Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 10 5月, 2022 2 次提交
  3. 22 4月, 2022 1 次提交
    • Y
      jbd2: fix a potential race while discarding reserved buffers after an abort · 23e3d7f7
      由 Ye Bin 提交于 
      we got issue as follows:
[   72.796117] EXT4-fs error (device sda): ext4_journal_check_start:83: comm fallocate: Detected aborted journal
[   72.826847] EXT4-fs (sda): Remounting filesystem read-only
fallocate: fallocate failed: Read-only file system
[   74.791830] jbd2_journal_commit_transaction: jh=0xffff9cfefe725d90 bh=0x0000000000000000 end delay
[   74.793597] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[   74.794203] kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/transaction.c:2063!
[   74.794886] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
[   74.795533] CPU: 4 PID: 2260 Comm: jbd2/sda-8 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc8-next-20220315-dirty #150
[   74.798327] RIP: 0010:__jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer+0x3e/0x60
[   74.801971] RSP: 0018:ffffa828c24a3cb8 EFLAGS: 00010202
[   74.802694] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
[   74.803601] RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffff9cfefe725d90 RDI: ffff9cfefe725d90
[   74.804554] RBP: ffff9cfefe725d90 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa828c24a3b20
[   74.805471] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9cfefe725d90
[   74.806385] R13: ffff9cfefe725d98 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9cfe833a4d00
[   74.807301] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9d01afb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[   74.808338] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[   74.809084] CR2: 00007f2b81bf4000 CR3: 0000000100056000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[   74.810047] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[   74.810981] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[   74.811897] Call Trace:
[   74.812241]  <TASK>
[   74.812566]  __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0x12f/0x180
[   74.813246]  jbd2_journal_refile_buffer+0x4c/0xa0
[   74.813869]  jbd2_journal_commit_transaction.cold+0xa1/0x148
[   74.817550]  kjournald2+0xf8/0x3e0
[   74.819056]  kthread+0x153/0x1c0
[   74.819963]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30

Above issue may happen as follows:
        write                   truncate                   kjournald2
generic_perform_write
 ext4_write_begin
  ext4_walk_page_buffers
   do_journal_get_write_access ->add BJ_Reserved list
 ext4_journalled_write_end
  ext4_walk_page_buffers
   write_end_fn
    ext4_handle_dirty_metadata
                ***************JBD2 ABORT**************
     jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata
 -> return -EROFS, jh in reserved_list
                                                   jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
                                                    while (commit_transaction->t_reserved_list)
                                                      jh = commit_transaction->t_reserved_list;
                        truncate_pagecache_range
                         do_invalidatepage
			  ext4_journalled_invalidatepage
			   jbd2_journal_invalidatepage
			    journal_unmap_buffer
			     __dispose_buffer
			      __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer
			       jbd2_journal_put_journal_head ->put last ref_count
			        __journal_remove_journal_head
				 bh->b_private = NULL;
				 jh->b_bh = NULL;
				                      jbd2_journal_refile_buffer(journal, jh);
							bh = jh2bh(jh);
							->bh is NULL, later will trigger null-ptr-deref
				 journal_free_journal_head(jh);

After commit 96f1e097, we no longer hold the j_state_lock while
iterating over the list of reserved handles in
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction().  This potentially allows the
journal_head to be freed by journal_unmap_buffer while the commit
codepath is also trying to free the BJ_Reserved buffers.  Keeping
j_state_lock held while trying extends hold time of the lock
minimally, and solves this issue.

Fixes: 96f1e097("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock while committing a transaction")
Signed-off-by: NYe Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220317142137.1821590-1-yebin10@huawei.comSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      23e3d7f7
  5. 03 2月, 2022 2 次提交
  7. 28 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 07 11月, 2020 2 次提交
  11. 22 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 18 10月, 2020 2 次提交
  15. 22 5月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 06 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 14 2月, 2020 2 次提交
  21. 25 1月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 06 11月, 2019 3 次提交
  25. 21 10月, 2019 2 次提交
    • T
      jbd2: Make state lock a spinlock · 46417064
      由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于 
      Bit-spinlocks are problematic on PREEMPT_RT if functions which might sleep
on RT, e.g. spin_lock(), alloc/free(), are invoked inside the lock held
region because bit spinlocks disable preemption even on RT.

A first attempt was to replace state lock with a spinlock placed in struct
buffer_head and make the locking conditional on PREEMPT_RT and
DEBUG_BIT_SPINLOCKS.

Jan pointed out that there is a 4 byte hole in struct journal_head where a
regular spinlock fits in and he would not object to convert the state lock
to a spinlock unconditionally.

Aside of solving the RT problem, this also gains lockdep coverage for the
journal head state lock (bit-spinlocks are not covered by lockdep as it's
hard to fit a lockdep map into a single bit).

The trivial change would have been to convert the jbd_*lock_bh_state()
inlines, but that comes with the downside that these functions take a
buffer head pointer which needs to be converted to a journal head pointer
which adds another level of indirection.

As almost all functions which use this lock have a journal head pointer
readily available, it makes more sense to remove the lock helper inlines
and write out spin_*lock() at all call sites.

Fixup all locking comments as well.
Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-7-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      46417064
    • J
      jbd2: Move dropping of jh reference out of un/re-filing functions · 93108ebb
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      __jbd2_journal_unfile_buffer() and __jbd2_journal_refile_buffer() drop
transaction's jh reference when they remove jh from a transaction. This
will be however inconvenient once we move state lock into journal_head
itself as we still need to unlock it and we'd need to grab jh reference
just for that. Move dropping of jh reference out of these functions into
the few callers.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190809124233.13277-4-jack@suse.czSigned-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      93108ebb
  27. 21 6月, 2019 1 次提交
    • R
      jbd2: introduce jbd2_inode dirty range scoping · 6ba0e7dc
      由 Ross Zwisler 提交于 
      Currently both journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() operate on the entire address space
of each of the inodes associated with a given journal entry.  The
consequence of this is that if we have an inode where we are constantly
appending dirty pages we can end up waiting for an indefinite amount of
time in journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() while we wait for all the
pages under writeback to be written out.

The easiest way to cause this type of workload is do just dd from
/dev/zero to a file until it fills the entire filesystem.  This can
cause journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() to wait for the duration of
the entire dd operation.

We can improve this situation by scoping each of the inode dirty ranges
associated with a given transaction.  We do this via the jbd2_inode
structure so that the scoping is contained within jbd2 and so that it
follows the lifetime and locking rules for that structure.

This allows us to limit the writeback & wait in
journal_submit_inode_data_buffers() and
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() respectively to the dirty range for
a given struct jdb2_inode, keeping us from waiting forever if the inode
in question is still being appended to.
Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <zwisler@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      6ba0e7dc
  29. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 01 3月, 2019 1 次提交
    • L
      jbd2: fix invalid descriptor block checksum · 6e876c3d
      由 luojiajun 提交于 
      In jbd2_journal_commit_transaction(), if we are in abort mode,
we may flush the buffer without setting descriptor block checksum
by goto start_journal_io. Then fs is mounted,
jbd2_descriptor_block_csum_verify() failed.

[  271.379811] EXT4-fs (vdd): shut down requested (2)
[  271.381827] Aborting journal on device vdd-8.
[  271.597136] JBD2: Invalid checksum recovering block 22199 in log
[  271.598023] JBD2: recovery failed
[  271.598484] EXT4-fs (vdd): error loading journal

Fix this problem by keep setting descriptor block checksum if the
descriptor buffer is not NULL.

This checksum problem can be reproduced by xfstests generic/388.
Signed-off-by: Nluojiajun <luojiajun3@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      6e876c3d
  33. 04 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock while committing a transaction · 96f1e097
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      We can hold j_state_lock for writing at the beginning of
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() for a rather long time (reportedly for
30 ms) due cleaning revoke bits of all revoked buffers under it. The
handling of revoke tables as well as cleaning of t_reserved_list, and
checkpoint lists does not need j_state_lock for anything. It is only
needed to prevent new handles from joining the transaction. Generally
T_LOCKED transaction state prevents new handles from joining the
transaction - except for reserved handles which have to allowed to join
while we wait for other handles to complete.

To prevent reserved handles from joining the transaction while cleaning
up lists, add new transaction state T_SWITCH and watch for it when
starting reserved handles. With this we can just drop the lock for
operations that don't need it.
Reported-and-tested-by: NAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Suggested-by: N"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      96f1e097
  35. 30 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  37. 18 12月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      ext4: fix up remaining files with SPDX cleanups · f5166768
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      A number of ext4 source files were skipped due because their copyright
permission statements didn't match the expected text used by the
automated conversion utilities.  I've added SPDX tags for the rest.

While looking at some of these files, I've noticed that we have quite
a bit of variation on the licenses that were used --- in particular
some of the Red Hat licenses on the jbd2 files use a GPL2+ license,
and we have some files that have a LGPL-2.1 license (which was quite
surprising).

I've not attempted to do any license changes.  Even if it is perfectly
legal to relicense to GPL 2.0-only for consistency's sake, that should
be done with ext4 developer community discussion.
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      f5166768
  39. 06 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  41. 14 1月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      fs/jbd2, locking/mutex, sched/wait: Use mutex_lock_io() for journal->j_checkpoint_mutex · 6fa7aa50
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      When an ext4 fs is bogged down by a lot of metadata IOs (in the
reported case, it was deletion of millions of files, but any massive
amount of journal writes would do), after the journal is filled up,
tasks which try to access the filesystem and aren't currently
performing the journal writes end up waiting in
__jbd2_log_wait_for_space() for journal->j_checkpoint_mutex.

Because those mutex sleeps aren't marked as iowait, this condition can
lead to misleadingly low iowait and /proc/stat:procs_blocked.  While
iowait propagation is far from strict, this condition can be triggered
fairly easily and annotating these sleeps correctly helps initial
diagnosis quite a bit.

Use the new mutex_lock_io() for journal->j_checkpoint_mutex so that
these sleeps are properly marked as iowait.
Reported-by: NMingbo Wan <mingbo@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-team@fb.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1477673892-28940-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      6fa7aa50
  43. 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  45. 12 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  47. 30 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  49. 08 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  51. 24 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      jbd2: add support for avoiding data writes during transaction commits · 41617e1a
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Currently when filesystem needs to make sure data is on permanent
storage before committing a transaction it adds inode to transaction's
inode list. During transaction commit, jbd2 writes back all dirty
buffers that have allocated underlying blocks and waits for the IO to
finish. However when doing writeback for delayed allocated data, we
allocate blocks and immediately submit the data. Thus asking jbd2 to
write dirty pages just unnecessarily adds more work to jbd2 possibly
writing back other redirtied blocks.

Add support to jbd2 to allow filesystem to ask jbd2 to only wait for
outstanding data writes before committing a transaction and thus avoid
unnecessary writes.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NTheodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
      41617e1a
  53. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于 
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  55. 23 2月, 2016 4 次提交
  57. 18 10月, 2015 1 次提交