- 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 03 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Commit 4df48999 "Add power8 EBB support" included a bug in the handling of the FAB_CRESP_MATCH and FAB_TYPE_MATCH fields. These values are pulled out of the event code using EVENT_THR_CTL_SHIFT, however we were then or'ing that value directly into MMCR1. This meant we were failing to set the FAB fields correctly, and also potentially corrupting the value for PMC4SEL. Leading to no counts for the FAB events and incorrect counts for PMC4. The fix is simply to shift left the FAB value correctly before or'ing it with MMCR1. Reported-by: NSooraj Ravindran Nair <soonair3@in.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.10+ Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 01 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
We use bit 63 of the event code for userspace to request that the event be counted using EBB (Event Based Branches). Export this value, making it part of the API - though only on processors that support EBB. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 24 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Anshuman Khandual 提交于
Completely ignore BHRB privilege state filter request as we are already configuring that with privilege state filtering attribute for the accompanying PMU event. This would help achieve cleaner user space interaction for BHRB. This patch fixes a situation like this Before patch:- ------------ ./perf record -j any -e branch-misses:k ls Error: The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 95 (Operation not supported) for event (branch-misses:k). /bin/dmesg may provide additional information. No CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=y kernel support configured? Here 'perf record' actually copies over ':k' filter request into BHRB privilege state filter config and our previous check in kernel would fail that. After patch:- ------------- ./perf record -j any -e branch-misses:k ls perf perf.data perf.data.old test-mmap-ring [ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ] [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.002 MB perf.data (~102 samples)] Signed-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NMichael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
The presence or absence of EBB is advertised to userspace via the presence or absence of PPC_FEATURE2_EBB in cpu_user_features2. Because the kernel can be built without PMU support, we should only add PPC_FEATURE2_EBB to cpu_user_features2 when we successfully register the power8 PMU support. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 01 7月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
Add logic to the power8 PMU code to support EBB. Future processors would also be expected to implement similar constraints. At that time we could possibly factor these out into common code. Finally mark the power8 PMU as supporting EBB, which is the actual enable switch which allows EBBs to be configured. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
On Power8 we can freeze PMC5 and 6 if we're not using them. Normally they run all the time. As noticed by Anshuman, we should unfreeze them when we disable the PMU as there are legacy tools which expect them to run all the time. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v3.10] Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
A mistake we have made in the past is that we pull out the fields we need from the event code, but don't check that there are no unknown bits set. This means that we can't ever assign meaning to those unknown bits in future. Although we have once again failed to do this at release, it is still early days for Power8 so I think we can still slip this in and get away with it. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v3.10] Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 26 4月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Anshuman Khandual 提交于
This patch populates BHRB specific data for power_pmu structure. It also implements POWER8 specific BHRB filter and configuration functions. Signed-off-by: NAnshuman Khandual <khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Michael Ellerman 提交于
This patch adds support for the power8 PMU to perf. Work is ongoing to add generic cache events. Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au> Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-