS (ubi0:1): media format: w4/r0 (latest is w4/r0), UUID 40DFFC0E-70BE-4193-8905-F7D6DFE60B17, small LPT model [ 95.489875] UBIFS (ubi1:0): background thread "ubifs_bgt1_0" started, PID 699 [ 95.529713] UBIFS (ubi1:0): UBIFS: mounted UBI device 1, volume 0, name "test2" [ 95.529718] UBIFS (ubi1:0): LEB size: 126976 bytes (124 KiB), min./max. I/O unit sizes: 2048 bytes/2048 bytes [ 95.529724] UBIFS (ubi1:0): FS size: 19808256 bytes (18 MiB, 156 LEBs), journal size 1015809 bytes (0 MiB, 8 LEBs) [ 95.529727] UBIFS (ubi1:0): reserved for root: 935592 bytes (913 KiB) [ 95.529733] UBIFS (ubi1:0): media format: w4/r0 (latest is w4/r0), UUID EEB7779D-F419-4CA9-811B-831CAC7233D4, small LPT model [ 954.264767] UBIFS error (ubi1:0 pid 756): ubifs_read_node: bad node type (255 but expected 6) [ 954.367030] UBIFS error (ubi1:0 pid 756): ubifs_read_node: bad node at LEB 0:0, LEB mapping status 1 Signed-off-by: NSheng Yong <shengyong1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Subodh Nijsure 提交于
The journal update function did not work for extended attributes properly, because extended attribute inodes carry the xattr data, and the size of this data was not taken into account. Artem: improved commit message, amended the patch a bit. Signed-off-by: NSubodh Nijsure <snijsure@grid-net.com> Signed-off-by: NMarc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NBen Shelton <ben.shelton@ni.com> Acked-by: NBrad Mouring <brad.mouring@ni.com> Acked-by: NGratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 19 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
This assertion was only correct before UBIFS had xattr support. Now with xattr support also a directory node can carry data and can act as host node. Suggested-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 25 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 21 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 21 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Weinberger 提交于
We do not need this feature and to our shame it even was not working and there was a bug found very recently. -- Artem Bityutskiy Without the data type hint UBI2 (fastmap) will be easier to implement. Signed-off-by: NRichard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
This commit re-names all functions which dump something from "dbg_dump_*()" to "ubifs_dump_*()". This is done for consistency with UBI and because this way it will be more logical once we remove the debugging sompilation option. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
In case of errors we almost always need the stack dump - it makes no sense to compile it out. Remove the 'dbg_dump_stack()' function completely. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Subodh Nijsure 提交于
Remove CONFIG_UBIFS_FS_XATTR configuration option and associated UBIFS_FS_XATTR ifdefs. Testing: Tested using integck while using nandsim on x86 & MX28 based platform with Micron MT29F2G08ABAEAH4 nand. Signed-off-by: NSubodh Nijsure <snijsure@grid-net.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Before commit 56e46742 we have had locking around all printing macros and we could use static buffers for creating key strings and printing them. However, now we do not have that locking and we cannot use static buffers. This commit removes the old DBGKEY() macros and introduces few new helper macros for printing debugging messages plus a key at the end. Thankfully, all the messages are already structures in a way that the key is printed in the end. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
UBIFS leaks memory on error path in 'ubifs_jnl_update()' in case of write failure because it forgets to free the 'struct ubifs_dent_node *dent' object. Although the object is small, the alignment can make it large - e.g., 2KiB if the min. I/O unit is 2KiB. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 16 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
Currently when UBIFS fills up the current bud (which is the last in the journal head) and switches to the next bud, it first writes the log reference node for the next bud and only after this synchronizes the write-buffer of the previous bud. This is not a big deal, but an unclean power cut may lead to a situation when we have corruption in a next-to-last bud, although it is much more logical that we have to have corruption only in the last bud. This patch also removes write-buffer synchronization from 'ubifs_wbuf_seek_nolock()' because this is not needed anymore (we synchronize the write-buffer explicitly everywhere now) and also because this is just prone to various errors. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 14 5月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
This patch improves the 'dbg_check_space_info()' function which checks whether the amount of space before re-mounting and after re-mounting is the same (remounting from R/O to R/W modes and vice-versa). The problem is that 'dbg_check_space_info()' does not save the budgeting information before re-mounting, so when an error is reported, we do not know why the amount of free space changed. This patches makes the following changes: 1. Teaches 'dbg_dump_budg()' function to accept a 'struct ubifs_budg_info' argument and print out the this argument. This way we may ask it to print any saved budgeting info, no only the current one. 2. Accordingly changes all the callers of 'dbg_dump_budg()' to comply with the changed interface. 3. Introduce a 'saved_bi' (saved budgeting info) field to 'struct ubifs_debug_info' and save the budgeting info before re-mounting there. 4. Change 'dbg_check_space_info()' and make it print both old and new budgeting information. 5. Additionally, save 'c->igx_gc_cnt' and print it if and error happens. This value contributes to the amount of free space, so we have to print it. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于
The current 'dbg_dump_budg()' calling convention is that the 'c->space_lock' spinlock is held. However, none of the callers actually use it from contects which have 'c->space_lock' locked, so all callers have to explicitely lock and unlock the spinlock. This is not very sensible convention. This patch changes it and makes 'dbg_dump_budg()' lock the spinlock instead of imposing this to the callers. This simplifies the code a little. Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-
- 11 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew L. Creech 提交于
Running kernel 2.6.37, my PPC-based device occasionally gets an order-2 allocation failure in UBIFS, which causes the root FS to become unwritable: kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:2, mode:0x4050 Call Trace: [c787dc30] [c00085b8] show_stack+0x7c/0x194 (unreliable) [c787dc70] [c0061aec] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x4f0/0x57c [c787dd00] [c0061b98] __get_free_pages+0x20/0x50 [c787dd10] [c00e4f88] ubifs_jnl_write_data+0x54/0x200 [c787dd50] [c00e82d4] do_writepage+0x94/0x198 [c787dd90] [c00675e4] shrink_page_list+0x40c/0x77c [c787de40] [c0067de0] shrink_inactive_list+0x1e0/0x370 [c787de90] [c0068224] shrink_zone+0x2b4/0x2b8 [c787df00] [c0068854] kswapd+0x408/0x5d4 [c787dfb0] [c0037bcc] kthread+0x80/0x84 [c787dff0] [c000ef44] kernel_thread+0x4c/0x68 Similar problems were encountered last April by Tomasz Stanislawski: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/50965/ This patch implements Artem's suggested fix: fall back to a mutex-protected static buffer, allocated at mount time. I tested it by forcing execution down the failure path, and didn't see any ill effects. Artem: massaged the patch a little, improved it so that we'd not allocate the write reserve buffer when we are in R/O mode. Signed-off-by: NMatthew L. Creech <mlcreech@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
-