- 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sara Sharon 提交于
Add support for extended command id in notification system. Extended command id header contains group id in addition to command id. Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 04 8月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
Since the time-event is sent with the immediate flag set, there is no need to sample the device time. Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
In the mvm driver, neither the old command nor the return value are used, so remove them. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
As pointed out by smatch, there's no need for a loop that always immediately terminates. Use an if statement instead and while at it clean up the mvmvif initialization. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eliad Peller 提交于
commit b112889c ("iwlwifi: mvm: add Aux ROC request/response flow") added aux ROC flow in addition to the existing ROC flow. While doing it, it moved the ROC reference release to a common work item, which is being called for both the ROC and aux ROC flows. This resulted in invalid reference accounting, as no reference was taken in case of aux ROC, while a reference was released on completion. Fix it by adding a reference for the aux ROC as well, and release only the relevant references on completion (according to the set bits). While at it, convert cancel_work_sync() to flush_work(), in order to make sure the references are being cleaned properly. Fixes: b112889c ("iwlwifi: mvm: add Aux ROC request/response flow") Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 02 4月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The only other way to catch these would have been to monitor the Tx deauth event, but we can send a deauth when we roam. So it would have been tricky to make sure we capture the connection losses only. Define a separate trigger for the connection losses to make it easier to catch them. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This will allow to collect data when a time event notifcation with a certain id and action is coming from the firmware. This can be very useful to debug various flows. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Sara Sharon 提交于
Fix spelling error across the driver. Modified only comments and prints. Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 18 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
This warning is misleading. In many cases, for example P2P ROC time events, this will happen if the time event is aborted, for example due to a higher priority time event. This is entirely normal and not worth warning about. In other cases, where we actually do act upon this, for example when trying to connect and this fails, we should instead warn as part of the disconnect operation. Change the code to do that, i.e. make the warning a debug message, and make it more prominent (an error) when we actually disconnect because of it. This also fixes confusion in the logs - the warning was mistaken for something that needed investigation, while in most cases it's just expected behaviour that occasionally some lower-priority time events would not complete fully. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If, on a GO, the CSA time event fails to be scheduled, continue the flow towards mac80211's state machine so it doesn't get stuck, but report an error later on the post switch which will cause mac80211 to tear down the operation. This ensures nothing gets stuck due to the scheduling failure. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 12 3月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The code here is a little confusing, the iwl_mvm_te_check_disconnect() will check that the interface is a station, but going into it after already having processed the time even end for P2P seems strange at first look. Put a switch statement there to distinguish the interface types and make this more readable. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If this situation ever happens, the mac80211 state machine gets confused because it never clears csa_active. There was a separate bug that lead to this happening with a working connection, but it isn't very robust to try to keep the connection up in this case. When removing the time event the CSA essentially procedure stops, so the safest thing to do is to disconnect in this case. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrei Otcheretianski 提交于
iwl_mvm_stop_roc removes TE only if running flag is set. This is not correct since this flag is only set when the TE is started. This resulted in a TE not being removed, when mac80211 believes that there are no active ROCs. Fixes: bf5da87f ("iwlwifi: mvm: add remove flow for AUX ROC time events") Signed-off-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 24 11月, 2014 4 次提交
-
-
由 Luciano Coelho 提交于
If setting the CSA time event fails, we must clear the TE data, otherwise we'll try to remove it when, for instance, a disconnection occurs, causing a SYSASSERT. Signed-off-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luciano Coelho 提交于
We need to call ieee80211_chswitch_done() ourselves just when the absence TE started, so we perform the actual context switch early enough. To do so, add a dummy channel_switch op, which will cause mac80211 to skip the countdown timer and allow us to call ieee80211_chswitch_done() to complete the operation. Signed-off-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luciano Coelho 提交于
Add an absent time event when pre_channel_switch is called and use the time event started indication to set the disable_tx bit instead of doing it in unassign_vif(). This is done so that the firmware queues are stopped before the actual switch takes place to avoid losing packets while the AP/GO is performing its actual switch. Signed-off-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Matti Gottlieb 提交于
Add a flow that handles the requests to cancel the roc time event, that has been triggered via the aux framework. The roc for bss is different than the roc for p2p devices, and is done via the aux framework using the aux queue, thus requires a different flow to cancel the time event. Signed-off-by: NMatti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matti Gottlieb 提交于
Don't add the time event to the list. We added it several times the same time event, which leads to an infinite loop when walking the list. Since we (currently) don't support more than one ROC for STA vif at a time, enforce this and don't add the time event to any list. We were also missing the locking of the mutex which led to a lockdep splat - fix that. Signed-off-by: NMatti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 15 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luciano Coelho 提交于
The time event used for CSA GO will also be used by CSA client. Rename the symbols to something more generic and aligned with the firmware code. Signed-off-by: NLuciano Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Our legal structure changed at some point (see wikipedia), but we forgot to immediately switch over to the new copyright notice. For files that we have modified in the time since the change, add the proper copyright notice now. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
由 Liad Kaufman 提交于
Make sure that when running the TDLS discovery session protection - the time event that ensures we remain on channel has been scheduled and started running before leaving. Signed-off-by: NLiad Kaufman <liad.kaufman@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ariej Marjieh 提交于
The Remain On Channel framework added to the firmare is a bit like time events. It allows the driver to request the firmware to be on a certain channel for a certain time. Unlike the time events, the ROC infrastructure doesn't need a MAC context in the firmware - it uses a generic context called "auxiliary framework". This is useful for any offchannel activity that is not bound to a specific MAC. The flow is synchronized much like with time events: 1) The driver receives an action frame from the wpa_supplicant via nl80211 that requests to be sent offchannel. 2) The driver sends an Aux ROC command (0x53) to the firmware. 3) The firmware responds with the unique id of the time event. 4) When time event starts, the driver puts the frame in the Aux queue. Special care needs to be taken when the time events ends: the queue needs to be cleaned-up. Signed-off-by: NAriej Marjieh <ariej.marjieh@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 08 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrei Otcheretianski 提交于
According to the spec, GO/AP should perform the channel switch just before "beacon 0". However, since the exact timing isn't defined, it may result in a sudden GO disappearance from the channel. Prevent potential packet loss when performing the CS by scheduling NoA time event and executing the channel switch flow when a notification from fw is received. Signed-off-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
CMD_SYNC is really 0 which is confusing: if (cmd.flags & CMD_SYNC) is always false. Fix this by simply removing its definition. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
All the supported firmwares have this flag set. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Newer firmware support a new bit in the policy that allows to request to apply the time event immediately. Add this bit without removing the workarounds we used until now to support older firmares. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 04 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eliad Peller 提交于
Take a reference when ROC command is started, and unref it on completion. Signed-off-by: NEliad Peller <eliadx.peller@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 14 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Add an inline helper function for getting an RX packet's length or payload length and use it throughout the code (most of which I did using an spatch.) While at it, adjust some code, and remove a bogus comment from the dvm calibration code. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NEran Harary <eran.harary@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Happy new year! Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
-
- 26 11月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Time event notification can have a failure status even if the time event was scheduled: * in START notification, this can happen if the time event was scheduled later than the requested apply time. * in STOP notification, this can happen if the time event is truncated. Even if both happened, the offchannel packets sent during the remain on channel are very likely to have been sent. Hence, don't WARN when this happens, but rather print a discrete line in the kernel log. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 03 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When firmware restart happens, the timers are obviously reset and the new firmware has no synchronisation with the AP as we program timings to the pre-restart values. The firmware should attempt to synchronise by itself, but in multi-channel scenarios this isn't easy, particularly since it has to try to keep service quality up for other MACs. To make it more reliable, give each client MAC some time to catch beacons when restarting or resuming. Service quality was impacted anyway (or in resume doesn't really matter much.) Reviewed-by: NMoshe Island <moshe.island@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Masanari Iida 提交于
Correct spelling typo in printk Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
-
- 12 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eytan Lifshitz 提交于
The time event firmware API will change, add the support for that. Use the new API throughout and convert to the old where needed. Signed-off-by: NEytan Lifshitz <eytan.lifshitz@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGuy Cohen <guy.cohen@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
A few places in the code (mac80211 and iwlmvm) use the same TU_TO_JIFFIES() macro and could use TU_TO_EXP_TIME() that mac80211 has. Make these available to everyone and use them. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If scheduling an important time event fails, or if we get an unexpected notification from the firmware, there isn't much we can do to recover, so just drop the connection and let higher layers retry it. Reviewed-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 04 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
The firmware API changed to differentiate between event and fragment start/end. Change the time-event handling accordingly. Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
Schedule different time event based on the ROC type Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 06 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
7000.c was released as GPL only by mistake: it should be dual licensed - GPL / BSD. The file that contains the license in the kernel is COPYING and not LICENSE.GPL. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 19 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Occasionally, we would run into this warning: iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_protect_session extend 0x2601: only 200 ms left iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_remove_time_event Removing TE 0x2601 iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: I iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd Sending command TIME_EVENT_CMD (#29), seq: 0x0925, 60 bytes at 37[5]:9 iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_pcie_send_hcmd_sync Attempting to send sync command TIME_EVENT_CMD iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_pcie_send_hcmd_sync Setting HCMD_ACTIVE for command TIME_EVENT_CMD iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: I iwl_pcie_enqueue_hcmd Sending command TIME_EVENT_CMD (#29), seq: 0x0926, 60 bytes at 38[6]:9 iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_time_event_response TIME_EVENT_CMD response - UID = 0x2601 iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: I iwl_pcie_hcmd_complete Clearing HCMD_ACTIVE for command TIME_EVENT_CMD iwlwifi 0000:02:00.0: U iwl_mvm_rx_time_event_notif Time event notification - UID = 0x2701 action 1 wlan0: associate with 00:0a:b8:55:a8:30 (try 2/3) ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: at drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/time-event.c:269 iwl_mvm_time_event_send_add+0x163/0x1a0 [iwlmvm]() Modules linked in: [...] Call Trace: [<c1046e42>] warn_slowpath_common+0x72/0xa0 [<c1046e92>] warn_slowpath_null+0x22/0x30 [<f8cad913>] iwl_mvm_time_event_send_add+0x163/0x1a0 [iwlmvm] [<f8cadead>] iwl_mvm_protect_session+0xcd/0x1c0 [iwlmvm] [<f8ca2087>] iwl_mvm_mac_mgd_prepare_tx+0x67/0xa0 [iwlmvm] [<f882a130>] ieee80211_sta_work+0x8f0/0x1070 [mac80211] The reason is a problem with asynchronous vs. synchronous commands, what happens here is the following: * TE 0x2601 is removed, the TIME_EVENT_CMD for that is async * a new TE (will be 0x2701) is created, the TIME_EVENT_CMD for that is sync and also uses a notification wait for the response (to avoid another race condition) * the response for the TE 0x2601 removal comes from the firmware, and is handled by the notification wait handler that's really waiting for the second response, but can't tell the difference, we therefore see the message "TIME_EVENT_CMD response - UID = 0x2601" instead of "TIME_EVENT_CMD response - UID = 0x2701". Fix this issue by making the TE removal synchronous as well, this means that we wait for the response to that command first, before there's any chance of sending a new one. Also, to detect such issues more easily in the future, add a warning to the notification handler that detects them. Reviewed-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-