Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 20 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 09 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 25 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 18 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 14 11月, 2019 1 次提交
    • B
      drm/i915: Avoid atomic context for error capture · 48715f70
      由 Bruce Chang 提交于 
      io_mapping_map_atomic/kmap_atomic are occasionally taken in error capture
(if there is no aperture preallocated for the use of error capture), but
the error capture and compression routines are now run in normal
context:

<3> [113.316247] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at mm/page_alloc.c:4653
<3> [113.318190] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 678, name: debugfs_test
<4> [113.319900] no locks held by debugfs_test/678.
<3> [113.321002] Preemption disabled at:
<4> [113.321130] [<ffffffffa02506d4>] i915_error_object_create+0x494/0x610 [i915]
<4> [113.327259] Call Trace:
<4> [113.327871] dump_stack+0x67/0x9b
<4> [113.328683] ___might_sleep+0x167/0x250
<4> [113.329618] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x26b/0x1110
<4> [113.334614] pool_alloc.constprop.19+0x14/0x60 [i915]
<4> [113.335951] compress_page+0x7c/0x100 [i915]
<4> [113.337110] i915_error_object_create+0x4bd/0x610 [i915]
<4> [113.338515] i915_capture_gpu_state+0x384/0x1680 [i915]

However, it is not a good idea to run the slow compression inside atomic
context, so we choose not to.

Fixes: 895d8ebe ("drm/i915: error capture with no ggtt slot")
Signed-off-by: NBruce Chang <yu.bruce.chang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Welty <brian.welty@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191113231104.24208-1-yu.bruce.chang@intel.com
      48715f70
  13. 07 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 30 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  17. 29 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 26 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 24 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 04 10月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Remove logical HW ID · 2935ed53
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      With the introduction of ctx->engines[] we allow multiple logical
contexts to be used on the same engine (e.g. with virtual engines).
According to bspec, aach logical context requires a unique tag in order
for context-switching to occur correctly between them. [Simple
experiments show that it is not so easy to trick the HW into performing
a lite-restore with matching logical IDs, though my memory from early
Broadwell experiments do suggest that it should be generating
lite-restores.]

We only need to keep a unique tag for the active lifetime of the
context, and for as long as we need to identify that context. The HW
uses the tag to determine if it should use a lite-restore (why not the
LRCA?) and passes the tag back for various status identifies. The only
status we need to track is for OA, so when using perf, we assign the
specific context a unique tag.

v2: Calculate required number of tags to fill ELSP.

Fixes: 976b55f0 ("drm/i915: Allow a context to define its set of engines")
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111895Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-14-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      2935ed53
    • C
      drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex · b1e3177b
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Forgo the struct_mutex serialisation for i915_active, and interpose its
own mutex handling for active/retire.

This is a multi-layered sleight-of-hand. First, we had to ensure that no
active/retire callbacks accidentally inverted the mutex ordering rules,
nor assumed that they were themselves serialised by struct_mutex. More
challenging though, is the rule over updating elements of the active
rbtree. Instead of the whole i915_active now being serialised by
struct_mutex, allocations/rotations of the tree are serialised by the
i915_active.mutex and individual nodes are serialised by the caller
using the i915_timeline.mutex (we need to use nested spinlocks to
interact with the dma_fence callback lists).

The pain point here is that instead of a single mutex around execbuf, we
now have to take a mutex for active tracker (one for each vma, context,
etc) and a couple of spinlocks for each fence update. The improvement in
fine grained locking allowing for multiple concurrent clients
(eventually!) should be worth it in typical loads.

v2: Add some comments that barely elucidate anything :(
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191004134015.13204-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      b1e3177b
  25. 10 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  27. 30 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 24 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 19 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 15 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 13 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  37. 09 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  39. 07 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  41. 31 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  43. 29 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  45. 26 7月, 2019 2 次提交
    • G
      drm/i915: Mark expected switch fall-throughs · 2defb94e
      由 Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于 
      In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.

This patch fixes the following warnings:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c: In function ‘i915_gem_fault’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c:342:6: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
   if (!i915_terminally_wedged(i915))
      ^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_mman.c:345:2: note: here
  case -EAGAIN:
  ^~~~

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c: In function ‘i915_gem_object_map’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
  unlikely(__ret_warn_on);     \
  ^~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h:49:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN’
 #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \
                         ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c:270:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘MISSING_CASE’
   MISSING_CASE(type);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_pages.c:272:2: note: here
  case I915_MAP_WB:
  ^~~~

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c: In function ‘error_record_engine_registers’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
  unlikely(__ret_warn_on);     \
  ^~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h:49:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN’
 #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \
                         ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:1196:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘MISSING_CASE’
     MISSING_CASE(engine->id);
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c:1197:4: note: here
    case RCS0:
    ^~~~

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c: In function ‘intel_dp_get_fia_supported_lane_count’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:78:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
 # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:136:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
  unlikely(__ret_warn_on);     \
  ^~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h:49:25: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN’
 #define MISSING_CASE(x) WARN(1, "Missing case (%s == %ld)\n", \
                         ^~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:233:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘MISSING_CASE’
   MISSING_CASE(lane_info);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c:234:2: note: here
  case 1:
  ^~~~

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c: In function ‘check_digital_port_conflicts’:
  CC [M]  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/cursgv100.o
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:12043:7: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
    if (WARN_ON(!HAS_DDI(to_i915(dev))))
       ^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c:12046:3: note: here
   case INTEL_OUTPUT_DP:
   ^~~~

Also, notice that the Makefile is modified to stop ignoring
fall-through warnings. The -Wimplicit-fallthrough option
will be enabled globally in v5.3.

Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3

This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      2defb94e
    • C
      drm/i915: Capture vma contents outside of spinlock · 79c7a28e
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Currently we use the engine->active.lock to ensure that the request is
not retired as we capture the data. However, we only need to ensure that
the vma are not removed prior to use acquiring their contents, and
since we have already relinquished our stop-machine protection, we
assume that the user will not be overwriting the contents before we are
able to record them.

In order to capture the vma outside of the spinlock, we acquire a
reference and mark the vma as active to prevent it from being unbound.
However, since it is tricky allocate an entry in the fence tree (doing
so would require taking a mutex) while inside the engine spinlock, we
use an atomic bit and special case the handling for i915_active_wait.

The core benefit is that we can use some non-atomic methods for mapping
the device pages, we can remove the slow compression phase out of atomic
context (i.e. stop antagonising the nmi-watchdog), and no we longer need
large reserves of atomic pages.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111215Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.william.auld@gmail.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725223843.8971-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      79c7a28e
  47. 25 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  49. 23 7月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Rely on spinlock protection for GPU error capture · 3bdd4f84
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Trust that we now have adequate protection over the low level structures
via the engine->active.lock to allow ourselves to capture the GPU error
state without the heavy hammer of stop_machine(). Sadly this does mean
that we have to forgo some of the lesser used information (not derived
from the active state) that is not controlled by the active locks. This
includes the list of buffers in the ppGTT and pinned globally in the
GGTT. Originally this was used to manually verify relocations, but
hasn't been required for sometime and modern mesa now has the habit of
ensuring that all interesting buffers within a batch are captured in their
entirety (that are the auxiliary state buffers, but not the textures).

A useful side-effect is that this allows us to restore error capturing
for Braswell and Broxton.

v2: Use pagevec for a typical arbitrary number of preallocated pages
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190722222847.24178-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      3bdd4f84
  51. 16 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  53. 14 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  55. 21 6月, 2019 3 次提交
  57. 20 6月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/execlists: Preempt-to-busy · 22b7a426
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      When using a global seqno, we required a precise stop-the-workd event to
handle preemption and unwind the global seqno counter. To accomplish
this, we would preempt to a special out-of-band context and wait for the
machine to report that it was idle. Given an idle machine, we could very
precisely see which requests had completed and which we needed to feed
back into the run queue.

However, now that we have scrapped the global seqno, we no longer need
to precisely unwind the global counter and only track requests by their
per-context seqno. This allows us to loosely unwind inflight requests
while scheduling a preemption, with the enormous caveat that the
requests we put back on the run queue are still _inflight_ (until the
preemption request is complete). This makes request tracking much more
messy, as at any point then we can see a completed request that we
believe is not currently scheduled for execution. We also have to be
careful not to rewind RING_TAIL past RING_HEAD on preempting to the
running context, and for this we use a semaphore to prevent completion
of the request before continuing.

To accomplish this feat, we change how we track requests scheduled to
the HW. Instead of appending our requests onto a single list as we
submit, we track each submission to ELSP as its own block. Then upon
receiving the CS preemption event, we promote the pending block to the
inflight block (discarding what was previously being tracked). As normal
CS completion events arrive, we then remove stale entries from the
inflight tracker.

v2: Be a tinge paranoid and ensure we flush the write into the HWS page
for the GPU semaphore to pick in a timely fashion.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620142052.19311-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      22b7a426
  59. 17 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  61. 15 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  63. 13 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  65. 12 6月, 2019 1 次提交