- 18 3月, 2020 2 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
All the 0x2526 devices are now in the new table, so we can start reusing configurations and adding the strings independently to all of them, reusing them when possible. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200309091348.88e3d47c42a8.I1bd37ae0d0f9f79732f03badf84d7d063993b73e@changeid
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Now that we have the strings separate from the rest, we can move the remaining 0x2526 devices to the new table in preparation to reuse the configs. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20200309091348.a7998f8d7507.I4be8776edb8c30416efc184c66f11add5eed06de@changeid
-
- 04 1月, 2020 3 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
We have a lot of mostly duplicated data structures that are repeated only because the device name string is different. To avoid this, move the string from the cfg to the trans structure and add it independently from the rest of the configuration to the PCI mapping tables. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Add a new device table that contains information that can be checked at runtime in order to decide which configuration to use. This allows us to map the full cfg independently from the tran-specific configuration. This is the first step in creating the new table. Subsequent patches will add the possibility of checking different values at runtime in order to make the decision. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
With the new concept of separating the trans-specific (trans_cfg) data from the rest of the cfg, we will start mapping only the trans_cfg part to the PCI device ID/subsystem device ID. So we can assume that the data passed to the probe function contains the trans_cfg, but since the full cfg still contains the trans_cfg at the beginning, we can allow a full cfg to be passed as well. This makes it easier to convert the existing tables one by one. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 23 12月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
We needed this abstraction for some CSR registers for IWL_DEVICE_22560, but that has been removed, so we don't need the abstraction anymore. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
A few configuration structures were either not referenced anymore or assigned to devices IDs that were not in use anymore. Remove them. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Johannes Berg 提交于
For HE-capable devices, we need to allocate more receive buffers as there could be 256 frames aggregated into a single A-MPDU, and then they might contain A-MSDUs as well. Until 22000 family, the devices are able to put multiple frames into a single RB and the default RB size is 4k, but starting from AX210 family this is no longer true. On the other hand, those newer devices only use 2k receive buffers (by default). Modify the code and configuration to allocate an appropriate number of RBs depending on the device capabilities: * 4096 for AX210 HE devices, which use 2k buffers by default, * 2048 for 22000 family devices which use 4k buffers by default, * 512 for existing 9000 family devices, which doesn't really change anything since that's the default before this patch, * 512 also for AX210/22000 family devices that don't do HE. Theoretically, for devices lower than AX210, we wouldn't have to allocate that many RBs if the RB size was manually increased, but to support that the code got more complex, and it didn't really seem necessary as that's a use case for monitor mode only, where hopefully the wasted memory isn't really much of a concern. Note that AX210 devices actually support bigger than 12-bit VID, which is required here as we want to allocate 4096 buffers plus some for quick recycling, so adjust the code for that as well. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anders Kaseorg 提交于
This reverts commit 968dcfb4. Both that commit and commit 809805a8 attempted to fix the same bug (dead assignments to the local variable cfg), but they did so in incompatible ways. When they were both merged, independently of each other, the combination actually caused the bug to reappear, leading to a firmware crash on boot for some cards. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=205719Signed-off-by: NAnders Kaseorg <andersk@mit.edu> Acked-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 23 10月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
When converting the wrong qu configurations in an earlier commit, I accidentally swapped 0x2720 and 0x30DC. Instead of converting 0x2720, I converted 0x30DC. Undo 0x30DC and convert 0x2720. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
A bunch of the entries for qnj were wrong. The 9460 device doesn't exist, so update them to 9461 and 9462. There are still a bunch of other occurrences of 9460, but that will be fixed separately. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Some entries for PCI ID 0x2720 were using iwl9260_2ac_cfg, but the correct is to use iwl9260_2ac_cfg_soc. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Two patches were sent out of order: one removed some conditions from an if and the other moved the code elsewhere. When sending the patch that moved the code, an older version of the original code was moved, causing the "make QnJ exclusive" code to be essentially undone. Fix that by removing the inclusive conditions from the check again. Fixes: 809805a8 ("iwlwifi: pcie: move some cfg mangling from trans_pcie_alloc to probe") Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 09 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
There were a bunch of devices with qu and jf that were loading the configuration with pu and jf, which is wrong. Fix them all accordingly. Additionally, remove 0x1010 and 0x1210 subsytem IDs from the list, since they are obviously wrong, and 0x0044 and 0x0244, which were duplicate. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 06 9月, 2019 11 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Stop accessing the trans configuration via the iwl_cfg structure and always access it via the iwl_trans structure. This completes the requirements to disassociate the trans-specific configuration from the rest of the configuration. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Add a pointer to the iwl_trans structure and point it to the trans part of the cfg. This is the first step in disassociating the trans configuration from the rest of the configuration. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Instead of accessing the iwl_config_trans_params from the cfg that is stored in the trans struct, pass this structure directly to functions that need it during trans_alloc. This will be useful to isolate the elements needed during allocation and pass them separately before the actual cfg struct is known. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Instead of setting the cfg to iwl_trans already during allocation, set it only later when we have had the time to decide which cfg to use. This is part of the effort to be able to decide the cfg based on HW revision and RF ID after iwl_trans_alloc() has been called. For now, since we still have a bunch of code checking the HW revision and the RF ID, we set iwl_trans->cfg early, even before we decided the real cfg to use. We only use the trans configuration at this point, so this is fine for now. In the future, the trans configuration will be completely independent from the rest of the config structure, so we'll be able to avoid this. Additionally, we can't access the PRPH registers in iwl_trans_alloc() anymore, so move the HW REV C-step check for family 8000 code later to the probe function as well. This step is probably not necessary, but if that's the case it should be removed separately later on. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
There were a couple of special handling to find the correct cfg inside iwl_trans_pcie_alloc(). Move them to iwl_pci_probe() so they're together with the rest of the decisions. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
In order to be able to select the cfg depending on the HW revision or on the RF ID, we need to set up the trans before selecting the cfg. To do so, move the elements from cfg that are needed by iwl_trans_alloc() to a separate struct at the top of the cfg, so it can be used by other cfg types as well, before selecting the rest of the configuration. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This means: 1) stop calling pm_runtime_resume when starting the hardware 2) removing the unneeded low_power parameter to start / stop hw / fw transport ops 3) squashing transport functions that are now the same _iwl_trans_pcie_start_hw / iwl_trans_pcie_start_hw Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
Remove the now unneeded functions that called those from the transport layer. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is always set to IWL_PLAT_PM_MODE_DISABLED Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This flag should never be set unless integration work with the platform is done. We don't support any platforms officially and don't plan to do so in the near future, so we can remove this option entirely in order to avoid having it enabled by mistake. This has been marked with "depends on EXPERT", so there shouldn't be many systems running with it set. And, if there are systems, they should not be using this flag. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Emmanuel Grumbach 提交于
This is set but never read. Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 03 9月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
We were erroneously assigning the new configuration to a local variable cfg, but that was not being assigned to anything, so the change was getting lost. Assign directly to iwl_trans->cfg instead. Fixes: 5a8c31aa ("iwlwifi: pcie: fix recognition of QuZ devices") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2 Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 29 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
We need to use a different firmware for C0 versions of killer Qu NICs. Add structures for them and handle them in the if block that detects C0 revisions. Additionally, instead of having an inclusive check for QnJ devices, make the selection exclusive, so that switching to QnJ is the exception, not the default. This prevents us from having to add all the non-QnJ cards to an exclusion list. To do so, only go into the QnJ block if the device has an RF ID type HR and HW revision QnJ. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2 Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20190821171732.2266-1-luca@coelho.fiSigned-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
If the HW revision of Qu devices we found is QuZ, then we need to switch the configuration accordingly in order to use the correct FW. Add a block of ifs in order do that. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 31 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
Add a few PCI ID'S for 9000 series. Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
Add support for C-step devices. Currently we don't have a nice way of matching the step and choosing the proper configuration, so we need to switch the config structs one by one. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
add two new PCI ID's for 9000 and 20000 series Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 24 6月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
change the fw of 0x02F0 platform from qu to quz Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
add few PCI ID'S for 22000 and chainge few cards structs names Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
add few PCI ID'S for 22000 and fix the wrong name for one of the structs Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
-
- 19 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Luca Coelho 提交于
This device ID and device type was never released, so we can remove it from the PCI IDs list. Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 03 4月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
Two of the PCI ID entries for the 22260 series were incorrectly using the subsystem vendor ID (which we ignore) as the PCI device ID. This is obviously wrong and can be simply removed since we already have the correct entries in the list. Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the return value. The function can work or not, but the code logic should never do something different based on this. Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com> Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com> Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
add new PCI ID 0x2723/0x2080 for 22000 series Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
rename few structs to fit the new marketing names Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-
- 21 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ihab Zhaika 提交于
Add a few PCI ID'S for 22000 and killer series in addition to chainging the marketing name. Signed-off-by: NIhab Zhaika <ihab.zhaika@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
-