Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  3. 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 05 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 01 1月, 2020 3 次提交
  9. 24 12月, 2019 2 次提交
  11. 22 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 12 12月, 2019 2 次提交
  15. 09 12月, 2019 7 次提交
  17. 05 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 04 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 27 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 20 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  25. 18 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  27. 16 11月, 2019 3 次提交
  29. 14 11月, 2019 1 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915/gen8+: Add RC6 CTX corruption WA · 2248a283
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      In some circumstances the RC6 context can get corrupted. We can detect
this and take the required action, that is disable RC6 and runtime PM.
The HW recovers from the corrupted state after a system suspend/resume
cycle, so detect the recovery and re-enable RC6 and runtime PM.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v3:
- Move intel_suspend_gt_powersave() to the end of the GEM suspend
  sequence.
- Add commit message.
v4:
- Rebased on intel_uncore_forcewake_put(i915->uncore, ...) API
  change.
v5:
- Rebased on latest upstream gt_pm refactoring.
v6:
- s/i915_rc6_/intel_rc6_/
- Don't return a value from i915_rc6_ctx_wa_check().
v7:
- Rebased on latest gt rc6 refactoring.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
[airlied: pull this later version of this patch into drm-next
to make resolving the conflict mess easier.]
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      2248a283
  31. 12 11月, 2019 3 次提交
  33. 06 11月, 2019 5 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915/gen8+: Add RC6 CTX corruption WA · 7e34f4e4
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      In some circumstances the RC6 context can get corrupted. We can detect
this and take the required action, that is disable RC6 and runtime PM.
The HW recovers from the corrupted state after a system suspend/resume
cycle, so detect the recovery and re-enable RC6 and runtime PM.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v3:
- Move intel_suspend_gt_powersave() to the end of the GEM suspend
  sequence.
- Add commit message.
v4:
- Rebased on intel_uncore_forcewake_put(i915->uncore, ...) API
  change.
v5: rebased on gem/gt split (Mika)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
      7e34f4e4
    • J
      drm/i915/cmdparser: Add support for backward jumps · f8c08d8f
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      To keep things manageable, the pre-gen9 cmdparser does not
attempt to track any form of nested BB_START's. This did not
prevent usermode from using nested starts, or even chained
batches because the cmdparser is not strictly enforced pre gen9.

Instead, the existence of a nested BB_START would cause the batch
to be emitted in insecure mode, and any privileged capabilities
would not be available.

For Gen9, the cmdparser becomes mandatory (for BCS at least), and
so not providing any form of nested BB_START support becomes
overly restrictive. Any such batch will simply not run.

We make heavy use of backward jumps in igt, and it is much easier
to add support for this restricted subset of nested jumps, than to
rewrite the whole of our test suite to avoid them.

Add the required logic to support limited backward jumps, to
instructions that have already been validated by the parser.

Note that it's not sufficient to simply approve any BB_START
that jumps backwards in the buffer because this would allow an
attacker to embed a rogue instruction sequence within the
operand words of a harmless instruction (say LRI) and jump to
that.

We introduce a bit array to track every instr offset successfully
validated, and test the target of BB_START against this. If the
target offset hits, it is re-written to the same offset in the
shadow buffer and the BB_START cmd is allowed.

Note: This patch deliberately ignores checkpatch issues in the
cmdtables, in order to match the style of the surrounding code.
We'll correct the entire file in one go in a later patch.

v2: set dispatch secure late (Mika)
v3: rebase (Mika)
v4: Clear whitelist on each parse
    Minor review updates (Chris)
v5: Correct backward jump batching
v6: fix compilation error due to struct eb shuffle (Mika)

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      f8c08d8f
    • J
      drm/i915: Support ro ppgtt mapped cmdparser shadow buffers · 4f7af194
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      For Gen7, the original cmdparser motive was to permit limited
use of register read/write instructions in unprivileged BB's.
This worked by copying the user supplied bb to a kmd owned
bb, and running it in secure mode, from the ggtt, only if
the scanner finds no unsafe commands or registers.

For Gen8+ we can't use this same technique because running bb's
from the ggtt also disables access to ppgtt space. But we also
do not actually require 'secure' execution since we are only
trying to reduce the available command/register set. Instead we
will copy the user buffer to a kmd owned read-only bb in ppgtt,
and run in the usual non-secure mode.

Note that ro pages are only supported by ppgtt (not ggtt), but
luckily that's exactly what we need.

Add the required paths to map the shadow buffer to ppgtt ro for Gen8+

v2: IS_GEN7/IS_GEN (Mika)
v3: rebase
v4: rebase
v5: rebase
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      4f7af194
    • J
      drm/i915: Remove Master tables from cmdparser · 66d8aba1
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      The previous patch has killed support for secure batches
on gen6+, and hence the cmdparsers master tables are
now dead code. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      66d8aba1
    • J
      drm/i915: Disable Secure Batches for gen6+ · 44157641
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      Retroactively stop reporting support for secure batches
through the api for gen6+ so that older binaries trigger
the fallback path instead.

Older binaries use secure batches pre gen6 to access resources
that are not available to normal usermode processes. However,
all known userspace explicitly checks for HAS_SECURE_BATCHES
before relying on the secure batch feature.

Since there are no known binaries relying on this for newer gens
we can kill secure batches from gen6, via I915_PARAM_HAS_SECURE_BATCHES.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v3: rebase (Mika)
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      44157641
  35. 05 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  37. 01 11月, 2019 3 次提交