Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 03 12月, 2014 6 次提交
    • J
      drm/i915: Convert 'i915_seqno_passed' calls into 'i915_gem_request_completed' · 1b5a433a
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      Almost everywhere that caled i915_seqno_passed() was really asking 'has the
given seqno popped out of the hardware yet?'. Thus it had to query the current
hardware seqno and then do a signed delta comparison (which copes with wrapping
around zero but not with seqno values more than 2GB apart, although the latter
is unlikely!).

Now that the majority of seqno instances have been replaced with request
structures, it is possible to convert this test to be request based as well.
There is now a 'i915_gem_request_completed()' function which takes a request and
returns true or false as appropriate. Note that this currently just wraps up the
original _passed() test but a later patch in the series will reduce this to
simply returning a cached internal value, i.e.:
  _completed(req) { return req->completed; }'

This checkin converts almost all _seqno_passed() calls. The only one left is in
the semaphore code which still requires seqnos not request structures.

For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop hunk touching the trace_irq code since I've dropped the
patch which converts that, and resolve resulting conflict.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1b5a433a
    • J
      drm/i915: Convert 'ring_idle()' to use requests not seqnos · 44cdd6d2
      由 John Harrison 提交于 
      More seqno value to request structure conversions. Note, this change temporarily
moves the 'get_seqno()' call inside ring_idle() but this will disappear again in
a later patch when i915_seqno_passed() itself is converted.

For: VIZ-4377
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NThomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      44cdd6d2
    • I
      drm/i915: mask RPS IRQs properly when disabling RPS · 9939fba2
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      Atm, igt/gem_reset_stats can trigger the recently added WARN on
left-over PM_IIR bits in gen6_enable_rps_interrupts(). There are two
reasons for this:
1. we call intel_enable_gt_powersave() without a preceeding
   intel_disable_gt_powersave()
2. gen6_disable_rps_interrupts() doesn't mask interrupts in PM_IMR

1. means RPS interrupts will remain enabled and can be serviced during
the HW initialization after a GPU reset. 2. means even if we called
gen6_disable_rps_interrupts() any new RPS interrupt during RPS
initialization would still propagate to PM_IIR too early (though
wouldn't be serviced).

This patch solves the 2. issue by also masking interrupts in PM_IMR, the
following patch fixes 1. getting rid of the WARN. This also makes
intel_enable_gt_powersave() and intel_disable_gt_powersave() more
symmetric.

Since gen6_disable_rps_interrupts() is called during driver loading with
i915 interrupts disabled add a new version of gen6_disable_pm_irq() that
doesn't WARN for this.

Also while at it, get the irq_lock around the whole PM_IMR/IER/IIR
programming sequence and make sure that any queued PM_IIR bit is also
cleared.

The WARN was caught by PRTS after I sent my previous RPS sanitizing
patchset and I could easily reproduce it on HSW. To actually fix it we
also need the next patch.
Reported-by: NHe, Shuang <shuang.he@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      9939fba2
    • D
      drm/i915: Tune down spurious CRC interrupt warning · 34273620
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      We don't really synchronously turn them off from debugfs. We try to
avoid hitting them too badly by waiting one vblank, but apparently the
irq handler can still race through that gap.

Since this isn't really all that important for testcases, only for
debugging CRC issues let's tune it down to a debug message.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82602
Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Acked-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
      34273620
    • V
      drm/i915: Grab modeset locks for GPU rest on pre-ctg · 7514747d
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      On gen4 and earlier the GPU reset also resets the display, so we should
protect against concurrent modeset operations. Grab all the modeset locks
around the entire GPU reset dance, remebering first ti dislogde any
pending page flip to make sure we don't deadlock. Any pageflip coming
in between these two steps should fail anyway due to reset_in_progress,
so this should be safe.

This fixes a lot of failed asserts in the modeset code when there's a
modeset racing with the reset. Naturally the asserts aren't happy when
the expected state has disappeared.

v2: Drop UMS checks, complete pending flips after the reset (Daniel)

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7514747d
    • D
      drm/i915: Stop gathering error states for CS error interrupts · aaecdf61
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      There's quite a few bug reports with error states where the error
reasons makes just about no sense at all. Like dying on tlbs for a
display plane that's not even there. Also users don't really report a
lot of bad side effects generally, just the error states.

Furthermore we don't even enable these interrupts any more on gen5+
(though the handling code is still there). So this mostly concerns old
platforms.

Given all that lets make our lives a bit easier and stop capturing
error states, in the hopes that we can just ignore them. In case
that's not true and the gpu indeed dies the hangcheck should
eventually kick in. And I've left some debug log in to make this case
noticeble. Referenced bug is just an example.

v2: Fix missing \n Jani spotted.

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82095
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85944Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      aaecdf61
  3. 21 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 20 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 19 11月, 2014 4 次提交
    • I
      drm/i915: sanitize rps irq disabling · d4d70aa5
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      When disabling the RPS interrupts there is a tricky dependency between
the thread disabling the interrupts, the RPS interrupt handler and the
corresponding RPS work. The RPS work can reenable the interrupts, so
there is no straightforward order in the disabling thread to (1) make
sure that any RPS work is flushed and to (2) disable all RPS
interrupts. Currently this is solved by masking the interrupts using two
separate mask registers (first level display IMR and PM IMR) and doing
the disabling when all first level interrupts are disabled.

This works, but the requirement to run with all first level interrupts
disabled is unnecessary making the suspend / unload time ordering of RPS
disabling wrt. other unitialization steps difficult and error prone.
Removing this restriction allows us to disable RPS early during suspend
/ unload and forget about it for the rest of the sequence. By adding a
more explicit method for avoiding the above race, it also becomes easier
to prove its correctness. Finally currently we can hit the WARN in
snb_update_pm_irq(), when a final RPS work runs with the first level
interrupts already disabled. This won't lead to any problem (due to the
separate interrupt masks), but with the change in this and the next
patch we can get rid of the WARN, while leaving it in place for other
scenarios.

To address the above points, add a new RPS interrupts_enabled flag and
use this during RPS disabling to avoid requeuing the RPS work and
reenabling of the RPS interrupts. Since the interrupt disabling happens
now in intel_suspend_gt_powersave(), we will disable RPS interrupts
explicitly during suspend (and not just through the first level mask),
but there is no problem doing so, it's also more consistent and allows
us to unify more of the RPS disabling during suspend and unload time in
the next patch.

v2/v3:
- rebase on patch "drm/i915: move rps irq disable one level up" in the
  patchset
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d4d70aa5
    • I
      drm/i915: sanitize rps irq enabling · 3cc134e3
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      Atm we first enable the RPS interrupts then we clear any pending ones.
By this we could lose an interrupt arriving after we unmasked it. This
may not be a problem as the caller should handle such a race, but logic
still calls for the opposite order. Also we can delay enabling the
interrupts until after all the RPS initialization is ready with the
following order:

1. disable left-over RPS (earlier via intel_uncore_sanitize)
2. clear any pending RPS interrupts
3. initialize RPS
4. enable RPS interrupts

This also allows us to do the 2. and 4. step the same way for all
platforms, so let's follow this order to simplifying things.

Also make sure any queued interrupts are also cleared.

v2:
- rebase on the GEN9 patches where we don't support RPS yet, so we
  musn't enable RPS interrupts on it (Paulo)
v3:
- avoid enabling RPS interrupts on GEN>9 too (Paulo)
- clarify the RPS init sequence in the log message (Chris)
- add POSTING_READ to gen6_reset_rps_interrupts() (Paulo)
- WARN if any PM_IIR bits are set in gen6_enable_rps_interrupts()
  (Paulo)
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      3cc134e3
    • I
      drm/i915: WARN if we receive any rps interrupts on gen>9 · 4a74de82
      由 Imre Deak 提交于 
      This extends

commit 132f3f17
Author: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Nov 10 15:34:33 2014 +0200

    drm/i915: WARN if we receive any gen9 rps interrupts

to GEN>9 platforms as suggested by Paulo.
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      4a74de82
    • C
      drm/i915: Don't continually defer the hangcheck · 672e7b7c
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      With multiple rings, we may continue to render on the blitter whilst
executing an infinite shader on the render ring. As we currently, rearm
the timer with each execbuf, in this scenario the hangcheck will never
fire and we will never detect the lockup on the render ring. Instead,
only arm the timer once per hangcheck, so that hangcheck runs more
frequently.

v2: Rearrange code to avoid triggering a BUG_ON in add_timer from
softirq context.

Testcase: igt/gem_reset_stats/defer-hangcheck*
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86225Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      672e7b7c
  9. 15 11月, 2014 2 次提交
  11. 14 11月, 2014 5 次提交
  13. 08 11月, 2014 13 次提交
  15. 24 10月, 2014 4 次提交
  17. 16 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 08 10月, 2014 1 次提交
  21. 03 10月, 2014 2 次提交