- 22 10月, 2021 6 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When auth/assoc completes, we should remove session protection, except when association is successful, where we need it until a beacon is received from the AP. In particular, in the case of assoc comeback, currently the session protection event just times out, leading to confusing messages: wlan0: 42:00:00:00:00:00 rejected association temporarily; comeback duration 1000 TU (1024 ms) iwlwifi 0000:00:00.0: Not associated and the session protection is over already... wlan0: Connection to AP 42:00:00:00:00:00 lost wlan0: associate with 42:00:00:00:00:00 (try 2/3) mac80211 never does anything on the "Connection ... lost" as it's not even connected. Removing the session protection when it's no longer needed removes those confusing messages and lets the device do other things in the allocated time. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211017162352.95e4bebb069b.I635280e5d26c70414ac6eb5d62b46fe4bd942818@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Miri Korenblit 提交于
As part of the new rate_n_flags, a new version of tlc_update_notif was added in FW in order to support the new rate_n_flags. Add support for the new version, and move the all API to use the new rate_n_flags only (if FW supports the old one - convert it). Signed-off-by: NMiri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211017123741.9fc0cb5d5898.I1f88e02317f79f1be7f792c01236d836045a44b3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Miri Korenblit 提交于
As a part of preparing to the new rate & flags version Update the relevant definitions and use them. Signed-off-by: NMiri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211017123741.5862bf4f14c4.Ib476b5443faa085539b79d49a0aebd81a213b42f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
For TDLS stations, much of the sta-state logic shouldn't apply, since they don't affect the link to the AP. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211017123741.954001ec079f.I9deb8bc7520ad569a453f72c8d99adc9c99c9be3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Avraham Stern 提交于
Add support for 160Mhz bandwidth in ranging measurements for initiator and responder. Advertise 160Mhz in the supported bandwidths for ranging. Signed-off-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211017113927.32a13ac0f4d4.I883492648518cc5067a2f91b7ecf8bfa55f6876a@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We should consider the P2P interface type, which isn't in vif->type due to mac80211's special handling of that. Use ieee80211_vif_type_p2p() to convert appropriately. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20211017113927.8e992a3beee2.I4231ac8a7ae8f844e35a1ec221baf3e2b676e765@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 27 8月, 2021 5 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
BSS elements are protected using RCU, so we need to use RCU properly to access them, fix that. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210805130823.fd8b5791ab44.Iba26800a6301078d3782fb249c476dd8ac2bf3c6@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
There's no need for all the complicated conditions here, any bufferable MMPDUs or MMPDUs for client interfaces are already coming through the TXQ interface, not iwl_mvm_mac_tx(). Simplify the logic. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210802172232.3939f7c5c43a.I1d5cb5262e31a000023d79acbb897b8db50adf0d@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Since switching to mac80211 TXQs, we no longer need to advertise more hardware queues than ACs, since we don't even set QUEUE_CONTROL anyway, so the vif->hw_queue[] mapping array won't be used. All we need (at least for now) is for hw->queues to indicate that we have enough queues to handle QoS. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210802172232.80611a3c1ee7.I8a3d2b269421b6d8bada8c12cce3e095e6cfaeed@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The firmware SMPS request should only be honoured if the connection is currently with HE and on 160 MHz, so check that and then potentially reapply any request if the BW changes. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210802172232.0cdcac5660da.I9ee7956fd4f48399855d1f97728bc58b36caf112@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Mordechay Goodstein 提交于
EAPOL failure results in deauthentication with various reasons, not related to AUTH failure specifically, so we just merge AUTH failure with failed to assoc to AP. Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210802172232.2ff350d85eab.I02c5b5d29c0d5c2e014bd1081b07ed33772ae04d@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 23 6月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We have mgd_prepare_tx(), but sometimes drivers may want/need to take action when the exchange finishes, whether successfully or not. Add a notification to the driver on completion, i.e. call the new method mgd_complete_tx(). To unify the two scenarios, and to add more information, make both of them take a struct that has the duration (prepare only), subtype (both) and success (complete only). Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210618133832.5d94e78f6230.I6dc979606b6f28701b740d7aab725f7853a5a155@changeidSigned-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
In case of unbinding, the FW would remove the session protection time events without sending a notification, so explicitly cancel the session protection, so future requests for mgd_prepare_tx() would not assume that the session protection is running. Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210618105614.7c30f85ed241.Ibc19fdbefca7135f2c4ea83d0aef6b81b5033dcd@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When we have a P2P Device active, we attempt to only change the PHY context it uses when we get a new remain-on-channel, if the P2P Device is the only user of the PHY context. This is fine if we're switching within a band, but if we're switching bands then the switch implies a removal and re-add of the PHY context, which isn't permitted by the firmware while it's bound to an interface. Fix the code to skip the unbind/release/... cycle only if the band doesn't change (or we have old devices that can switch the band on the fly as well.) Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210612142637.e9ac313f70f3.I713b9d109957df7e7d9ed0861d5377ce3f8fccd3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2021 4 次提交
-
-
由 Ilan Peer 提交于
When doing scan while 6GHz channels are not enabled, the 6GHz band is not scanned. Thus, if there are no APs on the 2GHz and 5GHz bands (that will allow discovery of geographic location etc. that would allow enabling the 6GHz channels) but there are non collocated APs on 6GHz PSC channels these would never be discovered. To overcome this, FW added support for performing passive UHB scan in case no APs were discovered during scan on the 2GHz and 5GHz channels. Add support for enabling such scan when the following conditions are met: - 6GHz channels are supported but not enabled by regulatory. - Station interface is not associated or less than a defined time interval passed from the last resume or HW reset flows. - At least 4 channels are included in the scan request - The scan request includes the widlcard SSID. - At least 50 minutes passed from the last 6GHz passive scan. Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210331121101.7c7bd00e0aeb.Ib226ad57e416b43a710c36a78a617d4243458b99@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
When we do queue sync, it's confusing that we have the structures declared in the FW API header files that aren't really firmware, and the union is also confusing - especially now in the code that checks the size on the return. So rework this: change the type of sync and whether to do it in a synchronous fashion to arguments, and build the data structure in the function, so we don't need the union. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210331121101.f62833fd9893.I612d7ac1c655ec4880329360e15d207698c750bc@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We use mvm->queue_sync_state to wait for synchronous queue sync messages, but if an async one happens inbetween we shouldn't clear mvm->queue_sync_state after sending the async one, that can run concurrently (at least from the CPU POV) with another synchronous queue sync. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210331121101.d11c9bcdb4aa.I0772171dbaec87433a11513e9586d98b5d920b5f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
"Fully associated" means that we heard a beacon with the DTIM information and the firmware is configured to track the beacons. Since the firmware needs to track the beacons for the CSA, we can't configure the firmware for CSA before it knows when the beacons are expected otherwise we'd get ASSERT 301D. If we are required to start CSA before we told the firmware when the beacons are expected to arrive, just report a failure and let mac80211 disconnect. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210330162204.9adaedeb59e4.Idaad6aaf3f9759d023b8e00b10064915c0db9aa3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
The STA_CTXT_HE_NIC_NOT_ACK_ENABLED flag tells the firmware whether *we* support ack-enabled. So what should be checked is our *own* capability and not the *peer's* capability. Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210171218.59f44e210096.I8f31968f6f7303255e212d869ca0131becd309aa@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 10 2月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Add the count and the mode to the modify CSA flow. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210210135352.361bc0f024ef.I904f269858b3123b7d6532f049c7f92b63fb8807@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 05 2月, 2021 7 次提交
-
-
由 Mordechay Goodstein 提交于
For debug we add auth/assoc failed event and disconnect event. Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210131201907.fa62d6770dd1.I5b2ea2e5316ebed94ed77ff0a31d78a9672e4016@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If the firmware has support, then advertise it to the stack and send the key down. Since we re-check the protection in the host anyway, we don't really need to do anything on RX except that we should drop frames that the firmware _knows_ are replay errors, since beacon filtering might otherwise result in replays being possible. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.f5a3d53301b3.I23e84c9bb0b039d9106a07e9d6847776757f9029@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
There's no need to double this code, just put it into the common code that's called in all the cases. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.1f75d426ebe4.I58f6612f7e168c655bdef206a53e5bc117c84cf5@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Shaul Triebitz 提交于
While disconnecting from the AP due to bad channel switch params (e.g. too long Tx block), do not send the firmware 'CSA abort' before disconnecting. That causes canceling the immediate quiet and can cause transmitting data before the disconnection happens. Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.b9af359a675f.I996fc7eb3d94e9539f8b117017c428448c42c7ad@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
When we want to stop TX'ing because we are suspending, we have two options: either we check system_pm_mode or we check the mvm's status that has a bit for the suspend flow. The latter is better because test_bit is atomic. Also add a call to synchronize_net after we set the bit to make sure that all the new Tx see the bit before we actually complete the suspend flow. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.243c88781302.I5c0379c5a7e5d49410569e7fcd2fff7a419c6dea@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Mordechay Goodstein 提交于
In the new api all the flush in the FW is done before we get the response and in the response we only get the updated read pointer and all queued packets don't get anymore rx_tx per packet to free the queued packet, so driver needs to free all queued packets on flushed queue at once after flush response. Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4bd0eca8c0ef.I1601aad2eb2cc83f6f73b8ca52be57bb9fd626ab@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If there are frequent CCA delays due to the extension channel as detected by the firmware, and we're on 2.4 GHz, then handle this by disconnecting (with a reconnect hint). When we disconnect, we'll also update our capabilities to use only 20 MHz on the next connection (if it's on 2.4 GHz) as to avoid the use of the extension channel that has too much noise. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4de9c363b0b5.I709b7e6f73a7537c53f22d7418927691259de8a8@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 26 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Currently, _everything_ in cfg80211 holds the RTNL, and if you have a slow USB device (or a few) you can get some bad lock contention on that. Fix that by re-adding a mutex to each wiphy/rdev as we had at some point, so we have locking for the wireless_dev lists and all the other things in there, and also so that drivers still don't have to worry too much about it (they still won't get parallel calls for a single device). Then, we can restrict the RTNL to a few cases where we add or remove interfaces and really need the added protection. Some of the global list management still also uses the RTNL, since we need to have it anyway for netdev management, but we only hold the RTNL for very short periods of time here. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122161942.81df9f5e047a.I4a8e1a60b18863ea8c5e6d3a0faeafb2d45b2f40@changeid Tested-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> [marvell driver issues] Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sara Sharon 提交于
In the new CSA flow, we remain associated during CSA, but still do a unbind-bind to the vif. However, sending the power command right after when vif is unbound but still associated causes FW to assert (0x3400) since it cannot tell the LMAC id. Just skip this command, we will send it again in a bit, when assigning the new context. Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210115130252.64a2254ac5c3.Iaa3a9050bf3d7c9cd5beaf561e932e6defc12ec3@changeid
-
- 12 12月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a replacement for a number of "fall through" markings. Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as implicit fall-through. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor
-
- 10 12月, 2020 8 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
If the channel switch delay that we would incur after the channel switch actually happens is longer than the quiet time we're willing to tolerate, disconnect as well. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.3bc3449922da.Ib0255deb67b2fc21317e274adcacb545bb1dc669@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Sara Sharon 提交于
When we get a channel switch with a very long quiet period, we schedule a work to disconnect after a while. This work runs in background. In the meanwhile, we keep getting beacons and sending FW modify command for each. This has a potential race, where we modify the CSA after we aborted it. Protect the flow by setting csa_failed to true in case we abort, and check it before sending the modify command. This required a modification to the way we treat csa_failed in iwl_mvm_post_channel_switch: 1. The variable isn't being reset anymore, so we can still look at it in iwl_mvm_channel_switch_rx_beacon. This is fine, since we reset it when starting a new CSA. 2. There is no more early return in case of csa_failed. This is fine, since before this patch csa_failed was set only for GO, and for GO the function is only resetting the power settings, which we want to restore even in case of failure. Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b023856bdf39.I4ed0149e0018fe5e1ae3c2a1cbc614954016063f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
Use SPDX tags instead of the long copyright notices. Also cleanup some duplicate copyright notices and combine the years where possible. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000603.481bcb512a6f.I8146abe5a637079e7336209f23cb26af98b12b31@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
We're currently doing accounting on the queue sync with an atomic variable that counts down the number of remaining notifications that we still need. As we've been hitting issues in this area, modify this to track a bitmap of queues, not just the number of queues, and print out the remaining bitmap in the warning. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.0a3fa177cd6b.I7c69ff999419368266279ec27dd618eb450908b3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
The argument type to iwl_mvm_notify_rx_queue() is currently just a u8 *, but that's misleading because we actually need the inner data to be of type struct iwl_mvm_internal_rxq_notif, because we interpret it when we get it back from the device (to check the sync bool and possibly the cookie.) Therefore, clear up any potential confusion and require that the data passed is of type struct iwl_mvm_internal_rxq_notif *. Also, while at it, rename the "count" to "notif_size" as "count" doesn't really clearly say what it's counting. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.d28e14682bdc.I9ac366aa97db045be4daa4ba263267a3ac6a6a2f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This was a hack done to test the data path of devices that didn't support well CSUM offload in Tx. This is not needed anymore. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6c9fc9fb48d5.I2aaebf90e6fe81860105d049a8d35746fa8d86c2@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
The new inclusive terminology requires to change a few terms that were used in iwlwifi. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1eb4c8625f36.I1b17b68d4a8e77071da3e15ffbd902d15c1d4938@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Add support to the 6GHz band (aka. Ultra High Band or UHB). This allows us to scan and connect to channels in that band, including all the relevant features, such as preferred scan channels, colocated channels etc. Co-developed-by: NHaim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHaim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com> Co-developed-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NIlan Peer <ilan.peer@intel.com> Co-developed-by: NTova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTova Mussai <tova.mussai@intel.com> Co-developed-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrei Otcheretianski <andrei.otcheretianski@intel.com> Co-developed-by: NTali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTali Levi Rovinsky <Tali.Levi-rovinsky@intel.com> Co-developed-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com> Co-developed-by: NAyala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAyala Beker <ayala.beker@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000657.0fdbfc3d7352.Idb648536faf21716e2ab2c6d6890d3e49f719cd3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 11 11月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sara Sharon 提交于
During CSA, we briefly nullify the phy context, in __iwl_mvm_unassign_vif_chanctx. In case we have a FW assert right after it, it remains NULL though. We end up running into endless loop due to mac80211 trying repeatedly to move us to ASSOC state, and we keep returning -EINVAL. Later down the road we hit a kernel panic. Detect and avoid this endless loop. Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.d64de2c17bff.Iedd0d2afa20a2aacba5259a5cae31cb3a119a4eb@changeid
-
由 Avraham Stern 提交于
We use mvm->queue_sync_state to wait for synchronous queue sync messages, but if an async one happens inbetween we shouldn't clear mvm->queue_sync_state after sending the async one, that can run concurrently (at least from the CPU POV) with another synchronous queue sync. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Fixes: 3c514bf8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add a loose synchronization of the NSSN across Rx queues") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201107104557.51a3148f2c14.I0772171dbaec87433a11513e9586d98b5d920b5f@changeid
-