Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 6月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 05 6月, 2019 20 次提交
  5. 03 6月, 2019 1 次提交
    • J
      x86/power: Fix 'nosmt' vs hibernation triple fault during resume · ec527c31
      由 Jiri Kosina 提交于 
      As explained in

	0cc3cd21 ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once")

we always, no matter what, have to bring up x86 HT siblings during boot at
least once in order to avoid first MCE bringing the system to its knees.

That means that whenever 'nosmt' is supplied on the kernel command-line,
all the HT siblings are as a result sitting in mwait or cpudile after
going through the online-offline cycle at least once.

This causes a serious issue though when a kernel, which saw 'nosmt' on its
commandline, is going to perform resume from hibernation: if the resume
from the hibernated image is successful, cr3 is flipped in order to point
to the address space of the kernel that is being resumed, which in turn
means that all the HT siblings are all of a sudden mwaiting on address
which is no longer valid.

That results in triple fault shortly after cr3 is switched, and machine
reboots.

Fix this by always waking up all the SMT siblings before initiating the
'restore from hibernation' process; this guarantees that all the HT
siblings will be properly carried over to the resumed kernel waiting in
resume_play_dead(), and acted upon accordingly afterwards, based on the
target kernel configuration.

Symmetricaly, the resumed kernel has to push the SMT siblings to mwait
again in case it has SMT disabled; this means it has to online all
the siblings when resuming (so that they come out of hlt) and offline
them again to let them reach mwait.

Cc: 4.19+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Debugged-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 0cc3cd21 ("cpu/hotplug: Boot HT siblings at least once")
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: NJosh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      ec527c31
  7. 31 5月, 2019 13 次提交
  9. 30 5月, 2019 1 次提交
    • R
      x86: intel_epb: Do not build when CONFIG_PM is unset · be1fcde6
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Commit 9ed09853 ("x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into account")
prevented the majority of the Performance and Energy Bias Hint (EPB)
handling code from being built when CONFIG_PM is unset to fix a
regression introduced by commit b9c273ba ("PM / arch: x86:
MSR_IA32_ENERGY_PERF_BIAS sysfs interface").

In hindsight, however, it would be better to skip all of the EPB
handling code for CONFIG_PM unset as there really is no reason for
it to be there in that case.  Namely, if the EPB is not touched
by the kernel at all with CONFIG_PM unset, there is no need to
worry about modifying the EPB inadvertently on CPU online and since
the system will not suspend or hibernate then, there is no need to
worry about possible modifications of the EPB by the platform
firmware during system-wide PM transitions.

For this reason, revert the changes made by commit 9ed09853
and only allow intel_epb.o to be built when CONFIG_PM is set.

Note that this changes the behavior of the kernels built with
CONFIG_PM unset as they will not modify the EPB on boot if it is
zero initially any more, so it is not a fix strictly speaking, but
users building their kernels with CONFIG_PM unset really should not
expect them to take energy efficiency into account.  Moreover, if
CONFIG_PM is unset for performance reasons, leaving EPB as set
initially by the platform firmware will actually be consistent
with the user's expectations.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      be1fcde6
  11. 28 5月, 2019 1 次提交
    • T
      KVM: s390: Do not report unusabled IDs via KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID · a86cb413
      由 Thomas Huth 提交于 
      KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID is currently always reporting KVM_MAX_VCPU_ID on all
architectures. However, on s390x, the amount of usable CPUs is determined
during runtime - it is depending on the features of the machine the code
is running on. Since we are using the vcpu_id as an index into the SCA
structures that are defined by the hardware (see e.g. the sca_add_vcpu()
function), it is not only the amount of CPUs that is limited by the hard-
ware, but also the range of IDs that we can use.
Thus KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID must be determined during runtime on s390x, too.
So the handling of KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPU_ID has to be moved from the common
code into the architecture specific code, and on s390x we have to return
the same value here as for KVM_CAP_MAX_VCPUS.
This problem has been discovered with the kvm_create_max_vcpus selftest.
With this change applied, the selftest now passes on s390x, too.
Reviewed-by: NAndrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NCornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20190523164309.13345-9-thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NChristian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
      a86cb413
  13. 25 5月, 2019 3 次提交