Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 4月, 2021 2 次提交
  3. 14 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 09 4月, 2021 3 次提交
  7. 09 3月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      Revert "mm: memcontrol: avoid workload stalls when lowering memory.high" · c0daedd0
      由 Johannes Weiner 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.16
commit dd0a41bc17bb9e934e401246ab2f8d269a49c6cf
bugzilla: 48168

--------------------------------

commit e82553c1 upstream.

This reverts commit 536d3bf2, as it can
cause writers to memory.high to get stuck in the kernel forever,
performing page reclaim and consuming excessive amounts of CPU cycles.

Before the patch, a write to memory.high would first put the new limit
in place for the workload, and then reclaim the requested delta.  After
the patch, the kernel tries to reclaim the delta before putting the new
limit into place, in order to not overwhelm the workload with a sudden,
large excess over the limit.  However, if reclaim is actively racing
with new allocations from the uncurbed workload, it can keep the write()
working inside the kernel indefinitely.

This is causing problems in Facebook production.  A privileged
system-level daemon that adjusts memory.high for various workloads
running on a host can get unexpectedly stuck in the kernel and
essentially turn into a sort of involuntary kswapd for one of the
workloads.  We've observed that daemon busy-spin in a write() for
minutes at a time, neglecting its other duties on the system, and
expending privileged system resources on behalf of a workload.

To remedy this, we have first considered changing the reclaim logic to
break out after a couple of loops - whether the workload has converged
to the new limit or not - and bound the write() call this way.  However,
the root cause that inspired the sequence change in the first place has
been fixed through other means, and so a revert back to the proven
limit-setting sequence, also used by memory.max, is preferable.

The sequence was changed to avoid extreme latencies in the workload when
the limit was lowered: the sudden, large excess created by the limit
lowering would erroneously trigger the penalty sleeping code that is
meant to throttle excessive growth from below.  Allocating threads could
end up sleeping long after the write() had already reclaimed the delta
for which they were being punished.

However, erroneous throttling also caused problems in other scenarios at
around the same time.  This resulted in commit b3ff9291 ("mm, memcg:
reclaim more aggressively before high allocator throttling"), included
in the same release as the offending commit.  When allocating threads
now encounter large excess caused by a racing write() to memory.high,
instead of entering punitive sleeps, they will simply be tasked with
helping reclaim down the excess, and will be held no longer than it
takes to accomplish that.  This is in line with regular limit
enforcement - i.e.  if the workload allocates up against or over an
otherwise unchanged limit from below.

With the patch breaking userspace, and the root cause addressed by other
means already, revert it again.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210122184341.292461-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org
Fixes: 536d3bf2 ("mm: memcontrol: avoid workload stalls when lowering memory.high")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[5.8+]
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      c0daedd0
  9. 08 2月, 2021 1 次提交
    • R
      mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining · 8385f0f9
      由 Roman Gushchin 提交于 
      stable inclusion
from stable-5.10.11
commit 26f54dac15640c65ec69867e182de7be708ea389
bugzilla: 47621

--------------------------------

commit 3de7d4f2 upstream.

Imran Khan reported a 16% regression in hackbench results caused by the
commit f2fe7b09 ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects
instead of pages").  The regression is noticeable in the case of a
consequent allocation of several relatively large slab objects, e.g.
skb's.  As soon as the amount of stocked bytes exceeds PAGE_SIZE,
drain_obj_stock() and __memcg_kmem_uncharge() are called, and it leads
to a number of atomic operations in page_counter_uncharge().

The corresponding call graph is below (provided by Imran Khan):

  |__alloc_skb
  |    |
  |    |__kmalloc_reserve.isra.61
  |    |    |
  |    |    |__kmalloc_node_track_caller
  |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |slab_pre_alloc_hook.constprop.88
  |    |    |     obj_cgroup_charge
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |__memcg_kmem_charge
  |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |page_counter_try_charge
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |refill_obj_stock
  |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |drain_obj_stock.isra.68
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |__memcg_kmem_uncharge
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |page_counter_uncharge
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |    |page_counter_cancel
  |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |__slab_alloc
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |    |___slab_alloc
  |    |    |    |    |
  |    |    |    |slab_post_alloc_hook

Instead of directly uncharging the accounted kernel memory, it's
possible to refill the generic page-sized per-cpu stock instead.  It's a
much faster operation, especially on a default hierarchy.  As a bonus,
__memcg_kmem_uncharge_page() will also get faster, so the freeing of
page-sized kernel allocations (e.g.  large kmallocs) will become faster.

A similar change has been done earlier for the socket memory by the
commit 475d0487 ("mm: memcontrol: use per-cpu stocks for socket
memory uncharging").

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210106042239.2860107-1-guro@fb.com
Fixes: f2fe7b09 ("mm: memcg/slab: charge individual slab objects instead of pages")
Signed-off-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reported-by: NImran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Tested-by: NImran Khan <imran.f.khan@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Koutn <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NXie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
      8385f0f9
  11. 12 1月, 2021 2 次提交
  13. 23 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 03 11月, 2020 2 次提交
  17. 19 10月, 2020 5 次提交
  19. 14 10月, 2020 11 次提交
  21. 27 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 25 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 06 9月, 2020 1 次提交
    • M
      memcg: fix use-after-free in uncharge_batch · f1796544
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      syzbot has reported an use-after-free in the uncharge_batch path

  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in instrument_atomic_write include/linux/instrumented.h:71 [inline]
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic64_sub_return include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:970 [inline]
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in atomic_long_sub_return include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:113 [inline]
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in page_counter_cancel mm/page_counter.c:54 [inline]
  BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in page_counter_uncharge+0x3d/0xc0 mm/page_counter.c:155
  Write of size 8 at addr ffff8880371c0148 by task syz-executor.0/9304

  CPU: 0 PID: 9304 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 5.8.0-syzkaller #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
  Call Trace:
    __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
    dump_stack+0x1f0/0x31e lib/dump_stack.c:118
    print_address_description+0x66/0x620 mm/kasan/report.c:383
    __kasan_report mm/kasan/report.c:513 [inline]
    kasan_report+0x132/0x1d0 mm/kasan/report.c:530
    check_memory_region_inline mm/kasan/generic.c:183 [inline]
    check_memory_region+0x2b5/0x2f0 mm/kasan/generic.c:192
    instrument_atomic_write include/linux/instrumented.h:71 [inline]
    atomic64_sub_return include/asm-generic/atomic-instrumented.h:970 [inline]
    atomic_long_sub_return include/asm-generic/atomic-long.h:113 [inline]
    page_counter_cancel mm/page_counter.c:54 [inline]
    page_counter_uncharge+0x3d/0xc0 mm/page_counter.c:155
    uncharge_batch+0x6c/0x350 mm/memcontrol.c:6764
    uncharge_page+0x115/0x430 mm/memcontrol.c:6796
    uncharge_list mm/memcontrol.c:6835 [inline]
    mem_cgroup_uncharge_list+0x70/0xe0 mm/memcontrol.c:6877
    release_pages+0x13a2/0x1550 mm/swap.c:911
    tlb_batch_pages_flush mm/mmu_gather.c:49 [inline]
    tlb_flush_mmu_free mm/mmu_gather.c:242 [inline]
    tlb_flush_mmu+0x780/0x910 mm/mmu_gather.c:249
    tlb_finish_mmu+0xcb/0x200 mm/mmu_gather.c:328
    exit_mmap+0x296/0x550 mm/mmap.c:3185
    __mmput+0x113/0x370 kernel/fork.c:1076
    exit_mm+0x4cd/0x550 kernel/exit.c:483
    do_exit+0x576/0x1f20 kernel/exit.c:793
    do_group_exit+0x161/0x2d0 kernel/exit.c:903
    get_signal+0x139b/0x1d30 kernel/signal.c:2743
    arch_do_signal+0x33/0x610 arch/x86/kernel/signal.c:811
    exit_to_user_mode_loop kernel/entry/common.c:135 [inline]
    exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x8d/0x1b0 kernel/entry/common.c:166
    syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x5e/0x1a0 kernel/entry/common.c:241
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Commit 1a3e1f40 ("mm: memcontrol: decouple reference counting from
page accounting") reworked the memcg lifetime to be bound the the struct
page rather than charges.  It also removed the css_put_many from
uncharge_batch and that is causing the above splat.

uncharge_batch() is supposed to uncharge accumulated charges for all
pages freed from the same memcg.  The queuing is done by uncharge_page
which however drops the memcg reference after it adds charges to the
batch.  If the current page happens to be the last one holding the
reference for its memcg then the memcg is OK to go and the next page to
be freed will trigger batched uncharge which needs to access the memcg
which is gone already.

Fix the issue by taking a reference for the memcg in the current batch.

Fixes: 1a3e1f40 ("mm: memcontrol: decouple reference counting from page accounting")
Reported-by: syzbot+b305848212deec86eabe@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+b5ea6fb6f139c8b9482b@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200820090341.GC5033@dhcp22.suse.czSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f1796544
  27. 15 8月, 2020 1 次提交
  29. 14 8月, 2020 1 次提交
    • J
      mm: memcontrol: fix warning when allocating the root cgroup · 9f457179
      由 Johannes Weiner 提交于 
      Commit 3e38e0aa ("mm: memcg: charge memcg percpu memory to the
parent cgroup") adds memory tracking to the memcg kernel structures
themselves to make cgroups liable for the memory they are consuming
through the allocation of child groups (which can be significant).

This code is a bit awkward as it's spread out through several functions:
The outermost function does memalloc_use_memcg(parent) to set up
current->active_memcg, which designates which cgroup to charge, and the
inner functions pass GFP_ACCOUNT to request charging for specific
allocations.  To make sure this dependency is satisfied at all times -
to make sure we don't randomly charge whoever is calling the functions -
the inner functions warn on !current->active_memcg.

However, this triggers a false warning when the root memcg itself is
allocated.  No parent exists in this case, and so current->active_memcg
is rightfully NULL.  It's a false positive, not indicative of a bug.

Delete the warnings for now, we can revisit this later.

Fixes: 3e38e0aa ("mm: memcg: charge memcg percpu memory to the parent cgroup")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Acked-by: NRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9f457179
  31. 13 8月, 2020 4 次提交
  33. 08 8月, 2020 2 次提交