Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 4月, 2021 18 次提交
  3. 09 3月, 2021 9 次提交
  5. 08 2月, 2021 10 次提交
  7. 28 1月, 2021 3 次提交
    • J
      mm, slub: consider rest of partial list if acquire_slab() fails · 18940a66
      由 Jann Horn 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.9
commit c8c01da728ef65ad20d26a338819639a2ee25a13
bugzilla: 47457

--------------------------------

commit 8ff60eb0 upstream.

acquire_slab() fails if there is contention on the freelist of the page
(probably because some other CPU is concurrently freeing an object from
the page).  In that case, it might make sense to look for a different page
(since there might be more remote frees to the page from other CPUs, and
we don't want contention on struct page).

However, the current code accidentally stops looking at the partial list
completely in that case.  Especially on kernels without CONFIG_NUMA set,
this means that get_partial() fails and new_slab_objects() falls back to
new_slab(), allocating new pages.  This could lead to an unnecessary
increase in memory fragmentation.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201228130853.1871516-1-jannh@google.com
Fixes: 7ced3719 ("slub: Acquire_slab() avoid loop")
Signed-off-by: NJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Acked-by: NJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      18940a66
    • L
      mm: don't put pinned pages into the swap cache · 8d757a4b
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.9
commit 72c5ce89427feb277ac6f998a6ec27b820863fb5
bugzilla: 47457

--------------------------------

[ Upstream commit feb889fb ]

So technically there is nothing wrong with adding a pinned page to the
swap cache, but the pinning obviously means that the page can't actually
be free'd right now anyway, so it's a bit pointless.

However, the real problem is not with it being a bit pointless: the real
issue is that after we've added it to the swap cache, we'll try to unmap
the page.  That will succeed, because the code in mm/rmap.c doesn't know
or care about pinned pages.

Even the unmapping isn't fatal per se, since the page will stay around
in memory due to the pinning, and we do hold the connection to it using
the swap cache.  But when we then touch it next and take a page fault,
the logic in do_swap_page() will map it back into the process as a
possibly read-only page, and we'll then break the page association on
the next COW fault.

Honestly, this issue could have been fixed in any of those other places:
(a) we could refuse to unmap a pinned page (which makes conceptual
sense), or (b) we could make sure to re-map a pinned page writably in
do_swap_page(), or (c) we could just make do_wp_page() not COW the
pinned page (which was what we historically did before that "mm:
do_wp_page() simplification" commit).

But while all of them are equally valid models for breaking this chain,
not putting pinned pages into the swap cache in the first place is the
simplest one by far.

It's also the safest one: the reason why do_wp_page() was changed in the
first place was that getting the "can I re-use this page" wrong is so
fraught with errors.  If you do it wrong, you end up with an incorrectly
shared page.

As a result, using "page_maybe_dma_pinned()" in either do_wp_page() or
do_swap_page() would be a serious bug since it is only a (very good)
heuristic.  Re-using the page requires a hard black-and-white rule with
no room for ambiguity.

In contrast, saying "this page is very likely dma pinned, so let's not
add it to the swap cache and try to unmap it" is an obviously safe thing
to do, and if the heuristic might very rarely be a false positive, no
harm is done.

Fixes: 09854ba9 ("mm: do_wp_page() simplification")
Reported-and-tested-by: NMartin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org>
Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      8d757a4b
    • A
      mm/process_vm_access.c: include compat.h · 8f049a8d
      由 Andrew Morton 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.9
commit ccd903e26750b92c4cbb1bec0a451f8002838059
bugzilla: 47457

--------------------------------

commit eb351d75 upstream.

Fix the build error:

  mm/process_vm_access.c:277:5: error: implicit declaration of function 'in_compat_syscall'; did you mean 'in_ia32_syscall'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]

Fixes: 38dc5079 "Fix compat regression in process_vm_rw()"
Reported-by: syzbot+5b0d0de84d6c65b8dd2b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Cc: Kyle Huey <me@kylehuey.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NChen Jun <chenjun102@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      8f049a8d