1. 13 4月, 2012 3 次提交
    • P
      ARM: OMAP1: OCPI: move to mach-omap1/ · 6f3c1af2
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      Move the OMAP1 OCPI "bus" code to arch/arm/mach-omap1, since it is
      only used on OMAP1 devices.  In the long term, it probably makes sense
      to move the OCPI bus code to somewhere under drivers/.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      6f3c1af2
    • P
      ARM: OMAP: add includes for missing prototypes · e2ed89fc
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      Several C files in arch/arm/mach-omap* and arch/arm/plat-omap declare
      functions that are used by other files, but don't include the header
      file where the prototype is declared.  This results in the following
      warnings from sparse:
      
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:114:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_pending' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:186:13: warning: symbol 'omap2_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:191:13: warning: symbol 'omap3_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:196:13: warning: symbol 'ti81xx_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:233:39: warning: symbol 'omap2_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:242:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_save_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:265:6: warning: symbol 'omap_intc_restore_context' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:291:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_suspend' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:297:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_prepare_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:306:6: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_resume_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/irq.c:312:39: warning: symbol 'omap3_intc_handle_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.c:59:12: warning: symbol 'omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-zoom-display.c:133:13: warning: symbol 'zoom_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/plat-omap/common.c:73:13: warning: symbol 'omap_init_consistent_dma_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:61:5: warning: symbol 'omap_irq_flags' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/irq.c:179:13: warning: symbol 'omap1_init_irq' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/reset.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'omap1_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
      
      Fix by including the appropriate header files.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Cc: Senthilvadivu Guruswamy <svadivu@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      
      e2ed89fc
    • P
      ARM: OMAP2+: declare file-local functions as static · 8c3d4534
      Paul Walmsley 提交于
      Several function declarations used only in the files in which they're
      declared should include the static keyword, but don't:
      
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/serial.c:248:6: warning: symbol 'cmdline_find_option' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c:259:6: warning: symbol 'irq_sar_clear' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:878:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_vibra_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-rx51-peripherals.c:882:27: warning: symbol 'rx51_audio_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:201:29: warning: symbol 'omap_panda_wlan_data' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:393:24: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_device' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:403:12: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_dvi_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-omap4panda.c:464:6: warning: symbol 'omap4_panda_display_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hsmmc.c:434:6: warning: symbol 'omap_init_hsmmc' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap2/hwspinlock.c:31:12: warning: symbol 'hwspinlocks_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/timer.c:58:12: warning: symbol 'omap1_dm_timer_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
          arch/arm/mach-omap1/fpga.c:90:6: warning: symbol 'innovator_fpga_IRQ_demux' was not declared. Should it be static?
      
      Mark all of these as static.
      
      Thanks to Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> for pointing out a typo in the
      original patch description.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
      Cc: Govindraj R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
      Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Cc: David Anders <x0132446@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NSantosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
      Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      8c3d4534
  2. 06 4月, 2012 2 次提交
    • S
      simple_open: automatically convert to simple_open() · 234e3405
      Stephen Boyd 提交于
      Many users of debugfs copy the implementation of default_open() when
      they want to support a custom read/write function op.  This leads to a
      proliferation of the default_open() implementation across the entire
      tree.
      
      Now that the common implementation has been consolidated into libfs we
      can replace all the users of this function with simple_open().
      
      This replacement was done with the following semantic patch:
      
      <smpl>
      @ open @
      identifier open_f != simple_open;
      identifier i, f;
      @@
      -int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f)
      -{
      (
      -if (i->i_private)
      -f->private_data = i->i_private;
      |
      -f->private_data = i->i_private;
      )
      -return 0;
      -}
      
      @ has_open depends on open @
      identifier fops;
      identifier open.open_f;
      @@
      struct file_operations fops = {
      ...
      -.open = open_f,
      +.open = simple_open,
      ...
      };
      </smpl>
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: checkpatch fixes]
      Signed-off-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
      Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      234e3405
    • R
      ARM: fix __io macro for PCMCIA · 1ac02d79
      Rob Herring 提交于
      With commit c334bc15 (ARM: make mach/io.h include optional), PCMCIA was
      broken. PCMCIA depends on __io() returning a valid i/o address, and most
      ARM platforms require IO_SPACE_LIMIT be set to 0xffffffff for PCMCIA. This
      needs a better fix with a fixed i/o address mapping, but for now we just
      restore things to the previous behavior.
      
      This fixes at91, omap1, pxa and sa11xx. pxa needs io.h if PCI is enabled,
      but PCMCIA is not. sa11xx already has IO_SPACE_LIMIT set to 0xffffffff,
      so it doesn't need an io.h.
      Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
      Cc: Joachim Eastwood <joachim.eastwood@jotron.com>
      Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>
      Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
      Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
      Tested-by: Paul Parsons <lost.distance@yahoo.com> (pxa270)
      Acked-by: NTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
      Signed-off-by: NOlof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
      1ac02d79
  3. 05 4月, 2012 18 次提交
  4. 04 4月, 2012 13 次提交
  5. 03 4月, 2012 3 次提交
  6. 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交