- 14 4月, 2017 11 次提交
-
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
On IPsec hardware offloading, we already get a secpath with valid state attached when the packet enters the GRO handlers. So check for hardware offload and skip the state lookup in this case. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Ilan Tayari 提交于
Both esp4 and esp6 used to assume that the SKB payload is encrypted and therefore the inner_network and inner_transport offsets are not relevant. When doing crypto offload in the NIC, this is no longer the case and the NIC driver needs these offsets so it can do TX TCP checksum offloading. This patch sets the inner_network and inner_transport members of the SKB, as well as encapsulation, to reflect the actual positions of these headers, and removes them only once encryption is done on the payload. Signed-off-by: NIlan Tayari <ilant@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
When we do IPsec offloading, we need a fallback for packets that were targeted to be IPsec offloaded but rerouted to a device that does not support IPsec offload. For that we add a function that checks the offloading features of the sending device and and flags the requirement of a fallback before it calls the IPsec output function. The IPsec output function adds the IPsec trailer and does encryption if needed. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
This patch adds functions that handles IPsec sequence numbers for GSO segments and TSO offloading. We need to calculate and update the sequence numbers based on the segments that GSO/TSO will generate. We need this to keep software and hardware sequence number counter in sync. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
This patch extends the xfrm_type by an encap function pointer and implements esp4_gso_encap and esp6_gso_encap. These functions doing the basic esp encapsulation for a GSO packet. In case the GSO packet needs to be segmented in software, we add gso_segment functions. This codepath is going to be used on esp hardware offloads. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
This patch adds all the bits that are needed to do IPsec hardware offload for IPsec states and ESP packets. We add xfrmdev_ops to the net_device. xfrmdev_ops has function pointers that are needed to manage the xfrm states in the hardware and to do a per packet offloading decision. Joint work with: Ilan Tayari <ilant@mellanox.com> Guy Shapiro <guysh@mellanox.com> Yossi Kuperman <yossiku@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NGuy Shapiro <guysh@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NIlan Tayari <ilant@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NYossi Kuperman <yossiku@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
This is needed for the upcomming IPsec device offloading. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
We add a struct xfrm_type_offload so that we have the offloaded codepath separated to the non offloaded codepath. With this the non offloade and the offloaded codepath can coexist. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
This is an add-on to the previous patch that passes the extended ACK structure where it's already available by existing genl_info or extack function arguments. This was done with this spatch (with some manual adjustment of indentation): @@ expression A, B, C, D, E; identifier fn, info; @@ fn(..., struct genl_info *info, ...) { ... -nlmsg_parse(A, B, C, D, E, NULL) +nlmsg_parse(A, B, C, D, E, info->extack) ... } @@ expression A, B, C, D, E; identifier fn, info; @@ fn(..., struct genl_info *info, ...) { <... -nla_parse_nested(A, B, C, D, NULL) +nla_parse_nested(A, B, C, D, info->extack) ...> } @@ expression A, B, C, D, E; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { <... -nlmsg_parse(A, B, C, D, E, NULL) +nlmsg_parse(A, B, C, D, E, extack) ...> } @@ expression A, B, C, D, E; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { <... -nla_parse(A, B, C, D, E, NULL) +nla_parse(A, B, C, D, E, extack) ...> } @@ expression A, B, C, D, E; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { ... -nlmsg_parse(A, B, C, D, E, NULL) +nlmsg_parse(A, B, C, D, E, extack) ... } @@ expression A, B, C, D; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { <... -nla_parse_nested(A, B, C, D, NULL) +nla_parse_nested(A, B, C, D, extack) ...> } @@ expression A, B, C, D; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { <... -nlmsg_validate(A, B, C, D, NULL) +nlmsg_validate(A, B, C, D, extack) ...> } @@ expression A, B, C, D; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { <... -nla_validate(A, B, C, D, NULL) +nla_validate(A, B, C, D, extack) ...> } @@ expression A, B, C; identifier fn, extack; @@ fn(..., struct netlink_ext_ack *extack, ...) { <... -nla_validate_nested(A, B, C, NULL) +nla_validate_nested(A, B, C, extack) ...> } Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Pass the new extended ACK reporting struct to all of the generic netlink parsing functions. For now, pass NULL in almost all callers (except for some in the core.) Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Add the base infrastructure and UAPI for netlink extended ACK reporting. All "manual" calls to netlink_ack() pass NULL for now and thus don't get extended ACK reporting. Big thanks goes to Pablo Neira Ayuso for not only bringing up the whole topic at netconf (again) but also coming up with the nlattr passing trick and various other ideas. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Whitcroft 提交于
Kees Cook has pointed out that xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() is subject to wrapping issues. To ensure we are correctly ensuring that the two ESN structures are the same size compare both the overall size as reported by xfrm_replay_state_esn_len() and the internal length are the same. CVE-2017-7184 Signed-off-by: NAndy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Acked-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Andy Whitcroft 提交于
When a new xfrm state is created during an XFRM_MSG_NEWSA call we validate the user supplied replay_esn to ensure that the size is valid and to ensure that the replay_window size is within the allocated buffer. However later it is possible to update this replay_esn via a XFRM_MSG_NEWAE call. There we again validate the size of the supplied buffer matches the existing state and if so inject the contents. We do not at this point check that the replay_window is within the allocated memory. This leads to out-of-bounds reads and writes triggered by netlink packets. This leads to memory corruption and the potential for priviledge escalation. We already attempt to validate the incoming replay information in xfrm_new_ae() via xfrm_replay_verify_len(). This confirms that the user is not trying to change the size of the replay state buffer which includes the replay_esn. It however does not check the replay_window remains within that buffer. Add validation of the contained replay_window. CVE-2017-7184 Signed-off-by: NAndy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com> Acked-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 24 3月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
x86_64 is zero-extending arch so "unsigned int" is preferred over "int" for address calculations. Space savings: add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/3 up/down: 0/-58 (-58) function old new delta xfrm_hash_resize 2752 2743 -9 policy_hash_bysel 985 973 -12 policy_hash_direct 1036 999 -37 Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 27 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julian Anastasov 提交于
Fix xfrm_neigh_lookup to provide dst->path to the neigh_lookup dst_ops method. When skb is provided, the IP address in packet should already match the dst->path address family. But for the non-skb case, we should consider the last tunnel address as nexthop address. Fixes: f894cbf8 ("net: Add optional SKB arg to dst_ops->neigh_lookup().") Signed-off-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 15 2月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
This patch adds GRO ifrastructure and callbacks for ESP on ipv4 and ipv6. In case the GRO layer detects an ESP packet, the esp{4,6}_gro_receive() function does a xfrm state lookup and calls the xfrm input layer if it finds a matching state. The packet will be decapsulated and reinjected it into layer 2. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
We need to keep per packet offloading informations across the layers. So we extend the sec_path to carry these for the input and output offload codepath. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
We need it in the ESP offload handlers, so export it. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
The upcomming IPsec ESP gro callbacks will consume the skb, so prepare for that. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
Add a new helper to set the secpath to the skb. This avoids code duplication, as this is used in multiple places. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
On IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses sk_family is AF_INET6, but the flow informations are created based on AF_INET. So the routing set up 'struct flowi4' but we try to access 'struct flowi6' what leads to an out of bounds access. Fix this by using the family we get with the dst_entry, like we do it for the standard policy lookup. Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Tested-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 09 2月, 2017 9 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Alternative is to keep it an make the (unused) afinfo arg const to avoid the compiler warnings once the afinfo structs get constified. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Only needed it to register the policy backend at init time. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Just call xfrm_garbage_collect_deferred() directly. This gets rid of a write to afinfo in register/unregister and allows to constify afinfo later on. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Nothing checks the return value. Also, the errors returned on unregister are impossible (we only support INET and INET6, so no way xfrm_policy_afinfo[afinfo->family] can be anything other than 'afinfo' itself). Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
The comment makes it look like get_tos() is used to validate something, but it turns out the comment was about xfrm_find_bundle() which got removed years ago. xfrm_get_tos will return either the tos (ipv4) or 0 (ipv6). Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Nothing writes to these structures (the module owner was not used). While at it, size xfrm_input_afinfo[] by the highest existing xfrm family (INET6), not AF_MAX. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Dmitry reports following splat: INFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 13059 Comm: syz-executor1 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170207 #1 [..] spin_lock_bh include/linux/spinlock.h:304 [inline] xfrm_policy_flush+0x32/0x470 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:963 xfrm_policy_fini+0xbf/0x560 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3041 xfrm_net_init+0x79f/0x9e0 net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:3091 ops_init+0x10a/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:115 setup_net+0x2ed/0x690 net/core/net_namespace.c:291 copy_net_ns+0x26c/0x530 net/core/net_namespace.c:396 create_new_namespaces+0x409/0x860 kernel/nsproxy.c:106 unshare_nsproxy_namespaces+0xae/0x1e0 kernel/nsproxy.c:205 SYSC_unshare kernel/fork.c:2281 [inline] Problem is that when we get error during xfrm_net_init we will call xfrm_policy_fini which will acquire xfrm_policy_lock before it was initialized. Just move it around so locks get set up first. Reported-by: NDmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Fixes: 283bc9f3 ("xfrm: Namespacify xfrm state/policy locks") Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
We have many gro cells users, so lets move the code to avoid duplication. This creates a CONFIG_GRO_CELLS option. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 08 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Julian Anastasov 提交于
Add confirm_neigh method to dst_ops and use it from IPv4 and IPv6 to lookup and confirm the neighbour. Its usage via the new helper dst_confirm_neigh() should be restricted to MSG_PROBE users for performance reasons. For XFRM prefer the last tunnel address, if present. With help from Steffen Klassert. Signed-off-by: NJulian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Acked-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steffen Klassert 提交于
This patch adds a dummy network device so that we can use gro_cells for IPsec GRO. With this, we handle IPsec GRO with no impact on the generic networking code. Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 16 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Dan reports following smatch warning: net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:659 error: we previously assumed 'afinfo' could be null (see line 651) 649 struct xfrm_state_afinfo *afinfo = xfrm_state_afinfo_get_rcu(family); 651 if (afinfo) ... 658 } 659 afinfo->init_temprop(x, tmpl, daddr, saddr); I am resonably sure afinfo cannot be NULL here. xfrm_state4.c and state6.c are both part of ipv4/ipv6 (depends on CONFIG_XFRM, a boolean) but even if ipv6 is a module state6.c can't be removed (ipv6 lacks module_exit so it cannot be removed). The only callers for xfrm6_fini that leads to state backend unregister are error unwinding paths that can be called during ipv6 init function. So after ipv6 module is loaded successfully the state backend cannot go away anymore. The family value from policy lookup path is taken from dst_entry, so that should always be AF_INET(6). However, since this silences the warning and avoids readers of this code wondering about possible null deref it seems preferrable to be defensive and just add the old check back. Fixes: 711059b9 ("xfrm: add and use xfrm_state_afinfo_get_rcu") Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 10 1月, 2017 4 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Instead of: if (foo) { unlock(); return bar(); } unlock(); do: unlock(); if (foo) return bar(); This is ok because rcu protected structure is only dereferenced before the conditional. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
xfrm_init_tempstate is always called from within rcu read side section. We can thus use a simpler function that doesn't call rcu_read_lock again. While at it, also make xfrm_init_tempstate return value void, the return value was never tested. A followup patch will replace remaining callers of xfrm_state_get_afinfo with xfrm_state_afinfo_get_rcu variant and then remove the 'old' get_afinfo interface. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
commit 44abdc30 ("xfrm: replace rwlock on xfrm_state_afinfo with rcu") made xfrm_state_put_afinfo equivalent to rcu_read_unlock. Use spatch to replace it with direct calls to rcu_read_unlock: @@ struct xfrm_state_afinfo *a; @@ - xfrm_state_put_afinfo(a); + rcu_read_unlock(); old: text data bss dec hex filename 22570 72 424 23066 5a1a xfrm_state.o 1612 0 0 1612 64c xfrm_output.o new: 22554 72 424 23050 5a0a xfrm_state.o 1596 0 0 1596 63c xfrm_output.o Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
xfrm/xfrm_state.c:1973:21: error: incompatible types in comparison expression (different address spaces) Harmless, but lets fix it to reduce the noise. While at it, get rid of unneeded NULL check, its never hit: net/ipv4/xfrm4_state.c: xfrm_state_register_afinfo(&xfrm4_state_afinfo); net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c: return xfrm_state_register_afinfo(&xfrm6_state_afinfo); net/ipv6/xfrm6_state.c: xfrm_state_unregister_afinfo(&xfrm6_state_afinfo); ... are the only callsites. Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 06 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Florian Westphal 提交于
Once flow cache gets removed the mtu initialisation happens for every skb that gets an xfrm attached, so this lock starts to show up in perf. It is not obvious why this lock is required -- the caller holds reference on the state struct, type->destructor is only called from the state gc worker (all state structs on gc list must have refcount 0). xfrm_init_state already has been called (else private data accessed by type->get_mtu() would not be set up). So just remove the lock -- the race on the state (DEAD?) doesn't matter (could change right after dropping the lock too). Signed-off-by: NFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexander Alemayhu 提交于
o s/descentant/descendant o s/workarbound/workaround Signed-off-by: NAlexander Alemayhu <alexander@alemayhu.com> Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
-