1. 02 8月, 2011 23 次提交
  2. 28 7月, 2011 15 次提交
    • C
      Merge branch 'integration' into for-linus · ff95acb6
      Chris Mason 提交于
      ff95acb6
    • C
      Btrfs: make sure reserve_metadata_bytes doesn't leak out strange errors · 75c195a2
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The btrfs transaction code will return any errors that come from
      reserve_metadata_bytes.  We need to make sure we don't return funny
      things like 1 or EAGAIN.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      75c195a2
    • C
      Btrfs: use the commit_root for reading free_space_inode crcs · 2cf8572d
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Now that we are using regular file crcs for the free space cache,
      we can deadlock if we try to read the free_space_inode while we are
      updating the crc tree.
      
      This commit fixes things by using the commit_root to read the crcs.  This is
      safe because we the free space cache file would already be loaded if
      that block group had been changed in the current transaction.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      2cf8572d
    • C
      Btrfs: reduce extent_state lock contention for metadata · 19b6caf4
      Chris Mason 提交于
      For metadata buffers that don't straddle pages (all of them), btrfs
      can safely use the page uptodate bits and extent_buffer uptodate bit
      instead of needing to use the extent_state tree.
      
      This greatly reduces contention on the state tree lock.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      19b6caf4
    • C
      Btrfs: remove lockdep magic from btrfs_next_leaf · 31533fb2
      Chris Mason 提交于
      Before the reader/writer locks, btrfs_next_leaf needed to keep
      the path blocking to avoid making lockdep upset.
      
      Now that btrfs_next_leaf only takes read locks, this isn't required.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      31533fb2
    • C
      Btrfs: make a lockdep class for each root · 85d4e461
      Chris Mason 提交于
      This patch was originally from Tejun Heo.  lockdep complains about the btrfs
      locking because we sometimes take btree locks from two different trees at the
      same time.  The current classes are based only on level in the btree, which
      isn't enough information for lockdep to figure out if the lock is safe.
      
      This patch makes a class for each type of tree, and lumps all the FS trees that
      actually have files and directories into the same class.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      85d4e461
    • C
      Btrfs: switch the btrfs tree locks to reader/writer · bd681513
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant
      lock contention, especially in the root node.   This
      commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer
      lock.
      
      The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it
      extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a
      read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking.  Atomics
      count the number of blocking readers or writers at any
      given time.
      
      It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code
      and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs
      to decide when it should continue spinning.
      
      In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster.  In write
      heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention
      on the root node lock.
      
      We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often
      during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      bd681513
    • J
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when throttling transactions · 81317fde
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Hit this nice little deadlock.  What happens is this
      
      __btrfs_end_transaction with throttle set, --use_count so it equals 0
        btrfs_commit_transaction
          <somebody else actually manages to start the commit>
          btrfs_end_transaction --use_count so now its -1 <== BAD
            we just return and wait on the transaction
      
      This is bad because we just return after our use_count is -1 and don't let go
      of our num_writer count on the transaction, so the guy committing the
      transaction just sits there forever.  Fix this by inc'ing our use_count if we're
      going to call commit_transaction so that if we call btrfs_end_transaction it's
      valid.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      81317fde
    • C
      Btrfs: stop using highmem for extent_buffers · a6591715
      Chris Mason 提交于
      The extent_buffers have a very complex interface where
      we use HIGHMEM for metadata and try to cache a kmap mapping
      to access the memory.
      
      The next commit adds reader/writer locks, and concurrent use
      of this kmap cache would make it even more complex.
      
      This commit drops the ability to use HIGHMEM with extent buffers,
      and rips out all of the related code.
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      a6591715
    • M
      Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() caused by ENOSPC when relocating space · 199c36ea
      Miao Xie 提交于
      When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in
      __finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered.
      
      ------------[ cut here ]------------
      kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568!
      [SNIP]
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160
       [<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30
       [<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs]
       [<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0
       [<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0
       [<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880
       [<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0
       [<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
       [<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160
       [<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0
       [<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
       [<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
       [<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [SNIP]
      RIP  [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs]
      
      The reason is:
      Task1					Space balance task
      do_chunk_alloc()
        __finish_chunk_alloc()
          update device info
          in the chunk tree
            alloc system metadata block
      					relocate system metadata block group
      					  set system metadata block group
      					  readonly, This block group is the
      					  only one that can allocate space. So
      					  there is no free space that can be
      					  allocated now.
              find no space and don't try
              to alloc new chunk, and then
              return ENOSPC
        BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc()
        was triggered.
      
      Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the
      old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting
      the old block group to be read-only.
      Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      199c36ea
    • J
      Btrfs: tag pages for writeback in sync · f7aaa06b
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Everybody else does this, we need to do it too.  If we're syncing, we need to
      tag the pages we're going to write for writeback so we don't end up writing the
      same stuff over and over again if somebody is constantly redirtying our file.
      This will keep us from having latencies with heavy sync workloads.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      f7aaa06b
    • J
      Btrfs: fix enospc problems with delalloc · 9e0baf60
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      So I had this brilliant idea to use atomic counters for outstanding and reserved
      extents, but this turned out to be a bad idea.  Consider this where we have 1
      outstanding extent and 1 reserved extent
      
      Reserver				Releaser
      					atomic_dec(outstanding) now 0
      atomic_read(outstanding)+1 get 1
      atomic_read(reserved) get 1
      don't actually reserve anything because
      they are the same
      					atomic_cmpxchg(reserved, 1, 0)
      atomic_inc(outstanding)
      atomic_add(0, reserved)
      					free reserved space for 1 extent
      
      Then the reserver now has no actual space reserved for it, and when it goes to
      finish the ordered IO it won't have enough space to do it's allocation and you
      get those lovely warnings.
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      9e0baf60
    • J
      Btrfs: don't flush delalloc arbitrarily · a5991428
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Kill the check to see if we have 512mb of reserved space in delalloc and
      shrink_delalloc if we do.  This causes unexpected latencies and we have other
      logic to see if we need to throttle.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
      a5991428
    • J
      Btrfs: use find_or_create_page instead of grab_cache_page · a94733d0
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      grab_cache_page will use mapping_gfp_mask(), which for all inodes is set to
      GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE.  So instead use find_or_create_page in all cases where we
      need GFP_NOFS so we don't deadlock.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      a94733d0
    • J
      Btrfs: use a worker thread to do caching · bab39bf9
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      A user reported a deadlock when copying a bunch of files.  This is because they
      were low on memory and kthreadd got hung up trying to migrate pages for an
      allocation when starting the caching kthread.  The page was locked by the person
      starting the caching kthread.  To fix this we just need to use the async thread
      stuff so that the threads are already created and we don't have to worry about
      deadlocks.  Thanks,
      Reported-by: NRoman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
      bab39bf9
  3. 26 7月, 2011 2 次提交
    • M
      btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot · 38a1a919
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I
      also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
      38a1a919
    • M
      btrfs: Don't BUG_ON alloc_path errors in find_next_chunk · 92b8e897
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      I also removed the BUG_ON from error return of find_next_chunk in
      init_first_rw_device(). It turns out that the only caller of
      init_first_rw_device() also BUGS on any nonzero return so no actual behavior
      change has occurred here.
      
      do_chunk_alloc() also needed an update since it calls btrfs_alloc_chunk()
      which can now return -ENOMEM. Instead of setting space_info->full on any
      error from btrfs_alloc_chunk() I catch and return every error value _except_
      -ENOSPC. Thanks goes to Tsutomu Itoh for pointing that issue out.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
      92b8e897