1. 09 1月, 2015 8 次提交
  2. 28 12月, 2014 2 次提交
  3. 18 12月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 11 12月, 2014 2 次提交
  5. 10 12月, 2014 3 次提交
  6. 05 12月, 2014 9 次提交
  7. 04 12月, 2014 8 次提交
  8. 26 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      kvm: fix kvm_is_mmio_pfn() and rename to kvm_is_reserved_pfn() · d3fccc7e
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      This reverts commit 85c8555f ("KVM: check for !is_zero_pfn() in
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn()") and renames the function to kvm_is_reserved_pfn.
      
      The problem being addressed by the patch above was that some ARM code
      based the memory mapping attributes of a pfn on the return value of
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn(), whose name indeed suggests that such pfns should
      be mapped as device memory.
      
      However, kvm_is_mmio_pfn() doesn't do quite what it says on the tin,
      and the existing non-ARM users were already using it in a way which
      suggests that its name should probably have been 'kvm_is_reserved_pfn'
      from the beginning, e.g., whether or not to call get_page/put_page on
      it etc. This means that returning false for the zero page is a mistake
      and the patch above should be reverted.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      d3fccc7e
  9. 25 11月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      kvm: fix kvm_is_mmio_pfn() and rename to kvm_is_reserved_pfn() · bf4bea8e
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      This reverts commit 85c8555f ("KVM: check for !is_zero_pfn() in
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn()") and renames the function to kvm_is_reserved_pfn.
      
      The problem being addressed by the patch above was that some ARM code
      based the memory mapping attributes of a pfn on the return value of
      kvm_is_mmio_pfn(), whose name indeed suggests that such pfns should
      be mapped as device memory.
      
      However, kvm_is_mmio_pfn() doesn't do quite what it says on the tin,
      and the existing non-ARM users were already using it in a way which
      suggests that its name should probably have been 'kvm_is_reserved_pfn'
      from the beginning, e.g., whether or not to call get_page/put_page on
      it etc. This means that returning false for the zero page is a mistake
      and the patch above should be reverted.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
      Signed-off-by: NMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
      bf4bea8e
  10. 24 11月, 2014 4 次提交
  11. 22 11月, 2014 1 次提交