- 05 11月, 2018 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Now that all the infrastructure is in place to support multiple required OPPs, lets switch over to using it. A new internal routine _set_required_opps() takes care of updating performance state for all the required OPPs. With this the performance state updates are supported even when the end device needs to configure regulators as well, that wasn't the case earlier. The pstates were earlier stored in the end device's OPP structures, that also changes now as those values are stored in the genpd's OPP structures. And so we switch over to using pm_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() instead of of_genpd_opp_to_performance_state() to get performance state for the genpd OPPs. The routine _generic_set_opp_domain() is not required anymore and is removed. On errors we don't try to recover by reverting to old settings as things are really complex now and the calls here should never really fail unless there is a bug. There is no point increasing the complexity, for code which will never be executed. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Multiple generic power domains for a consumer device are supported with the help of virtual devices, which are created for each consumer device - genpd pair. These are the device structures which are attached to the power domain and are required by the OPP core to set the performance state of the genpd. The helpers added by this commit are required to be called once for each of these virtual devices. These are required only if multiple domains are available for a device, otherwise the actual device structure will be used instead by the OPP core. The new helpers also support the complex cases where the consumer device wouldn't always require all the domains. For example, a camera may require only one power domain during normal operations but two during high resolution operations. The consumer driver can call dev_pm_opp_put_genpd_virt_dev(high_resolution_genpd_virt_dev) if it is currently operating in the normal mode and doesn't have any performance requirements from the genpd which manages high resolution power requirements. The consumer driver can later call dev_pm_opp_set_genpd_virt_dev(high_resolution_genpd_virt_dev) once it switches back to the high resolution mode. The new helpers differ from other OPP set/put helpers as the new ones can be called with OPPs initialized for the table as we may need to call them on the fly because of the complex case explained above. For this reason it is possible that the genpd virt_dev structure may be used in parallel while the new helpers are running and a new mutex is added to protect against that. We didn't use the existing opp_table->lock mutex as that is widely used in the OPP core and we will need this lock in the dev_pm_opp_set_rate() helper while changing OPP and we need to make sure there is not much contention while doing that as that's the hotpath. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
An earlier commit populated the OPP tables from the "required-opps" property, this commit populates the individual OPPs. This is repeated for each OPP in the OPP table and these populated OPPs will be used by later commits. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The current implementation works only for the case where a single phandle is present in the "required-opps" property, while DT allows multiple phandles to be present there. This patch adds new infrastructure to parse all the phandles present in "required-opps" property and save pointers of the required OPP's OPP tables. These will be used by later commits. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Create a separate routine to take care of custom set_opp() handler specific stuff. Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Return error number instead of 0 on failures. Fixes: a1e8c136 ("PM / OPP: "opp-hz" is optional for power domains") Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 01 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
When two or more devices are sharing their clock and voltage rails, they share the same OPP table. But there are some corner cases where the OPP core incorrectly creates separate OPP tables for them. For example, CPU 0 and 1 share clock/voltage rails. The platform specific code calls dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() for CPU0 and the OPP core creates an OPP table for it (the individual OPPs aren't initialized as of now). The same is repeated for CPU1 then. Because _opp_get_opp_table() doesn't compare DT node pointers currently, it fails to find the link between CPU0 and CPU1 and so creates a new OPP table. Fix this by calling _managed_opp() from _opp_get_opp_table(). _managed_opp() gain an additional argument (index) to get the right node pointer. This resulted in simplifying code in _of_add_opp_table_v2() as well. Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 20 9月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Currently there are two separate ways to free the OPP table based on how it is created in the first place. We call _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() to free the static and/or dynamic OPP, OPP list devices, etc. This is done for the case where the OPP table is added while initializing the OPPs, like via the path dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(). We also call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() in some cases which eventually frees the OPP table structure once the reference count reaches 0. This is used by the first case as well as other cases like dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() where the OPPs aren't necessarily initialized at this point. This whole thing is a bit unclear and messy and obstruct any further cleanup/fixup of OPP core. This patch tries to streamline this by keeping a single path for OPP table destruction, i.e. dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(). All the cleanup happens in _opp_table_kref_release() now after the reference count reaches 0. _dev_pm_opp_remove_table() is removed as it isn't required anymore. We don't drop the reference to the OPP table after creating it from _of_add_opp_table_v{1|2}() anymore and the same is dropped only when we try to remove them. Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Only one platform was depending on this feature and it is already updated now. Stop removing dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(). This simplifies lot of paths and removes unnecessary parameters. Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The static OPPs don't always get freed with the OPP table, it can happen before that as well. For example, if the OPP table is first created using helpers like dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() and the OPPs are created at a later point. Now when the OPPs are removed, the OPP table stays until the time dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw() is called. Later patches will streamline the freeing of OPP table and that requires the static OPPs to get freed with help of a separate kernel reference. This patch prepares for that by creating a separate kref for static OPPs list. Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The reference count is only required to be incremented for every call that may lead to adding the OPP table. For static OPPs the same should be done from the parent routine which adds all static OPPs together and so only one refcount for all static OPPs. Update code to reflect that. The refcount is incremented every time a dynamic OPP is created (as that can lead to creating the OPP table) and the same is dropped when the OPP is removed. Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This is a preparatory patch required for the next commit which will start using OPP table's node pointer in _of_init_opp_table(), which requires the index in order to read the OPP table's phandle. This commit adds the index argument in the call chains in order to get it delivered to _of_init_opp_table(). Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The dev_list needs to be protected with a lock, else we may have simultaneous access (addition/removal) to it and that would be racy. Extend scope of the opp_table lock to protect dev_list as well. Tested-by: NNiklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 19 6月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Waldemar Rymarkiewicz 提交于
This commit fixes a rare but possible case when the clk rate is updated without update of the regulator voltage. At boot up, CPUfreq checks if the system is running at the right freq. This is a sanity check in case a bootloader set clk rate that is outside of freq table present with cpufreq core. In such cases system can be unstable so better to change it to a freq that is preset in freq-table. The CPUfreq takes next freq that is >= policy->cur and this is our target_freq that needs to be set now. dev_pm_opp_set_rate(dev, target_freq) checks the target_freq and the old_freq (a current rate). If these are equal it returns early. If not, it searches for OPP (old_opp) that fits best to old_freq (not listed in the table) and updates old_freq (!). Here, we can end up with old_freq = old_opp.rate = target_freq, which is not handled in _generic_set_opp_regulator(). It's supposed to update voltage only when freq > old_freq || freq > old_freq. if (freq > old_freq) { ret = _set_opp_voltage(dev, reg, new_supply); [...] if (freq < old_freq) { ret = _set_opp_voltage(dev, reg, new_supply); if (ret) It results in, no voltage update while clk rate is updated. Example: freq-table = { 1000MHz 1.15V 666MHZ 1.10V 333MHz 1.05V } boot-up-freq = 800MHz # not listed in freq-table freq = target_freq = 1GHz old_freq = 800Mhz old_opp = _find_freq_ceil(opp_table, &old_freq); #(old_freq is modified!) old_freq = 1GHz Fixes: 6a0712f6 ("PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_set_rate()") Cc: 4.6+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.6+ Signed-off-by: NWaldemar Rymarkiewicz <waldemar.rymarkiewicz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 22 5月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
It should be fine to call dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper() for all possible CPUs, even if some of them share the OPP table as the caller may not be aware of sharing policy. Lets increment the reference count of the OPP table and return its pointer. The caller need to call dev_pm_opp_register_put_opp_helper() the same number of times later on to drop all the references. To avoid adding another counter to count how many times dev_pm_opp_register_set_opp_helper() is called for the same OPP table, dev_pm_opp_register_put_opp_helper() frees the resources on the very first call made to it, assuming that the caller would be calling it sequentially for all the CPUs. We can revisit that if that assumption is broken in the future. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
It should be fine to call dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() for all possible CPUs, even if some of them share the OPP table as the caller may not be aware of sharing policy. Lets increment the reference count of the OPP table and return its pointer. The caller need to call dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() the same number of times later on to drop all the references. To avoid adding another counter to count how many times dev_pm_opp_set_regulators() is called for the same OPP table, dev_pm_opp_put_regulators() frees the resources on the very first call made to it, assuming that the caller would be calling it sequentially for all the CPUs. We can revisit that if that assumption is broken in the future. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
It should be fine to call dev_pm_opp_set_prop_name() for all possible CPUs, even if some of them share the OPP table as the caller may not be aware of sharing policy. Lets increment the reference count of the OPP table and return its pointer. The caller need to call dev_pm_opp_put_prop_name() the same number of times later on to drop all the references. To avoid adding another counter to count how many times dev_pm_opp_set_prop_name() is called for the same OPP table, dev_pm_opp_put_prop_name() frees the resources on the very first call made to it, assuming that the caller would be calling it sequentially for all the CPUs. We can revisit that if that assumption is broken in the future. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
It should be fine to call dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() for all possible CPUs, even if some of them share the OPP table as the caller may not be aware of sharing policy. Lets increment the reference count of the OPP table and return its pointer. The caller need to call dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw() the same number of times later on to drop all the references. To avoid adding another counter to count how many times dev_pm_opp_set_supported_hw() is called for the same OPP table, dev_pm_opp_put_supported_hw() frees the resources on the very first call made to it, assuming that the caller would be calling it sequentially for all the CPUs. We can revisit that if that assumption is broken in the future. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 09 5月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
These helpers aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The genpd core provides an API now to retrieve the performance state from DT, use that instead of the ->get_pstate() callback. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
A device's DT node or its OPP nodes can contain a phandle to other device's OPP node, in the "required-opps" property. This patch implements a routine to find that required OPP from the node that contains the "required-opps" property. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
"opp-hz" property is optional for power domains now and we shouldn't error out if it is missing for power domains. This patch creates two new routines, _get_opp_count() and _opp_is_duplicate(), by separating existing code from their parent functions. Also skip duplicate OPP check for power domain OPPs as they may not have any the "opp-hz" field, but a platform specific performance state binding to uniquely identify OPP nodes. By default the debugfs OPP nodes are named using the "rate" value, but that isn't possible for the power domain OPP nodes and hence they use the index of the OPP node in the OPP node list instead. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
-
- 14 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This adds the dev_pm_opp_{un}register_get_pstate_helper() helper routines which will be used to set the get_pstate() callback for a device. This callback will be later called internally by the OPP core to get performance state corresponding to an OPP. This is required temporarily until the time we have proper DT bindings to include the performance state information. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The genpd framework now provides an API to request device's power domain to update its performance state. Use that interface from the OPP core for devices whose power domains support performance states. Note that this commit doesn't add any mechanism by which performance states are made available to the OPP core. That would be done by a later commit. Note that the current implementation is restricted to the case where the device doesn't have separate regulators for itself. We shouldn't over engineer the code before we have real use case for them. We can always come back and add more code to support such cases later on. Tested-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The routine is named incorrectly since the first attempt as there is nothing like a put_opp() helper. We wanted to unregister the set_opp() helper here and so it should rather be named as dev_pm_opp_unregister_set_opp_helper(). Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Fabio Estevam 提交于
On some i.MX6 platforms which do not have speed grading check, opp table will not be created in platform code, so cpufreq driver prints the following error message: cpu cpu0: dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count: OPP table not found (-19) However, this is not really an error in this case because the imx6q-cpufreq driver first calls dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() and if it fails, it means that platform code does not provide OPP and then dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() will be called. In order to avoid such confusing error message, move it to debug level. It is up to the caller of dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() to check its return value and decide if it will print an error or not. Signed-off-by: NFabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 03 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The drivers/base/power/ directory is special and contains code related to power management core like system suspend/resume, hibernation, etc. It was fine to keep the OPP code inside it when we had just one file for it, but it is growing now and already has a directory for itself. Lets move it directly under drivers/ directory, just like cpufreq and cpuidle. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 9月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The notifier callbacks may want to call some OPP helper routines which may try to take the same opp_table->lock again and cause a deadlock. One such usecase was reported by Chanwoo Choi, where calling dev_pm_opp_disable() leads us to the devfreq's OPP notifier handler, which further calls dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor() and it deadlocks. We don't really need the opp_table->lock to be held across the notifier call though, all we want to make sure is that the 'opp' doesn't get freed while being used from within the notifier chain. We can do it with help of dev_pm_opp_get/put() as well. Let's do it. Cc: 4.11+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.11+ Fixes: 5b650b38 "PM / OPP: Take kref from _find_opp_table()" Reported-by: NChanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Tested-by: NChanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NChanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 6月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
In order to support OPP switching, OPP layer needs to get pointer to the clock for the device. Simple cases work fine without using the routines added by this patch (i.e. by passing connection-id as NULL), but for a device with multiple clocks available, the OPP core needs to know the exact name of the clk to use. Add a new set of APIs to get that done. Tested-by: NRajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This code was required while the OPP core was managed with help of RCUs, but not anymore. Get rid of unnecessary alloc/memcpy operations. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The code was overly complicated here because of the limitations that we had with RCUs (Couldn't use opp-table and OPPs outside RCU protected section and can't call sleep-able routines from within that). But that is long gone now. Reorganize _generic_set_opp_regulator() in order to avoid using "struct dev_pm_set_opp_data" and copying data into it for the case where opp_table->set_opp is not set. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrzej Hajda 提交于
Reading array at given index before checking if index is valid results in illegal memory access. The bug was detected using KASAN framework. Signed-off-by: NAndrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Fixes the following sparse warning: drivers/base/power/opp/core.c:49:18: warning: symbol '_find_opp_table_unlocked' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 1月, 2017 7 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() calls _find_opp_table() two times effectively. Merge _get_regulator_count() into dev_pm_opp_get_max_volt_latency() to avoid that. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
As we don't use RCU locking anymore, there is no need to replace an earlier OPP node with a new one. Just update the existing one. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two readers only at a time. Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the mutex instead. And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more confusing. Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and simplify the code a lot. Remove all RCU references from code and comments. Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Take reference of the OPP table from within _find_opp_table(). Also update the callers of _find_opp_table() to call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table() after they have used the OPP table. Note that _find_opp_table() increments the reference under the opp_table_lock. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed until the callers of _find_opp_table() call dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(), there is no need to take the opp_table_lock or rcu_read_lock() around it. Drop them. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This patch updates dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to get a reference to the OPPs returned by them. Also updates the users of dev_pm_opp_find_freq_*() routines to call dev_pm_opp_put() after they are done using the OPPs. As it is guaranteed the that OPPs wouldn't get freed while being used, the RCU read side locking present with the users isn't required anymore. Drop it as well. This patch also updates all users of devfreq_recommended_opp() which was returning an OPP received from the OPP core. Note that some of the OPP core routines have gained rcu_read_{lock|unlock}() calls, as those still use RCU specific APIs within them. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> [Devfreq] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Add kref to struct dev_pm_opp for easier accounting of the OPPs. Note that the OPPs are freed under the opp_table->lock mutex only. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Migrate all users of _add_opp_table() to use dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() to guarantee that the OPP table doesn't get freed while being used. Also update _managed_opp() to get the reference to the OPP table. Now that the OPP table wouldn't get freed while these routines are executing after dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table() is called, there is no need to take opp_table_lock. Drop them as well. Now that _add_opp_table(), _remove_opp_table() and the unlocked release routines aren't used anymore, remove them. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-