Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 12 3月, 2013 8 次提交
  3. 04 3月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 26 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 22 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 17 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 13 2月, 2013 2 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / hotplug: Fix concurrency issues and memory leaks · 3757b948
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      This changeset is aimed at fixing a few different but related
problems in the ACPI hotplug infrastructure.

First of all, since notify handlers may be run in parallel with
acpi_bus_scan(), acpi_bus_trim() and acpi_bus_hot_remove_device()
and some of them are installed for ACPI handles that have no struct
acpi_device objects attached (i.e. before those objects are created),
those notify handlers have to take acpi_scan_lock to prevent races
from taking place (e.g. a struct acpi_device is found to be present
for the given ACPI handle, but right after that it is removed by
acpi_bus_trim() running in parallel to the given notify handler).
Moreover, since some of them call acpi_bus_scan() and
acpi_bus_trim(), this leads to the conclusion that acpi_scan_lock
should be acquired by the callers of these two funtions rather by
these functions themselves.

For these reasons, make all notify handlers that can handle device
addition and eject events take acpi_scan_lock and remove the
acpi_scan_lock locking from acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_trim().
Accordingly, update all of their users to make sure that they
are always called under acpi_scan_lock.

Furthermore, since eject operations are carried out asynchronously
with respect to the notify events that trigger them, with the help
of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device(), even if notify handlers take the
ACPI scan lock, it still is possible that, for example,
acpi_bus_trim() will run between acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and
the notify handler that scheduled its execution and that
acpi_bus_trim() will remove the device node passed to
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() for ejection.  In that case, the struct
acpi_device object obtained by acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() will be
invalid and not-so-funny things will ensue.  To protect agaist that,
make the users of acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run get_device() on
ACPI device node objects that are about to be passed to it and make
acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() run put_device() on them and check if
their ACPI handles are not NULL (make acpi_device_unregister() clear
the device nodes' ACPI handles for that check to work).

Finally, observe that acpi_os_hotplug_execute() actually can fail,
in which case its caller ought to free memory allocated for the
context object to prevent leaks from happening.  It also needs to
run put_device() on the device node that it ran get_device() on
previously in that case.  Modify the code accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      3757b948
    • R
      ACPI: Drop the container.h header file · 87d4a4da
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The include/acpi/container.h only contains a definition of a
structure that is not used any more, so drop it entirely.

Similar change was proposed earlier by Toshi Kani.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      87d4a4da
  13. 30 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler · ca589f94
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Introduce struct acpi_scan_handler for representing objects that
will do configuration tasks depending on ACPI device nodes'
hardware IDs (HIDs).

Currently, those tasks are done either directly by the ACPI namespace
scanning code or by ACPI device drivers designed specifically for
this purpose.  None of the above is desirable, however, because
doing that directly in the namespace scanning code makes that code
overly complicated and difficult to follow and doing that in
"special" device drivers leads to a great deal of confusion about
their role and to confusing interactions with the driver core (for
example, sysfs directories are created for those drivers, but they
are completely unnecessary and only increase the kernel's memory
footprint in vain).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      ca589f94
  15. 26 1月, 2013 4 次提交
  17. 25 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  19. 24 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  21. 20 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  23. 19 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / scan: Drop acpi_bus_add() and use acpi_bus_scan() instead · b8bd759a
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The only difference between acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() is the
invocation of acpi_update_all_gpes() in the latter which in fact is
unnecessary, because acpi_update_all_gpes() has already been called
by acpi_scan_init() and the way it is implemented guarantees the next
invocations of it to do nothing.

For this reason, drop acpi_bus_add() and make all its callers use
acpi_bus_scan() directly instead of it.  Additionally, rearrange the
code in acpi_scan_init() slightly to improve the visibility of the
acpi_update_all_gpes() call in there.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      b8bd759a
  25. 17 1月, 2013 5 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Common string representations of device power states · 96bfd3ce
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The function returning string representations of ACPI device power
states, state_string((), is now static, because it is only used
internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c.  However, it will be used outside
of that file going forward, so rename it to
acpi_power_state_string(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its
header to acpi_bus.h.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      96bfd3ce
    • R
      ACPI / PM: More visible function for retrieving device power states · ad0c3b0e
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The function used for retrieving ACPI device power states,
__acpi_bus_get_power(), is now static, because it is only used
internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c.  However, it will be used
outside of that file going forward, so rename it to
acpi_device_get_power(), in analogy with acpi_device_set_power(),
add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ad0c3b0e
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of wakeup power resources into account · 993cbe59
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.

Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of wakeup power resources.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      993cbe59
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Take order attribute of power resources into account · 0b224527
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      ACPI power resources have an order attribute that should be taken
into account when turning them on and off, but it is not used now.

Modify the power resources management code to preserve the
spec-compliant ordering of power resources that power states of
devices depend on (analogous changes will be done separately for
power resources used for wakeup).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      0b224527
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources · bc9b6407
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device
to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI
core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then
it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required
by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on.

Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices
depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they
should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0
state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices
the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices
depend on what power resources.

For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a
new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used
internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code
from kernel subsystems using ACPI.

For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be
resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into
D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in
the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage
such dependencies.  Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new
functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      bc9b6407
  27. 15 1月, 2013 3 次提交
  29. 14 1月, 2013 2 次提交
    • J
      ACPI: remove unused acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind · 115c9ad8
      由 Jiang Liu 提交于 
      With commit f2a33cde55a03 "ACPI: Drop ACPI device .bind() and .unbind()
callbacks", acpi_op_bind and acpi_op_unbind are not used any more. So
remove them.
Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      115c9ad8
    • R
      ACPI / PCI: Set root bridge ACPI handle in advance · 6c0cc950
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The ACPI handles of PCI root bridges need to be known to
acpi_bind_one(), so that it can create the appropriate
"firmware_node" and "physical_node" files for them, but currently
the way it gets to know those handles is not exactly straightforward
(to put it lightly).

This is how it works, roughly:

  1. acpi_bus_scan() finds the handle of a PCI root bridge,
     creates a struct acpi_device object for it and passes that
     object to acpi_pci_root_add().

  2. acpi_pci_root_add() creates a struct acpi_pci_root object,
     populates its "device" field with its argument's address
     (device->handle is the ACPI handle found in step 1).

  3. The struct acpi_pci_root object created in step 2 is passed
     to pci_acpi_scan_root() and used to get resources that are
     passed to pci_create_root_bus().

  4. pci_create_root_bus() creates a struct pci_host_bridge object
     and passes its "dev" member to device_register().

  5. platform_notify(), which for systems with ACPI is set to
     acpi_platform_notify(), is called.

So far, so good.  Now it starts to be "interesting".

  6. acpi_find_bridge_device() is used to find the ACPI handle of
     the given device (which is the PCI root bridge) and executes
     acpi_pci_find_root_bridge(), among other things, for the
     given device object.

  7. acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() uses the name (sic!) of the given
     device object to extract the segment and bus numbers of the PCI
     root bridge and passes them to acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle().

  8. acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() browses the list of ACPI PCI
     root bridges and finds the one that matches the given segment
     and bus numbers.  Its handle is then used to initialize the
     ACPI handle of the PCI root bridge's device object by
     acpi_bind_one().  However, this is *exactly* the ACPI handle we
     started with in step 1.

Needless to say, this is quite embarassing, but it may be avoided
thanks to commit f3fd0c8a (ACPI: Allow ACPI handles of devices to be
initialized in advance), which makes it possible to initialize the
ACPI handle of a device before passing it to device_register().

Accordingly, add a new __weak routine, pcibios_root_bridge_prepare(),
defaulting to an empty implementation that can be replaced by the
interested architecutres (x86 and ia64 at the moment) with functions
that will set the root bridge's ACPI handle before its dev member is
passed to device_register().  Make both x86 and ia64 provide such
implementations of pcibios_root_bridge_prepare() and remove
acpi_pci_find_root_bridge() and acpi_get_pci_rootbridge_handle() that
aren't necessary any more.

Included is a fix for breakage on systems with non-ACPI PCI host
bridges from Bjorn Helgaas.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
      6c0cc950
  31. 11 1月, 2013 2 次提交
  33. 10 1月, 2013 3 次提交