- 05 7月, 2016 10 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We are just about to introduce router interfaces (RIFs), but before that we need to be able update the device with the correct RIF attributes whenever they change for the netdev the RIF is backing. Two such attributes are MTU and MAC. The MAC is used both to set the source MAC of packets egressing from the RIF and also to program an FDB rule that will direct packets to the router block. Use the existing netdevice notification block and respond to CHANGEADDR and CHANGEMTU accordingly. Store both attributes in the RIF struct in case we need to revert to old attributes following a failed update. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Add functions that iterate over lower devices and find port device. As a dependency add netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev and netdev_for_each_all_lower_dev_rcu macro with netdev_all_lower_get_next and netdev_all_lower_get_next_rcu shelpers. Also, add functions to return mlxsw struct according to lower device found and mlxsw_port struct with a reference to lower device. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Implement ipv4 FIB entries addition and removal. Initially, we support local and broadcast routes using "ip2me" trap action. Also, unicast routes without nexthop are supported using "local" action. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Serves for adding, updating and removing fib entries. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Virtual router is a construct used inside HW. In this implementation we map kernel tables to virtual routers one to one. Introduce management logic to create virtual routers when needed and destroy in case they are no longer in use. According to that, call into LPM tree management. Each virtual router is always bound to one LPM tree. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Introduce basic LPM tree management allowing to share the trees in between tables if the used prefixes in the tables are the same. Build the tree structure according to the used prefixes. Although it is not optimal for many use cases, this initial implementation does only simple linear left-tree. More advanced structures will be introduced later on, possibly including mechanisms to change trees on the fly. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
This register is used to bind virtual router and protocol to an allocated LPM tree. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Serves to build LPM tree structure. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Register serves for allocation and deallocation of LPM search tree. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
Shadow FIB is needed in order to hold additional information for FIB entries and keep track of used prefixes. That is needed for the LPM tree construction to be introduced later on in this set. Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 7月, 2016 12 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Pirko 提交于
ip2me: To instruct HW to send trapped ip2me traffic to kernel, we have to add this trap. Selection ip2me traffic is introduced later on in this set. ARPs: We are going to stop flooding to CPU port when netdev isn't bridged and only get packets destined to the netdev's IP address and certain control packets. Add traps for ARP request (broadcast) and response (unicast) in order to get these to the CPU and resolve neighbours. host miss: If a packet is routed through a directly connected route and its destination IP is not in the device's neighbour table, then we need to trap it to CPU. This will cause the host to resolve the MAC of the neighbour, which will be eventually programmed to the device's table. router ingress: In order to trap packets in router part. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When removing packet traps we should use action 'discard' instead of 'forward', as some trap IDs we'll add cannot be configured with the later. However, result is the same, as packets are not trapped to the CPU. In the future we will be able to reverse the operation properly by detaching the trap group from the CPU. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Add the Router Interface Table Register (RITR), which allows us to create and configure router interfaces (RIFs). Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Incoming packets are directed to the router when they match an FDB entry with action forward to IP router. Add this action, which was mistakenly named "TRAP". Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When enabling the router in the device we will represent L3 netdevs using router interfaces (RIFs). These will be specified whenever programming routes or neighbours on the netdev. Introduce the basic RIF infrastructure which allows one to lookup a RIF by its netdev. Later patches in the series will extend this, but the basic routines are needed now in order to direct traffic to CPU. Pointers to the RIF structs are stored in an array indexed by the RIF's number. This will allow us to efficiently update the kernel's neighbour table when regularly dumping the device's table. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Create a skeleton router file and do basic HW initialization of router. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
During ports initialization a net device is registered for each available port, which implies the port is usable. However, a port is only usable after the different parts of the device (e.g. flooding, buffers) are initialized. This is especially important now, when we must initialize the router before the ports, as otherwise the device can't be initialized. Solve that by initializing the switch ports at the end of init sequence. Also, remove an unnecessary warning about port up/down events, which would otherwise be invoked whenever removing the driver, as ports are removed before unregistering the listener for these events. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Add the Router General Configuration Register (RGCR), which allows us to enable the router in the device and configure its various parameters. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We are going to assign router interfaces (RIFs) to netdevs if an IPv4 address was assigned to them. If one was assigned to a port netdev, this will translate to the PVID vPort being member in a RIF. While it's possible for a LAG slave to have an IP address, we can't have a vPort being member in two FIDs (assuming the LAG device will be put in bridge / assigned an IP address). Solve that by making the PVID vPort leave any FID it might be a member in when joining / leaving LAG. Note that the PVID vPort is the only vPort that can be present on the port when it's put under LAG. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When VLAN devices are created on top of LAG, their underlying vPorts are configured correctly with LAG membership. However, the PVID vPort is implicit and already present when the port netdev is put under LAG, so its LAG membership is never set. Set it correctly when joining / leaving LAG. This didn't matter until now, but we are going to introduce support for router interfaces (RIFs), which need to take into account LAG membership. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When port isn't bridged it is still possible to invoke switchdev ops and configure the device's VLAN filters. However, this will require us to use different Router InterFaces (RIFs) for the same netdev, instead of one per-netdev as with any other configuration. Taking the above into account and the fact that this functionality is questionable with regards to the device's normal use-case, remove it and instead return an error. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Port netdevs (e.g. swXpY) that are not bridged are represented in the device using a vPort with VID=PVID=1 (the PVID vPort), as untagged packets entering the switch are internally tagged with the PVID VLAN. When these packets are routed through a different port netdev they should egress untagged. This wasn't a problem until now, as non-bridged traffic only originated from the CPU, which transmits packets out of the port as-is. When a vPort is created with VID 1 mark it as egress untagged. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 6月, 2016 18 次提交
-
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
For debug purposes, it's useful to know the order in which the driver responds to changes in the topology of its upper devices. Add debug prints to signal these events. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
There are situations in which a vPort is destroyed while still holding references to device's resources such as FIDs and FDB records. This can happen, for example, when a VLAN device is deleted while still being bridged. Instead of trying to make sure vPort destruction is invoked when it no longer uses device's resources, just free them upon destruction. This simplifies the code, as we no longer need to take different situations into account when events are received - cleanup is taken care of in one place. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
FDB entries are learned using {Port / LAG ID, FID} and therefore should be flushed whenever a port (vPort) leaves its FID (vFID). However, when the bridge port is a LAG device (or a VLAN device on top), then FDB flushing is conditional. Ports removed from such LAG configurations must not trigger flushing, as other ports might still be members in the LAG and therefore the bridge port is still active. The decision whether to flush or not was previously computed in the netdevice notification block, but in order to flush the entries when a port leaves its FID this decision should be computed there. Strip the notification block from this logic and instead move it to one FDB flushing function that is invoked from both the FID / vFID leave functions. When port isn't member in LAG, FDB flushing should always occur. Otherwise, it should occur only when the last port (vPort) member in the LAG leaves the FID (vFID). This will allow us - in the next patch - to simplify the cleanup code paths that are hit whenever the topology above the port netdevs changes. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Not all vPorts will have FIDs assigned to them, so make sure functions first test for FID presence. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
As previously explained, not all vPorts will be assigned FIDs, so instead of returning the FID index of a vPort, return a pointer to its FID struct. This will allow us to know whether it's legal to access the vPort's FID parameters such as index and device. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When L3 interfaces will be introduced a vPort won't necessarily have a FID assigned to it. This can happen if it's not member in a bridge (in which case it's assigned a vFID) or doesn't have an IP address (in which case it's assigned an rFID). Therefore, instead check the VID parameter to test whether a port is a vPort or not. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In a very similar way to the vFIDs, make the first 4K FIDs - used in the VLAN-aware bridge - use the new FID struct. Upon first use of the FID by any of the ports do the following: 1) Create the FID 2) Setup a matching flooding entry 3) Create a mapping for the FID Unlike vFIDs, upon creation of a FID we always create a global VID-to-FID mapping, so that ports without upper vPorts can use it instead of creating an explicit {Port, VID} to FID mapping. When a port leaves a FID the reverse is performed. Whenever the FID's reference count reaches zero the FID is deleted along with the global mapping. The per-FID struct will later allow us to configure L3 interfaces on top of the VLAN-aware bridge. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When a vPort is created or when it joins a bridge we always do the same set of operations: 1) Create the vFID, if not already created 2) Setup flooding for the vFID 3) Map the {Port, VID} to the vFID When a vPort is destroyed or when it leaves a bridge the reverse is performed. Encapsulate the above in join / leave functions and simplify the code. FIDs and rFIDs will use a similar set of functions. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Up until now we had a dedicated struct only for vFIDs, but before introducing support for L3 interfaces we need to make it generic and use it for all three types of FIDs: 1) FIDs - 0..4K-1, used for the VLAN-aware bridge 2) vFIDs - 4K..15K-1, used for VLAN-unaware bridges 3) rFIDs - 15K..16K-1, used to direct traffic to / from the router in the device. Will be introduced later in the series. The three types of L3 interfaces - Router InterFaces, RIFs - that will be introduced correspond to the three types of FIDs and are configured using them. Therefore, we'll need to store the links between them as well as a reference count on the underlying FID, so that the corresponding RIF will be destroyed when it reaches zero. Note that the lower 0.5K vFIDs are currently used for for non-bridged netdevs, so that traffic could be flooded to the CPU port. However, when rFIDs will be introduced we'll no longer need these and they too will be used for VLAN-unaware bridges. Make the vFID struct generic by renaming it and some of its fields. FIDs will be converted to use it later in the series. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Use a FID index instead of vFID and ease the transition towards a generic FID struct. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
A FID used by a vPort (vFID, but also rFID later in the series) is always mapped using {Port, VID} and not only VID as with the 4K FIDs of the VLAN-aware bridge. Instead of specifying all the arguments each time, just wrap this operation using a dedicated function and simplify the code. As before, the function takes FID as its argument in preparation for a generic FID struct. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
Simplify the code and use only one function for vFID creation / destruction. Unlike before, the function receives a FID index as its argument and not a vFID index. Instead of passing 0, now one would need to pass 4K, which is the first vFID. This is the first step in creating a generic FID struct that will be used for all three types of FIDs. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
In all call sites 'only_uc' is set to false, so strip it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
There is a macro to do this kind of declarations, so use it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
We hold a reference count on the number of ports member in the VLAN-aware bridge, as we only support one. Instead of always incrementing / decrementing the reference count after joining / leaving the bridge, simply do this accounting in the join / leave functions. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
The argument 'br_dev' is never used, so remove it. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Ido Schimmel 提交于
When responding to unlinking CHANGEUPPER notifications we shouldn't return any value, as it's not checked by upper layers. In addition, there's nothing the driver can do in case of failure, so it should simply continue and try to free as much resources as possible and not stop on first error. Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-