- 06 2月, 2007 5 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
Add a "ci_" prefix to the fields in the dlm_config_info struct so that we can use macros to add configfs functions to access them (in a later patch). No functional changes in this patch, just naming changes. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
When the dlm fakes an unlock/cancel reply from a failed node using a stub message struct, it wasn't setting the flags in the stub message. So, in the process of receiving the fake message the lkb flags would be updated and cleared from the zero flags in the message. The problem observed in tests was the loss of the USER flag which caused the dlm to think a user lock was a kernel lock and subsequently fail an assertion checking the validity of the ast/callback field. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
LVB's are not sent as part of new requests, but the code receiving the request was copying data into the lvb anyway. The space in the message where it mistakenly thought the lvb lived actually contained the resource name, so it wound up incorrectly copying this name data into the lvb. Fix is to just create the lvb, not copy junk into it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
The send_args() function is used to copy parameters into a message for a number different message types. Only some of those types are set up beforehand (in create_message) to include space for sending lvb data. send_args was wrongly copying the lvb for all message types as long as the lock had an lvb. This means that the lvb data was being written past the end of the message into unknown space. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
There's a chance the new master of resource hasn't learned it's the new master before another node sends it a lock during recovery. The node sending the lock needs to resend if this happens. - A sends a master lookup for resource R to C - B sends a master lookup for resource R to C - C receives A's lookup, assigns A to be master of R and sends a reply back to A - C receives B's lookup and sends a reply back to B saying that A is the master - B receives lookup reply from C and sends its lock for R to A - A receives lock from B, doesn't think it's the master of R and sends an error back to B - A receives lookup reply from C and becomes master of R - B gets error back from A and resends its lock back to A (this resending is what this patch does) - A receives lock from B, it now sees it's the master of R and takes the lock Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
RH BZ 211622 The ALTMODE flag can be set in the lock master's copy of the lock but never cleared, so ALTMODE will also be returned in a subsequent conversion of the lock when it shouldn't be. This results in lock_dlm incorrectly switching to the alternate lock mode when returning the result to gfs which then asserts when it sees the wrong lock state. The fix is to propagate the cleared sbflags value to the master node when the lock is requested. QA's d_rwrandirectlarge test triggers this bug very quickly. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
Red Hat BZ 211914 There's a race between dlm_recoverd (1) enabling locking and (2) clearing out the requestqueue, and dlm_recvd (1) checking if locking is enabled and (2) adding a message to the requestqueue. An order of recoverd(1), recvd(1), recvd(2), recoverd(2) will result in a message being left on the requestqueue. The fix is to have dlm_recvd check if dlm_recoverd has enabled locking after taking the mutex for the requestqueue and if it has processing the message instead of queueing it. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Steven Whitehouse 提交于
As per Andrew Morton's request, removed trailing whitespace. Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 09 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
Fixing the following scenario: - A request is on the waiters list waiting for a reply from a remote node. - The request is the first one on the resource, so first_lkid is set. - The remote node fails causing recovery. - During recovery the requesting node becomes master. - The request is now processed locally instead of being a remote operation. - At this point we need to call confirm_master() on the resource since we're certain we're now the master node. This will clear first_lkid. - We weren't calling confirm_master(), so first_lkid was not being cleared causing subsequent requests on that resource to get stuck. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 24 8月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
The down-conversion optimization was resulting in the lkb flags being cleared because the stub message reply had no flags value set. Copy the current flags into the stub message so they'll be copied back into the lkb as part of processing the fake reply. Also add an assertion to catch this error more directly if it exists elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 23 8月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 Patrick Caulfield 提交于
Oh, and here's (hopefully) the last of these ua_tmp patches. I think I've caught all the paths now. Sorry it didn't make the last one. Signed-off-by: NPatrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 Patrick Caulfield 提交于
This patch fixes bz#203444 where the LKSB was lost during userland conversion operations Signed-off-by: NPatrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 21 8月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
Introduce new function dlm_dump_rsb() to call within assertions instead of dlm_print_rsb(). The new function dumps info about all locks on the rsb in addition to rsb details. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Patrick Caulfield 提交于
This patch fixes the userland DLM unlock code so that it correctly returns the address of the userland lock status block in its completion AST. It fixes bug #201348 Patrick Signed-Off-By: NPatrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
The loop through all waiting locks in recover_waiters can potentially be long, so we should schedule explicitly. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
The loop in grant_after_purge is intended to find all rsb's in each hash bucket that have the LOCKS_PURGED flag set. The loop was quitting the current bucket after finding just one rsb instead of going until there are no more. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 20 7月, 2006 2 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
User NOQUEUE lock requests to a remote node that failed with -EAGAIN were never being removed from a process's list of locks. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
On Thu, Jul 13, 2006 at 10:48:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: >... > Changes since 2.6.18-rc1-mm1: >... > git-gfs2.patch >... > git trees. >... This patch removes the unused EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dlm_lvb_operations). Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
This changes the way the dlm handles user locks. The core dlm is now aware of user locks so they can be dealt with more efficiently. There is no more dlm_device module which previously managed its own duplicate copy of every user lock. Signed-off-by: NPatrick Caulfield <pcaulfie@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 03 5月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
In dlm_grant_after_purge() we were holding a hash table read_lock while calling put_rsb() which potentially removes the rsb from the hash table, taking the same lock in write. Fix this by flagging rsb's ahead of time that have been purged. Then iteratively read_lock the hash table, find a flagged rsb, unlock, process rsb. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 01 3月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
In some cases a lockspace isn't attached to the lkb, so that it needs to be passed directly to the lkb put function. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 23 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
This patch removes support for range locking from the DLM Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-
- 18 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Teigland 提交于
This is the core of the distributed lock manager which is required to use GFS2 as a cluster filesystem. It is also used by CLVM and can be used as a standalone lock manager independantly of either of these two projects. It implements VAX-style locking modes. Signed-off-by: NDavid Teigland <teigland@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NSteve Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
-