Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 8月, 2019 4 次提交
  3. 30 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that need it · 10a08fd6
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The EC GPE needs to be set up for system wakeup only if there is a
driver depending on it, either intel-hid or intel-vbtn, bound to a
button device that is expected to wake up the system from sleep (such
as the power button on some Dell systems, like the XPS13 9360).  It
doesn't need to be set up for waking up the system from sleep in any
other cases and whether or not it is expected to wake up the system
from sleep doesn't depend on whether or not the LPS0 device is
present in the ACPI namespace.

For this reason, rearrange the ACPI suspend-to-idle code to make the
drivers depending on the EC GPE wakeup take care of setting it up and
decouple that from the LPS0 device handling.

While at it, make intel-hid and intel-vbtn prepare for system wakeup
only if they are allowed to wake up the system from sleep by user
space (via sysfs).

[Note that acpi_ec_mark_gpe_for_wake() and acpi_ec_set_gpe_wake_mask()
 are there to prevent the EC GPE from being disabled by the
 acpi_enable_all_wakeup_gpes() call in acpi_s2idle_prepare(), so on
 systems with either intel-hid or intel-vbtn this change doesn't
 affect any interactions with the hardware or platform firmware.]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
      10a08fd6
  5. 23 7月, 2019 6 次提交
    • R
      PM: sleep: Drop dpm_noirq_begin() and dpm_noirq_end() · b605c44c
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Note that after previous changes dpm_noirq_begin() and
dpm_noirq_end() each have only one caller, so move the code from
them to their respective callers and drop them.

Also note that dpm_noirq_resume_devices() and
dpm_noirq_suspend_devices() need not be exported any more, so make
them both static.

This change is not expected to alter functionality.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      b605c44c
    • R
      PM: sleep: Simplify suspend-to-idle control flow · 56b99184
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      After commit 33e4f80e ("ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups
from suspend-to-idle") the "noirq" phases of device suspend and
resume may run for multiple times during suspend-to-idle, if there
are spurious system wakeup events while suspended.  However, this
is complicated and fragile and actually unnecessary.

The main reason for doing this is that on some systems the EC may
signal system wakeup events (power button events, for example) as
well as events that should not cause the system to resume (spurious
system wakeup events).  Thus, in order to determine whether or not
a given event signaled by the EC while suspended is a proper system
wakeup one, the EC GPE needs to be dispatched and to start with that
was achieved by allowing the ACPI SCI action handler to run, which
was only possible after calling resume_device_irqs().

However, dispatching the EC GPE this way turned out to take too much
time in some cases and some EC events might be missed due to that, so
commit 68e22011 ("ACPI: EC: Dispatch the EC GPE directly on
s2idle wake") started to dispatch the EC GPE right after a wakeup
event has been detected, so in fact the full ACPI SCI action handler
doesn't need to run any more to deal with the wakeups coming from the
EC.

Use this observation to simplify the suspend-to-idle control flow
so that the "noirq" phases of device suspend and resume are each
run only once in every suspend-to-idle cycle, which is reported to
significantly reduce power drawn by some systems when suspended to
idle (by allowing them to reach a deep platform-wide low-power state
through the suspend-to-idle flow).  [What appears to happen is that
the "noirq" resume of devices after a spurious EC wakeup brings some
devices into a state in which they prevent the platform from reaching
the deep low-power state going forward, even after a subsequent
"noirq" suspend phase, and on some systems the EC triggers such
wakeups already when the "noirq" suspend of devices is running for
the first time in the given suspend/resume cycle, so the platform
cannot reach the deep low-power state at all.]

First, make acpi_s2idle_wake() use the acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() return
value to determine whether or not the wakeup may have been triggered
by the EC (in which case the system wakeup is canceled and ACPI
events are processed in order to determine whether or not the event
is a proper system wakeup one) and use rearm_wake_irq() (introduced
by a previous change) in it to rearm the ACPI SCI for system wakeup
detection in case the system will remain suspended.

Second, drop acpi_s2idle_sync(), which is not needed any more, and
the corresponding global platform suspend-to-idle callback.

Next, drop the pm_wakeup_pending() check (which is an optimization
only) from __device_suspend_noirq() to prevent it from returning
errors on system wakeups occurring before the "noirq" phase of
device suspend is complete (as in the case of suspend-to-idle it is
not known whether or not these wakeups are suprious at that point),
in order to avoid having to carry out a "noirq" resume of devices
on a spurious system wakeup.

Finally, change the code flow in s2idle_loop() to (1) run the
"noirq" suspend of devices once before starting the loop, (2) check
for spurious EC wakeups (via the platform ->wake callback) for the
first time before calling s2idle_enter(), and (3) run the "noirq"
resume of devices once after leaving the loop.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      56b99184
    • R
      ACPI: PM: Set s2idle_wakeup earlier and clear it later · 41275eb5
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The role of the s2idle_wakeup variable is to cause
acpi_pm_wakeup_event() and acpi_pm_notify_handler() to
increment pm_abort_suspend and trigger a wakeup from
suspend-to-idle in case the ACPI SCI wakeup was canceled
by acpi_s2idle_wake().

However, for this purpose it need not be set in acpi_s2idle_wake()
and cleared in acpi_s2idle_sync(), respectively.  In fact, it
may be set as early as in acpi_s2idle_prepare() and cleared as
late as in acpi_s2idle_restore(), so do that to allow subsequent
changes to be simpler.

This change is not expected to alter functionality.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      41275eb5
    • R
      PM: sleep: Fix possible overflow in pm_system_cancel_wakeup() · 2933954b
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      It is not actually guaranteed that pm_abort_suspend will be
nonzero when pm_system_cancel_wakeup() is called which may lead to
subtle issues, so make it use atomic_dec_if_positive() instead of
atomic_dec() for the safety sake.

Fixes: 33e4f80e ("ACPI / PM: Ignore spurious SCI wakeups from suspend-to-idle")
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      2933954b
    • R
      ACPI: EC: Return bool from acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() · 9089f16e
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      On some systems, if suspend-to-idle is used, the EC may signal system
wakeup events (power button events, for example) as well as events
that should not cause the system to resume and acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe()
needs to be called to determine whether or not the system should
resume then.  In particular, if acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() doesn't detect
any EC events at all, the system should remain suspended, so it is
useful to know when that is the case.

For this reason, make acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() return a bool value
indicating whether or not any EC events have been detected by it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      9089f16e
    • R
      ACPICA: Return u32 from acpi_dispatch_gpe() · 6921de89
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      In some cases it is useful to know whether or not the
acpi_ev_detect_gpe() called by acpi_dispatch_gpe() has found
the GPE to be active, so return the return value of it (whose
data type is u32) from latter.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      6921de89
  7. 22 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • Q
      iommu/amd: fix a crash in iova_magazine_free_pfns · 8cf66504
      由 Qian Cai 提交于 
      The commit b3aa14f0 ("iommu: remove the mapping_error dma_map_ops
method") incorrectly changed the checking from dma_ops_alloc_iova() in
map_sg() causes a crash under memory pressure as dma_ops_alloc_iova()
never return DMA_MAPPING_ERROR on failure but 0, so the error handling
is all wrong.

   kernel BUG at drivers/iommu/iova.c:801!
    Workqueue: kblockd blk_mq_run_work_fn
    RIP: 0010:iova_magazine_free_pfns+0x7d/0xc0
    Call Trace:
     free_cpu_cached_iovas+0xbd/0x150
     alloc_iova_fast+0x8c/0xba
     dma_ops_alloc_iova.isra.6+0x65/0xa0
     map_sg+0x8c/0x2a0
     scsi_dma_map+0xc6/0x160
     pqi_aio_submit_io+0x1f6/0x440 [smartpqi]
     pqi_scsi_queue_command+0x90c/0xdd0 [smartpqi]
     scsi_queue_rq+0x79c/0x1200
     blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list+0x4dc/0xb70
     blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests+0x249/0x310
     __blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0x128/0x200
     blk_mq_run_work_fn+0x27/0x30
     process_one_work+0x522/0xa10
     worker_thread+0x63/0x5b0
     kthread+0x1d2/0x1f0
     ret_from_fork+0x22/0x40

Fixes: b3aa14f0 ("iommu: remove the mapping_error dma_map_ops method")
Signed-off-by: NQian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8cf66504
  9. 19 7月, 2019 28 次提交