- 10 8月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
A COPY with unstable write data needs a simple sync commit. Filehandle value is gotten as a part of the inner loop so in case of a reboot retry it should get the new value. Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
Make this function available to nfs42proc.c Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Olga Kornievskaia 提交于
Signed-off-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 09 8月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Error code is set in the error handling cases but never used. Fix it. Fixes: 937e3133 ("NFSv4.1: Ensure we clear the SP4_MACH_CRED flags in nfs4_sp4_select_mode()") Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Warning level 2 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we update the change attribute, we should also clear the flag that says it is out of date. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the object being renamed from one directory to another is also a directory, then 'nlink' will change for both directories. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we always bump or drop the nlink count on the parent directory when we do a mkdir or a rmdir(). This needs to be done by hand as we don't have pre/post op attributes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server tells us that out layoutreturn raced with another layout update, then we must ensure that the new layout segments are not in use before we resend with an updated layout stateid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 01 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bill Baker 提交于
After a live data migration event at the NFS server, the client may send I/O requests to the wrong server, causing a live hang due to repeated recovery events. On the wire, this will appear as an I/O request failing with NFS4ERR_BADSESSION, followed by successful CREATE_SESSION, repeatedly. NFS4ERR_BADSSESSION is returned because the session ID being used was issued by the other server and is not valid at the old server. The failure is caused by async worker threads having cached the transport (xprt) in the rpc_task structure. After the migration recovery completes, the task is redispatched and the task resends the request to the wrong server based on the old value still present in tk_xprt. The solution is to recompute the tk_xprt field of the rpc_task structure so that the request goes to the correct server. Signed-off-by: NBill Baker <bill.baker@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: NHelen Chao <helen.chao@oracle.com> Fixes: fb43d172 ("SUNRPC: Use the multipath iterator to assign a ...") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.9+ Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
When reclaiming a delegation via CLAIM_PREVIOUS open, the server can indicate that the delegation has been recalled since it was issued by setting the "recalled" flag in the delegation. Ensure that we respect the flag by initiating a delegation return when it is set. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 27 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Even if the results of the permissions checks failed, we should parse the results of the layout on open call so that we can return the layout if required. Note that we also want to ignore the sequence counter for whether or not a layout recall occurred. If the recall pertained to our OPEN, then the callback will know, and will attempt to wait for us to finih processing anyway. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 19 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the layout was invalidated due to a reboot, then don't try to send a layoutreturn for it. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Right now, we can call nfs_commit_inode() while holding the session slot, which could lead to NFSv4 deadlocks. Ensure we only keep the slot if the server returned a layout that we have to process. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 10 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server returns NFS4ERR_SEQ_FALSE_RETRY or NFS4ERR_RETRY_UNCACHED_REP, then it thinks we're trying to replay an existing request. If so, then let's just bump the sequence ID and retry the operation. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to compare the slot_id to the highest slot number advertised by the server. Fixes: 3be0f80b ("NFSv4.1: Fix up replays of interrupted requests") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.15+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 06 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit 69dd716c ("NFSv4: Add socket proto argument to setclientid") (2007) added the transport protocol name to the client ID string, but the patch description doesn't explain why this was necessary. At that time, the only transport protocol name that would have been used is "tcp" (for both IPv4 and IPv6), resulting in no additional distinctiveness of the client ID string. Since there is one client instance, the server should recognize it's state whether the client is connecting via TCP or RDMA. Same client, same lease. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
It is possible for two distinct clients to have the same cl_ipaddr: - if the client admin disables callback with clientaddr=0.0.0.0 on more than one client - if two clients behind separate NATs use the same private subnet number - if the client admin specifies the same address via clientaddr= mount option (pointing the server at the same NAT box, for example) Because of the way the Linux NFSv4.0 client constructs its client ID string by default, such clients could interfere with each others' lease state when mounting the same server: scnprintf(str, len, "Linux NFSv4.0 %s/%s %s", clp->cl_ipaddr, rpc_peeraddr2str(clp->cl_rpcclient, RPC_DISPLAY_ADDR), rpc_peeraddr2str(clp->cl_rpcclient, RPC_DISPLAY_PROTO)); cl_ipaddr is set to the value of the clientaddr= mount option. Two clients whose addresses are 192.168.3.77 that mount the same server (whose public IP address is, say, 3.4.5.6) would both generate the same client ID string when sending a SETCLIENTID: Linux NFSv4.0 192.168.3.77/3.4.5.6 tcp and thus the server would not be able to distinguish the clients' leases. If both clients are using AUTH_SYS when sending SETCLIENTID then the server could possibly permit the two clients to interfere with or purge each others' leases. To better ensure that Linux's NFSv4.0 client ID strings are distinct in these cases, remove cl_ipaddr from the client ID string and replace it with something more likely to be unique. Note that the replacement looks a lot like the uniform client ID string. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 05 6月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Fix a compiler warning: fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:910:13: warning: 'nfs4_layoutget_release' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] static void nfs4_layoutget_release(void *calldata) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we hold a delegation, we don't need to care about whether or not the inode attributes are up to date. We know we can cache the results of this call regardless. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Again, when revalidating the inode, we don't need to ask for attributes for which we are authoritative. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Allow the getattr() callback to check things like whether or not we hold a delegation so that it can adjust the attributes that it is asking for. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we hold a delegation, we should not need to request attributes such as the file size or the change attribute. For some servers, avoiding asking for these unneeded attributes can improve the overall system performance. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
- 01 6月, 2018 16 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the server recalls the layout that was just handed out, we risk hitting a race as described in RFC5661 Section 2.10.6.3 unless we ensure that we release the sequence slot after processing the LAYOUTGET operation that was sent as part of the OPEN compound. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
The flag was not always being cleared after LAYOUTGET on OPEN. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Move the actual freeing of the struct nfs4_layoutget into fs/nfs/pnfs.c where it can be reused by the layoutget on open code. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
This triggers when have no pre-existing inode to attach to. The preexisting case is saved for later. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
It will be needed now by the pnfs code. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
They work better in the new alloc_init function. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
Preparing to add conditional LAYOUTGET to OPEN rpc, the LAYOUTGET will need the ctx info. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Fred Isaman 提交于
nfs_init_sequence() will clear this for us. Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <fred.isaman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Benjamin Coddington 提交于
If the wait for a LOCK operation is interrupted, and then the file is closed, the locks cleanup code will assume that no new locks will be added to the inode after it has completed. We already have a mechanism to detect if there was signal, so let's use that to avoid recreating the local lock once the RPC completes. Also skip re-sending the LOCK operation for the various error cases if we were signaled. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com> [Trond: Fix inverted test of locks_lock_inode_wait()] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we get an ESTALE error in response to an RPC call operating on the file on the MDS, we should immediately cancel the layout for that file. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Ensure that we pass down the inode of the file being deleted so that we can return any delegation being held. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Even then it isn't really necessary. The reason why we may not want to pass in a stateid in other cases is that we cannot use the delegation credential. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Having these exist as two functions doesn't seem to add anything useful, and I think merging them together makes this easier to follow. Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
-